• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Remedy : Next-Gen consoles are a quantum leap

Is this pre-rendered in engine? If it's real-time, then it's impressive. Otherwise, not really.

It's real time but it's a cam recording, and ofc, a gif, so it'll look better. Also the game seems to be running at sub30 fps. Still, it is quite impressive texture work and modelling.
 

derExperte

Member
So you're saying the vast majority of PC gamers WILL be able to run PS4 and 720 games at the same fidelity when said consoles release?

Define "vast majority". Majority of what? Everyone that plays games on PC? Seeing as there are hundereds of millions of those you're right. But looking at and comparing absolute numbers I wouldn't be so sure, especially at the end of next year.

Edit: And while talking about how "disingenuous" the high-end PC argument is because oh so few people have one we shouldn't forget that the new consoles won't be cheap either and suddenly materialize under everyones TVs.
 

Reiko

Banned
You mean Stuburns answer shared your point of view on how PCs always win and mine doesn't?

Not being a console means ALOT on the subject of this thread about, you know, CONSOLES.

Yes, the PC is a gaming platform, and a good one at that, but it isn't a console, some people don't want to buy PCs, they want to buy consoles, they want to buy a system that doesn't require upgrades, where games released for it will always work well without configuration, where they have a company behind that console that develops great games, or simply because they're freaking fanboys, it doesn't matter whatever reasoning is behind them.



So you're saying the vast majority of PC gamers WILL be able to run PS4 and 720 games at the same fidelity when said consoles release?

You are delusional.



lol, that's just a small section, there's an entire city area behind her.

An entire city that's nowhere as detailed as her. That's not next gen... That's compromise.
 

tkscz

Member
8 core intel,
8 GB of system ram
dual gpu

obviously if every individual key tech rumors are to be believed.

I still think the PS4 is going to come out a year later with the leap that we're all waiting for. 2014 is when the new microprocessor techs, 3d transistors, stacked memory, etc really gets kicked off.

I wouldn't say we all. I'm not waiting for anything. I just want fun games, that's it. Could careless about high-end hardware as I doubt it would really make gameplay more exciting. I could very well be wrong, as the tech of this gen brought me games like Left 4 Dead and Dead Rising.
 
Define "vast majority". Majority of what? Everyone that plays games on PC? Seeing as there are hundereds of millions of those you're right. But looking at and comparing absolute numbers I wouldn't be so sure, especially at the end of next year.

Vast majority = 50%+


And no, I'm obviously not even considering facebook/popcap gamers.


An entire city that's nowhere as detailed as her. That's not next gen... That's compromise.
Ofcourse it's not next gen, it's current gen. It's on PS3.

And there's nothing wrong with the city btw.
 

Reiko

Banned
Vast majority = 50%+


And no, I'm obviously not even considering facebook gamers.



Ofcourse it's not next gen, it's current gen. It's on PS3.

And there's nothing wrong with the city btw.

It doesn't look even with the fidelity of the character models.

Look at Uncharted 2/3. The characters and the environments are at the same fidelity.
 

Teletraan1

Banned
For all the budget experts in this thread. What is the total cost involved with having to squeeze these games onto these current consoles with all of the limitations they present. How many dev hours are spent optimizing for these archaic boxes from 2005. The devs thought bigger than the box this gen constantly. A quick look at the shitty frame rates, smeared textures and overall piss poor IQ will give you a clue on that.

IMO the smart, budget conscious devs are going to release games with a similar structure as the games we have now but with a decent IQ and no extra effort. In fact it should be less effort since you aren't trying to shoe horn a game into less than 512mb ram.

I think there will be standout graphical showcases if you want to dump a shitload of money at something but the average dev house shouldn't incur much extra cost.
 

Pranay

Member
Lots of graphics cards are going to struggle once next gen arrives.

Buying a mid tier card is quite useless in the first 3 years of next gen system.

Ill gladly stick with consoles for all the games and im sure their will be many.

The only good time to have a PC upgrade is genreally at the end where i get to play most games @ 60 fps easily.
 
I'm not sure that people should be using that GIF.

Unless I'm just stupid it looks like someone has significantly touched it up in some image program.
 

Sentenza

Member
I don't believe you.
Bad luck for you because you're wrong, then.
I bought that PC in december 2004 to play World of Warcraft and I kept it until December 2007 (when I bought the one I'm using now and that I'm planning to change this autumn).
I used it to play God of Wars, Oblivion, etc as soon as they came out for PC, and I used to play at 1680x1050.

I wasn't maxing the shit out of these games, sure, but it was more than enough to leave a 360 behind.
 
Its not that next gen consoles are weak, its that modern gpus have become powerful power hungry monsters...The top of the range stuff is powerful, but the energy demands are ridiculous.

I think next gen console tech next gen will be plenty powerful enough to output insane visuals, and it will come down to dev effort. Of course PCs with powerful gpus are capable of more impressive visuals, but at the end of the day it comes down to the devs. In the first couple of years of next gen, devs will be targetting consoles. I doubt much effort will be made to optimize games heavily to the most powerful gpus...
 

Pranay

Member
Bad luck for you because you're wrong, then.
I bought that PC in december 2004 to play World of Warcraft and I kept it until December 2007 (when I bought the one I'm using now and that I'm planning to change this autumn).
I used it to play God of Wars, Oblivion, etc as soon as they came out for PC, and I used to play at 1680x1050.

I wasn't maxing the shit out of these games, sure, but it was more than enough to leave a 360 behind.

The PC you made at 2004. will it leave behind 360 @ 2012/2013 ?
 
It's an off screen cam recording, but there's no touchups. That was recorded from a live demo iirc.

Just looking at the GIF in Gimp though. Is that how every GIFed vid looks? Like someone cut the character from the background? I would have thought a GIF from a video would only take the frames from the video to make up the GIF. Instead of separating character from background.
 

StuBurns

Banned
Bad luck for you because you're wrong, then.
I bought that PC in december 2004 to play World of Warcraft and I kept it until December 2007 (when I bought the one I'm using now and that I'm planning to change this autumn).
I used it to play God of Wars, Oblivion, etc as soon as they came out for PC, and I used to play at 1680x1050.

I wasn't maxing the shit out of these games, sure, but it was more than enough to leave a 360 behind.
God of War? I find that hard to believe.
 

Pranay

Member
Just looking at the GIF in Gimp though. Is that how every GIFed vid looks? Like someone cut the character from the background? I would have thought a GIF from a video would only take the frames from the video to make up the GIF. Instead of separating character from background.

I guess you should rather check out the video ?
 
I guess you should rather check out the video ?

I wouldn't be able to see the individual frames or layers. And that still doesn't make sense. The video itself might have been realtime, but I'd wager that GIF has been touched up. Again there's no congruity. Some frames are just of the character with no background, others feature the character and the background.
 
Just looking at the GIF in Gimp though. Is that how every GIFed vid looks? Like someone cut the character from the background? I would have thought a GIF from a video would only take the frames from the video to make up the GIF. Instead of separating character from background.

It's a scene where she looks up to the "spirit" (or whatever it is) and starts talking to it. I don't think there's been any cutting at all.



Bad luck for you because you're wrong, then.
I bought that PC in december 2004 to play World of Warcraft and I kept it until December 2007 (when I bought the one I'm using now and that I'm planning to change this autumn).
I used it to play God of Wars, Oblivion, etc as soon as they came out for PC, and I used to play at 1680x1050.

I wasn't maxing the shit out of these games, sure, but it was more than enough to leave a 360 behind.
Still don't believe you.

What were the specs?
 

Sentenza

Member
The PC you made at 2004. will it leave behind 360 @ 2012/2013 ?
Hardly. While it was roughly comparable as hardware, since these early days many console developers went from using general APIs to coding on metal to squeeze the shit out of these platforms.


God of War? I find that hard to believe.
Not sure why. It wasn't even particularly demanding, unlike Oblivion.
 

tkscz

Member
Hardly. While it was roughly comparable as hardware, since these early days many console developers went from using general APIs to coding on metal to squeeze the shit out of these platforms.



Not sure why. It wasn't even particularly demanding, unlike Oblivion.

God of war is not on PC.
 

Hoo-doo

Banned
Hardly. While it was roughly comparable as hardware, since these early days many console developers went from using general APIs to coding on metal to squeeze the shit out of these platforms.



Not sure why. It wasn't even particularly demanding, unlike Oblivion.

God of War?

You mean with this guy?

kratos5.jpg
 

StevieP

Banned
No-one is denying this. But people aren't allowed to care about what hardware they are purchasing, unless it's extremely high-end and sitting in a black tower underneath a desk? Come the fuck on.

Just stop shitting on people from on top of your high horse, acting like the PC is the end-all-be-all of videogaming.
In graphics, it currently is, but for a lot of other things, naaaaaah.

This is one of my 2 high-end gaming rigs:
gaminghtpce0ky8.jpg


Note that it is not my photo, but mine looks EXACTLY like that (same case, same place in the rack, etc). It's a fully loaded Sandy Bridge rig w/2xATI 7850s and a 700w PS. It is plugged into my entertainment center via a single HDMI cable, and is accessorized by the multiple of these things:

Using-Xbox-360-Controller-For-Pc.jpg

logitech_rumblepad_2.jpg


wiimote_with_wii_nunchuck_controller_1__84539.jpg


And of course this (on a lapboard or a stand, depending on my mood and the game):
14449.png



Despite the fact that my other gaming rig is slightly higher end, I do most of my gaming on my comfy couch at 1080p on a 120" screen, and it's not on a cramped desk with a little black tower (which, incidentally, is what the Durango dev kit looks like lol).

What's my point? That particular argument is dated.
Do most people have desktop PCs that are better than the next gen consoles? (i.e. mid-end gaming PC) No. Will they? Probably not - most people are unfortunately migrating to inferior computing devices (laptops, even tablets - yuck). Will the purchase of a PS4 yield them with a better hardware/GPU than their shitty Macbook Air? Absolutely.

But what I believe that Thunder Monkey is trying to say is that it wouldn't be prudent of them to claim anything ultra high-end about it.
For reference, btw - the APIs that are being used in future aren't going to be as down-to-the-metal as previous console generations.
 

Hoo-doo

Banned
Note that it is not my photo, but mine looks EXACTLY like that (same case, same place in the rack, etc). It's a fully loaded Sandy Bridge rig w/2xATI 7850s and a 700w PS. It is plugged into my entertainment center via a single HDMI cable, and is accessorized by the multiple of these things:




On a lapboard or a stand, depending on my mood and the game.

Despite the fact that my other gaming rig is slightly higher end, I do most of my gaming on my comfy couch at 1080p on a 120" screen, and it's not on a cramped desk with a little black tower (which, incidentally, is what the Durango dev kit looks like lol).

What's my point? That particular argument is dated.
Do most people have desktop PCs that are better than the next gen consoles? (i.e. mid-end gaming PC) No. Will they? Probably not - most people are unfortunately migrating to inferior computing devices (laptops, even tablets - yuck). Will the purchase of a PS4 yield them with a better hardware/GPU than their shitty Macbook Air? Absolutely.

But what I believe that Thunder Monkey is trying to say is that it wouldn't be prudent of them to claim anything ultra high-end about it.

This is indeed great. I have my gaming PC hooked to my living room TV as well and enjoy many games that way.

I'm just not fond of the "it's not going to be better than PC so nobody is allowed to care how powerful it is" attitude.
 

derExperte

Member
You're right, which only makes it even more unlikely.

Don't forget who wrote what. Nobody claimed the "vast majority of PC gamers will be able to...", you wrote that but there are a few steps between that and "overwhelmingly vast majority of PC gamers won't be able to...".
 
This is what I mean:
51Kct.gif


That's a frame taken from that GIF up there. Almost all of the 186 frames look similar.

I just thought that was very strange, and wanted to know if it's common for a GIF of a video to do that.
 
Top Bottom