• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Wii U Speculation thread IV: Photoshop rumors and image memes

Status
Not open for further replies.

BurntPork

Banned
Oh.. no no no! I don't think that the specs have been cut. Just taking note of the difference.

Then I made the jump.

*jumps down the stairs*

Also, I really doubt it's an SoC, and REALLY doubt that the GPU is 32nm. Granted, it being 32nm would put us in a whole new ballgame...
 

StevieP

Banned
still spec-ulating?
what can't we say they won't be anything impressive and leave it at that.

That will be the case for all 3 consoles, but putting the pieces of the puzzle together and speculating in a speculation thread is certainly more fun than random gifs.
 

sfried

Member
Actually, I know the guys who created this Oban. Maybe I can ask them to leak some stuff. They're French, so...
That's awesome. I'm a fan of French animation in general, but it's neither here or there.

Still interested in this "Oban" chip, but why would it be on the Wii U? Why would Nintendo pick up a chip that MS possibly "dropped", if ever?

I'm sort of confused. Even if they both have AMD/IBM it means squat since Nintendo would need to meet specific needs. And based on what I read, only release dates coincide?
 
Hey, isn't it far more entertaining to speculate about the Wii U in the Wii U speculation thread?
it's better than the endless cycle of crappy replacement names and pessimism over NDAs lol

dylan-%28n1294200309702%29.gif



well for 4 threads now you guys really had me going that some of you really had some sources and kinda pretty much had the specs and just could not talk about it

but to be guessing on the what the chip is right now leaves me feeling lost

you guys let me down seriously... there is no Santa :|
 
Do it DrWong. With them being French they will tell you everything.

That's awesome. I'm a fan of French animation in general, but it's neither here or there.

Still interested in this "Oban" chip, but why would it be on the Wii U? Why would Nintendo pick up a chip that MS possibly "dropped", if ever?

I'm sort of confused. Even if they both have AMD/IBM it means squat since Nintendo would need to meet specific needs. And based on what I read, only release dates coincide?

The notion is that Oban never belonged to MS and that it was Nintendo's chip the whole time.

dylan-%28n1294200309702%29.gif



well for 4 threads now you guys really had me going that some of you really had some sources and kinda pretty much had the specs and just could not talk about it

but to be guessing on the what the chip is right now leaves me feeling lost

you guys let me down seriously... there is no Santa :|

The current talk is about how the processors might look/work, not how many GB of memory it has, ALUs, TMUs, ROPS, in the GPU, etc.
 

Thraktor

Member
Here's something that's extremely unlikely to yield any info, but might as well throw it up here given the Fab 8 discussion:

GlobalFoundries profiled by ABC News

timesunion.com said:
For your information, if you did not know ABC News paid a visit to GlobalFoundries in April to film air an episode of “Made in America”. Travis Bullard, a spokesman for GlobalFoundries, said that on Monday, April 30th, ABC News with Diane Sawyer is airing the episode. The series will feature the company’s Fab 8 Manufacturing facility and the local community.

“Earlier this month, David Muir from ABC World News spent a day touring the Fab 8 facility and speaking with local students, teachers, and businesses owners in the community who are already seeing the positive impact of the company’s new advanced manufacturing operations,” Bullard said.
 

BurntPork

Banned
Do it DrWong. With them being French they will tell you everything.



The notion is that Oban never belonged to MS and that it was Nintendo's chip the whole time.



The current talk is about how the processors might look/work, not how many GB of memory it has, ALUs, TMUs, ROPS, in the GPU, etc.

And what an improbable notion it is...
 
so let me get this straight

WiiU has a CPU and a GPU being built somewhere by IBM/AMD we know who the players are but we just don't know the name of the project and where they are being fabbed? is that what we are talking about here?

like the Project Flanker rumor?

so will we know the names of these chips at E3?
 

wsippel

Banned
That's awesome. I'm a fan of French animation in general, but it's neither here or there.

Still interested in this "Oban" chip, but why would it be on the Wii U? Why would Nintendo pick up a chip that MS possibly "dropped", if ever?

I'm sort of confused. Even if they both have AMD/IBM it means squat since Nintendo would need to meet specific needs. And based on what I read, only release dates coincide?
That's not what I was trying to imply. I think "Oban", the chip described by SemiAccurate, never existed in the first place, and that the chip in production at fab 8 (and previously at East Fishkill) might be a Wii U component. Maybe the GPU. The chip might or might not be called Oban, would have nothing to do with Microsoft, and would not be a six core PPC with a Southern Islands GPU. But I'm just speculating.
 
And what an improbable notion it is...

Improbable based on what SemiAccurate described Oban as? Definitely.

But there is a reason why SemiAccurate is a good choice for the site's name.

http://semiaccurate.com/2012/01/02/the-next-generation-amd-gpu-is-not-called-sea-islands/

http://fudzilla.com/home/item/25822-amd-28nm-sea-islands-official-successor-to-southern-islands

So while Charlie's description of Oban doesn't fit the bill. It's also plausible his description isn't correct either.

But, to what evidence? What is in this Oban that makes it "fit" the Wii U puzzle?
It's just too convinient to be true, too.

Those are good questions. The primary evidence IMO would be the likelihood that MS switched to an all AMD solution and possibly before Mr. Demerjian started reporting on Oban. Then there is what wsippel mentioned. Adding to it Oban has multiple associations to Japan.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oban_(disambiguation)

I'm not saying it is true, just showing why it can be viewed as true.
 
Wasn't the Oban rumor only speculating the chip belonged to MS because of the timeframe? There was nothing else in the rumor that stated it was for MS other than timing.

People thought Xbox720 would come out end of this year and that WiiU would be out before summer.

Now that the timing is completely off, wouldn't the speculation that the chip was for MS be completely off?
 

Thraktor

Member
so let me get this straight

WiiU has a CPU and a GPU being built somewhere by IBM/AMD we know who the players are but we just don't know the name of the project and where they are being fabbed? is that what we are talking about here?

In a nutshell, yes. IBM did say that the CPU would be manufactured in their East Fishkill plant on a 45nm process. It's possible but unlikely that that's changed. We have pretty much no idea of either the manufacturing location or node of the GPU. We also don't know the chips' codenames, but it's possible that Project Flanker refers to the CPU.
 
so let me get this straight

WiiU has a CPU and a GPU being built somewhere by IBM/AMD we know who the players are but we just don't know the name of the project and where they are being fabbed?

I believe the GPU aspect is what's still up for discussion.

is that what we are talking about here?

like the Project Flanker rumor?

For the most part, yes.

so will we know the names of these chips at E3?

I'm going to say no.
 
(slowly catching up with today -- was busy S-ranking a group project!)

Sure, but IR is significantly more reliable than motion (and gyroscopic pointing a-la WM+/Move) and vastly more accurate than dual-analog.

Yeah, calling IR pointing "motion controls" is pretty much the same thing as referring to a mouse as "motion controls". Moving your hand around to directly control a pointer predates the population of the term "waggle" (and so forth) by about forty-three years.


Alright fine. I prefer dual analog controls but I hope that those who prefer IR get what they want.

This is a good idea. Everybody gets what they want.



If GameplayWhore keeps going what he's doing it's not so bad. Like he should post one on every page or something. Otherwise, this thread is basically a community thread with the occasional sprinkling of information from folks such as yourself/lherre/wsippel/bg etc. lol

Hm, that'd increase the rate of posting by a solid percent. Or even two percent if we went the 50ppp route. Brilliant!
 

BlackJace

Member
Aw man, we're still on hardware? I'm not conducive to the discussion when it comes to console hardware.

Oh well, I can sit back and read.


Just remember I'm watching, guys...stay classy.
 
(almost… caught… up!)

I wouldn't count out an official spec reveal. Wasn't the Wii the first system Nintendo said they weren't going to discuss specs for? And the Wii-U is supposed to be targeting core gamers, and they know core gamers like specs. Especially with these rumors going around about the Wii-U being "on par" with current-gen consoles, Nintendo might want to say "That's all a lot of hooey, look how powerful this mofo is!"

Not a chance in hell they're going to reveal specs.

I personally don't expect too much in the way of details on the gpu and cpu. It seems that the idea of focusing their marketing of some aspect of the system rather than computational strength is the Iwata Way. This doesn't mean they won't make super powerful systems, but it does mean that they finally noticed the "powerhouse never actually wins the generation" rule. It only took them about thirty years. I wonder how long it'll take Sony and Microsoft to notice it.


8th home console (or 12th if you count all 5 systems in the Color TV Game generation)

1977 Nintendo Color TV Game series
1980 Nintendo Computer TV Game
1983 Famicom/NES
1990 Super Famicom/SNES
1996 N64
2001 Gamecube
2006 Wii
2012 Wii U

Well, that's interesting. The Wikipedia article on the second generation does not cover the "Computer TV Game", but it obviously seems to have existed from other accounts.

Quick! Somebody who isn't me fix this travesty of history!
 

HylianTom

Banned
I personally don't expect too much in the way of details on the gpu and cpu. It seems that the idea of focusing their marketing of some aspect of the system rather than computational strength is the Iwata Way. This doesn't mean they won't make super powerful systems, but it does mean that they finally noticed the "powerhouse never actually wins the generation" rule. It only took them about thirty years. I wonder how long it'll take Sony and Microsoft to notice it.

Even if Sony doesn't notice this rule, something tells me that in order to increase their chances of good financial health, they'll take a more Nintendo-like path this time around. And it'll divide their core base of fans like nothing else.
 

udivision

Member
people think it'll actually be that strong?

I don't. That's how they're going they're still going to make money per console, have the console be reasonably priced, and have the console comparable to current gen offerings. I wont' be surprised if it's weaker than the HD Twins.


Enough of this spec-ulation.

Let's speculate about Zelda or something

;)
You owe me $5 for that. And discussing Zelda, Pokemon or even 2D Mario is just as bad.
 

BY2K

Membero Americo
If it's A Link to the Past remake or sequel I will flip the fuck out.

No remakes. Aonuma (or was it Miyamoto) said it wouldn't be right to release 2 remakes back-to-back before making an original one.

(And the next remake is most likely going to be Majora's Mask 3D.)
 

AGITΩ

Member
Long time lurker to this series of thread, since before I was a member, and the console rumor threads since pre-e3 last year.

The thing about the WiiU I hope they do correctly is Advertise it right, especially if they decide to keep the name. A good 50% of customers I get into my Gaming Department at Best Buy are casual consumers (casual in the sense of, they only play a system a couple of times, get a few games.). Surprisingly, the majority of them do know about the WiiU, but I've had to clear up misconceptions. A lot still believe its either

A - A Handheld device

B - An added Controller to the Wii to Make it HD

C - Just an accessory to the Wii, not even HD capabilities

And given how they advertised it at E3 last year, thats exactly the message a lot of people got.

On my end, I would really hope that they would change the form factor of the Console though. As to no be too Similar to the Wii. I would actually like them to do different light indicators for the Tray light. Similar to the notification light on the 3DS. Tray glows orange when a Friend comes online, Blue when theres an update, Green when a friend sends a message. Since I doubt they'll go out there with colors, I would prefer black over white for the System/Controller. Mainly for the controller, because the sensor bar portion looks too out there.

When it comes to price, I like speculating with customers and have actually gotten some decent feedback from the casual consumers. Now I speculate with them a $299-399 price tag with $349 as the sweet spot. They see nothing wrong with that price and say its actually a good deal. Consider it this way, they know its a game system, but are big on the tablet market as well. On average, tablets cost in the $299-$399 range. You price a Game system with a tablet style controller that could potentially have its own apps, stream videos, browse the web, play Wii games and the new WiiU games and have access to a virtual console library? Consumers do see it as a good price.

Will it be impacted by PS3 and 360 if they go down in price? Not as much as most of us think. These casual consumers see "new" as better and also longevity. Most are aware PS3 and 360 have been out for 6-7 years and are probably on their way out as well. Although some will buy because of price, most wont buy because its been out a while.

When it comes to digital download prices set by retailers, I see this as helping us out. Since a lot of people are saying retail gaming is on its way out, at least this keeps us afloat and drives competition.

Just my 2 cents from the Retail front.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom