• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Justice League - Comic-Con Sneak Peek

eizarus

Banned
I'm not going to argue that the Marvel way doesn't allow for a better build up to the ensemble movie, but let's not pretend that it was entirely for plot reasons. 4 out of 6 of the Avengers were B-listers and mostly trash tier.

The Hulk was the most popular of their lineup followed by Cap (who wasn't exactly all that high in terms of popularity and quality). Iron Man was trash until RDJ made him popular. Same with Thor. Black Widow and Hawkeye were just crammed in (Black Widows barely had anything substantial in IM2, so let's not pretend they built her character up before Avengers, as a poster insinuated a few comments back).
 

FeD.nL

Member
Not a single part of the incredible hulk is mentioned in the Avengers or future MCU films or how the ending transitions to the avengers that isn't already a part of the generic hulk mythos. The film may as well not exist.

Banner mentions his Harlem fight in the Avengers and you of course have Thunderbolt Ross being a presence in Civil War.
 

LotusHD

Banned
I really don't understand why people keep insisting on the Marvel universe way.
They only made the choices they did was because the characters they wanted to push don't have any recognition in the public. 90% of the cast of Infinity War are only recently introduced to the mainstream audience, while DC has had decades of establishing their roster. Batman and Superman have decades of movies people cherish, they have the animated JL, Bats, and Supes series. You have Smallville and the CW shows, and the recent films as well. The only people in the JL who are probably in most need of attention are Aquaman and Green Lantern.

Simply put, because doing that way inspires more confidence in the eventual team-up film than the way the DCEU has gone about it, as there's a precedent that has clearly worked.

It obviously isn't mandatory (especially if the writing's good enough), and I understand why they'd obviously want to just speed straight to making Justice League a thing. Even the MCU didn't bother with having movies for everyone, but they still introduced the characters beforehand at least, while Hawkeye in particular was a brief antagonist so as to make up for him having the least screentime. Meanwhile BvS did it through what were essentially Youtube videos and brought the movie down in quality (Should've been an after-credits scene), with Flash having very slightly more screentime in Suicide Squad. Flash, Aquaman, and Cyborg have a lot more prominence than Black Widow and Hawkeye ability-wise, so it is kind of disheartening to see them all shoved in at once.

Again, it can work, but as I've said, the way Marvel did it inspired more confidence, regardless of them having more of a need to do so due to their characters being less popular.

But hey, they got the main three out of the way, so close enough I guess.

Steppenwolf isn't here to talk and share his personal feelings, he's here to fucking conquer Earth, he's going to be your typical MCU shit villain...

He's giving me Apocalypse vibes tbh
 

Finaika

Member
bruce-wayne-supersomeone.gif.jpg-anim.gif


Is that Supergirl?!
 

Veelk

Banned
Makes sense then, forgot about Ross after all these and the harlem reference I didn't catch.

You're not entirely wrong about it being a soft reboot though. In Hulk, his entire character arc is him accepting that there is a time and place for him to unleash Hulk. In Avengers....he goes through that same character arc again. Literally, it's the same lesson he is supposed to have learned.

Also, the end of Hulk has Tony approaching Ross, seemingly regarding Shield. What happened to that, especially given how Tony was ambivalent towards the Shield in Iron Man 2, who knows.

So there is some of canon discontinuity going on, but it's still generally accepted to have happened.
 

Pat_DC

Member
This looks fun and like a film that will make the most of group dynamic without being too dark! Liking most things here like flash's humour, the look of batman is spot on & aquaman in general.

The things that do stand out as slight negatives are cyborg and also some very obvious digital doubles (WW landing from her swing and Aquaman as he comes out of the destroyed building). This was also an issue in WW but considering how long we have left until the film arrives some of this shots might have been pushed out in crunch just for the trailer and could change.

After watching BvS I never thought I'd be looking forward to the next film in the series but I am in.
 
One thing is that, and I had this issue in BVS, that half the talk about how 'the' Superman is about how he inspires hope and makes people see the best in themselves.

But, did he? Like, that was not a superman that I was in any way inspired by and ultimately only actually did a handful of things, most of which he seemed to feel people didn't appreciate enough to the point where his Mom just goes on about how he doesn't own people shit.

It feels like they're talking about a superman that they didn't have in this universe.
 

DeathyBoy

Banned
One thing is that, and I had this issue in BVS, that half the talk about how 'the' Superman is about how he inspires hope and makes people see the best in themselves.

But, did he? Like, that was not a superman that I was in any way inspired by and ultimately only actually did a handful of things, most of which he seemed to feel people didn't appreciate enough to the point where his Mom just goes on about how he doesn't own people shit.

It feels like they're talking about a superman that they didn't have in this universe.

Superman dying inspired Batman to be a better man.

I think it's okay for Batman to exaggerate that a tad.
 
The action just looks garbage again. Why does it always boil down to the amount of destruction? Buildings falling, crashing down, people smashing through them. You can dial action up to 11 and the cgi down to minimum and it can have a much stronger impact.

You don't need world ending villians right from the start.
 
Looking forward to it, liking all the characters except Cyborg just looks wrong somehow.

The character that Alfred is greeting is obviously Lobo coming to claim a bounty on Steppenwolf...... Yeah OK, not gonna happen, but I believe they were looking at Jason Fuchs (WW writer) doing a Lobo script set in the DCMU, after how good WW turned out I'd be stoked if it's still in the works.
 
The action just looks garbage again. Why does it always boil down to the amount of destruction? Buildings falling, crashing down, people smashing through them. You can dial action up to 11 and the cgi down to minimum and it can have a much stronger impact.

You don't need world ending villians right from the start.

They wouldnt be forming the Justice League if it wasn't world ending.
 

Arjayes

Banned
I’m firmly convinced that it’s not Superman at the end. My guess is it’s Supergirl. That hologram he’s looking at makes it seem like it’s Supergirl. Coupled with the
empty pod from MoS
and the death of Superman you could easily make the connection that Bruce learned about her and then assumed she’d come to the rescue sooner or later because Supes is gone. Hence, Alfred’s “He said you’d come” line as well as the “hope” emphasis. If it were Superman I would guess there’d be a cheesy “welcome back” line.
 

normanski

Neo Member
You're not entirely wrong about it being a soft reboot though. In Hulk, his entire character arc is him accepting that there is a time and place for him to unleash Hulk. In Avengers....he goes through that same character arc again. Literally, it's the same lesson he is supposed to have learned.

Also, the end of Hulk has Tony approaching Ross, seemingly regarding Shield. What happened to that, especially given how Tony was ambivalent towards the Shield in Iron Man 2, who knows.

So there is some of canon discontinuity going on, but it's still generally accepted to have happened.

The bit at the end of Iron Man with Stark and Ross was retconned in the consultant.

Banner's control in Avengers comes as a direct result of the end of Incredible Hulk. He doesn't have an arc as such in Avengers, the only time he loses it involuntarily is when the Helicarrier is attacked.
 

normanski

Neo Member
Banner mentions his Harlem fight in the Avengers and you of course have Thunderbolt Ross being a presence in Civil War.

The bit when Banner mentions trying to commit suicide but Hulk spitting the bullet out is also a direct reference to an alternative opening that's on the Incredible Hulk extras.
 

BumRush

Member
These threads are getting so predicable.
bad cg, too dark hurr harr

It was pretty dark and it's okay for people to not enjoy something for this reason. The entire trailer took place at night with either a rainy setting or a red hue in the sky, save for a couple quick shots of underwater, indoors, etc. Really disappointing trailer for me.
 

Principate

Saint Titanfall
It could be Supergirl. The legs look a little bit thin for Superman in that Hologram that Bruce is looking at.

Super girls been on earth and out of her pod for while in this universe it seems like. In the prequel comic for Man of Steel by Snyder she's been around walking about for over a thousand years (either her or the person she fought wit)h. That could be her and there's a theory in the community thread that she's the one that originally fought back steppenwolf which is why he refers to there now being no Kryptonions around to protect earth.
 

strafer

member
Super girls been on earth and out of her pod for while in this universe it seems like. In the prequel comic for Man of Steel by Snyder she's been around walking about for over a thousand years (either her or the person she founght with. That could be her and there's a theory in the community thread that she's the one that originally fought back steppenwolf which is why he refers to there now being no Kryptonions around to protect earth.

Steppenwolf says No Kryptonian, singular, meaning only Clark.
 
Loved everything I saw in the trailer...




...except Cyborg. The face...it's just not working for me. Was WETA not available or something? Maybe it was just the trailer and they're still touching it up?

Or...


I mean is it just me? It's really hard for me to accept that he might look that bad, but presumably the shots they added him in were among the better looking shots available, right? Worried about him. I expect everything else to be good regardless, but as others have mentioned I would have rather seen a stand-alone Batman, Cyborg and Flash movie before this so that their arcs and personalities in this new DCEU have been imagined. But I'm sure there's a reason they wanted to get this out ASAP, so hopefully the future will be bright.
 

Sinfamy

Member
Am I the only one who gets distracted by that super green screen effect?
Every set piece looks super quickly rendered, worse then 300.

And I think it's the Martian at the end played by Cumberbatch.
 

number11

Member
I saw the first trailer during my Dunkirk IMAX screening. That screen really does make everything look incredible. Does anyone know if the entire movie will be converted to fill that screen? If so I may need to buy an IMAX ticket for this.
 

shira

Member
I saw the first trailer during my Dunkirk IMAX screening. That screen really does make everything look incredible. Does anyone know if the entire movie will be converted to fill that screen? If so I may need to buy an IMAX ticket for this.

No.
 

IconGrist

Member
He can't only be referring to Clark regardless as he isn't the only known kryptonian on Earth. Both Zod and Clark are dead. There was a whole bunch of Kryptonians on Earth

Steppenwolf got his information from Lex. He doesn't have some historical record of every opposing force to come to Earth.
 

Chichikov

Member
I just can't get hyped for this. I think it's due to them doing the world building backwards. Marvel established all the characters and then threw them into an ensemble film. I have no idea how these characters fit with one another yet. Hopefully there is a point in the film like this where you appreciate the fact all your childhood favorites are in the same movie and it's all working, this IS the Justice League.
I think I only watched Iron Man before watching the Avengers and I enjoyed that film quite a lot.

From a marketing/hype perspective you're probably right, but in terms of making a movie that works I don't think individual origin movies are necessary. Those characters are mostly known properties (DC way more than Marvel for me by the way) and if you do them right (and I think Marvel for the most part did) it can be effective even without the backstory.

I think DC's problem so far is that they did a shit job with their characterization. And shit characterization is shit characterization, even if it's done over the span of a couple of movies (see: current Superman).

Oh and I should note that I have not seen Wonder Woman yet but I heard it's good, so this is of course not taking that film into account.
 
That bullshit about Superman completely soured me on the trailer. Yeah, they're going for a full on retcon I guess but if they wanted Superman to be an inspiring person like they claim then this should have been the film that made people change their minds about Superman. They should have shown Superman do stuff that brought hope to people and so on. Mentioning that he already did that was a damn cop-out.
It's like the end of BvS doesn't exist or something. It's pretty well established how he was all of that for a lot of people.

This is an example of people not paying attention and blaming a movie for failing to do something that it actually did pretty well.
 
But this is what people are reacting to, really—It's not that they're blindsided. It's not that they missed something, or weren't paying attention, or are misunderstanding what's going on. A lot of people are getting it just fine:

Tell, don't show

And this is what they're reacting to. The films didn't show a lot of what they're telling you. They paid it lip service and then told you it counted. Amanda Waller says that a thing happened, so it happens. Bruce says Superman represented a thing, so its a representation.

Man of Steel and Batman v Superman (and Man of Steel was much better at it than BvS was, even though it still didn't do it all that well) paid a lot of lip service to Superman's ability to inspire, but almost all the drama of the films themselves aren't focused on that. The characters in the films who are supposed to represent those feelings - largely don't feel those things.

We are told later they did. We are told later that other people also felt that stuff. And people can point to the moments where the lip service is paid, the perfunctory execution is shrugged at, and the effects are explained to us instead of felt, and asked to accept that as being satisfactory.

Tell, don't show is a huge shortcut for these movies. Wonder Woman worked because it does not take that shortcut very often. Justice League's trailer seems to suggest that in some parts it has to (and Suicide Squad indulged this as well) because the story won't work if they don't shortcut the feeling that never got earned in the prior two movies.

Like, films aren't wikipedia entries - you can't just say a thing happened and then use it as a bullet point later as if that counts as building a living fictional world. It doesn't.

Often, Superman's effect on the world he occupied in MoS and BvS is an effect we're told about second and thirdhand instead of shown, or made to feel. And that's why Bruce's line rang false as fuck to a lot of people who heard it. Because the Superman he's describing was not the Superman we were shown, and the people we were asked to identify with in those movies certainly didn't think of or react to him in that way, either.
But in happened in BvS. They showed all the people congregated, holding candles, bringing flowers, exalting him as an example for the good things in humanity. That was shown.
 
But in happened in BvS. They showed all the people congregated, holding candles, bringing flowers, exalting him as an example for the good things in humanity. That was shown.

It was technically shown, but it was just as unearned as the lip service lines in the trailer. They never actually showed anything Superman did that brought out the best in people, they only ever showed how he brought out the worst in Batman, Lex, and side characters like the guy who vandalized the Superman statue.
 

Slaythe

Member
I just can't get hyped for this. I think it's due to them doing the world building backwards. Marvel established all the characters and then threw them into an ensemble film. I have no idea how these characters fit with one another yet. Hopefully there is a point in the film like this where you appreciate the fact all your childhood favorites are in the same movie and it's all working, this IS the Justice League.

This is a legitimate concern, but it's not exactly the same.

Avengers was a bunch of nobodies put together, and then Hulk.

Justice League is Batman Superman WonderWoman (now a $$$ name) + Flash and some randoms. You know who the characters are to some extent.

Look at the new Spiderman, they didn't give a shit explaining his back story at all, because they assumed people know. They do.
 
Top Bottom