• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

EA refuses to refund user for Sim City and then threatens a ban if they chargeback

Conan-san

Member
tank_636221.jpg


Here you have you tanks.

Thanks Ants, Thants.
 

linkboy

Member
The last EA game I purchased new was Amular and it's probably going to be the last EA game I buy for a long, long time.

I actually think my gaming habits have been better since I dropped EA.
 

phisheep

NeoGAF's Chief Barrister
You'd have to prove that Sim City is "faulty, not fit for purpose or doesn't match description". Unless the game is down for several days at once, I doubt that you've got a case.

Shouldn't be too hard to prove:

Described as "always online", actually almost never online. Therefore not as described.

Purpose is to play a game, actually cannot play game. Therefore not fit for purpose.

As for faulty? Well, how long should it take to log a game on online - couple of seconds maybe. Not two days. Therefore faulty as well.

That's a full house right there.
 

Forkball

Member
Remember when the biggest problem Sim City had was figuring out how to get electricity to all your buildings? Times have changed, man.
 

Ill Saint

Member
I remember when I was a kid, EA was always a sign of quality and innovation. I grew up with titles like Populous, Bioforge, the Ultima Series, Magic Carpet, Dungeon Keeper and many more amazing games from talented studios and developers they ended up screwing over. They've long since become an out-of-touch, profit-at-all-costs behemoth, which discards talent like rubbish and treats customers with contempt. No respect left for them at all.
 
Wait. This hasn't been translated?
This is what they wrote? That's possibly the poorest writing I've ever seen from a gaming website.

Even the quote from the Press Release has an error, which I doubt was in there originally. It barely makes sense.
 

QaaQer

Member
No it's not broken, it's down servers. No online service has every had 100% uptime, ever. This shit just happens.

I would feel bad for the average joe who got suckered into this without knowing, but if you post on Neogaf, bought this game, then did a charge back when the servers are inevitably down, you're stupid.

And I'm not the one that bought the damn game, so lol at 'standing up to it'.

yeah, cuz being able to return a product you aren't happy with is for socialists and people who shop at walmart.
 

Tacitus_

Member
Shouldn't be too hard to prove:

Described as "always online", actually almost never online. Therefore not as described.

Purpose is to play a game, actually cannot play game. Therefore not fit for purpose.

As for faulty? Well, how long should it take to log a game on online - couple of seconds maybe. Not two days. Therefore faulty as well.

That's a full house right there.

Well you're the lawyer here, not me. I'm just of the opinion that EA would be able to argue otherwise, since service disruptions are going to happen. Imo it really depends on how they're going to quantify the limits and EA will have logs while the netizens mostly have "feels".
(note: not defending EA, just doubtful of any legal proceedings going against them)
 

Htown

STOP SHITTING ON MY MOTHER'S HEADSTONE
Also, can we PLEASE stop taking outsourced, poorly trained customer service reps as official representatives of a multimillion dollar company?

Sure, as soon as the multimillion dollar company stops paying them as representatives.
 

Bisnic

Really Really Exciting Member!
I thought that despite being very hated here, many people said EA customer support was pretty good.

Was that guy just an asshole that deserve to be fired or would any EA customer service rep have done the same shit?
 
EA really has terrible support from what I've seen. They should give a refund for it if their game is broken but it doesn't really surprise me that they won't.
 

phisheep

NeoGAF's Chief Barrister
Well you're the lawyer here, not me. I'm just of the opinion that EA would be able to argue otherwise, since service disruptions are going to happen. Imo it really depends on how they're going to quantify the limits and EA will have logs while the netizens mostly have "feels".
(note: not defending EA, just doubtful of any legal proceedings going against them)

Mostly it's not about whether they would win in court, it's about being able to assert your rights to a refund under whatever consumer law are where you are. If it is faulty/not to description/not fit for purpose at the point of delivery, then you'll usually be able to demand a refund - and not "at their discretion" either.

I imagine, too, that they might have a bit of a tough argument trying the line in court that "service disruptions are going to happen". If they tried that with me I'd cross examine and have them admit in the end that the service (and therefore the product) is inherently faulty. Slam dunk.
 

Mugaaz

Member
So I bought the game from GreenManGaming. I want to get a refund, obviously GMG is not going to refund an activated key. However, its not like I bought the game from Origin, so I'm in a dilemma. To get a refund I have to dispute the charge from GMG which F's them over. Its not their fault though, it's Origin's. I don't see a way to get a refund for this without screwing GMG, I'd have no problem screwing Origin, but don't see a way to do it.
 
So I bought the game from GreenManGaming. I want to get a refund, obviously GMG is not going to refund an activated key. However, its not like I bought the game from Origin, so I'm in a dilemma. To get a refund I have to dispute the charge from GMG which F's them over. Its not their fault though, it's Origin's. I don't see a way to get a refund for this without screwing GMG, I'd have no problem screwing Origin, but don't see a way to do it.

I'm not sure with Origin, but I know with Steam, GMG can get a refund on an activated key, they just refuse to do so. If you do a charge back they'll revoke your Steam key.
 

Nevasleep

Member
So I bought the game from GreenManGaming. I want to get a refund, obviously GMG is not going to refund an activated key. However, its not like I bought the game from Origin, so I'm in a dilemma. To get a refund I have to dispute the charge from GMG which F's them over. Its not their fault though, it's Origin's. I don't see a way to get a refund for this without screwing GMG, I'd have no problem screwing Origin, but don't see a way to do it.
Request a refund from GMG, I don't believe you can do a chargeback without speaking to the retailer first anyway.
Then GMG will have to claim the refund back from EA, which should be easy and at the end of the day isn't your problem. GMG chose to sell this product.
 

Tunesmith

formerly "chigiri"
Request a refund from GMG, I don't believe you can do a chargeback without speaking to the retailer first anyway.
Then GMG will have to claim the refund back from EA, which should be easy and at the end of the day isn't your problem. GMG chose to sell this product.

This.
 

diamount

Banned
I'm pretty sure that Steam only started doing refunds very recently as in the past two years or so..

lets not go crazy here

They only do refunds on pre-orders. After that you only get one, and even then it's only a refund to your Steam wallet. Not your payment card.
 

Tacitus_

Member
Mostly it's not about whether they would win in court, it's about being able to assert your rights to a refund under whatever consumer law are where you are. If it is faulty/not to description/not fit for purpose at the point of delivery, then you'll usually be able to demand a refund - and not "at their discretion" either.

I imagine, too, that they might have a bit of a tough argument trying the line in court that "service disruptions are going to happen". If they tried that with me I'd cross examine and have them admit in the end that the service (and therefore the product) is inherently faulty. Slam dunk.

Well, software is inherently faulty, since only space agencies can have so thorough QA that it nabs all the errors (and not even they have a 100% success rate). Maybe it's just a simple bug like being able to fall through the world at some points, or maybe it's a bug that stops your progress or eats your save. This imo falls somewhere in the middle, since while it obviously is currently not allowing you to play the game, it is time specific.
Now this isn't that great of an analogy since this is not planned, but if you purchase an MMO subscription and attempt to play at maintenance, do you get to claim that the game is broken?
 

Mugaaz

Member
Request a refund from GMG, I don't believe you can do a chargeback without speaking to the retailer first anyway.
Then GMG will have to claim the refund back from EA, which should be easy and at the end of the day isn't your problem. GMG chose to sell this product.

GMG refused to refund to the game.
 
They only do refunds on pre-orders. After that you only get one, and even then it's only a refund to your Steam wallet. Not your payment card.
Not true. When Valve says just once its to cover their ass if they dont do it the next time. Everytime you cancel a preorder the support says 'just this once'.
 
Are you a lawyer?

This kind of ToS clauses are generally binding in pretty much every western jurisdiction. In fact, the clause may not even be necessary in e.g. EU because distance selling directive (Directive 97/7/EC) defines when and under what conditions the consumer has the right to cancel or rescind the contract. Unless a law or a contract term stipulates otherwise, the buyer has no right to return a product, at least initially (the seller first has the right to provide a non-defective one or to repair the original). It's certainly possible that the ECJ will later elaborate more on these rights, but as it is the ToS clause is perfectly legal and enforceable. I think the directive sets the minimum level of protection, but I believe no EU country provides wider protection than the directive, perhaps Germany aside. In fact, the specific clause, as it applies to EU, uses the same terminology as the directive.

I am in my third year of law school and in the U.S. they can't rescind an offer after it has been accepted.

I would have agreed with you that they are entitled to some time to remedy the problem but since they specifically offered to refund anyone who asks for one, they are obligated to do so.

Not to mention there is a perfectly good argument that the product is inherently defective because the online DRM is not going away and has significant potential to not work like it should at various points in time and often as evidenced by this fiasco.

If I can make the argument in the U.S., I'll have it ten times easier in the EU because they put up with way less bullshit.

Also this thanks to another poster:

What's interesting about 97/7/EC is that it also mentioned this, which is pretty much what EA did and what the guy in the OP is referring to: "Where a supplier fails to perform his side of the contract on the grounds that the goods or services ordered are unavailable, the consumer must be informed of this situation and must be able to obtain a refund of any sums he has paid as soon as possible and in any case within 30 days."

This clearly says they can get a refund immediately and from the wording here, the supplier is not entitled to time to remedy.

Suing EA for banning your account after a chargeback seems more like a fantasy than a rational plan of action, but I'd be interested in hearing a lawyer's take on it. It seems like the odds are stacked in EA's favor if the matter is to be decided in court. Fighting a court battle against a huge corporation isn't quick or cheap even if you're legally in the right. They're better equipped for lengthy litigation.

Which is why the government has traditionally stepped in to provide consumer protection. But I don't know of any laws that kick in to protect you if EA bans your ass after you do a chargeback. If you know of any then now's the time to talk about them.

It's complicated but there are a lot of arguments to be made.

A couple easy ones are that this is an unconscionable contract which basically means the contract is bullshit and no reasonable person would have agreed to it if they had equal bargaining power. This wouldn't work well if it was your first game you bought from them but if you have several games on your account and they threaten to ban your account, now you are being bullied into a position that you probably wouldn't have accepted otherwise.

Refunds at someone's discretion is also bullshit. If it doesn't work, they have some amount of time to fix it but generally they owe you your money back. It wouldn't be too hard to argue that the game is inherently defective and will never work right thanks to online DRM.

You could argue how the industry itself doesn't provide proper protection when compared to every other industry on earth which requires judicial interference such as not being able to try it/see it before you play it. Carefully tailored trailers are not a fair opportunity and don't count.

These are just examples.
 

JeTmAn81

Member
This seems nuts. Companies can now just take away your ability to play the games you purchased...because they don't like you?
 

diamount

Banned
Do you mean one refund EVER? As in if you buy two different broken games a year apart Valve wont give you a refund for the second? If so mind providing a link? If I am misunderstanding you I apologize.

I'm sure there are exceptions like WarZ for example but for the majority of the time it will be a one-off. No source because they don't provide one, it was from one of their CSR's after getting a refund and even then they were hard pressed to give me that one. Had to throw them some British legislation in their face.
 

Chili

Member
Steam have refunded me on two occasions for a faulty product. The first was From Dust which was a mess on release and had previously unadvertised DRM included, the other is a Codemaster's F1 game, which have all been buggy messes. I had put a lot of hours into that F1 game as well before I gave up and asked for a refund. I think it was 2010 or 2011.
 

sangreal

Member
I just tried to get a refund. I was extremely polite but after being transferred to someone to process my refund (45 min) they told me tough shit. I will do a chargeback and they can ban me if they want
 

Mugaaz

Member
I just tried to get a refund. I was extremely polite but after being transferred to someone to process my refund (45 min) they told me tough shit. I will do a chargeback and they can ban me if they want

My sentiments exactly. If I get banned, so be it. Not just going to take it up the ass and then pay for it.
 
Big multinationals will never acknowledge the consumer laws of individual countries because to do so sets a precedent. Shove the laws under their noses and they'll tell you to get stuffed, but have a lawyer do it for you and things change very quickly.
 

diamount

Banned
Thats what I meant with cancelling preorders. Its their default response. They will always say that even though it isn't actually true.

Their position on cancelling and refunding pre-orders is clearly listed on their site. Refunds after they have released however is not and is a murky area, some people are successful while others are not.
 

RiccochetJ

Gold Member
I just tried to get a refund. I was extremely polite but after being transferred to someone to process my refund (45 min) they told me tough shit. I will do a chargeback and they can ban me if they want

Did they give you a reason why? This is the part that completely irks me with what EA is doing. If EA says that people can request a refund on the game as part of their official statement, it should completely blow up in their face if they turn around and start denying refunds based on "their discretion". I hope this whole thing turns into a gigantic PR nightmare for them.
 

10k

Banned
Fucken EA, if it wasn't for you buying BioWare I would have no reason to buy shit from you. Stopped buying FIFA and NHL and have no intention of buying Crysis 3 unless its on steam. Bought Crysis 2 on steam for 4.99.
 
Their position on cancelling and refunding pre-orders is clearly listed on their site. Refunds after they have released however is not and is a murky area, some people are successful while others are not.
I agree but my position is just as Valve doesn't always offer a refund they also don't always limit customers to one lifetime refund. Its at the discretion of support. We have already seen a couple in this thread state they have received more than one refund from Valve.
 
Top Bottom