• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

DF/Eurogamer: First Xbox 3 Devkit leaks, 8 Core Intel CPU, nvidia GPU, 8-12GB RAM

cyberheater

PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 Xbone PS4 PS4

derFeef

Member
All true, but saying devkits have double the amount of ram still today is mad. Was true when ram still was 512mb maybe, but now it's really much more if you go double. I can see them having 12gb in devkit, 8gb in retail (wildly optimistic for sure), or 8gb in devkit, 6gb in retail.

(incl vram)
 

Grim1ock

Banned
Nobody will use XDR ever again. Little benefit and way too expensive. There's a reason IBM threw that shit out as soon as possible.

without XDR RAM the cell processor in the ps3 would have been ineffectual due severe memory bottlenecks and latency. There's no point in having a super fast processor wihtout a memory system that is fast enough to take advantage.


The faster the memory, the better it is
 
That's wildly optimistic. Not even high-end PC games use more than 4GB.

The rumours say 8 GB. But what I meant with my 'No', is that just beacause the 360 Dev Kits have twice memory than retail it doesn't mean the next xbox will follow the same rule.

8 GB would be a problem regarding multiplatform titles if PS4 doesn't approach.

Also, other rumours suggest that Durango's ram speed will be slower than PS4's.
 

cyberheater

PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 Xbone PS4 PS4
Just asking,how much ram did high end pc games use in 2005?

I don't know but a pretty good system would have had 1Gb main memory and a 256Mb graphics card.
 

adelante

Member
Let's not forget the new console is rumored to have media features running in the background (dvr functionality for eg) so ram wouldn't be just for games.
 
People saying 8 gig is too much.
Remember these system probably will be on the market for 6~8 years before the new NExt gen arrives. And frostbite with the new MOH will not even support 32 bit os.
 

JaseC

gave away the keys to the kingdom.
Let's not forget the new console is rumored to have media features running in the background (dvr functionality for eg) so ram wouldn't be just for games.

Yeah, I suspect a significant chunk of it will be reserved for the OS. 6GB total, with a 4GB/2GB split (free/reserved), maybe?
 

GavinGT

Banned
All true, but saying devkits have double the amount of ram still today is mad. Was true when ram still was 512mb maybe, but now it's really much more if you go double. I can see them having 12gb in devkit, 8gb in retail (wildly optimistic for sure), or 8gb in devkit, 6gb in retail.

(incl vram)

They're charging thousands of dollars for them, and the extra RAM is certainly welcome to test out unoptimized code, so I don't think double the RAM would be unrealistic.

That said, I think 4 GB is the sweet spot for retail consoles next gen. Even if PC hardware moves past 4 GB, consoles will still make do.
 

Triple U

Banned
All true, but saying devkits have double the amount of ram still today is mad. Was true when ram still was 512mb maybe, but now it's really much more if you go double. I can see them having 12gb in devkit, 8gb in retail (wildly optimistic for sure), or 8gb in devkit, 6gb in retail.

(incl vram)
I don't see why you say that. Most of this is more than likely DDR which is dirt cheap. I doubt this is GDDR5 or something.

You really need that buffer to profile and debug.

They're charging thousands of dollars for them, and the extra RAM is certainly welcome to test out unoptimized code, so I don't think double the RAM would be unrealistic.

That said, I think 4 GB is the sweet spot for retail consoles next gen. Even if PC hardware moves past 4 GB, consoles will still make do.
this too
 

BlazinAm

Junior Member
Wait don't devs use Visual Studio on current Xbox games it doesn't suggest anything about the chipsets inside at all.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
Wouldn't this be outrageously expensive if true?
 

1-D_FTW

Member
YES it is, especially after people around here have been swearing AMD up and down.

Intel is even stranger.

Considering Intel makes the best CPUs hands down, it's a very pleasant surprise if actually true. Especially considering how things ended with MS and Intel/Nvidia with Xbox 1.

People just need to keep in mind, however, Digital Foundry wasn't able to get anyone on record to confirm this part of the story.
 

Triple U

Banned
Wouldn't this be outrageously expensive if true?
I don't see how you could say this. We still don't know a lot about this system. Alpha kits don't really have the custom parts.
Wait don't devs use Visual Studio on current Xbox games it doesn't suggest anything about the chipsets inside at all.

Its taken from the kit itself. The include statement is what gives us the clue.
 

Grim1ock

Banned

You're missing the point i was trying to make. XDR was necessary at the time because it was the fastest available memory capable of working with the cell. There's a reason why sony paid loads of money to RAMBUS

And if and that's a big if sony decides to go with their own propiertary processor like the cell again for the playstation 4 then it would mean XDR 2 in the pipeline

PS XDR RAM is rambus developed not IBM
 

S1kkZ

Member
I wonder if MS leave it flexible, so if a developer does not need that feature, they can switch it off to gain extra memory?

i hope so. as long as they dont make kinect/media features mandatory for every game...
cant wait to play halo 5, watch a youtube video and twitter at the same time!
 

Enlil

Member
didn't Microsoft do much better saleswise compared to Sony? So they might invest in a much more powerfull system than Sony.

It's obvious they are moving more towards PC. With all the community things and connectivity these console are basicly PC's.

Wouldn't suprise me if you would be able to upgrade the CPU or GPU in the future. these 5-10 years console with old graphics and cpu should be thing of the past.
 

GavinGT

Banned
didn't Microsoft do much better saleswise compared to Sony? So they might invest in a much more powerfull system than Sony.

It's obvious they are moving more towards PC. With all the community things and connectivity these console are basicly PC's.

Wouldn't suprise me if you would be able to upgrade the CPU or GPU in teh future. these 5-10 years console with old graphics and cpu should be thing of the past.

Welcome to NeoGAF. Your informed opinions will be highly valued here.
 

Raide

Member
i hope so. as long as they dont make kinect/media features mandatory for every game...
cant wait to play halo 5, watch a youtube video and twitter at the same time!

A more featured and accurate Kinect would actually be pretty awesome. Most of the issues people have with it now is due to its accuracy. I hope they do push the tech, since it could lead to some genuinely cool ideas but I also hope they leave it open to Developers to choose and not force them to add it.

I also hope they open the system up to more Community Created Content. Need to design me some skateboards!
 

Satchel

Banned
A more featured and accurate Kinect would actually be pretty awesome. Most of the issues people have with it now is due to its accuracy. I hope they do push the tech, since it could lead to some genuinely cool ideas but I also hope they leave it open to Developers to choose and not force them to add it.

I also hope they open the system up to more Community Created Content. Need to design me some skateboards!

If Kinect 2.0 kept the processor on board, used a camera with at least 720p resolution and the console had at least 4-6GB of RAM Kinect games would be fucking amazing next gen.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
I don't see how you could say this. We still don't know a lot about this system. Alpha kits don't really have the custom.

Just checking--saw people talking about "top of the line GPU at release."
 

Triple U

Banned
Considering Intel makes the best CPUs hands down, it's a very pleasant surprise if actually true. Especially considering how things ended with MS and Intel/Nvidia with Xbox 1.

People just need to keep in mind, however, Digital Foundry wasn't able to get anyone on record to confirm this part of the story.

I wouldn't say Intel makes the best Cpu's for the dedicated gaming space.

Also this DaE guy obviously has connections, I don't see a reason to doubt him yet.
 
didn't Microsoft do much better saleswise compared to Sony? So they might invest in a much more powerfull system than Sony.

It's obvious they are moving more towards PC. With all the community things and connectivity these console are basicly PC's.

Wouldn't suprise me if you would be able to upgrade the CPU or GPU in the future. these 5-10 years console with old graphics and cpu should be thing of the past.

Nah dont think they will allow us to upgrade.
The mass market is too stupid or doesn't have the knowledge to do it.
 

S1kkZ

Member
A more featured and accurate Kinect would actually be pretty awesome. Most of the issues people have with it now is due to its accuracy. I hope they do push the tech, since it could lead to some genuinely cool ideas but I also hope they leave it open to Developers to choose and not force them to add it.

I also hope they open the system up to more Community Created Content. Need to design me some skateboards!

i think an improved kinect could be awesome, but please: not at launch and not at the cost of more powerful hardware. launch the new console, introduce kinect 2.0 with the first big price-drop.
 

Raide

Member
If Kinect 2.0 kept the processor on board, used a camera with at least 720p resolution and the console had at least 4-6GB of RAM Kinect games would be fucking amazing next gen.

Kinect did well so late in this Gen, so I do hope they put some effort into it for next-gen, without sacrificing the rest of the system. They can appeal to "casual" and "hardcore" if they really want to.


i think an improved kinect could be awesome, but please: not at launch and not at the cost of more powerful hardware. launch the new console, introduce kinect 2.0 with the first big price-drop.


Good point. I hope the system is cheaper due to not coming with Kinect off the bat but how long after launch do you announce Kinect 2? Or will they push it out with Kinect 1 and upgrade it later?
 

Haunted

Member
At the very least, the x86 nature of the leaked Visual Studio shot is intriguing - in combination with the AMD rumours swirling around PlayStation 4, there's the very strong suggestion that the era of custom console hardware is now very much a thing of the past. Licensing revised versions of existing architecture - exactly as Sony did with PlayStation Vita - appears to be the most efficient way of getting the most powerful consoles without breaking the bank in terms of R&D. In a world where many blame consoles for the decline in PC gaming, it would be richly ironic if the next-gen platforms from Microsoft and Sony were based almost exclusively on PC technology...
PC gaming is eternal.


That said, going with "stock" PC parts means that it'll be incredibly difficult for consoles to keep up the usual 5+ years cycle as they'll appear obsolete even faster than before. Figuring out ways to take advantage of the custom console architecture was always an inherent advantage (since it meant developers were spending more time getting familiar with the architecture and in turn, they were able to improve on the same hardware basis for a longer time).

Well, we'll see.

I say everyone goes third party and makes games on the Steam box Splorgenborg.
 
Top Bottom