Not self-defense?
Nazis literally want to murder you if you aren't one of them.
You have to asses the threat in accordance to what you're dealing with. If I gave you a gun and told you to shoot a man walking down the street with a confederate flag because he *literally* supports slavery; Would you find that acceptable?
There has to be a logical progression of where you escalate a conflict from order, to verbal, to the physical, to violence, to death.
Self defense is protecting yourself from a imminint threat. Someone is going to harm you. Self defense is not escalating a conflict from a person standing passively. If you're the one who give up on the non-physical, to engage in violence, then you're the aggressor, and not acting in self defense.
Democracy is ultimately, protecting your right to say what you want; even if that involves telling people to jump out of windows or whatever. If you don't want that, that's fine. We could go for a Duterte style system where we try to vet ourselves as good as we can, and hope we only kill the bad people.
And frankly, I can understand that idea. I really can. I just don't think this is, can or will be possible isolated to fools who wear nazi idols.
Do you remember back in Orlando with the mass shooting at that night club? That guy who did that, declared his support for ISIS before he did it, and if I remember correctly, the right wing news media was on that, to try and drive home a anti-immigration agenda. But you're not in ISIS just because you wave a flag or say the words. You're not a nazi because you wear the symbols.
That's not to say you cannot be dangerous. That's not to say you should be underestimated because you're an imitation. But the reality is that a lot of these people don't really seem to understand nazism as it was 1930s.
You have neo-nazis who are pro Israel.
You have neo-nazis who quote the Quran and call their mission a "white jihad". None of these things make sense to the actual ideology of the nazi party as it existed in Germany. But even that is not surprising given that nazi ideology in itself is a contradiction.
I suspect that many of these people are hate groups who like to wear nazi symbols because it upsets people. Due to this you have a large congregation of fuck ups. But its people who are predisposed to hate, and so they will fling to anything that gives them meaning. Their lives suck, and so they have dedicated their existence to being hated.
They know they will be hated for wearing a nazi band in public. They are counting on the confrontation and prosecution. So it fits their narrative and their agenda, and it helps reform nazism into conversations about collective group guilt.
We're talking about this so much that we are getting further and further away from actual nazism was all about. Because the conversation is changing. I don't believe these fucks deserve to be put on a pedestal.
I dont believe they recruit anybody at their rallies. There is a statistical % of the population, and there has been, in both countries with and without hate speech laws since WW2 who keep doing this shit.
The idea the narrative has changed because of Trump doesn't make sense to me. Because Trump has no ideology. He was driven to the white house due to conservatives and republicans, to which you can then argue, that if Trump is the new Hitler, then why not put violence on all trump supporters?
Since we've had so many of these threads, I feel like I've googled a shit ton of "former neo nazi" related stories, and it seems really clear to me that punching them down with violence doesn't have the desired effect. Punching people in general to change their behavior often has the desired effect.
So if the proof is actually out there that you're helping the neo nazis by punching them, then that's bad, and that shouldn't be supported.
It really is the same sort of pitfall we fell into with Milo. We don't want him to speak his garbage at Berkely in front of 200 people whose lives will not be swayed by his idiocy, but the result of that is that the same night he is speaking to millions of people on fox news about what it feels like when liberals gang on you, just for being a conservative- and suddenly, many viewers identify with that. It's just another example of the road to hell being paved with good intentions.
We should not, and must not magnify the situation.
Just to re-iderate; I totally support violence when someone is being opressed. I totally support escalating a situation against a person who is facing verbal abuse.
I don't know why people keep talking about this as if the point is converting people. It's not. The point of committing violence on people who wear Nazi regalia in public is to make them afraid of showing up with their fascist outfits, to be afraid to share their evil ideas with people, to be afraid to have it be known that they're white supremacists because of what could happen to them.
But here is the thing. Nazis want that. They wear it because they welcome the confrontation. Because there are no happy neo-nazis. These are broken people immersed in self hatred who achieve purpose, and camraderie by staying together in their group and fighting a larger systemic evil.
The argument has always been that if they are allowed to have their rallies, that they will recruit people with their swift and enticing rhetoric.
But in reality, they recruit a lot more and distort the narrative when they are getting beaten and outnumbered on Fox News. Because there always has been a bias towards the underdog.