• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Wii U Speculation Thread 2: Can't take anymore of this!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wait - why are we back to talking about GDC? It seems like there's a chance we might get some good info from Reggie tomorrow. Shouldn't that be what we're excited about?

Why aren't we discussing the possibilities and opportunities of Nintendo at GDC? Should be the question.
 

Salvadora

Member
Maybe this is what they meant about WiiU news before E3,I have my doubts that we will get anything though. 3DS seems to have a lot going on.
 

Hiltz

Member
I'll be keeping a gun to my head. If Nintendo says something important about the Wii U at GDC, then I'll shoot myself. Don't worry, it's just a water gun.
 

Wolfie5

Member
Wait - why are we back to talking about GDC? It seems like there's a chance we might get some good info from Reggie tomorrow. Shouldn't that be what we're excited about?

Reggie - "We have one exciting announcement about Wii U you won´t believe... wait for GDC" ;)



At GDC - "We are going to reveal a new Mario game at E3 for Wii U"




At E3 - "It´s Mario party 10 for Wii U"
 
R

Rösti

Unconfirmed Member
Wasn't Nintendo next to these companies in previous GDC?
Correct, though with a different layout. Also, Wii U had not been shown by GDC 2011, and no business partners were confirmed.

Nintendo's booth is next to Crytek's booth in the business center as well:

4581.jpg


Full floorplans: http://www.gdconf.com/pdf/floorplans/GDC_2012_FloorPlan_02_17_2012.pdf
 
You know, if Nintendo's going to change the name of the Wii-U, tomorrow's gig would be the perfect time to announce it. Much better than waiting to E3 and going "And now...the Nintendo DreamBlaster!", leaving people confused about what product they are announcing. This way people will be done discussing the new name by E3 so the real Wii-U news (launch titles, awesomeness) will be frontmost in people's minds.
 
You know, if Nintendo's going to change the name of the Wii-U, tomorrow's gig would be the perfect time to announce it. Much better than waiting to E3 and going "And now...the Nintendo DreamBlaster!", leaving people confused about what product they are announcing. This way people will be done discussing the new name by E3 so the real Wii-U news (launch titles, awesomeness) will be frontmost in people's minds.
that is true. They have done it before, they announced Wii's name before E3 to get all the hooplah about the name over with.
 

royalan

Member
You know, if Nintendo's going to change the name of the Wii-U, tomorrow's gig would be the perfect time to announce it. Much better than waiting to E3 and going "And now...the Nintendo DreamBlaster!", leaving people confused about what product they are announcing. This way people will be done discussing the new name by E3 so the real Wii-U news (launch titles, awesomeness) will be frontmost in people's minds.

Agreed.

I really think Reggie's going to drop something big tomorrow. I'm excited.
 
You know, if Nintendo's going to change the name of the Wii-U, tomorrow's gig would be the perfect time to announce it. Much better than waiting to E3 and going "And now...the Nintendo DreamBlaster!", leaving people confused about what product they are announcing. This way people will be done discussing the new name by E3 so the real Wii-U news (launch titles, awesomeness) will be frontmost in people's minds.

That sounds wrong.
I do hope Nintendo change the name though, and I'd be surprised if they didn't to be honest. If they do change it, I hope they announce it before E3, even like a week before would be fine.
 
and like I said, people say this EVERY time, guyss guysss it's just a investors meeting FOR INVESTORSSS, nothing is gonna be said. Then we get thursdayton. It's GDC. It's a gaming focused media event, and a huge one at that. You don't need to be present to drop some news. Just like E3, not all companies have pressers but they still announce things.

GDC itself is not a press conference, or an investor briefing, for that matter. Point is, there is no Nintendo-specific briefing/event/conference scheduled that we know of that could potentially serve as a venue for Wii U announcements to be made, and Reggie isn't going to just slip something in an interview.
 
GDC itself is not a press conference, or an investor briefing. Point is, there is no Nintendo-specific briefing/event/conference scheduled that we know of that would serve as a venue for Wii U announcements to be made, and Reggie isn't going to just slip something in an interview.
why not. It's all business in the end. They need to keep a level attention focused on the WiiU. They could drop a line in an interview, they could send out a press release, they could lift an embargo or two on specific things. ANYTHING CAN HAPPPPPPENNNN.
 

Roo

Member
Rösti;35343943 said:
Correct, though with a different layout. Also, Wii U had not been shown by GDC 2011, and no business partners were confirmed.

Nintendo's booth is next to Crytek's booth in the business center as well:

4581.jpg


Full floorplans: http://www.gdconf.com/pdf/floorplans/GDC_2012_FloorPlan_02_17_2012.pdf

Ohh I see.
Actually, I didn't see Microsoft's booth this year so I assume they skipped this year.
By the way... what happened with your Wii U trademark guy? Did he respond?
I really hope they ditch the Wii U name. I know they're after the brand recognition, but Wii U is just plain awful =/

Edit: About Microsoft, maybe I just overlooked it haha =P
 

JJConrad

Sucks at viral marketing
Hopefully you'll make good use of your time off.
KuGsj.gif


I don't think there's going to be any solid new info about Wii-U at GDC. I think we're just going to have to wait till E3.

Only big thing I expect from GDC is going to be a Zelda 3DS trailer or announcement.
Are you taking him up his bet?

I'm expecting at least a follow-up to their investor's briefing about Nintendo Network and NFC.
 
R

Rösti

Unconfirmed Member
Ohh I see.
Actually, I didn't see Microsoft's booth this year so I assume they skipped this year.
By the way... what happened with your Wii U trademark guy? Did he respond?
I really hope they ditch the Wii U name. I know they're after the brand recognition, but Wii U is just plain awful =/
I'm still waiting for Jerald Nagae's reply, and a reply from another contact which I won't name (it's Nintendo though, but it's nothing extraordinary). Jerald got back in office just yesterday and probably have to go through a bunch of messages before dealing with my inquiry.
 

Roo

Member
Rösti;35344340 said:
I'm still waiting for Jerald Nagae's reply, and a reply from another contact which I won't name (it's Nintendo though, but it's nothing extraordinary). Jerald got back in office just yesterday and probably have to go through a bunch of messages before dealing with my inquiry.

The more sources, the better =P
a shame you can share the name tho
Ohh well, you will hear something from them soon, hopefully good news
let us know as soon as you can.
 
Fair enough. Not sure what I can say that will back my claims up without getting my self in trouble. But I will try to clarify a bit without getting too specific.

The current Wii U dev kit i am talking about (not this supposed new one in the last few weeks) Is slightly LESS powerful than the Xbox 360. What I mean by that is that we would have to scale back/change our Xbox/PS3 games to run on the console. Its a tri core out of order cpu with 1GB of pretty slow ram and a decently featured gpu that lacks raw muscle. Its good and efficient, just not that powerful. As we all know they can change it and according to rumors they have. But nothing they can do this late in the game is going to dramatically change its performance. When it ships it will be in the ball park of the Xbox 360/PS3 (give or take a little). But in no way will it be 2x or more powerful then the HD twins. Just not happening.

I am a huge Nintendo fanboy, so I am disappointed that they are not putting more power in the box. Nintendo will have no problem making great looking games on it, and 3rd party studios will be able to port games from 360/ps3. But when ever MS/Sony show their next consoles it might not be so true.

So believe it or not. Either way is cool by me.

Now I don't understand what is the problem if the Wii U is not more powerful than the xbox360, it sure is gonna have great GFX and for sure it's gonna be a huge step from the Wii since the Wii was very outdated (DX7-like hw), and if it will have more memory than the xbox360 it means very nice high resolution textures, it seems all very logical to me and in agreement with Nintendo philosophy to rely on innovation and not on horsepower.
 
8-10x the graphical power of the PS360 can easily be achieved with a GTX560TI/HD6870 level GPU. This time next year a GPU with that spec will be considered low-mid range at best and should fit within a 100 watt spec. A GPU consuming less than 100 watt can be put in a very small console. Also let's not forget with vapour chamber and even newer liquid chamber cooling technology manufacturers will be able to put a 250 watt GPU in a PS360 sized console.
 

StevieP

Banned
What in the name of the flying spaghetti monster happened in here? I leave GAF for the weekend and I miss out on 40 pages? lol

Anyone care to summarize? I've read from 185... and what's this about flaming people? Guys, c'mon, don't flame people for a dissenting opinion. Even specialguy, and luckyman et all have their place. It can't just be one huge circle jerk.

BG made a great post a page ago about how you *can* temper your expectations and still have a system more powerful than current gen. As far as "next gen engines" go, if you can scale a game like Witcher 2 and BF3 to a 360, you can scale any PS4 game to a Wii U (or even a 360 for that matter). It's whether the effort is put into it - THAT'S the key. Architecturally, you can "scale" Samaritan to an ipad.

You know, if Nintendo's going to change the name of the Wii-U, tomorrow's gig would be the perfect time to announce it. Much better than waiting to E3 and going "And now...the Nintendo DreamBlaster!", leaving people confused about what product they are announcing. This way people will be done discussing the new name by E3 so the real Wii-U news (launch titles, awesomeness) will be frontmost in people's minds.

Name's not changing, guys.

Guilty Bystander said:
Also let's not forget with vapour chamber and even newer liquid chamber cooling technology manufacturers will be able to put a 250 watt GPU in a PS360 sized console.

You'd better temper your expectations. You're not getting a liquid-cooled console, and certainly not one with a 250w GPU.

I can't wait until all the graphics whores leave Nintendo en masse like they've been promising (for decades, now). Bunch of fucking hysterical drama queens with zero appreciation for what they already have or the work that goes into it. These are the people who have been dragging video gaming down, setting the bar impossibly high for the industry - and for what? The games aren't getting more fun or challenging. Now they're just basically little movies written for 14 year olds whose parents let them hear curse words. Whoop-de-fucking-do. "Wow, I can clrealy see the wrinkles in that guy's forehead - this is so much more fun now. I feel so immersed." How many more wrinkles is it going to take before you guys are ever satisfied?

Nobody is impressed that the Wii U isn't powerful enough for you. Good job; I bet you also only fuck supermodels. Nintendo isn't doomed because they're not doing the "full gen upgrade" you've been wetting your pants over. The general gaming public doesn't share your obsession with pixel counting; they're simply into video games and if the games look nicer than last year, then that's a bonus. They don't lose their shit over hardware power like you do.

Also this. So much of this. And I say that as a person who does have a "graphic whore" side to them. Consoles aren't about graphics. If you care that much about visuals, build yourself a gaming PC and be done with the digitalfoundry pixel counting shit.
 

antonz

Member
Now I don't understand what is the problem if the Wii U is not more powerful than the xbox360, it sure is gonna have great GFX and for sure it's gonna be a huge step from the Wii since the Wii was very outdated (DX7-like hw), and if it will have more memory than the xbox360 it means very nice high resolution textures, it seems all very logical to me and in agreement with Nintendo philosophy to rely on innovation and not on horsepower.

Because Nintendo releasing an Xbox 360 in 2012 is not an acceptable advancement. Nintendo til the Wii did not cut corners and play the innovation over horsepower line. They innovated and brought the power.

Nintendo will have to go way out of its way to deliver an Xbox 360 in 2012 and if they go that far out of their way to do so then they dont deserve my money or anyone elses.
 

royalan

Member
Guys, c'mon, don't flame people for a dissenting opinion. Even specialguy, and luckyman et all have their place. It can't just be one huge circle jerk.

Truer words have never been spoken.

Also this. So much of this. And I say that as a person who does have a "graphic whore" side to them. Consoles aren't about graphics. If you care that much about visuals, build yourself a gaming PC and be done with the digitalfoundry pixel counting shit.

And in all the pages you missed, nobody even came close to suggesting this.
 
Now I don't understand what is the problem if the Wii U is not more powerful than the xbox360, it sure is gonna have great GFX and for sure it's gonna be a huge step from the Wii since the Wii was very outdated (DX7-like hw), and if it will have more memory than the xbox360 it means very nice high resolution textures, it seems all very logical to me and in agreement with Nintendo philosophy to rely on innovation and not on horsepower.

All that matters is that the Wii U is fully capable of handling ports of the PS4/nextBox and doing so without that much of a drop off. What's required to get to that point doesn't matter in the least. If it's able to handle ports of the two other next gen systems with being 1.5x that of the Xbox than thats fine. No matter how powerful the Wii U is or isn't, Nintendo will be able to make amazing looking games. That isn't the concern. The concern is if it will handle PS4/NextBox ports.
 

Gahiggidy

My aunt & uncle run a Mom & Pop store, "The Gamecube Hut", and sold 80k WiiU within minutes of opening.
Question.

By a factor, how much more powerful is the xbox 360 to the Wii?
 

Log4Girlz

Member
Holy carp this thread exploded since I was here last.

The Wii U will be between 100% and 500% the power of the X360 in some areas, but I'm betting its more commonly in the 100-200% processing power. It will take some effort by developers to create something dramatically nicer looking than the HD Twins, it won't be like they just click some buttons and get double the resolution and framerate, even if such performance was possible...would take a tweaking of code I imagine.
 
Has it been posted that 5th Cell is working on a Wii U launch title and that Pipeworks is also working on a Wii U game?

I hope Pipeworks is making another Godzilla, the GC Destroy All Monsters Melee was BOSS, but I avoided Unleashed on Wii due to the controls apparently being terribad with no other controller options. :(
 
Has it been posted that 5th Cell is working on a Wii U launch title and that Pipeworks is also working on a Wii U game?

I hope Pipeworks is making another Godzilla, the GC Destroy All Monsters Melee was BOSS, but I avoided Unleashed on Wii due to the controls apparently being terribad with no other controller options. :(

I bet the 5th Cell game is their shooter.
 
I like "Wii 1080."

Save that for the 1080 Avalanche sequel.


Has it been posted that 5th Cell is working on a Wii U launch title and that Pipeworks is also working on a Wii U game?

I hope Pipeworks is making another Godzilla, the GC Destroy All Monsters Melee was BOSS, but I avoided Unleashed on Wii due to the controls apparently being terribad with no other controller options. :(
Yes it has, about 2 pages ago if I recall correctly (as well as posted again on the last page)
 

royalan

Member
All that matters is that the Wii U is fully capable of handling ports of the PS4/nextBox and doing so without that much of a drop off. What's required to get to that point doesn't matter in the least. If it's able to handle ports of the two other next gen systems with being 1.5x that of the Xbox than thats fine. No matter how powerful the Wii U is or isn't, Nintendo will be able to make amazing looking games. That isn't the concern. The concern is if it will handle PS4/NextBox ports.

Right on the money.

The idea as we all came to accept it, was that the Wii U was likely going to be powerful enough for up-ports of PS360 games and down-ports of 720/PS4 games when 3rd party development inevitably transitioned to those being the primary systems. It was never about Wii U getting cutting edge graphics, but Nintendo realizing that maintaining parity with their competition was important. Arkam's claims cast a little doubt on that, but we shall see.
 

Mlatador

Banned
You know, considering this is already the second Wii U Spectulation Thread, I sometimes wonder how come it's got so many views and even posts. Clearly people must be immensly interested in Nintendo's next big thing as well as Nintendo themselves. It's gotta be FUN for you all or even an obsession of some sort, because you - fuck, me included - can't stop thinking about the damn thing. As soon as new information leaks, people jump on it like vultures on dead meat. The fact that Nintendo knows how to keep it's secrets makes it even more exciting and fun.

Nintendo must be the best thing ever, because they know how to produce enjoyment. Even just the thinking/the speculation about the Wii U let's people have fun - that's how genius they are. Nintendo's partly made out of PURE MAGIC it seems, don't you see? They know what you want, want makes you happy, even before you do. They could provide you with the details, but they don't want to. They just know how much fun it is to speculate about them.

They even have Ninjas, how is that?
 
You know, considering this is already the second Wii U Spectulation Thread, I sometimes wonder how come it's got so many views and even posts. Clearly people must be immensly interested in Nintendo's next big thing as well as Nintendo themselves. It's gotta be FUN for you all or even an obsession of some sort, because you - fuck, me included - can't stop thinking about the damn thing. As soon as new information leaks, people jump on it like vultures on dead meat. The fact that Nintendo knows how to keep it's secrets makes it even more exciting and fun.

Nintendo must be the best thing ever, because they know how to produce enjoyment. Even just the thinking/the speculation about the Wii U let's people have fun - that's how genius they are. Nintendo's partly made out of PURE MAGIC it seems, don't you see? They know what you want, want makes you happy, even before you do. They could provide you with the details, but they don't want to. They just know how much fun it is to speculate about them.

They even have Ninjas, how is that?


As much as people gripe on Nintendo for not announcing things and what not, they know how to build hype with minimal effort.
I mean, hell. Look at the Dojo thread. That thing broke GAF more than once. And it was just a website update! With mostly useless information!

So, when you have Nintendo go "Oh, hey, our next handheld will have 3D without glasses." or "Our next console will be HD with a funky tablet controller." people get excited because who the fuck knows what they're really doing with that technology.
 
This thread gets a lot of posts also because it's the only next-gen console topic with anything concrete, and it's also very controversial. Lots of new shit for Nintendo to be getting into. Nintendo always demands attention and people deservedly give it.
 

blu

Wants the largest console games publisher to avoid Nintendo's platforms.
Question.

By a factor, how much more powerful is the xbox 360 to the Wii?
I was about to post something earlier today, then I thought nah, who cares, but I'll post it now:

Game consoles are too darn complex systems to be meaningfully subjected to 'console_x = N * console_y' or 'console_x > console_y'. You really need to break down each system into a metric ton of factors until you can start to meaningfully use such statements (and then with a grain of salt). Until you do that, you're just fooling yourself via such equations. So if you get a source that tells you such info, or you yourself are tempted to make such statements - please, don't take that and run with it. As only shitstorms await down that road. Heck, we all know how 'ps3 is oh-so-many-times more powerful' went this gen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom