whiteninja
Member
Should of been Laser Brain
🤔expected.
But I'd have liked a bit more originality.
Or you could just be clear and straight to the point.Something original and thematic, besides the predictable "just use the character's name as the title" trend
Cool Han, Luke
What else were they gonna call it?
Because that's what they did?No matter how this movie turns out, there's going to be this narrative that Disney gutted it to make it "safe" and more star warsy.
No matter how this movie turns out, there's going to be this narrative that Disney gutted it to make it "safe" and more star warsy.
Because that's what they did?
They wrote articles on this. This is not a secret.Please share your insider Star Wars knowledge with the rest of us.
That's exactly what they're doing.
Gutting a film to make it safe doesn't necessarily make it bad.What if, and this is an out there theory so bear with me, but what if they gutted it to try and make it good instead of not good.
What else were they gonna call it?
This wouldve been goodIt should have been SCOUNDREL, YOU FOOLS.
SCOUNDREL.
SCOUNDREL!!!!!!
Han Solo: A "We Should Have Made A Lando Movie Instead" Story
What if, and this is an out there theory so bear with me, but what if they gutted it to try and make it good instead of not good.
Gutting a film to make it safe doesn't necessarily make it bad.
Not badShould've been One Rogue: A Star Wars Story.
Yeah, Scoundrels was an old EU book. As was The Last Jedi.Wasn't one of the books called Scoundrel?
Not to say they couldn't re-purpose it, but it sounds of character for them.
Everyone knows that every single movie ever made was a flawless industry-changing masterpiece before The Studio ruined it to appease their master Satan.
Well obviously. Execution is usually the biggest determinant of that. That still doesn't change though what Lucasfilm did.And a movie being less "safe" doesn't make it good.