I'm ready for the next-gen!
I'm mean the Wii U from the PS3/360 isn't a SD to HD jump like the Xbox and Xbox 360, we already know the Wii U can use DX10 and possibly DX11 from more improved dev kits, the Wii U's ram is 3-4x more than the Xbox 360's ram, the Wii U is using a Radeon HD GPU rumored to be Radeon E6760.
From reliable sources on NeoGAF the WiiU/PS4/720 uses similar architecture.
Yeah but that's the same for the PS4 and Xbox 720 as well.
The Zelda and Bird tech demo.
Well, technically a quantum isnt defined to any fixed amount, that is true. But a quantum leap is usually used when there is a large step forward.No idea why anyone is excited to hear this.
Quanta is the absolute minimum amount of any physical entity.
A quantum leap forward is pretty discouraging. Hope they're just referring to the Wii U.
No idea why anyone is excited to hear this.
Quanta is the absolute minimum amount of any physical entity.
A quantum leap forward is pretty discouraging. Hope they're just referring to the Wii U.
Well, technically a quantum isnt defined to any fixed amount, that is true. But a quantum leap is usually used when there is a large step forward.
Depends on what the developers do. More hardware doesnt limit their abilities, quite the opposite in fact.Leap in fun and gameplay right? ... right?
Hehe =)Hey, stop ruining other people's fun .
No idea why anyone is excited to hear this.
Quanta is the absolute minimum amount of any physical entity.
A quantum leap forward is pretty discouraging. Hope they're just referring to the Wii U.
Edit: Beaten like a red headed step child
Awesome news. Bring it on. I don't mind paying $599+ and $80+ games. Not joking. I want the top secret tessellated toad level stuff in all games.
I honestly do think we'll see games on the Wii-U that exceed current gen offerings, but I don't believe the jump will be that large at all.
ITT: Everybody plays dumb like they don't know what Remedy means when they say Quantum Leap.
But the Wii U Speculation Thread Team told us 720 and PS4 wouldn't be that big of a leap. Who to believe?
Awesome news. Bring it on. I don't mind paying $599+ and $80+ games. Not joking. I want the top secret tessellated toad level stuff in all games.
Absolutely I would. Especially if the publishers keep pairing down and reducing the total number of releases a year.I almost feel you are trolling. Seriously GAF, who would pay $80+ for games?
Generally I just laugh because you could build a PC much more powerful than the PS4 last year.But the Wii U Speculation Thread Team told us 720 and PS4 wouldn't be that big of a leap. Who to believe?
Absolutely I would. Especially if the publishers keep pairing down and reducing the total number of releases a year.
If there was only one major release a month, I'd pay $100 for a game, no question.
Absolutely I would. Especially if the publishers keep pairing down and reducing the total number of releases a year.
If there was only one major release a month, I'd pay $100 for a game, no question.
ITT: Everybody plays dumb like they don't know what Remedy means when they say Quantum Leap.
I almost feel you are trolling. Seriously GAF, who would pay $80+ for games?
Keep on living in that bubble. Watch gaming slowly die because you want to see better textures, and other shit.
It's kind of sad really.
quantum means really really really small right?
Generally I just laugh because you could build a PC much more powerful than the PS4 last year.
Talking about purely theoretical capability. By the time it comes out powerhouse PC's will be so much more powerful as to be comical. First gen that happens as well.
Do we really want a boring gen like this? With two twins fighting over who got the best looking ports.
They is more to a game then just how it looks, it's not a out right win. Look at 3DS and Vita and PS1 and N64.
It's games that every one want will next gen. They is more to game design then looking nice and being more real.
Do we really want a boring gen like this? With two twins fighting over who got the best looking ports.
They is more to a game then just how it looks, it's not a out right win. Look at 3DS and Vita and PS1 and N64.
It's games that every one want will next gen. They is more to game design then looking nice and being more real.
I wish people would stop endlessly bringing up PC's in console threads. It's getting real old, real fast.
I am typing this on my gaming PC, by the way.
Some people just want a livingroom experience that is tightly connected to their friends, plays all their media, is extremely easy to use, uses a controller, offers local co-op and has all of the console exclusive games.
Get over it.
Do we really want a boring gen like this? With two twins fighting over who got the best looking ports.
They is more to a game then just how it looks, it's not a out right win. Look at 3DS and Vita and PS1 and N64.
It's games that every one want will next gen. They is more to game design then looking nice and being more real.
Absolutely I would. Especially if the publishers keep pairing down and reducing the total number of releases a year.
If there was only one major release a month, I'd pay $100 for a game, no question.
It's going to happen anyway. Games don't sell well enough to cover costs now aside from a lucky few. Those lucky few are expected to offset the losses by every other game. Soon enough those lucky few won't be able to cover their own costs.
Why would i even want a next gen if there weren't going to be a power leap? Also if you want small quirky games, this gen had a TON of them with XBLA, PSN, Steam and such.
Leap in fun and gameplay right? ... right?
I'm not a PC gamer generally.
I just find it funny that people are worrying about hardware power of consoles in an era they can't compete with PC's. The only way a console will be on even ground with cutting edge PC's in this era?
By being a PC.
According to some, they are willing to get gouged and alienate an enormous part of the audience that buys games. All for better graphics and hardware. I'd go as far as calling elitist, but I don't want to start something else.
Yeah but that still doesn't answer my question: Why would i want to buy another piece of HW that doesn't improve over my Ps360? Why wouldn't i just stay with those two and call it a day?Because there will come a point where it can't be maintained. Expectations of "next-gen" leaps are already far exceeding the capability of tech. Not to say the tech hasn't advanced well beyond, just saying that consoles have too small of a TDP to realistically keep up.
No-one is denying this. But people aren't allowed to care about what hardware they are purchasing, unless it's extremely high-end and sitting in a black tower underneath a desk? Come the fuck on.
Just stop shitting on people from on top of your high horse, acting like the PC is the end-all-be-all of videogaming.
In graphics, it currently is, but for a lot of other things, naaaaaah.
No-one is denying this. But people aren't allowed to care about what hardware they are purchasing, unless it's extremely high-end and sitting in a black tower underneath a desk? Come the fuck on.
Just stop shitting on people from on top of your high horse, acting like the PC is the end-all-be-all of videogaming.
In graphics, it currently is, but for a lot of other things, naaaaaah.
I wonder where the people are that said that the next gen consoles won't be powerful at all and that they all will go the wii way/cheap way
Leap in fun and gameplay right? ... right?
I'm not a PC gamer generally.
I just find it funny that people are worrying about hardware power of consoles in an era they can't compete with PC's. The only way a console will be on even ground with cutting edge PC's in this era?
By being a PC.
You are getting strangely defensive for nothing dude. Chill out, no one has denied consoles have their advantages as well.
Well, I am a PC gamer. And I'm "worried about the hardware power of consoles" because if they all went the Wii U route multiplatform games would be stuck at a 2008 power level for the next 6 years. I'd rather be stuck at 2011.I'm not a PC gamer generally.
I just find it funny that people are worrying about hardware power of consoles in an era they can't compete with PC's. The only way a console will be on even ground with cutting edge PC's in this era?
By being a PC.
Not really, game sales haven't decreased with price hikes. CoD is selling twenty million copies every year like clockwork. Seemingly, as many people can afford to game now as ever.Keep on living in that bubble. Watch gaming slowly die because you want to see better textures, and other shit. It's like you're ignoring the average consumer who doesn't have money to blow on the 60 dollar games NOW. Let alone 1 fucking hundred.
It's kind of sad really.
I'm not a PC gamer generally.
I just find it funny that people are worrying about hardware power of consoles in an era they can't compete with PC's. The only way a console will be on even ground with cutting edge PC's in this era?
By being a PC.
How are you getting irritated at me for saying the truth?No-one is denying this. But people aren't allowed to care about what hardware they are purchasing, unless it's extremely high-end and sitting in a black tower underneath a desk? Come the fuck on.
Just stop shitting on people from on top of your high horse, acting like the PC is the end-all-be-all of videogaming.
In graphics, it currently is, but for a lot of other things, naaaaaah.