• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Eurogamer: Firewatch review-bombed following PewDiePie racism incident

Do you think the people who say that Europeans don't understand this racism stuff know how black people got to America?

Those people are liars and mostly juniors who spout bs thats not true.

At least in Germany people know what "nigger" means and know what "neger" means...
I doubt many people in Europe would go to a black person on street and say that slur.
 
I could see people giving the game negative reviews as a statement against the developers misusing the DMCA. In sure that the grand majority of them are just mad Pewdiepie fans.
 

chaos789

Banned
I recall that South Park episode where the boys are shocked to discover that the younger generation would rather watch games being played by shrill, annoying d-bags than play the game themselves.

I’ve been gaming a long time and I simply don’t get the appeal. If you’re going to spend hours staring at a screen without any form of interactivity, why not watch a film or a quality TV show?

Like I said earlier, I’m obviously getting old.

Yeah I am getting old too. But rather that than follow some douchebag youtube pseudo celebrity. I have watched ACG reviews on youtube at times because I think he gives a good analysis in his reviews. But other than that, not really interested in some guy streaming himself playing a game and acting like a child. Time would be better spent reading a book or watching a quality film or better yet actually playing the game myself.
 

L Thammy

Member
I could see people giving the game negative reviews as a statement against the developers misusing the DMCA. In sure that the grand majority of them are just mad Pewdiepie fans.

I don't really trust that first group either. Look at any thread where America's lack of hate speech laws comes up. Lots of handwringing that no amount of "look at every single other first world country" can calm.
 

L Thammy

Member
"you see, your honour, i did not rob that bank because i am a criminal. i robbed the bank because i am an idiot"
"sounds good. innocent"
 

mas8705

Member
Feels like a complete 180 of the nonsense with the Killing Grounds. Whereas you can have people properly justify why that game was bad, you can't really do the same here with Firewatch (or at least in comparison).

I guess the ball falls in Steam's court as how to approach this nonsense...
 
Delete the reviews? Ban said users? Implement systems to prevent purchase -> review -> return?

Lots of things.

All of those are terrible ideas with no specifics on how you would even separate the genuine reviews from the people piling on.

And as it is, Steam is already are doing a pretty decent job of curating reviews. The list of reviews you get by default on the current store page only has one negative review that mentions the PDP thing (and even then not directly) the rest of them are just regular negative reviews, most of them dated prior to the PDP incident. A bunch of the positive ones mention the PDP thing.

And even with the slightly increased negative reviews the game is still "Very positive" overall and will stay there since this will blow over in a few days.
 

Ferrio

Banned
I'm surprised reviews aren't yanked after a refund, they certainly should be or at least they shouldn't be factored into the overall score? Leaves a few odd edge cases though with games under 2 hours where people could have completed and have valid concerns.
 
I literally saw a review from 2016 that said "Gay." And it had more thought and meaning put into it than this sheeple pushback from the Bro Army.
 

Figboy79

Aftershock LA
I don't think they are numerous, but they are loud and obnoxious.

There are about 700k owners of fire watch on steam. These negative reviews make up a tiny fraction of that number and many of them are people using alt accounts to bomb the reviews. These idiots are a tiny majority of the good, diverse, and mature people who enjoy games these days.

Don't confuse volume of voice with presence.

As a black dude living in America, I strongly disagree. The sad truth is that there are a lot of racists in this country. No, not all of them are wearing white sheets and burning crosses on front lawns, but there are plenty that makes it clear that this county doesn't want to progress past that racism. It goes beyond gaming, so I think that's a topic for another day, but the main reason why I avoid multiplayer games is because it's often filled with racism, sexism, homophobia, and a plethora of other hate speech. Personally, I have not the desire nor patience to power through this shit anymore.

These people review bombing firewatch may be a small number, but the community that fosters this mindset is not. Obviously, it's not the entire gaming community, but it ultimately doesn't matter. For many minorities, women, and members of the LGBTQ community, gaming has been far from welcoming for them, even if it doesn't always devolve into hate speech.
 

Aaron D.

Member
See, I can get behind something like what you've posted here.

You'd be surprised.

There's a lot more intelligent "Let's Play" games coverage out there than you might imagine.

It's not all screaming d'bags even though they (understandably) get the most coverage.

And since you mentioned it, I'd much rather watch informative & entertaining YouTube personalities covering my favorite games & genres than brain-dead TV programming any day of the week.
 

DD

Member
I think I left a positive review for this amazing game when I played it some months ago. I'll check tonight and if I haven't, I'll fix this mistake.
 
Now I am leaving this discussion. I see the outcome and I am not interested in offending, because I won't benefit. I am not on GAF for politics either way.

"I'm leaving the discussion, but damn if I'm not going to shit out the most trite post imaginable on my way out so I can feel that I had the last word, including saying PDP isn't a racist, victim blaming people offended by the N-word, and comparing Firewatch devs to literal criminals."

OK then. Whatever we will do without your valuable input?
 

Fliesen

Member
I'm surprised reviews aren't yanked after a refund, they certainly should be or at least they shouldn't be factored into the overall score? Leaves a few odd edge cases though with games under 2 hours where people could have completed and have valid concerns.

again - i do not agree with this at all.

that's the whole point of the review / refund dynamic.

You buy a product, you notice it's faulty / doesn't work as advertised, you have your money refunded and review the product accordingly, so other prospective buyers can make a more informed purchase decision.

If a refund disqualified you from reviewing the product, when you're at 1.5 hours playtime of an obviously bad / faulty / disfunctional game, you'd have to choose between getting your money back (refund) or informing others of the low quality of the game (negative review).
So you'd end up with a much higher share of positive reviews, because people sure as hell would rather recoup their investment.
 
I recall that South Park episode where the boys are shocked to discover that the younger generation would rather watch games being played by shrill, annoying d-bags than play the game themselves.

I’ve been gaming a long time and I simply don’t get the appeal. If you’re going to spend hours staring at a screen without any form of interactivity, why not watch a film or a quality TV show?

Like I said earlier, I’m obviously getting old.
I'm turning 20 this year but even I find myself just not understanding the appeal of watching some guy scream while being bad at a game. Like, it's all my little nephew watches and its fucking weird.
 
Delete the reviews? Ban said users? Implement systems to prevent purchase -> review -> return?

Lots of things.

The problem is deciding that a review was illegitimate to begin with, and giving Valve the power to do that is inevitably going to result in false positives. Without a proven cause that invalidates the review, you can't do any of the above, including preventing purchase -> review -> refund. Sure, reviews that specifically mention the PDP controversy are probably easy to target, but then PDP supporters will simply post a low scoring review that doesn't mention it, and then what? Do you ban all negative reviews for Firewatch from now on?

It's not as easy or clear cut for Valve to do something about it. In this particular case it would not be a bad idea to remove all Firewatch reviews from the past week and instill a moratorium for new reviews, but this doesn't "solve" review bombing in general.

Edit: Actually, you know who should do something about this? PewDiePie himself. If he's truly as sorry, humbled and contrite about N-word slipping as he says he is, shouldn't he be sympathetic and understanding towards the devs that were disgusted about it? Shouldn't he be upset that his fans are attacking those devs over it?
 
As a black dude living in America, I strongly disagree. The sad truth is that there a lot of racists in this country. No, not all of them are wearing white sheets and burning crosses on front lawns, but there are plenty that makes it clear that this county doesn't want to progress past that racism. It goes beyond gaming, so I think that's a topic for another day, but the main reason why I avoid multiplayer games is because it's often filled with racism, sexism, homophobia, and a plethora of other hate speech. Personally, I have not the desire or patience to power through this shit anymore.

These people review bombing firewatch may be a small number, but the community that fosters this mindset is not. Obviously, it's not the entire gaming community, but it ultimately doesn't matter. For many minorities, women, and members of the LGBTQ community, gaming has been far from welcoming for them, even if it doesn't always devolve into hate speech.

Exactly my point that it's a societal problem, and games are a big enough element of society that that societal problem appears in people who also happen to play games. It is not exclusive to games or even fostered by or more prevalent in games, it just is a part of the world everyone has to work against.

People posting "this is why I don't want to play games anymore" accomplishes nothing because the problem still exists. Stopping playing games doesn't mean you won't encounter this behavior or bad racist beliefs.
 
Abuse of systems begets abuse of systems, I guess.

Haha, I love this logic.

Column A - game studio doesn't want to be represented through association with a high profile YouTuber with a track record of racism; and they don't want him profiting by making videos using their content - in the past, present or the future. With no other means (apart from asking nicely) they send this message by DMCA'ing his videos which utilize their content as the subject matter.

Column B - said high profile YouTuber's audience don't like this form of 'censorship' and abuse a system that isn't curated very well by a highly profitable platform holder.

One of these things is not like the other.
 

hawk2025

Member
Exactly my point that it's a societal problem, and games are a big enough element of society that that societal problem appears in people who also happen to play games. It is not exclusive to games or even fostered by or more prevalent in games, it just is a part of the world everyone has to work against.

This calls for a source.

All evidence points to the opposite -- it does seem to be proportionaly worse in gaming and geek culture.

I do my part: My Patreon support is carefully curated. Those people are getting peanuts.

Meanwhile, Mr. Moriarty gets $30K from gamers for switching careers out of spite and PDP is the top youtuber in the world.
 
Most of it is founded on cult of personality, I think, but there's also the (less popular) informative style, and there you clearly get some value that you might not from playing yourself. Try out Protonjon's Superman 64 or Researchindicates Jurassic Park Trespasser; if you don't see how it might appeal to someone I don't think you'll ever be able to get it.

There's also the excellent raycevick's and super bunnyhop for games commentary and many others. "YouTuber" is just the medium. Anyone can get in front of that camera and provide content that is either good and informative or terrible and mindless.
 

joecanada

Member
Abuse of systems begets abuse of systems, I guess.

Even if someone was fundamentally against YouTube strikes this is not the way to express it. It's not as if these developers have a history of abusive policy they made an exception to make an example out of one dickhead who noone feels sorry for.
 

L Thammy

Member
Was this jab really necessary considering he was talking about something completely different to what you linked?

That wasn't meant as a jab at all, I mean that those are probably the best demonstrators of a LP having value beyond just playing the game. If you still don't see the value after watching both the cult of personality style and the informative style I genuinely don't think you're ever going to - the disconnect is too great. Sorry if it came out that way.
 
I find it hard to believe this isn't a gaming problem given I can count the number of people who could go as unphased as PDP and other streamers for saying this shit in other mediums or jobs environments.
 

Ted

Member
Bluehole doesn't (and shouldn't) ban players based on their activity outside the game. PDP's offensive speech happened in a Discord channel, broadcast over Youtube/Twitch. That's not something they can be expected to monitor or control. The streaming services should be the ones to deal with it.

If he had used the in-game voice chat, that's another story.

Whilst much of what you say is true and I agree they should not be explicitly expected to monitor other channels than their own [realistically, how could they even start] but this is far from just another player. You'd have to be actively /not/ viewing any gaming channel right now to have missed this one. If said high profile streamer is foolish enough to hoist themselves by their own petard by streaming to Youtube/Twitch and still going directly against the spirit of the PUBG code of conduct using such abhorrent language, then so be it, that's his problem.

More broadly I think I also have to politely disagree about this being "activity outside of the game". It may not be using their built-in comms tools but he is playing/streaming their game with an audience of hundreds/thousands and commenting, hatefully, about another player of the same game.

Even their own TL;DR on that page states:

TL;DR—Play Fair And Respect Other Players.

In this instance he most certainly has not shown any respect for his fellow player, so he cannot be respecting the code of conduct as written here and I see no reason why any developer unambiguously committed to diversity in their community would feel any moral qualms banning this person.
 
They used it to block commentary. Just because it's disgusting, hateful commentary doesn't mean it's not comparable. YouTube should be the ones to remove this kind of stuff.

But actually was it? IIRC PDP was targeted for what he said in PUBG stream.
 

valeu

Member
don't we think that non-gaming alt-righters and non-gaming white surpremicists are also supporting pewdie since he is a vocal known racist and supporter and they could be contributing to the Firestorm smear campaign? it doesn't have to just be gamers. if you are involved in a white surpremecy movement you probably contribute however you can: from writing letters to senators to online smears
 

Mesoian

Member
Again it's putting words in my mouth and twisting my message to your own benefit. Why would I want to talk with you about this, if I am setup to become a bad guy which ever way I do this. You have no idea what I do for a living, what my background is, if I even care about Pewdiepie etc.

Yes I am defending Pewdiepies right to exist and have a career in spite of his idiocy. I don't think his use of the word had ill intention, but as I said earlier: good or bad intent doesn't make something free of consequence. I think he should be punished for his actions. But not to the degree some of you want.

Initially, I was trying to express concern regarding the developers who are now experiencing a backlash due to their actions.

In any case this should be left to the right authority to decide. Goodbye and good day.

It's really not, you said some dumbshit, then double down on that same dumbshit while saying people calling you out on said dumbshit are twisting your words.

Like seriously, "PDP isn't racist, and he deserves to have a career, but he should have to undergo the consequences, but it's not his fault because he grew up in a place without racism so how could he know, but it shouldn't impact his career, but he's just dumb and not racist, and that's not an excuse, but..."

You are literally talking in circles about how you don't care that he's racist or stupid or both. You are literally defending the idea that his stupidity trumps the racial overtones that he's been exuding for the past 3 years, and your next step if you do decide to come back into this thread is to say, "well I'm not a PDP fan anyway so I didn't know about the other 5 racial infractions he had prior to the two last week so I don't know, but still it's all just comedy and he's an idiot so it's not racist."

And to you sir, I say again, get the fuck out of here with that shit. That is a lame, lazy, baseless, thoughtless reduction of his actions and a stance you're taking because you don't, have never, and will never actually care.
 

Nanashrew

Banned
Since I feel a lot still needs clearing up.

Keep in mind Pewdiepie follows Lauren Southern (alt right), Alex Jones, Sargon of Akkad (alt-right YouTuber. Though he was recently banned on Twitter), Joe Rogan, Palmer Luckey, Stefan Molyneux (alt-right), Paul Joseph Watson (infowars writer and alt-right), MomBot (GamerGater and alt-right. Pretends to be a Japanese mother living in Japan but really not at all), Ian Miles Cheong (GamerGater, alt-right, holocaust denier), Nick Monroe (alt-right freelance journalist who has done work on the escapist).

I'm probably missing a lot. Some are new follows, some old, some just right after the "death to all jews" controversy because they came to his defense. But sure, that N word just slipped right now and he's only just an idiot.

Some of these people even retweet Pewdiepie and comment on the "SJWs going after him again," make fun of WallStreet Journal, or here with Lauren Southern "here we go again!" https://twitter.com/Lauren_Southern/status/906960217350529024

Lauren Southern in particular doesn't really cover games but boy she will defend Pewdiepie and even retweet Ian Miles Cheong and other terrible people who defend Pewdiepie.

There's definitely a movement and signal boosting from his allies to defend him.
 

Necrovoker

Neo Member
That's why Freedom of Expression is better than Freedom of Speech. There shouldn't even be a debate, Felix used hate speech online and it should be sanctioned accordingly, especially since the derogatory intent is very clear in this instance.

As for the reviews, while in this case the impact on sales they'll have on this 2015 game will most likely be minimal, Steam needs to actually start monitoring their platform, because next time this could very well kill an indie developer.
 
PDP is a racist, not an idiot. He's smart enough to know that fans and other racists will defend him every time he does racist shit for attention and attack others in his name.
 

Ushay

Member
Pewdie's army of a-holes gather.

Can't say I disagree with the developers stance on this, distancing themselves from this racist prick is smart if you ask me.
 
Top Bottom