• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

34,000 pieces of Wii U software were sold in the UK in January (incl. NintyLand)

ascii42

Member
360 had Oblivion and Ghost Recon within a few months of 2006. I thought the 360 launch was pretty decent to be honest. Condemned, PGR3, Amped 3, Ridge Racer 6, Call of Duty 2. Pretty rad in comparison to 3rd party ports of old games, a mini-game collection and another 2D Mario game.

This is true. As I recall, Obvlion came out in March.

Granted, the 360 did also have Tony Hawk and GUN, which were just up-resed PS2 games.
 

javac

Member
The Wii U is Gamecube 2.0, honestly. Nintendo's problem was that they mistook the Wii's success as them gaining a new core following of gamers, not seeing it as the casual fad it really was.

Basically its business as usual. And that's fine by me.
 

Madao

Member
the UK doesn't care about Nintendo anymore. nintendo should just quit that market.

(same way Microsoft should quit japan, right?)
 
I´m listening
Next generation means the next console in a line of consoles. Nothing more, nothing less. If you try to make it anything else "Next Gen" then you're leaving the definition of "Next Gen" up to personal opinion. Which is a pointless way to define something, because then the definition is constantly changing.
 

Daedardus

Member
People dont upgrade to a console when there is no compelling reason to do so.

Likewise, no one spending money when they have no compelling reason to do so.

There were a substantial amount of people who bought an iPhone 4S when they had an iPhone 4, a Gameboy Color when they had a Gameboy, a DSi when they had a Lite,...

I personally believe their marketing machine just flopped. Not that that is the only reason why it is doing badly, but big marketing budgets certainly do help.

There's just too much unawareness and confusion going round.
 
360 had Oblivion and Ghost Recon within a few months of 2006. I thought the 360 launch was pretty decent to be honest. Condemned, PGR3, Amped 3, Ridge Racer 6, Call of Duty 2. Pretty rad in comparison to 3rd party ports of old games, a mini-game collection and another 2D Mario game.
Kameo and PDZ were also both excellent launch titles.

Kameo is significantly better than any game on WiiU right now.
 

Pie and Beans

Look for me on the local news, I'll be the guy arrested for trying to burn down a Nintendo exec's house.
UK's whole video game market is tanking in comparison to other country in Europe tbh.

Normalising after Wii-mania sharper than other countries and 'gamers' are probably waiting for PS4 and 720. We'll see how that fares, but the blanket bomb excuses approach to trying to blame UK gaming market/economy doesnt make Nintendo's failure any less their fault.
 
Really poor. But just like the hardware's sales, it's completely down to the fact there's no compelling games to buy. One of the "big" exclusives ZombiU had little impact (which is surprising) and it's mainly just Mario holding those numbers up. With next to no games coming out over the Spring/Summer schedule, it's looking like a horrid 6 months to come from the platform and really little that Nintendo can do. They can't magically put out a Mario Kart/Mario 3D any time soon and really that's the only thing that can re-vitalise the console, coupled with a price drop. By then, there will be 2 new consoles on the market that will feel fresh and exciting, while the WiiU will be at the back shouting for attention.

But the 3DS stands out for me more I think. Considering it was the 2nd best selling hardware in the UK last year, the software sales are abysmal. And dropping further by quite a large % from last year as well. Added to the fact the majority of sales are just from Mario Kart and the 2 Mario's, the platform does not look healthy at all.
 
so does this

http://www.walmart.com/ip/VTech-InnoTab-2-Learning-App-Tablet/21007448

I bought that for my 2½ year old daughter... it costs 70$ in retail..

and this ... http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Techno+...mory/6913291.p?id=1218812710986&skuId=6913291

which is a little more expensive.,. 149$ in retail...

if they can make those (and others) pretty cheap, why can´t Nintendo..?

Does that have streaming tech that can stream any content from the TV with absolutely no-lag to the Gamepad? You realize how expensive that shit is?
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
so does this

http://www.walmart.com/ip/VTech-InnoTab-2-Learning-App-Tablet/21007448

I bought that for my 2½ year old daughter... it costs 70$ in retail..

and this ... http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Techno+...mory/6913291.p?id=1218812710986&skuId=6913291

which is a little more expensive.,. 149$ in retail...

if they can make those (and others) pretty cheap, why can´t Nintendo..?

As people have stated on GAF for months, the streaming tech being nearly brand new is what jacks up the price of the controller. Neither of the things you posted has it.

Nintendo painted themselves into a corner here and several executives may pay the price.
 
So I did a few calculations with these figures.

Total sales Jan 2012 - 2778
Total sales Jan 2013 - 2111

Market decrease of 26%

Now let's look at the detail.

Nintendo vs non-Nintendo:

Total Nintendo platform sales in Jan 2012 - 999k
Total non-Nintendo platform sales in Jan 2012 - 1779k

Total Nintendo platform sales in Jan 2013 - 467k
Total non-Nintendo platform sales in Jan 2013 - 1644k

Nintendo YoY decrease - 53.3%
Non-Nintendo YoY decrease - 7.6%
Non-Nintendo YoY decrease consoles only - 3.5%

So, is it the UK market that's dead, or Nintendo that's dead in the UK?

I hope this myth that gaming is dead in the UK ceases to exist, it's Nintendo that are in serious decline. A new generation of consoles from Sony and MS would more than fix the current problems for their own decline.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
Kameo and PDZ were also both excellent launch titles.

Kameo is significantly better than any game on WiiU right now.

I just played through Kameo for the first time a couple months ago. Your statement is completely false.

Also, PDZ an "excellent" game? In what universe?
 

SMD

Member
While the Wii U figures look terrible, so does the Vita's and the established consoles on the market are also selling at levels lower than last year.

A market wide decrease in units sold should be a bigger alarm than just the Wii U figures.
 

mxgt

Banned
It's only going to get worse.

I'm certainly contributing to the lack of sales, can't remember the last time I bought a retail game
 

Pie and Beans

Look for me on the local news, I'll be the guy arrested for trying to burn down a Nintendo exec's house.
As people have stated on GAF for months, the streaming tech being nearly brand new is what jacks up the price of the controller. Neither of the things you posted has it.

Nintendo painted themselves into a corner here and several executives may pay the price.

It really is pretty preposterous. The streaming tech is an "invisible value" to the mass-market, as its not something you can point to and they'll understand "RESPONSE TIMES... LAG.... SHIT WHAT OTHER WORDS", while the hardcore market is the only receptive one. But because you've dumped this expensive tech in, youre also not pleasing the hardcore with beefy specs and a generational jump. Heads absolutely should roll, they couldnt have constructed a worse system unless they perhaps gave the GamePad a 3D screen to jack the price up even further.

Worse still, theres still no big game that points out an absolute necessity to having the pad and your TV screen. Rayman was set to be the only one in earnest and... oh dear.
 

Kron

Banned
I'd say its just desserts considering the contempt Nintendo have with the European market and continually giving us the poorer option with 50hz Virtual Console titles.

Stuff em.
 

GlamFM

Banned
Next generation means the next console in a line of consoles. Nothing more, nothing less. If you try to make it anything else "Next Gen" then you're leaving the definition of "Next Gen" up to personal opinion. Which is a pointless way to define something, because then the definition is constantly changing.


Very well. Fair, but absolutely not the way I see it.


There was a time for a WiiHD, but that was about 3 or 4 years ago. That´s one of the rare occasions where I agree with Pachter.

Nintendo don´t seem to be able to move a significant amount of hardware right now and after Feb the 20th ( where what I consider "Next Gen" starts ) it will be even harder.

I´m not saying they are doomed - but the are definitely in a dark place right now.
 

javac

Member
Dead console in Europe at this point and requires a fairly hard relaunch. Rebrand, price-drop and accompanied by a three hit punch like new Mario, Retro game for more mature western audiences, and some other special sauce. Even then its got an uphill struggle.

Nintendo have always had it this way in Europe tho, as in an uphill battle, no?
 
No. They had to. They're struggling with a development process on a platform which is comparable to PS360. They would have not been able to develop games in a fast pace for a more powerful console. They're just catching up.

They may be "catching up" with PS3 and 360 and that would be fine and all if not for the fact we have 1 year at best until PS4 and 720 release and then Nintendo is right back to the bottom of the tech pyramid once again. Everyone buying the 3rd party games for PS3 and 360 right now and not falling for the "superior versions! Not the same game!" shit, 3rd parties already slamming the door on Wii U = the system is flat out dead when the the counter attack from Sony and MS happens. I'm sure they are laughing their asses off right now that the system is dying already and they haven't even revealed their new stuff yet.
 
It was really hard to believe that you could screw the launch better than what Sony did with PS3 but Nintendo really is trying to beat that...
 

Shion

Member
It really is pretty preposterous. The streaming tech is an "invisible value" to the mass-market, as its not something you can point to and they'll understand "RESPONSE TIMES... LAG.... SHIT WHAT OTHER WORDS", while the hardcore market is the only receptive one. But because you've dumped this expensive tech in, youre also not pleasing the hardcore with beefy specs and a generational jump. Heads absolutely should roll, they couldnt have constructed a worse system unless they perhaps gave the GamePad a 3D screen to jack the price up even further.
Pretty much.

Nintendo managed to create a highly unimpressive system (basically, an Xbox 360 with a cheap looking gamepad) and release it at a high price.
 

Drek

Member
30 mil 3DS's sold worldwide and a strong 2013 lineup means the 3DS will be fine.

Nintendo has had to eat a TON of red ink on 3DS hardware to get there, going against their core business model (never sell anything at a loss) and it's still far off the pace set by the 3DS.

The PS3 is doing fine now, but it lost Sony a bunch of money in the process. Nintendo's long term success has hinged on avoiding this kind of product. They did it with the 3DS and have now followed it up again with the Wii U. This is a troubling situation for Nintendo to be in over the next 5 years.

Basically its business as usual. And that's fine by me.
Except that unlike the Gamecube Nintendo actually loses money on both 3DS and Wii U hardware.

They avoided competing with the PS3 and 360 directly because they disagreed with the razors:razor blades model of doing business and knew they couldn't keep pace from a hardware standpoint. When that asymmetrical strategy actually paid off they got drunk on success and walked themselves directly into the very mistake they tried to avoid with the Wii, but now a technological generation behind the competition.

Nintendo likely still treads water over the next 5 years thanks to strong first party sales and a small but dedicated core fanbase, but Nintendo moved very few Gamecubes while still making a healthy profit. They weren't reliant on an economy of scale to bring hardware prices to a profitable point quickly and subsidize hardware losses with rapid software sales. They could make money on every consumer, from the hardcore Nintendo fan to the college kid who only had a GC and Smash Bros. to play with his buddies. Now that later example costs Nintendo money.

Neither the Wii U or 3DS work in their traditional model, and Nintendo's profits are going to contract sharply as a result.
 

Daedardus

Member
nope.. hence my question.. lol..

Do you think engineers work for free? That's the reason why 'newly developed' tech always costs so much in the first run. They need to account for the R&D costs. Once they can produce more units, the cost per unit will go down.
 

javac

Member
Worse still, theres still no big game that points out an absolute necessity to having the pad and your TV screen. Rayman was set to be the only one in earnest and... Its still coming.

But I get the point :p

Also, being able to play NMSBU in bed is awesome. Maybe not a feature that's easy to advertise and get people to Shell out £200 for, but it's mighty cool. Then again vita is mighty cool too...
 

Blablurn

Member
Damn, the industry in general looks pretty powerless lately. Nintendos performance in the UK is just one example. Will be interesting to see if they can save the console in the future.
 
I just played through Kameo for the first time a couple months ago. Your statement is completely false.

Also, PDZ an "excellent" game? In what universe?
There's your problem. And PDZ wasn't a great game but it was a great demonstration of the next tier of graphical capabilities, as was Kameo.
 

Pie and Beans

Look for me on the local news, I'll be the guy arrested for trying to burn down a Nintendo exec's house.
But I get the point :p

Also, being able to play NMSBU in bed is awesome. Maybe not a feature that's easy to advertise and get people to Shell out £200 for, but it's mighty cool. Then again vita is mighty cool too...

Being able to play Killzone and Tearaway in bed or while on a bench in the park is going to be awesome too. Sony will be pleased to hear theres a newly discovered audience for console parity handheld games.
 
172614.jpg


Yes, I know they both did quite bad, couldn't resist though. :D
 

Dynoro

Member
So I did a few calculations with these figures.

Total sales Jan 2012 - 2778
Total sales Jan 2013 - 2111

Market decrease of 26%

Now let's look at the detail.

Nintendo vs non-Nintendo:

Total Nintendo platform sales in Jan 2012 - 999k
Total non-Nintendo platform sales in Jan 2012 - 1779k

Total Nintendo platform sales in Jan 2013 - 467k
Total non-Nintendo platform sales in Jan 2013 - 1644k

Nintendo YoY decrease - 53.3%
Non-Nintendo YoY decrease - 7.6%
Non-Nintendo YoY decrease consoles only - 3.5%

So, is it the UK market that's dead, or Nintendo that's dead in the UK?

I hope this myth that gaming is dead in the UK ceases to exist, it's Nintendo that are in serious decline. A new generation of consoles from Sony and MS would more than fix the current problems for their own decline.

Thanks for this; hopefully it stops some of the "UK doomed" talk. Sure sales are down, but it is Nintendo causing the vast majority of that decline. Nintendo do seem to have launched the WiiU in a strange manner; I am pondering one for Lego City Undercover but with these sales I can only imagine that third parties will start abandoning the platform.
 
I got both games on launch. They fucking sucked. No amount of "next tier of graphical capabilities" excuses will keep them from sucking.

And yet you brought it, there in lies the problem Wii U needs a compelling software to succeed. Sure those games may suck but you brought it, Nintendo tbh should have been much better prepared =/
 
Top Bottom