• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Charlottesville alt-right white nationalist torch rally

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dynasty

Member
Didnt the US goverment go against the constitution in some ways when they enacted the Mulford Act? Which restricted the right to bear arms to some extent?

Cant they also do something like that with the these Nazi rallies. There is no way to have a peaceful assembly of Nazis when they advocate for the death of minorties. If this was a Black supermacy group, they would have already dealt with it already.
 

Tempy

don't ask me for codes
If folks like you had their way and we picked and chose which speech was defensible and which wasn't then we'd currently be seeing our president censoring liberal media and jailing people like us. The pendulum always swings back.

I would've thought it wouldn't be too hard to come to a unanimous conclusion that racist and facist speech was not defensible, but here we are...
 

Oriel

Member
Europe has plenty of ultra nationalist extremists too and many are rising in popularity.

When I see the rise of groups like the FN and Golden Dawn in Europe, their anti-hate laws don't exactly seem to be doing that great a job either.

There's an uprising of people like this going on across the globe right now.

Ultra right groups have repeatedly come and gone in Europe for decades, there's no real evidence to suggest they're on the cusp of taking power across the EU barring the occasional upset, like when Le Pen reached the run-off stage in the French pres. vote and the FPO entering govt in Austria in 2000. It seems it's left to Europe in fighting the far right scourge.

Your intentions are noble but woefully naive. I'm all for free speech but I draw the line at Holocaust deniers, racists and fucking Nazis.
 

FiggyCal

Banned
Good guy Bernie

uN7ZpgF.png
 

Kusagari

Member
Okay, and if that happens, us wanting Nazis not to have speech rights means jack shit.

If he gets 3-4 figures on the SC, that's happening regardless of what anyone else pushes (see: current presidency). So I'm not sure how that's a good counter argument?

Because with free speech open to all they can't block anyone using the Constitution as a shield. If the Constitution was rewritten to ban hate speech, they could then twist it to ban words from our side.
 

cordy

Banned
Sad thing is a great amount of people in America don't see how fucked up this is. This is a direct result of you voting for that man and putting him in office and yet you can't see. I don't know what it'll take for people to understand that this is wrong and this isn't something that we need to sit back and do nothing about. It's 2017 and people still don't get it. I don't even know what it'll take for them to realize it either at this point.

Oh and fuck that nigga with the Arkansas Engineering shit. We don't rep that here and that's not us. Fuck that.
 

Toxi

Banned
If the ACLU wants to argue for the free speech and assembly of extremists, it also needs to accept some responsibility when those extremists it represents kill people at their assemblies.

They can continue representing Nazis or the like in the name of free speech, just so long as they do not deny the consequences of what they're doing.
 
Btw no one is putting us Swedes in jail for protesting racists even though we have very rigid hate speech laws. Fuck your slippery slope coward argument.

Sure, but can you guarantee that eventually a shitheel won't come into power who can find a way to turn those laws to their advantage and use it to suppress legitimate causes? I'm not arguing that hate speech laws can't be done, I'm arguing that they can create an opening if the wrong people get into power.
 
Because with free speech open to all they can't block anyone using the Constitution as a shield. If the Constitution was outlawed to ban hate speech, they could then twist it to ban words from our side.

Um... what? Free speech is already regulated. There's nothing stopping a Trump SC court from regulating it further and doing what you said.
 
You're right, we're all suffering way too much over this debate compared to these people being killed in real-time by literal nazis.

Maybe take a step back here. Neither side is pro-nazi. Free speech is a complicated issue where different people come to different conclusions. Save the hate for the nazis.
 
Sure, but can you guarantee that eventually a shitheel won't come into power who can find a way to turn those laws to their advantage and use it to suppress legitimate causes? I'm not arguing that hate speech laws can't be done, I'm arguing that they can create an opening if the wrong people get into power.

Who gives a shit? Enact the law then fight whatever moron is trying to twist it. Revolt and riot in the streets if you need to. Why are you pretending to cower in fear when you aren't the one being murdered over this while other people actually are.
 
Growing up in France, we're taught from childhood that fuckin nazis are your worst ennemy. I can't understand how they have the right to even assemble. All of you defending their right to free speech are fools. Hate speech is not compatible with civilisation.
 

III-V

Member
https://www.facebook.com/fordf/posts/10212921759740919

https://imgur.com/a/ahWgr

I'm having trouble making that an image on mobile. Interesting post sent to me by a friend. This is a former colleague of his who was at the rally recording.

Also had a livestream from when it happened that is apparently very graphic. Haven't seen this stuff elsewhere.

https://www.facebook.com/N2Sreports/videos/1490419907732560/

The moment one of these fuckers pulls out a torch or a weapon they no longer have the right to congregate. Period.

You mean like this link?
 

Piggus

Member
In every reasonable democratic society hate speech is not protected speech. Nazis do not assemble peacefully. Nazism isn't defeated in debate. It cannot be given oxygen. This is so fucking basic I'm shocked many Americans, including the ACLU, do not understand this very basic principle

You can keep your Free Speech Lite. The First Amendment is clear, and chipping away at it sets a dangerous precedent.
 
The moment one of these fuckers pulls out a torch or a weapon they no longer have the right to congregate. Period.

Exactly. Motherfuckers showed up today with rifles, body armor, shields and batons. They were looking for a fight.


Let's see a BLM protest with torches, see how fast SWAT is drawing guns on them
 

ISOM

Member
Sure, but can you guarantee that eventually a shitheel won't come into power who can find a way to turn those laws to their advantage and use it to suppress legitimate causes? I'm not arguing that hate speech laws can't be done, I'm arguing that they can create an opening if the wrong people get into power.

If the wrong people get to power then they can create those laws anyway or brute force themselves to only apply laws to where they want it to be applied. What strict hate laws can do though is stop hate groups from rising in numbers and putting those people in power.
 
Ultra right groups have repeatedly come and gone in Europe for decades, there's no real evidence to suggest they're on the cusp of taking power across the EU barring the occasional upset, like when Le Pen reached the run-off stage in the French pres. vote and the FPO entering govt in Austria in 2000. It seems it's left to Europe in fighting the far right scourge.

Your intentions are noble but woefully naive. I'm all for free speech but I draw the line at Holocaust deniers, racists and fucking Nazis.

So far sure. but that doesn't mean it'll stay the same forever. I'm Jewish. I have literally zero sympathy for Nazis. But I think it's far more naive to assume shitty people will never get into power than to assume they will
 

jtb

Banned
Btw no one is putting us Swedes in jail for protesting racists even though we have very rigid hate speech laws. Fuck your slippery slope coward argument.

Nah, the problem isn't protecting free speech, the problem is that your country is being run by white supremacy.

Which is exactly why it makes no sense to give the white supremacists more tools to oppress minorities.
 

kamineko

Does his best thinking in the flying car
So a heavily armed mob of seditious, hatemongering pieces of shit is the price of freedom?

I'm not sure a large group of black people with rifles would have it so good
 
If the wrong people get to power then they can create those laws anyway or brute force themselves to only apply laws to where they want it to be applied. What strict hate laws can do though is stop hate groups from rising in power and putting those people in power.

Of course, but that doesn't mean you can't make it easier for them.

I'm also not convinced hate speech laws can stop hate groups from rising in power, especially not in the modern internet era where it's easier than ever to communicate anonymously.
 

Crossing Eden

Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
This most certainly should have been shut down from the get go. The intent was clear when they're out there in full on riot gear.

But there have been numerous peaceful Nazi and KKK rallies in the past and they should be allowed.
Genuinely read what you just typed and see if you can spot the contradiction. There's nothing peaceful about nazis or the KKK. Holy fuck!!! People straight up died today. 😡😡😡
 
It's very much possible to ban hate speech and retain freedom, but only so long as the people in charge are decent and don't want to abuse or corrupt those laws. It can be done, but there's always the risk because ultimately a human will always be the one making the call and if that human is evil...

You're preaching to the choir. I can't even remember now how many times I've gotten dogpiled in threads on this forum for suggesting that the 1st Amendment needs revising to stop protecting these groups and hate speech in general. The harm that they cause is too longstanding to continue to ignore in my opinion.
 
Of course, but that doesn't mean you can't make it easier for them.

I'm also not convinced hate speech laws can stop hate groups from rising in power, especially not in the modern internet era where it's easier than ever to communicate anonymously.

They can stop the police standing idly by while nazis are killing people.
 
If you're still under some pretence that the other side can be reasoned with, remember:

They Want You Dead.

Just imagine if you sat down and had a conversation with them. You'd learn from each other and maybe you could meet somewhere in the middle and they would just give you a severe beating.
 

ZOONAMI

Junior Member
Maybe take a step back here. Neither side is pro-nazi. Free speech is a complicated issue where different people come to different conclusions. Save the hate for the nazis.

I seem to be noticing a junior shit post trend with no avatars...

The pro nazi side walking around with nazi flags and driving into crouds of peaceful protestor are pro nazis.
 

low-G

Member
Sure, but can you guarantee that eventually a shitheel won't come into power who can find a way to turn those laws to their advantage and use it to suppress legitimate causes? I'm not arguing that hate speech laws can't be done, I'm arguing that they can create an opening if the wrong people get into power.

Our freedoms are already restricted to our detriment, and the law is already being used to their advantage to suppress us. There's no slippery slope, we're already plummeting downhill at an alarming rate.

Would not make much difference at this point. The dangerous leap is if hate speech was punishable with summary execution without trial.
 
You're preaching to the choir. I can't even remember now how many times I've gotten dogpiled in threads on this forum for suggesting that the 1st Amendment needs revising to stop protecting these groups and hate speech in general. The harm that they cause is too longstanding to continue to ignore in my opinion.

I personally do think revising the first amendment for that is dangerous though. It can be done, but the damage potential if it's abused is also very high. Just because it can be done right doesn't mean it always will be
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom