• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Rumor: Intel's 8th gen i5 and i7 may feature 6 cores.

Caayn

Member
A French magazine/website allegedly obtained information about engineering samples from Intels Coffee Lake consumer CPUs. Pointing towards a sudden change in core count for Intel's mainstream line of core I CPUs after seven generations without a change in core count.

From the site:
CPU - cores/threads - frequency - L3 - TDP
i7 8700k - 6c/12t - 3.7Ghz - 12MB - 95w
i7 8700 - 6c/12t -3.2Ghz - 12MB - 95w
i5 8600k - 6/6 - 3.6Ghz - 9MB - 95w
i5 8400 - 6/6 - 2.8Ghz - 9MB - 65w

These CPUs are set to use the LGA1151 socket. Which would also mean that the LGA1151 socket is the first consumer socket in a long time to host more than two generations of Intel CPUs. (As long as the chipset will be compatible of course)

Source: https://www.cpchardware.com/coffee-lake-approche/
 

JohnnyFootball

GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
French allegedly obtained information about engineering samples from Intels Coffee Lake consumer CPUs. Pointing towards a sudden change in core count for Intel's mainstream line of core I CPUs after seven generations without a change in core count.

From the site:
CPU - cores/threads - frequency - L3 - TDP
i7 8700k - 6c/12t - 3.7Ghz - 12MB - 95w
i7 8700 - 6c/12t -3.2Ghz - 12MB - 95w
i5 8600k - 6/6 - 3.6Ghz - 9MB - 95w
i5 8400 - 6/6 - 2.8Ghz - 9MB - 65w

These CPUs are set to use the LGA1151 socket. Which would also mean that the LGA1151 socket is the first consumer socket in a long time to host more than two generations of Intel CPUs. (As long as the chipset will be compatible of course)

Source: https://www.cpchardware.com/coffee-lake-approche/

If true this is a sign that Intel sees that AMD is a threat.

Upping the core count is something that has been long long overdue.
 

Smokey

Member
This isn't entirely new news. It's been known that CL would up the core count on the mainstream platform. The rumored timing of these chips may be due to Ryzen, but not the core count.
 
So if they retain the socket type, that mean Z270 boards could potentially support these (with a BIOS update and all)?

Interesting either way though
 
This would be great, we're finally seeing good advancements for mainstream CPUs after slow progression for quite some time!

First AMD's Ryzen and now this, awesome!
 

Duxxy3

Member
Interesting...

I might look to upgrade my 6500 to one of these and move the 6500 to my other machine.
 

McHuj

Member
If I don't need a new MB, I'll upgrade. Otherwise, I'll ride out my 6700k for a couple generations more.
 

Buggy Loop

Member
Could Intel segment their lineup even more than this? Holy shit, it'll be a case study to choose which intel CPU to pick in coming months. If it requires another socket and new mobos, that'll be rich.
 
I'm sitting here with a 2500k trying to make my next processor last as long as this one.

Please hit it out of the park Intel.
 

ShirAhava

Plays with kids toys, in the adult gaming world
Went from q6600 (2007) to i5 2400 (2012) now its time to finally leave the Quad Core ghetto!
 
1151 has been a good choice so far, my little £500 pc is going to last a while with these kinds of upgrades.

Same here. I had to build something quick and on a budget when my old PC crapped out. I went with an 1151 but a good i3 just to start so I could eventually upgrade.

I think I'm going to hold off for now on getting an i7 if these news ones will indeed work with 1151.
 

horkrux

Member
I thought we already knew we were gonna get 6-cores next? As far as rumours go anyways. Interesting that they might use the same socket though.

But I don't want no more Boiling Lake pls
 
If Intel uses their terrible TIM on these, they're not going to be as good a deal as Ryzen CPUs... especially if the i5-8600K is the same price as a 1600X. From what we're seeing with the 7700K, a delidding kit is practically a mandatory accessory to keep Intel chips from frying themselves.
 
The i7s getting a bump in core count in Coffee Lake was known basically as long as Coffee Lake's existence itself. That said, the top end i5s also getting a core count bump is new, and probably could be credited to Ryzen 5s doing it first, making it a better processor for that price range.
 

Datschge

Member
Intel chipsets are usually compatible for only two gens even if the socket stays the same. Coffee Lake will need a 300-series chipset.
 
If Intel uses their terrible TIM on these, they're not going to be as good a deal as Ryzen CPUs... especially if the i5-8600K is the same price as a 1600X. From what we're seeing with the 7700K, a delidding kit is practically a mandatory accessory to keep Intel chips from frying themselves.

A 1600X is all but hard capped at 4GHz for mere mortals. Delidding Intel chips are only if you're trying to push past 5GHz with custom loop. For "normal" people pushing 4.9GHz being at 60C instead of 80C doesn't have much difference. The single threaded performance is what's going to drive gaming performance and the Intel chips still have this in spades.

Will they even be an upgrade from a 7700K for gaming? They are clocked substantially lower.

There's no reason to think these won't overclock ridiculously well coming off the back of a die shrink. Also, having 6 cores on the same uncore ring is going to be a much more efficient than 2x triple core CCXs over infinity fabric.
 

prag16

Banned
Still sitting on my 2550k. Was waiting for a "mainstream" i7 with 6c/12t before I considered an upgrade necessary. You have my attention, Intel. (Not that it's in the budget any time soon just having bought a house... maybe I'll wait for the expected 10nm shrink with Cannonlake... but I don't like the first gen on new nodes.. maybe Icelake... can that little 2550k hold out that long????)
 
Coffee Lake is not coming off the back of a die shrink, it's 14nm++. You may be thinking of Cannonlake.

mb. Then yeah, using the 7820X as a yardstick it should be reasonably comfortable at 4.5GHz and push on through to 4.8 with enough cooling backing it.
 
Y'all seriously think AMD has anything to do with this? You know how long these things are in development?

fuck, i just got a 7700k like 3 months ago. Good for the people that need upgrades tho.
If only there was some way of knowing the processor would be updated again next year
 

GHG

Member
Finally. If this is true I will definitely do a CPU/Mobo/RAM overhaul when they come out.
 
A 1600X is all but hard capped at 4GHz for mere mortals. Delidding Intel chips are only if you're trying to push past 5GHz with custom loop. For "normal" people pushing 4.9GHz being at 60C instead of 80C doesn't have much difference. The single threaded performance is what's going to drive gaming performance and the Intel chips still have this in spades.
The i7-7700K has a reputation for bizarre thermal issues, some of which are dealt with by delidding:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/04/intel_i77700_heat_spike_problems/
Reg reader Bastard-Wizard says that he and many other i7-7700 owners are finding that the chips will occasionally kick themselves into overdrive, running at temperatures as high as 90°C (194°F) at times. Intel says the i7-7700 will run at temperatures up to 100°C (212°F).

"My own chip suffers from it, (without any overclocking) which is quite an annoyance," our tipster writes. "This despite a delid modification and a proper water loop, resulting in the fans ramping up and down very frequently, and the temperature appearing to frequently spike near the danger zone."

The users note that these temperatures are even being seen in high-end gaming rigs with liquid cooling setups with the chips running at fairly low voltages.

"At this point though, with the temps most people are seeing, even good chips capable of hitting high clocks at low voltage still have very little headroom due to the thermal spikes these chips are displaying at even stock settings," notes user mrobscura.

Intel's response was on par with that stupid "Epyc is 4 CPUs glued together" BS from their Xeon press deck:
http://www.pcgamer.com/intels-tells-core-i7-7700k-owners-to-stop-overclocking-to-avoid-high-temps/
The TL;DR version is that everything checks out on Intel's end and users should not overclocked their Core i7-7700K processors, which have unlocked multipliers specifically for overclocking.

...

Intel has also never stated that it would warranty processors that have been overclocked or over-volted (though it does offer an overclocking warranty as a separate purchase). However, that isn't the part that has users all riled up. They're ticked because Intel basically shrugged off the temperature spikes as being normal, and telling them to run their unlocked CPUs at stock settings rubs salt in the wound.

Intel's lead in single-threaded performance won't outweigh the massive pain in the ass that dealing with potential thermal problems will bring, especially if Intel keeps denying there's a problem and saying it's all the user's fault for overclocking an overclocking capable chip.
 
Are AMD's CPUs actually selling well?

Compared to their older CPU's, yes. Intel is panicking because they used to have the whole market to themselves. When your desktop x86 market share is 90%+ you literally have nowhere to go but down. Even if AMD only clawed away 1% market share, that's a straight -1% share for Intel. AMD is apparently eating up lot more than that. If Ryzen takes away 10% market share, Intel loses a straight 10% off their top line. No wonder they are shitting themselves.
 
Top Bottom