Nah. I still think there's a good chance she will be a Skywalker, but it still makes sense for her to be a nobody or someone else. These films are still about Skywalkers, one way or another.
Rey can be a Skywalker without being a blood relative. Like, she may literally become Luke's successor and take the name because her family is gone.
And I think there's still a good chance for her to a nobody, what I'm saying is wrong is the point that these episodic films aren't going to keep focusing on one group (the Skywalkers) and are going to try new things and go in different directions, basically what the anthology films are for, when everything we've heard has indicated the contrary.
That would actually be pretty cool. I'd be down either way.. if she makes a brand new name for herself or takes Skywalker.
It would be a nice tribute to Lucas in a sense because he has adopted daughters.
Rey can be a Skywalker without being a blood relative. Like, she may literally become Luke's successor and take the name because her family is gone.
That would actually be pretty cool. I'd be down either way.. if she makes a brand new name for herself or takes Skywalker.
They seem to be abandoning using the "Episode" titles as it is at least for marketing, so I could easily see them making non-Skywalker trilogies in the future that aren't technically "episodes".Yeah the focus is on the Skywalker family, at least for this trilogy. I would assume all trilogies will be about them though, unless something changes.
Wasn't that the plan?If they do an Episode X, I want another time jump. Another couple of decades, just to keep up the tradition.
Rey being an "adopted" Skywalker is fine by me. But the whole "chosen bloodline" shit has gotten old. It's been done twice in this series alone, enough.
They seem to be abandoning using the "Episode" titles as it is at least for marketing, so I could easily see them making non-Skywalker trilogies in the future that aren't technically "episodes".
Also, where the hell is Lando? Has Billy Dee Williams said anything publicly?
I like how Rey has done only one hairstyle for her whole life.
Wasn't this just in the trailers?"Who are you?"
"I'm no one."
I think it's happening
Yeah, using "Episode _" only began with The Phantom Menace.If I remember right, this has been a common practice since Empire. I think a lot of the marketing takes the words Episode X out
On Rebels.
Also, where the hell is Lando? Has Billy Dee Williams said anything publicly?
I remember Finn Calrissian. I also remember Finn Windu.
I'm guessing story-wise they maybe haven't found the perfect fit for him. But he had that lunch with Donald Glover and does Rebels, so I'm sure he'd be game to come back if it worked out.
Lando is busy with Lobot racketeering the First Order, probably. He's enjoying the good life as a rogue.
Wasn't this just in the trailers?
Which apparently have a ton of misdirection?
Yeah, using "Episode _" only began with The Phantom Menace.
I still believe
There's supposed to be a casino in TLJ right? That would be the perfect excuse to hook back up with him! And c'mon, we have to know what his response to Han's death is.
Nah. There's a scene of this happening:
It's very implied that she was left there.
Also, where the hell is Lando? Has Billy Dee Williams said anything publicly?
As much as I love Lando, having him pop up in the second movie of the new trilogy would probably end up being too close to ESB. We've already got the mentor training the young Jedi while the other characters are split up fighting the First Order, ala Luke with Yoda while Han and Leia run from the Empire, and it looks like we have a walker battle as well, ala Hoth. Bringing Lando back now would run the risk of having another repeat of the "TFA is A New Hope" problem.
That being said, if they can make it work then why not.
Wouldn't mind seeing him in the 9th movie though, if they can make it work.
Finn is Lando's son.
By left there I mean dropped off.What
How does that imply Rey was left on Jakku and not dropped off
All I'm saying is that Lando has more than earned a top billing spot on these movies. Sooner the better, because it isn't just the Han/Luke/Leia show.
Ah thanksBy left there I mean dropped off.
Rey can be a Skywalker without being a blood relative. Like, she may literally become Lukes successor and take the name because her family is gone.
Oh hey
Found the most accurate trailer reaction
Uh, Jenny, what are you doing to that Porg?
Nope. Nope. Nope.
First of all we have gotten confirmation from Lucasfilm that Snoke is NOT Plagueis. And we have official confirmation that Snoke is NOT Human.
So he isn't Plagueis and he can't be Rey's dad.
Oh hey
Found the most accurate trailer reaction
Apologies if this has been mentioned earlier in the thread, but the popular "Kylo spared Rey from the massacre and left her on Jakku" theory was deliberately debunked by an EU novel last year.
In "Bloodline," which takes place about six years before The Force Awakens, we hear that Ben is still off training with Luke. Rey, who is 19 in TFA, would be 13 when this novel takes place. Since she is clearly a child in the TFA flashback, and since Ben has yet to turn to the dark side, this means that Rey was abandoned on Jakku well before Kylo burned the temple, killed the Jedi, and betrayed Luke.
If you want to say that "it's a novel so who cares," the Lucasfilm Story Group was formed specifically to avoid this kind of problem where a novel contradicts a film. Pablo Hidalgo was asked about the timeline question on Twitter and, without addressing the theory, confirmed that the novel takes place six years before TFA. This definitively debunks the idea that Kylo left Rey on Jakku and severely injures, if not completely debunks, the idea that Luke left her there as well, and therefore means she is probably not his daughter.
That actually wasn't contradicted by "Bloodline", since Luke could've very much so been involved in the decision to leave Rey on Jakku years before "Bloodline", or might even have done it himself. There was plenty of time for Luke to have done that.
But I agree that she's most likely not his daughter, for many other reasons.
I noted that it "severely injures" the theory of Luke leaving Rey on Jakku, since there are only so many plausible reasons why Luke would choose to abandon a little girl on a desert planet before his spirit had been broken by Ben's betrayal.
He's back
Not feeling that involved or engaged in the Star Wars universe anymore, still liking the discussion of fan theories and speculation, I just went ahead and googled around for leaks. I'm not going to recite them here and obviously there is no way of actually confirming them. If they are true however then I'm actually ok with how they written the story. There are some weird aspects to some of that and you can actually see anectotal evidence of it being true in the trailer... but still, I think I could live with that. Not exactly mind bending stuff but could be way worse.
This is not supposed to start a leak discussion, I'm not going to post anything here (pm if you want to know details and don't want to google around yourself, for whatever reason)
I was contemplating not watching TLJ on the big screen this time because I feared that I would only get another pseudo sequel (which was TFA for me, an entertaining but utterly predictable ANH clone). Now I am kinda curious to see if the leaks are true and how it will play out on the screen.
I'm guessing story-wise they maybe haven't found the perfect fit for him. But he had that lunch with Donald Glover and does Rebels, so I'm sure he'd be game to come back if it worked out.
Lando is busy with Lobot racketeering the First Order, probably. He's enjoying the good life as a rogue.