• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Someone has Mario Odyssey already, so let's look at the Icon *Contains Spoiler*

FelipeMGM

Member
I fixed it GAF
2rOjHUQ.png

we have to keep going further down

DL0auDhWsAEC4q9.jpg
 

RoadHazard

Gold Member
Can't tell what's on it. On my phone, and that shitty image host site won't let me just view the image so I can zoom in on it. I really hate hosts like that.
 
I am sure Neiteio is fine. He's just really into competitive juicing and is probably covered in orange zest right now. He doesn't like to be bothered when "the juice is flowing." Please be patient.
 
Imagine Jawmuncher, but replace Dino Crisis with switch icons.

Jawmuncher likes Dino Crisis? What is that, some kind of band?

I kid, folks, I kid.

Anyway: the reason there is a newfound memetic focus on Switch icons is because of Snake Pass getting an update with a bad icon, prompting iconic GAFfer Neiteio to make a thread voicing their disappointment in the new design.

This motivated others who also value icon art the same way people value box art to come together and share good icons, bad icons, and debate what the standard format for a system like the Switch should be.

Several developers took notice, responded to fan feedback, and updated their icons as a result (including Snake Pass). But for all the people who care about game art, there are lots of people who don't. People who don't care think people who do are petulant infants with no priorities, people who do care believe they are promoting a beautiful and comforting mosaic that sets the tone of the Switch experience by preserving the first impression icons give from the home screen.

Both types of people play up how important it is to them and how much it affects them for laughs. There are some Kotaku articles about it.
 

Couleurs

Member
It’d be a pathetic thing to waste effort faking something so minor, but I always get suspicious at blurry 45 degree angle pictures. Like, why not just take a normal picture
 

Majine

Banned
What's the deal with NeoGAF's obsession with Switch icons? Is this a meme or something?

There isn't much else about the Switch we can discuss. No online service, no messaging, no Miiverse. Just icons.

And it's always current. New icons pop up all the time.
 
"contains spoiler"?

Come on guys. We should really draw a hard line for what does and doesn't constitute a spoiler.

Either way the icon is nice
 

OryoN

Member
All icons should be whatever the developers want it to be.

There are actually official guidelines for elements of those icons. Main one being; the the titled logo of the game should be presented with an image that represents the game. Some devs were slacking off in that regard, and the results clearly resembled cheap half-assed stuff that is commonly seen on mobile platforms.

I, too, thought it to be trivial until I found out (in a related article) that there are guidlines behind this stuff (obviously not strictly enforced). I still personally don't care how they show up on my Switch, but I can totally understand why others may. When you think about how simple this is to adjust and how much better it looks presentation-wise, the question is; why not do it the proper way to begin with?

You see, the issue was never about art choice, the problem was having a bunch of vague icon with no logos. As a developer and/or a gamer, wouldn't you want the games you made/bought to be properly represented? I know I would! Caring about such details may be considered too meticulous for some, but trivial implies that no real care is needed to be exercised in this matter. I think otherwise.
 
You see, the issue was never about art choice, the problem was having a bunch of vague icon with no logos. As a developer and/or a gamer, wouldn't you want the games you made/bought to be properly represented? I know I would! Caring about such details may be considered too meticulous for some, but trivial implies that no real care is needed to be exercised in this matter. I think otherwise.

Sony must not have any guidelines, because I've noticed it's especially an issue on PS4. Tons of games have icons that are just vague images that tell you nothing about the game without even a logo. Just adding a logo does so much presentation-wise, and it makes no sense to me why they'd ignore it. Grim Fandango, Heavy Rain and Wolfenstein: The New Order are just a few of the games that have terrible digital art.

There are also instances where you see only the logo, but no art. That'd be okay for a franchise like Final Fantasy where the logos are art, but plenty of logos I see are just bland text with a black background. It looks awful on my home screen.

To all devs: when it doubt, just use the standard box art.
 
I’m relieved... though this is Nintendo so this one was never in doubt.
I thought/hoped it may have some unique non-boxart art though a la Splatoon 2 though.

Unfortunately yes. I know some people who refused to see what new Pokemon were in Sun/Moon unless they caught it for themselves...it's nuts.

God forbid people wanting some surprises and a sense of discovery in their adventure games.
 
Not gonna lie, this is a case where I kind of wanted a different icon. There's a fantastic piece of art that's just a closeup of Mario with Cappy floating above his head. Can I request that Nintendo change it to that?
 
Unfortunately we live in a society where a packet of nuts needs to have a warning that states: "May Contain nuts"

I've also seen quite recently on this forum people complaining about the most trivial things. I was half expecting someone to come in the thread and complain that I ruined the game for them, had I not put a spoiler warning lol

I think equating spoiler culture to nut allergies is a bit much, as nuts can literally kill people and spoilers cannot. People sensitive to spoilers may disagree, but anaphylaxis doesn't.
 
Top Bottom