• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Playstation vita, like the Ps2 ?

Midou

Member
No, it wasn't, Dreamcast was, it also launched eighteen months before the other two, and included a DVD drive when it was very new tech.

It took years for any PS2 game to look close to Shenmue though. Who knows what devs could have done with 6+ years of working on it.
 
Id say more like Dreamcast than PS2

house_oh_snap.gif


I think Infinity Blade II looks better than anything on PSV personally, the iPhone 4 is approaching two years old, and isn't even a dedicated gaming device. The iPad 3 will probably completely outclass the PSV.

I'd say it's on par with PS2.

PSP was the real technical beast of the Sony systems in terms of it's peers.

Fair enough, loathe as I am to compare smartphones.
 

Emitan

Member
Ever since the PS3 people have been acting like Sony has had the strongest hardware forever, but that was never the case. PS2 was the weakest of its generation.

You mean besides mad polygon pushing power? Or the fact it launched a year and a half before anything else. Whoops! Forgot about the Dreamcast it totally trounced.
 

Jburton

Banned
Hardware is alright. Shame its main function is to be a dust collector.

Basically its not the PS2. Nothing ever will be again unless the market collapses and relaunches (again!). Which isn't that unlikely (if people don't adapt to new-gen and brands mean less, its open for a stronger competitor to come in after the market stagnates for a long period of time) - but still, Sony dropped the ball with PS3 and lost its brand and customer loyalty. Its one of the big brand failures of the 21st century; and yes their strategy to keep selling PS2's worked very well - but they forgot Microsoft/Nintendo were still competing with them as well.

Vita hardware is good. I just don't think its necessary. Too many wee bits and pieces to make it sound exciting, yet the back touch screen will most likely be underused by developers. Great graphics, but why is that important on a handheld? Some of the best DS games kept things simple (we already saw this fight lost with PSP VS DS - people wanted gameplay/games/affordability and a good system)

Vita looks good on paper. Its hardware is decent from a power perspective. From a consumer perspective its a bit rubbish, silly and really a bit unnecessary.


Unnecessary?

Why is that?

I am a consumer, I don't want to play games on a tiny, low res 3DS screen ..... I have an iPad and some of the games are good, due to the limited control methods a lot of the games begin to feel very samey.


Hardcore gamers still exist! ...... hardcore gamers like high end hardware (hardware is decent you say, what other portable games console has better?), proper control scheme (3DS frankenstick says two sticks is important) and full on console games experience on the move (why should I accept diluted games experiences just because I am using a portable).


A lot of recent gaming trends has been the move away from the hardcore gamer scene (I hate that phrase).

This makes sense from a business perspective but just because we have seen the gaming industry expand into other markets does not mean that the hardcore gaming base no longer exists.

Kinect, Wii, Casual ....... they are not for me!

I support innovation of course, but I like two sticks for control as a foundation (give options for others), high end graphics and full on, high level games.
 
No, it wasn't, Dreamcast was, it also launched eighteen months before the other two, and included a DVD drive when it was very new tech.
Yeah, what's with the revisionist history in all this?

The PS2 was a pretty fast (but unbalanced) piece of hardware when it was released. You can't call a piece of hardware unimpressive just because it couldn't match systems released a year and half later. That's absurd.

On topic: other than both being from Sony and having BC I don't see the similarities between the Vita and the PS2 at this point. Sony's new handheld needs more hype, much better hardware and software sales and much better third party support (among other things) to even begin to dream of being like the PS2.

Other than that, it's a really nice piece of hardware and it deserves some good sales and support.
 

Midou

Member
I completely disagree. MGS2 looked hugely better, year two.

Fair enough, though it was 2 years after shenmue 1 came out. MGS2 is still one of the best looking PS2 games, but most of the launch titles looked like PS1 games. Dreamcast had other great looking titles close to launch.

On the topic of Infinity Blade II looking better, I can certainly agree, but we have not seen all the Vita has to offer, and it does not have a ton of substance. The iPad 3 may outclass the vita but it is a tablet computer, not a handheld gaming device.
 

Jburton

Banned
I think Infinity Blade II looks better than anything on PSV personally, the iPhone 4 is approaching two years old, and isn't even a dedicated gaming device. The iPad 3 will probably completely outclass the PSV.

I'd say it's on par with PS2.

PSP was the real technical beast of the Sony systems in terms of it's peers.


I like Infinity Blade ...... but in reality it is a fancy slide show with a limited control scheme and limited interaction.

iPad 3 will cost twice as much, has around twice the real estate in terms of screen size so nay jump in terms of internal hardware will be swallowed up driving the extra resolution of the new screen.
 

Pezking

Member
Within about 12 months after launch, the PS2 got:

Ridge Racer V
Tekken Tag Tournament
SSX
Shadow of Destiny
Ring of Red
Onimusha: Warlords
Zone of the Enders
Red Faction
Twisted Metal: Black
Gran Turismo 3 A-Spec
Extermination
Klonoa 2: Lunatea's Veil
ICO
Silent Hill 2
Devil May Cry
Grand Theft Auto III
SSX Tricky
Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty
Jak and Daxter: The Precursor Legacy
Final Fantasy X

I'd love the Vita to feature a similar library in such a short amount of time, but I fear it won't be anywhere near that. But that being said, I don't expect any 1st year lineup to rival that of the PS2 ever again.
 

Tunin

Member
Way too early to judge, don't you think? I mean, all of you.

It has potential, let's just wait and see.
 
Hardware is alright. Shame its main function is to be a dust collector.

Basically its not the PS2. Nothing ever will be again unless the market collapses and relaunches (again!). Which isn't that unlikely (if people don't adapt to new-gen and brands mean less, its open for a stronger competitor to come in after the market stagnates for a long period of time) - but still, Sony dropped the ball with PS3 and lost its brand and customer loyalty. Its one of the big brand failures of the 21st century; and yes their strategy to keep selling PS2's worked very well - but they forgot Microsoft/Nintendo were still competing with them as well.

Vita hardware is good. I just don't think its necessary. Too many wee bits and pieces to make it sound exciting, yet the back touch screen will most likely be underused by developers. Great graphics, but why is that important on a handheld? Some of the best DS games kept things simple (we already saw this fight lost with PSP VS DS - people wanted gameplay/games/affordability and a good system)

Vita looks good on paper. Its hardware is decent from a power perspective. From a consumer perspective its a bit rubbish, silly and really a bit unnecessary.

Nextgen consoles are unnecessary. Hell, this gen consoles are unnecessary. Let's go back to the NES :D
 

DMeisterJ

Banned
Everytime I see a new Vita thread, I die a little inside. I guess I'm just having a bit too much fun playing the thing rather than discussing it's success or failure.

Truth is, it's too early to tell either way.
 

Jburton

Banned
What I find cute is that whenever somebody says the Vita has no games (that they're interested in), people bring up the 3DS, even if the post they're frantically trying to tear apart made no mention, allusion or comparison to the 3DS. It's very telling.


I reference the 3DS because it is its direct competitor as a rival gaming handheld.

Very telling from the guy with the Zelda avatar trying to paint my position as fanboyish in slant.

3DS had very little launch games and most of them were not very good, its a fact that is all.
 

StuBurns

Banned
I like Infinity Blade ...... but in reality it is a fancy slide show with a limited control scheme and limited interaction.

iPad 3 will cost twice as much, has around twice the real estate in terms of screen size so nay jump in terms of internal hardware will be swallowed up driving the extra resolution of the new screen.
I don't like Infinity Blade, but that doesn't make any difference to it's technical quality.
 

Nemo

Will Eat Your Children
It's not the new PS2 until it has the best game library by leaps and bounds.
If it gets half the Japanese 3rd party support i'll hail it as the best handheld of all time

My hope still remains, give me glorious RPGs!
 

fernoca

Member
It's a great system. It's barely a week old in the US and nearly 3 months old in Japan.

And agree with that to be "like the PS2"; it needs the games first. So, lets wait and see
 

Jburton

Banned
I don't like Infinity Blade, but that doesn't make any difference to it's technical quality.

Of course it does, the iPad is not having to process half the things a game with a full control scheme, higher level of interaction or a large scale, fully interactive gaming world.

If Infinity Blade had the same level of graphics, with a full controls and a game the scale of a Zelda game it would be impressive.
 

StuBurns

Banned
Why is the iPad being brought up though? We go through it in every vita thread. The Vita isn't a direct competitor.
If we're discussing the technical performance of the systems, I don't see that it matters. The only way a PS2 wasn't impressive at launch is if you're comparing it to something other than game consoles. If you're doing that, you have to treat the PSV the same way.

And iOS is directly competing with PSV, if you like it or not.
 

Midou

Member
Some do, although the size and quality of screen can be a barrier to some.

I was never all too happy playing games on the DS to be honest, it has some amazing games I would never have passed up, but I always enjoyed gaming on the PSP more for screen size, and analog nub, no matter how bad it was at times. 3DS is a similar story, I will never deny the quality of a good game, but I will always consider how I'd enjoy it more elsewhere. I don't care for 3D and the dual screen only really mattered for TWEWY. It's usually just a convenience that saves a button.
 

zoukka

Member
I don't see anything common with these console launches.

Vita doesn't come with a forced new media format, isn't too overpriced, has launch games and the competiton is quite different.
 

Chittagong

Gold Member
Vita will be a smash hit once the mainstream sees more of them. It's an absolutely wonderful device, playing games like Wipeout, Super Stardust HD and Uncharted with it is mindblowing, console experience on the go first time ever. It's a completely different market from the quick touch iPhone games.
 

Jburton

Banned
Gamers who are much more hardcore than you play 3DS, ducky

Why do posters keep coming at me like I am attacking the 3DS?

I don't have one but I do not hate it ....... each to their own.


"Gamers who are much more hardcore than me play 3DS" ....... who gives a fuck, I never said 3DS was not a hardcore machine.
 
It's a great system. It's barely a week old in the US and nearly 3 months old in Japan.

And agree with that to be "like the PS2"; it needs the games first. So, lets wait and see

This. I remember 3DS was off to a terrible start and it had doom & gloom articles for months now the thing sells better than home consoles globally!
 
Very telling from the guy with the Zelda avatar trying to paint my position as fanboyish in slant.
And when I say Nintendo is still completely incompetent by not having digital purchases tied to an account that can be retrieved on another device or that Nintendo of America are useless and should be eliminated due to their lousy localization record this generation, what does my Zelda avatar tell you?

3DS had very little launch games and most of them were not very good, its a fact that is all.
But it is a fact (technically an opinion) that is 100% irrelevant to somebody not having an interest in the Vita launch lineup.

Some do, although the size and quality of screen can be a barrier to some.
Then they would not qualify as hardcore because they let minor things prevent them from playing great games.
 

Duxxy3

Member
People got burned by the 3DS' first 6 months on the market. It was a disaster of epic proportion and the only solution was a massive price drop.

That alone is enough to make people apprehensive about buying an even more costly portable. Add to that the disaster the vita is in japan and confidence in the platform is very low.

I was in the market for a portable in the last week and decided i would try a 3DS (again) because i think the vita is an awful value right now.
 

Roto13

Member
Why do posters keep coming at me like I am attacking the 3DS?

I don't have one but I do not hate it ....... each to their own.


"Gamers who are much more hardcore than me play 3DS" ....... who gives a fuck, I never said 3DS was not a hardcore machine.

Unnecessary?

Why is that?

I am a consumer, I don't want to play games on a tiny, low res 3DS screen ..... I have an iPad and some of the games are good, due to the limited control methods a lot of the games begin to feel very samey.


Hardcore gamers still exist! ...... hardcore gamers like high end hardware (hardware is decent you say, what other portable games console has better?), proper control scheme (3DS frankenstick says two sticks is important) and full on console games experience on the move (why should I accept diluted games experiences just because I am using a portable).


A lot of recent gaming trends has been the move away from the hardcore gamer scene (I hate that phrase).

This makes sense from a business perspective but just because we have seen the gaming industry expand into other markets does not mean that the hardcore gaming base no longer exists.

Kinect, Wii, Casual ....... they are not for me!

I support innovation of course, but I like two sticks for control as a foundation (give options for others), high end graphics and full on, high level games.
You are the worst poster.
 
Top Bottom