• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

TIL Canada is less multi-cultural than the United States

Here's a random WaPo map I found from here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-most-and-least-ethnically-diverse-countries/

imrs.php


I've never actually understood what the metrics are though since if we talk purely ethnicity, the US is indeed more diverse.

That map looks off as shit. Let's forget NA for a second and think critically.

Brazil is definitely more ethnically diverse than Bolivia or Peru, how many Asian-Bolivians or Black-Peruvians are there? Brazil should be green as fuck.

France more homogeneous than Spain or Germany? I don't buy it for a second. France has a fairly decent arab and black population, especially compared to the former two countries.

Why are predominantly black countries like Congo and Angola being presented as some of the most ethnically diverse countries (i.e. the greenest ones)?

According to this map, the two most diverse countries in the world are Liberia and Uganda.

I highly question the validity of this study (if it even was a study)
 

Frimaire

Member
Wait, Stats Canada from 2011 says visible minorities make up 19.1% of the population, did that double in the 5 years since 2006?
 
How am I the only one who noticed OP's definition of multicultural is arbitrarily limited to race and ethnicity? Most people would probably define their culture as it relates to the languages, religion, the arts, etc. Not OP though, he defines his culture solely through his melanin. smh
 

Heshinsi

"playing" dumb? unpossible
Wait, Stats Canada from 2011 says visible minorities make up 19.1% of the population, did that double in the 5 years since 2006?
The numbers in the OP are wrong. Stats Canada haven't updated since 2011, so the percentages for minorities is even higher.
 

wandering

Banned
That map looks off as shit. Let's forget NA for a second and think critically.

Brazil is definitely more ethnically diverse than Bolivia or Peru, how many Asian-Bolivians or Black-Peruvians are there? Brazil should be green as fuck.

France more homogeneous than Spain or Germany? I don't buy it for a second. France has a fairly decent arab and black population, especially compared to the former two countries.

Why are predominantly black countries like Congo and Angola being presented as some of the most ethnically diverse countries (i.e. the greenest ones)?

According to this map, the two most diverse countries in the world are Liberia and Uganda.

I highly question the validity of this study (if it even was a study)

In regards to Africa most countries there are incredibly ethnically diverse. They're not all just "black." Liberia for example has 16 indigenous ethnicities, each of which speaks their own language.

Ethnicity != race
 
I've always wondered how that's calculated - I would assume it's by ethnic group since if it was by racial group like in the OP chart (with Hispanic essentially being a racialized group) African countries wouldn't be any more diverse than most other places. Black, Arab, some Indian, some Asian, some white...

But is the US calculated by ethnic group as well when compared to those African countries? Because then we'd have to take into account the different kinds of white, black, Asian, Hispanic, Native American, etc. And it just seems mind boggling that many countries could be more diverse than that.

People use race and ethnicity interchangeable. Also Hispanic is considered a ethnic group not a racial one at least according to the US census. Think like this Polish and Swedish are part of the white race, but are a different ethnic group.
 

kswiston

Member
Wait, Stats Canada from 2011 says visible minorities make up 19.1% of the population, did that double in the 5 years since 2006?

Visible minorities in Canada don't count aboriginal groups, so if you want to use the US definition, it was even higher in 2011.
 

Derwind

Member
I could have told you this, when you move outside of the major hubs like Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal...ect...the overall demographic makeup changes to White real fast.

That map looks off as shit. Let's forget NA for a second and think critically.

Brazil is definitely more ethnically diverse than Bolivia or Peru, how many Asian-Bolivians or Black-Peruvians are there? Brazil should be green as fuck.

France more homogeneous than Spain or Germany? I don't buy it for a second. France has a fairly decent arab and black population, especially compared to the former two countries.

Why are predominantly black countries like Congo and Angola being presented as some of the most ethnically diverse countries (i.e. the greenest ones)?

According to this map, the two most diverse countries in the world are Liberia and Uganda.

I highly question the validity of this study (if it even was a study)

Ethnically diverse and racial diverse are two different things.

The continent of Africa has vast genetic diversity, ridiculously so. Let's not even begin to discuss the staggering number of spoken languages there are.
 

t26

Member
That map looks off as shit. Let's forget NA for a second and think critically.

Brazil is definitely more ethnically diverse than Bolivia or Peru, how many Asian-Bolivians or Black-Peruvians are there? Brazil should be green as fuck.

France more homogeneous than Spain or Germany? I don't buy it for a second. France has a fairly decent arab and black population, especially compared to the former two countries.

Why are predominantly black countries like Congo and Angola being presented as some of the most ethnically diverse countries (i.e. the greenest ones)?

According to this map, the two most diverse countries in the world are Liberia and Uganda.

I highly question the validity of this study (if it even was a study)

More like you have no idea what you are talking about. 15-20% of Peru's population is Asian.

And for African counties, just because they have the same skin color doesn't mean they have the same culture/ethnicity. There are dozen languages being used in Uganda alone.
 

Represent.

Represent(ative) of bad opinions
No one says Canada as a whole is diverse really. It's always the cities that v are mentioned. I.e Toronto/Montreal.
 
That map looks off as shit. Let's forget NA for a second and think critically.

Brazil is definitely more ethnically diverse than Bolivia or Peru, how many Asian-Bolivians or Black-Peruvians are there? Brazil should be green as fuck.

France more homogeneous than Spain or Germany? I don't buy it for a second. France has a fairly decent arab and black population, especially compared to the former two countries.

Why are predominantly black countries like Congo and Angola being presented as some of the most ethnically diverse countries (i.e. the greenest ones)?

According to this map, the two most diverse countries in the world are Liberia and Uganda.

I highly question the validity of this study (if it even was a study)

Not all black people are the same. Different tribes could be totally separate ethnic groups that live in the same country. I agree with you that the study seems faulty though.
 

neoanarch

Member
Race/Ethnicity are like continents the answer depends in who you ask. But if you go by language its not a mystery why Africa is so diverse. It also has the most ancient hunan populatiins. They're genetically more diverse than anywhere else.
 
This is too old. In Vancouver alone I've seen way more Hispanic and Asian and middle eastern refugees/immigrants the past decade. Definitely hasn't caught up to the US but getting closer.
 
That map looks off as shit. Let's forget NA for a second and think critically.

Brazil is definitely more ethnically diverse than Bolivia or Peru, how many Asian-Bolivians or Black-Peruvians are there? Brazil should be green as fuck.

France more homogeneous than Spain or Germany? I don't buy it for a second. France has a fairly decent arab and black population, especially compared to the former two countries.

Why are predominantly black countries like Congo and Angola being presented as some of the most ethnically diverse countries (i.e. the greenest ones)?

According to this map, the two most diverse countries in the world are Liberia and Uganda.

I highly question the validity of this study (if it even was a study)
Do you also think that people from China, Taiwan Japan, Korea, and Vietnam are all the same? Race is not ethnicity. Even in places like the US and Canada, black populations have vastly different cultures and language traits based on their origins.
 
And for African counties, just because they have the same skin color doesn't mean they have the same culture/ethnicity. There are dozen languages being used in Uganda alone.

Again it all depends on how you want to define it.

In terms of ethnic diversity, yes the US isn't among the highest.

If we are discussing racial backgrounds the US has among the highest splits in the world. And while Canada has made strides, no its its still not even close.
 

Trace

Banned
This is too old. In Vancouver alone I've seen way more Hispanic and Asian and middle eastern refugees/immigrants the past decade. Definitely hasn't caught up to the US but getting closer.

To be fair, Vancouver isn't really representative of the rest of Canada. Caucasians are almost a minority here (or they might be already, not sure).
 

C4Lukins

Junior Member
Whether it is Canada, or Sweden, or Denmark..... lack of diversity and smaller populations are not comparable with what the US has to deal with.


These are countries with white male dominated populations.... And populations equivalent to the state of Texas. Which is maybe 15% percent of the population of the US. Congrats if you can make that work.

We are more diverse and more complex, and whatever works for you is infinitely more complicated for us.
 
Well, how active was Canada in the slave trade compared to the United States before it was abolished in the 1830s? I'm going to guess no where near the South, especially at its peak. Then there's Hispanic population where the U.S. Just seems like the more logical place to move to than Canada. Then there's also Puerto Rico which alone probably has around 10 times the Hispanic population of Canada. Hell, New York's Puerto Rican population is probably much, much larger than that.
 
Cities are almost always more diverse than the rest of the country or nation; been that way for decades I think perhaps longer. Not really that unique for any country.
 

ST2K

Member
Whether it is Canada, or Sweden, or Denmark..... lack of diversity and smaller populations are not comparable with what the US has to deal with.


These are countries with white male dominated populations.... And populations equivalent to the state of Texas. Which is maybe 15% percent of the population of the US. Congrats if you can make that work.

Yup.

For a point of reference, there are 10 million more Black Americans than there are Canadians of any sort.

Percentage-wise, it's surprisingly close. But the quantity involved in the US is incomparable to Canada.
 

Kin5290

Member
I don't think it's even in the top 40

Seriously? In terms of western/European countries America is crazy diverse. Take the UK, which is 87% white according to Wikipedia. The Northern European/Scandinavian countries are even more white.

Also, the US government measures ethnicity in far less granular terms than most other countries (like, say, Asian/Pacific Islander instead of Chinese/Japanese/Vietnamese/Thai/etc.), because there's a much larger variety of ethnicity represented in Americans.
 

Hypron

Member
Chart totally goes against the chart in the OP. One of them has to be wrong right? Or am I reading the this chart wrong?

According to the link, the chart you quoted represents the following:

They gauged this by asking an elegantly simple question: If you called up two people at random in a particular country and ask them their ethnicity, what are the odds that they would give different answers? The higher the odds, the more ethnically "fractionalized" or diverse the country.

I assume Canada has a large number of small minority groups, whereas most of the US' minority population comes from a couple of large groups. This would explain how it's possible for the US to have a higher percentage of minority, but less ethnic "fracture",
 

Beach

Member
How am I the only one who noticed OP's definition of multicultural is arbitrarily limited to race and ethnicity? Most people would probably define their culture as it relates to the languages, religion, the arts, etc. Not OP though, he defines his culture solely through his melanin. smh
Unfortunately a lot of GAF thinks like this.
 

iamblades

Member
In regards to Africa most countries there are incredibly ethnically diverse. They're not all just "black." Liberia for example has 16 indigenous ethnicities, each of which speaks their own language.

Ethnicity != race

Same thing can be said for whites(and blacks outside of africa, asians and hispanics, for that matter) too though.

Irish and Italian and German and English, etc.

But that's just in terms of nations, you could go deeper and count Frisians and Basques and whatever also.

Ultimately it's just an arbitrary statistical measure that could go any way you want it based on how you draw your line.

If you are just counting non-assimilated groups that maintain their own languages, you will get a different count than if you are just counting reported ethnicity or if you are just counting genetics, and it's all pretty much irrelevant.
 

Piggus

Member
I would like to see a more updated one, I would imagine we have grown in different ethnicity's over the last several years. Our population is around 35 million and we take in over 100 thousand people sometimes around 200 thousand (business owners, students, workers) from other countries every year plus refugees. Also some of our cities like Vancouver and Toronto are very multi cultural but our rural areas are mostly just white people.

We have more immigrants than you have people and take in over a million per year.
 
More Hispanics than Blacks in the US? I thought we were #2?

AAs are the biggest racial group and Hispanic is the biggest ethnic group. Any one race can be Hispanic and the Hispanic category includes various nationalities like Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, Spanish, etc.
 

Kin5290

Member
Sorta. By Western standards, it's pretty good. But a lot of countries in Africa blow it out of the water. The amount of diversity on the African continent is staggering, so the most diverse countries are like Chad, Cameroon, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo, etc. By a huge margin over places like the US and Canada.

Apples and oranges. If the US were to measure the ethnic diversity of its citizens in as granular a way as those African countries, it would blow them out of the water with regards to ethnic diversity.
 

BocoDragon

or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Realize This Assgrab is Delicious
Whether it is Canada, or Sweden, or Denmark..... lack of diversity and smaller populations are not comparable with what the US has to deal with.


These are countries with white male dominated populations.... And populations equivalent to the state of Texas. Which is maybe 15% percent of the population of the US. Congrats if you can make that work.

We are more diverse and more complex, and whatever works for you is infinitely more complicated for us.
Fine, we get it.. you want to repeal Obamacare.
 

kswiston

Member
We have more immigrants than you have people and take in over a million per year.

Canada has the highest immigration rate in the western world. Canada took in 270k people in 2015. The US took in just over 1 million. The US has 9x the population of Canada.

So, Canada took in 1 immigrant for every 130 people living in the country in 2015. The United States took in 1 person for every 320.
 
chart is misleading, it is basing itself only on RACE and not on ETHNCITY

is multiculraism based off diviersity of ethnicity? or race? because those are different things
 

kswiston

Member
chart is misleading, it is basing itself only on RACE and not on ETHNCITY

is multiculraism based off diviersity of ethnicity? or race? because those are different things

As I said a few times now, the chart isn't even right. White people were 80% in the year specified. No idea where any of those numbers come from.

EDIT: The Chart shows just over 2M Asian Canadians in 2006. But there were 2.5M Asian Canadians just counting people of Chinese and South Asian descent in 2006.

EDIT2: By the 2011 census, about 15% of the Canadian population was of Asian descent. 21% in Ontario and 26% in BC. Quebec is the whitest out of the big provinces (6% asian, 13% non-white in 2011).
 
So Italians, Portuguese, Spaniards, Greeks, Polish, Russians, Ukranians and etc are not considered "multicultural" according this chart because it is gauging Skin Color instead of Ethnic backhround
 
Top Bottom