What happened to radioheadrule83, anyone know?
Also I've been gaming since the very tail end of the SNES, but really since the N64.
Someone got upset over this post of his:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=37344353&postcount=803
What happened to radioheadrule83, anyone know?
Also I've been gaming since the very tail end of the SNES, but really since the N64.
Already stated my age, but I've commented on this in the past.Just out of curiosity, how old is everyone in here. I'm 29 and a big Nintendo Fan (Nintendo + PC for the future, though I have owned all brands of console) and I'm just curious about what the breakdown is in here. I think it's funny that the stereotype is that people who like Nintendo are young but I suspect this thread skews older. I know it's likely a selection effect of the higher level tech talk and the board itself, but age demographics are always interesting.
Just out of curiosity, how old is everyone in here. I'm 29 and a big Nintendo Fan (Nintendo + PC for the future, though I have owned all brands of console) and I'm just curious about what the breakdown is in here. I think it's funny that the stereotype is that people who like Nintendo are young but I suspect this thread skews older. I know it's likely a selection effect of the higher level tech talk and the board itself, but age demographics are always interesting.
Someone got upset over this post of his:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=37344353&postcount=803
29, been a nintendo fan since NES, and though I just finished my first self-built PC, been PC gaming pretty much since I learned to read (think marble madness and secret of monkey island in glorious tri-color CGA, and shitty shitty King's Quest 3).
feelsgoodman.gif
EDIT: Just like steam sales, the prospect of the NFC stuff for Nintendo games does nothing but make my heart skip as my wallet shrinks in fear.
Anything that doesn't involve standard controller input is a gimmick... especially if it's done by Nintendo. Emphasis on Nintendo.
Huh, that's weird...
I said something similar. Uh-oh.
the controller has an ugly mandatory wire now all the time AND it needs batteries to function and also a useless touchscreen has been added to the controller along with nfc functions (think skylanders)
nsmb2 will be available for digital download
sony is ripping off super smash bros. and they're the worst company ever for doing it
game of the year, rayman legends, was shown off in a leaked trailer.
Ubisoft apparently already in trouble with Universal over the trailer music, Nintendo Ninjas aren't their only worries, per Cheesemeister's Twitter feed:
Just out of curiosity, how old is everyone in here. I'm 29 and a big Nintendo Fan (Nintendo + PC for the future, though I have owned all brands of console) and I'm just curious about what the breakdown is in here. I think it's funny that the stereotype is that people who like Nintendo are young but I suspect this thread skews older. I know it's likely a selection effect of the higher level tech talk and the board itself, but age demographics are always interesting.
They also got axisofwevil (or however he spells it). Better go edit that shit...
...Huh, that's weird...
I said something similar. Uh-oh.
They also got axisofwevil (or however he spells it). Better go edit that shit...
Just out of curiosity, how old is everyone in here. I'm 29 and a big Nintendo Fan (Nintendo + PC for the future, though I have owned all brands of console) and I'm just curious about what the breakdown is in here. I think it's funny that the stereotype is that people who like Nintendo are young but I suspect this thread skews older. I know it's likely a selection effect of the higher level tech talk and the board itself, but age demographics are always interesting.
Did you read the rest of his list?
The usage of the word annoys me, since a gimmick is anything that makes people want to buy your product. That's it. That's what the word means.
I find this rather curious as well. Since when did the term start carrying a negative connotation?
I find this rather curious as well. Since when did the term start carrying a negative connotation?
I find this rather curious as well. Since when did the term start carrying a negative connotation?
peoplewhoknowstuff said:1
a : a mechanical device for secretly and dishonestly controlling gambling apparatus
b : an ingenious or novel mechanical device : gadget
2
a : an important feature that is not immediately apparent : catch
b : an ingenious and usually new scheme or angle
c : a trick or device used to attract business or attention <a marketing gimmick>
The definition implies that it is a feature, as in only one. Or at least, that's how it's interpreted.
Also "fun" is a buzzword.
Just out of curiosity, how old is everyone in here. I'm 29 and a big Nintendo Fan (Nintendo + PC for the future, though I have owned all brands of console) and I'm just curious about what the breakdown is in here. I think it's funny that the stereotype is that people who like Nintendo are young but I suspect this thread skews older. I know it's likely a selection effect of the higher level tech talk and the board itself, but age demographics are always interesting.
"buzzword" is a buzzword.
Just out of curiosity, how old is everyone in here. I'm 29 and a big Nintendo Fan (Nintendo + PC for the future, though I have owned all brands of console) and I'm just curious about what the breakdown is in here. I think it's funny that the stereotype is that people who like Nintendo are young but I suspect this thread skews older. I know it's likely a selection effect of the higher level tech talk and the board itself, but age demographics are always interesting.
The usage of the word annoys me, since a gimmick is anything that makes people want to buy your product. That's it. That's what the word means.
Having a more powerful cpu than a prior generation console is a gimmick. So is having online play, or digital downloads, or cross-game chat. Somebody saying "No gimmicks!" would be really bored with an upcoming system or game, since it would be exactly identical to what they already have.
In this thread, I hate on the English language and my own inability to evolve with its ongoing changes
Just out of curiosity, how old is everyone in here. I'm 29 and a big Nintendo Fan (Nintendo + PC for the future, though I have owned all brands of console) and I'm just curious about what the breakdown is in here. I think it's funny that the stereotype is that people who like Nintendo are young but I suspect this thread skews older. I know it's likely a selection effect of the higher level tech talk and the board itself, but age demographics are always interesting.
That's one big thing.. I'm lucky if I can keep-up with just what Nintendo releases. Anything else is gravy!I think I'm on board for Wii U at launch as long as it's $300 or less. More than that and I have to remind myself that I have no time to play these days anyway.
Well if you want me to get all bitter about it... Whatever label Nintendo's detractors come up with is typically what the entire userbase gets painted as.
"Kiddy" was easy to apply considering Nintendo still has the gall to not "modernize" Mario, and to this day I think EAD had never made a game that got higher than a T-rating, mostly using surrogates like Retro or Rare to provide such material. It also helps that Nintendo is still popular with children, which is by no means a bad thing, but this strength can be used against them. I should point out that it doesn't matter how many M-rated games Nintendo made. IT would not shake the label off, because it has to be done in the absence of Mario, or even worse, has to be Mario doing the M-rated stuff. And Nintendo's not going to do that, and good on them, IMO.
However with the DS and Wii, the detractors were faced with a conundrum. Seniors, Young women, middle-aged people, and children enjoyed them both immensely. So "kiddy" can't realistically apply to seniors and middle aged people. Then they searched and found the new label "casual." It doesn't matter what games Nintendo makes. Wii Music and Wii Sports still exist. Things Nintendo always did were magnified in the lens of finding "casual" identifiers. Games once considered "core" like Animal Crossing and, God Help us, Super Mario, were now considered "casual." A normal humdrum executive choice like Cammie Dunaway was eviscerated in a way that, say, Perrin Kaplan was not. Nintendo making different game types than the usual genre titles was considered a "betrayal" of a curiously previously undefined group known as "hardcores."
This is all Labeling Theory and is a valid point of view when discussing Nintendo's "image problem" as there are some elements of Nintendo's perception that are well beyond their control, and will probably forever be beyond their control.
This is also why I believe going into the next generation, if Nintendo can appeal to Eastern developers who find a safe zone in the Wii U by increased the base power level of the previous generation only moderately, then the requisite influx of Eastern titles will create the "Eastern/Western" labels, which will also have the curious side effect of lumping UBISoft in the "Eastern" Pile (I mean, they're East of America-land, right?) But this will be a more dangerous label than before, because we have now moved off the games and onto the people that make them, and labeling people have have horrible consequences.
I enjoy gimmicks. Especially optional gimmicks.
33
First gaming experience on a friends Vectrex, PC only (Spacequest, Police Quest, Kings Quest, Larry, Pango, Loderunner...) gamer up until the SNES in 92.
So did the Wii U leak upstage Sony Smash bros like Nintendo intended?heh
there's only a huge ass topic about it on the front pagewas sony smash was revealed today???
They also got axisofwevil (or however he spells it). Better go edit that shit...
That's a good start. The Vectrex was a godmachine. Raster displays can go suck an egg.
Just out of curiosity, how old is everyone in here. I'm 29 and a big Nintendo Fan (Nintendo + PC for the future, though I have owned all brands of console) and I'm just curious about what the breakdown is in here. I think it's funny that the stereotype is that people who like Nintendo are young but I suspect this thread skews older. I know it's likely a selection effect of the higher level tech talk and the board itself, but age demographics are always interesting.
Hmmm, I just hope the digital angle doesn't mean they ARE doing the anti-used copies thing. Though I'd hope Nintendo remembers to keep things accessible regardless of one's internet situation/reliability.
After the Rayman news, is it safe to say that Ideaman should not be doubted anymore?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=37308082&postcount=12976
After the Rayman news, is it safe to say that Ideaman should not be doubted anymore?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=37308082&postcount=12976
Well if you want me to get all bitter about it... Whatever label Nintendo's detractors come up with is typically what the entire userbase gets painted as.
"Kiddy" was easy to apply considering Nintendo still has the gall to not "modernize" Mario, and to this day I think EAD had never made a game that got higher than a T-rating, mostly using surrogates like Retro or Rare to provide such material. It also helps that Nintendo is still popular with children, which is by no means a bad thing, but this strength can be used against them. I should point out that it doesn't matter how many M-rated games Nintendo made. IT would not shake the label off, because it has to be done in the absence of Mario, or even worse, has to be Mario doing the M-rated stuff. And Nintendo's not going to do that, and good on them, IMO.
However with the DS and Wii, the detractors were faced with a conundrum. Seniors, Young women, middle-aged people, and children enjoyed them both immensely. So "kiddy" can't realistically apply to seniors and middle aged people. Then they searched and found the new label "casual." It doesn't matter what games Nintendo makes. Wii Music and Wii Sports still exist. Things Nintendo always did were magnified in the lens of finding "casual" identifiers. Games once considered "core" like Animal Crossing and, God Help us, Super Mario, were now considered "casual." A normal humdrum executive choice like Cammie Dunaway was eviscerated in a way that, say, Perrin Kaplan was not. Nintendo making different game types than the usual genre titles was considered a "betrayal" of a curiously previously undefined group known as "hardcores."
This is all Labeling Theory and is a valid point of view when discussing Nintendo's "image problem" as there are some elements of Nintendo's perception that are well beyond their control, and will probably forever be beyond their control.
This is also why I believe going into the next generation, if Nintendo can appeal to Eastern developers who find a safe zone in the Wii U by increased the base power level of the previous generation only moderately, then the requisite influx of Eastern titles will create the "Eastern/Western" labels, which will also have the curious side effect of lumping UBISoft in the "Eastern" Pile (I mean, they're East of America-land, right?) But this will be a more dangerous label than before, because we have now moved off the games and onto the people that make them, and labeling people can have horrible consequences.
I remember the controller/arcadestick was huge for my tiny hands back then... and now i usually hold it like a i do a regular controller with an analogue stick, with the thumb on top.
41 as of yesterday. I started with Colecovision and then the NES, then moved to Genesis, than PlayStation, then Dreamcast then PS2. Strangely, it was the demise of Sega as a hardware manufacturer that brought me back to Nintendo fandom. I didn't like the idea of losing both of the old guard, so I started supporting them and went out and got a Gamecube and then, of course, DS and Wii.
I think I'm on board for Wii U at launch as long as it's $300 or less. More than that and I have to remind myself that I have no time to play these days anyway.
/v/ circa 2005.
Here are the definitions from Merriam-Webster:
Everything save for 1a applies to online multiplayer and gpu features like tesselation and dynamic lighting as much as they do to touch screens and accelerometers. 1a applies to neither, but it is probably related to why the word has a bit of negativity to it.
"buzzword" is a buzzword.
Well if you want me to get all bitter about it... Whatever label Nintendo's detractors come up with is typically what the entire userbase gets painted as.
...
[long post]
the controller has an ugly mandatory wire now all the time AND it needs batteries to function and also a useless touchscreen has been added to the controller along with nfc functions (think skylanders)
nsmb2 will be available for digital download
sony is ripping off super smash bros. and they're the worst company ever for doing it
game of the year, rayman legends, was shown off in a leaked trailer.
You give your reasoning (which makes sense) so I am not calling you out but I am seeing this "$299 or bust" mentality a lot as if Nintendo isn't allowed to charge a lot for their new piece of technology while other companies can.
The 360 launched for either $350-450 ($100 extra if you wanted Wi-Fi), the PS3 for $500-600, the Vita is $250 (without mandatory costs like a memory card), an iPad is $600 (yes, I realize it does more but just making price comparisons), a smartphone is hundreds of dollars if you don't buy one on contract that will hit $300 in about 6 months, and a low-end laptop will run around $350.
You can't really compare a Wii U with some of those head-to-head because of different functionality (though the U will do much more than just play games) but I don't get why Nintendo has a ceiling on what they can charge on a brand new console that comes with a touchscreen controller. Are the 720 and PS4 going to have a similar price ceiling or will they be 'allowed' to charge more because they can get away with it?