• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

ZombiU |OT| Zombi Emergency! WiiU WiiU WiiU WiiU

Grakl

Member
A 4.5 is a total burial of the game. That's what surprises me the most, a 4.5 out of 10? That's just brutal. If it was a ~6-7 you could say oh it's probably not that bad but a 4.5 is a dagger and rarely seen for very high profile & hyped games outside of Edge.

Gamespot is the new Edge confirmed.
 

cyberheater

PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 Xbone PS4 PS4
Wow, 4.5 - I played it for 6 hours yesterday, and the room was packed throughout.

The game does not deserve a 4.5. Wait for more reviews, because they will NOT be 4.5. That is just awful and totally unrepresentative.

Brutal. I just can't see it being that bad.
 

D-e-f-

Banned
Honestly I think Darksiders 2 is a better deal to get than ZombiU, its not a Zelda but it seems to be a good game and the WiiU version will have all dlc s available

It all depends on what kind of game you're interested in. I personally don't care what any of the reviews say, I'll buy the game regardless since I'm generally interested in the premise and want to see for myself if they pulled off what they were going for. All the various very long video walkthroughs sold me on the game and pretty much guaranteed me a certain minimum amount of enjoyment from the game that makes it worth it. If you don't care for slow paced gameplay that's not focused on action then you probably knew you weren't gonna like ZombiU from the get-go.

That said, I've been holding out for the Wii U version of Darksiders 2 so I'll get that eventually as well.

Probably because that's not a criteria for giving--as close to as possible--an unbiased, objective review. If a reviewer absolutely hates a specific genre, then they are supposed to get someone else to review it.

There's no such thing as an unbiased review.
 
Kind of doubt it's just that considering Gamespot was in love with Demon's Souls. They gave Skyward Sword a 7.5 due to it "being the same old thing" too.



Probably because that's not a criteria for giving--as close to as possible--an unbiased, objective review. If a reviewer absolutely hates a specific genre, then they are supposed to get someone else to review it.
Demons souls is completely old school. It's a hardcore old school game done right in 3d.
Skyward sword does have all the wiimote stuff that's new.
 
Gamespot is the new Edge confirmed.

I actually wouldn't be surprised if it's a typo and was supposed to be 6.5. The review was mistakenly put up. But then you read the text and he's listing fairly detailed criticisms of the game throughout the entirety of the review until the last paragraph which praises the local multi. Still seems kinda harsh.
 

Hiltz

Member
Yikes! That's a mighty low review score from GameSpot. I have been looking forward to ZombiU, but remained skeptical about the overall quality of the game. This is largely due to whether the GamePad's various uses end up being more intrusive and gimmicky than clever and fun. It would naturally difficult to trust Ubisoft's capability to deliver good quality next-gen launch titles. I doubt the graphics and story are going to impress, but at least it's good to hear the controls have been significantly fine tuned according to IGN comment last week. Hopefully, the rest of ZombiU will be well designed and polished.
 
Thread is about to get epic.

ibmRLyUaHf9Y22.jpg
 

D-e-f-

Banned
On the downside, they say that the endgame is a bit disappointing (gets a bit fetch-questy, apparently) and some of the later enemies start wearing body armour/running/exploding on contact, and can push the difficulty level slightly into unfair territory.

Pretty positive review all round though, and sounds like they really enjoyed the game.

Weird how that thing about the enemies seems to go in the exact opposite direction than the GS review.

What's new about it? It's an on rails shooter. I played it at Walmart and wasn't impressed at all : /

You're mistaking this for the Fable: The Journey thread :p

I actually wouldn't be surprised if it's a typo and was supposed to be 6.5. The review was mistakenly put up. But then you read the text and he's listing fairly detailed criticisms of the game throughout the entirety of the review until the last paragraph which praises the local multi. Still seems kinda harsh.

The video review has the 4.5 in it as well.
 

Kai Dracon

Writing a dinosaur space opera symphony
There's no such thing as an unbiased review.

Which is a big part of the perceptual problem here.

Games are so expensive plus often require a time investment. We are drawn apart by conflicting forces.

We want to hear reviewers' opinions.

Yet we also want some kind of objective, Consumer Reports style product ranking before we spend a lot of money.

Movie reviews for example aren't placed under the same scrutiny as often, because it's relatively cheap, casual entertainment. Many people don't even bother to glance at a mainstream review before seeing a film. They watch a trailer and decide to fork over the seven bucks for a couple of hours.

So yes, no review is unbiased. Two different opinions can paint the same thing in diametrically opposed perspectives. Yet we want an objective product evaluation at the same time. So we get upset over reviews that conflict with our hopes or expectations.

The only real comment I have on the Gamespot review is that 4.5 is pretty brutal by the standards the press applies to a 100 point scale currently. To be honest, all hopes about the game aside, I'd be rather skeptical that the game is so objectively bad it deserves that, even if you dislike it out of taste.

The Edge score and summary sounds more in line with what I've been expecting, based on everything I've seen, and all hands-on I've read about.
 

guek

Banned
Wow, 4.5 - I played it for 6 hours yesterday, and the room was packed throughout.

The game does not deserve a 4.5. Wait for more reviews, because they will NOT be 4.5. That is just awful and totally unrepresentative.

This seems to be the more along the feedback we've been getting via tweets, etc.. Gamespot is presently an outlier among an admittedly narrow range of impressions.
 

Glass Joe

Member
True, still it is ONE review. ONE! And is his opinion more valid than other reviewers? Also, I love the idea of having to look at the gamepad now and again. Builds tension: keeping an eye out for supplies AND zombies too. I think however some people will not like this feature much.

A lot of it has to do with the timing of the leaked review. Other than a blurb review from an official Nintendo magazine, this is the only review we have to go on. When the first review is 4.5, ya have to think the game is pretty crap. 4.5 doesn't sound like a good but flawed game, it sounds like a total cluster. That's why these good reviews peeking out have me confused. I cancelled my preorder but I want the game to be awesome. I'll check IGN etc tomorrow before picking up my U to see if I'm getting some Zombi action after all. If they give it something in the high 7's or above and the review text appeals to me, I'll still bite.
 
I read the review and IMO, the reviewer is being harsh and biased with this review. ZumbiU, might have flaws, but from what he said, it's nowhere near a 4.5 game. He omitted a lot of information regarding the game, specially the online mode. Yet, he said the online is good, so pretty much, this is a single-player online review for a game that have strong focus on online multiplayer. Like saying Battlefield 3 sucks only because of the single player mode.
 
I read the review and IMO, the reviewer is being harsh and biased with this review. ZumbiU, might have flaws, but from what he said, it's nowhere near a 4.5 game. He omitted a lot of information regarding the game, specially the online mode. Yet, he said the online is good, so pretty much, this is a single-player online review for a game that have strong focus on online multiplayer. Like saying Battlefield 3 sucks only because of the single player mode.

I've got some bad news for ya -- there is no online multi-player.
 

MThanded

I Was There! Official L Receiver 2/12/2016
I read the review and IMO, the reviewer is being harsh and biased with this review. ZumbiU, might have flaws, but from what he said, it's nowhere near a 4.5 game. He omitted a lot of information regarding the game, specially the online mode. Yet, he said the online is good, so pretty much, this is a single-player online review for a game that have strong focus on online multiplayer. Like saying Battlefield 3 sucks only because of the single player mode.
Say what? Are you talking about the same game?
 

dochuge

Member
Actually according to this thread Edge gave it a 7 and a few others gave it 9+. So the gamespot review is the one that is deviating the most right now.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
I read the review and IMO, the reviewer is being harsh and biased with this review. ZumbiU, might have flaws, but from what he said, it's nowhere near a 4.5 game. He omitted a lot of information regarding the game, specially the online mode. Yet, he said the online is good, so pretty much, this is a single-player online review for a game that have strong focus on online multiplayer. Like saying Battlefield 3 sucks only because of the single player mode.


I'm waiting for ZumbaU, I heard it's compatible with the balance board
 

D-e-f-

Banned
A lot of it has to do with the timing of the leaked review. Other than a blurb review from an official Nintendo magazine, this is the only review we have to go on. When the first review is 4.5, ya have to think the game is pretty crap. 4.5 doesn't sound like a good but flawed game, it sounds like a total cluster. That's why these good reviews peeking out have me confused. I cancelled my preorder but I want the game to be awesome. I'll check IGN etc tomorrow before picking up my U to see if I'm getting some Zombi action after all. If they give it something in the high 7's or above and the review text appeals to me, I'll still bite.

And that's also where the actual text complaints don't really make it sound like a 4.5 when the only serious complaint is "boring" combat. No word about the game being broken or having serious issues other than narrative dissonance, the aforementioned boring combat and a general disinterest in the gamepad features while the multiplayer gets a lot of praise. how that amounts to a 4.5 with the word "poor" attached to it is beyond me.

There are various problems that could be cited that were apparent from the released footage and other reviews coming out but they aren't. So regardless if you care about the game or not, there should be some serious concerns regarding the quality of the review itself.
 

Teknoman

Member
Oh ubisoft. Feels like Red Steel all over again.

So basically its first person survival horror? Conserve ammo and weaponry, avoid what you can whenever possible, and dont get cocky.

EDIT: Constantly tapping to open a manhole is kinda dumb though. Should have at least mimicked opening one.
 

Sanctuary

Member
Yeah, I know there's no such thing as a 100% unbiased review, but Gamespot (as well as the old school EGM) used to give fairly accurate reviews, as far as my own tastes are concerned. They were nothing like IGN/Gamepro until later on, and the current Gamespot mostly sticks with what IGN does as far as scoring goes, with the very occasional outlier/oddball score just to make it seem like they aren't copying each other. Kevin is pretty much the only Gamespot reviewer that I listen to anymore from that site.

Edit: Actually just watched the video review. I'm not sure about a 4.5, but the repetitive nature and lame combat does make it seem that something around 6.0 is not too far off from reality. It doesn't matter how good a game looks if it's boring to play...

I haven't bothered with single review sites since 2006 or so, and use Gamerankings just like Rottentomatoes.

Movie reviews for example aren't placed under the same scrutiny as often, because it's relatively cheap, casual entertainment. Many people don't even bother to glance at a mainstream review before seeing a film. They watch a trailer and decide to fork over the seven bucks for a couple of hours.

I've been using Rottentomatoes since 1999. Unless it's a movie I had really been looking forward to, I won't go to see anything lower than a 75% at the theatre anymore (60% if I really wanted to see it). Even a rental, something on Netflix, or a download I typically won't bother with if it's sitting at the 25% territory--they usually are crap. I know what you're saying though, because none of my friends use review sites for anything. They usually just rely on me to do it for them.
 

NFreak

Member
Oh man that Gamespot review kind of worries me but it seems like all the reviewer wants throughout the video review is more action..... last I checked that's not exactly a staple of the survival horror genre. I'll pick up the game regardless but hopefully the game doesn't disappoint.
 
Oh man that Gamespot review kind of worries me but it seems like all the reviewer wants throughout the video review is more action..... last I checked that's not exactly a staple of the survival horror genre. I'll pick up the game regardless but hopefully the game doesn't disappoint.
The repetitive attack animations look like the pits. Especially without more melee variety.

They should have taken more notes from Dead Rising regarding melee options.
 
Top Bottom