• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Bloomberg: Nintendo to announce 18.7 Billion Yen loss for the fiscal year

The_Monk

Member
I have to ask this fellow GAFfers:

How Big is this? Sure it's a lot of money, but I'm not updated with the company profits, etc so is this really big and should this be seen as a big concern for the company?
 

Triple U

Banned
I didn't say kill. I said cripple. I'm aware Nintendo holds large amounts of cash and marketable securities. Losses like those you're talking about though would eat away like half of those and simultaneously destroy investor confidence. But again, yes, it's a moot point.Average of analyst predictions.It's only missing one known figure, the ~29B yen from FYE Mar-12. The PS3 has lost a lot of money.

Its missing 7 quarters of data. Im pretty sure I was the first to point out Sony's 4.7billion in losses so I don't see why you feel the need to point that out?

It still doesn't change the relative sillyness of posting a chart with almost two years missing of the latest data to point out how a company is doing now.
 

Somnid

Member
They were out after the first loss, or later on? Nintendo posted its first loss in 30 or so years just a year ago, after years of huge earnings.

Well it wasn't gaming division related, they lost a lot more than that elsewhere. Sony has been sliding for years and has massive debts. Sony will lose money on PS4 upfront, that doesn't seem to have much doubt. Investors might be irritated but they could lose as much or more than Nintendo without Kutaragi coming under fire so long as other divisions aren't losing billions of dollars. Playstation itself won't sink or float Sony.
 
Nintendo are not Sony. And the market has inexplicably changed since the PS3 was being all shitty 5 years ago.

Could they bounce back like Sony did? Certainly, but it's a poor thing to compare to.
 

Somnid

Member
Nintendo are not Sony. And the market has inexplicably changed since the PS3 was being all shitty 5 years ago.

Could they bounce back like Sony did? Certainly, but it's a poor thing to compare to.

Sony never bounced back, profitability is still a major issue.
 
I think he was suggesting the graph is missing the (more positive) recent date.
It is missing some more positive recent data; i.e. the 29B yen profit from year end March 2012.
Its missing 7 quarters of data. Im pretty sure I was the first to point out Sony's 4.7billion in losses so I don't see why you feel the need to point that out?

It still doesn't change the relative sillyness of posting a chart with almost two years missing of the latest data to point out how a company is doing now.
FYE Mar-13 hasn't been reported yet; while the division has made an operating profit of 3.3B yen though the first 9 months, it's as yet unknown what the last quarter's numbers are. The segment may ultimately post a loss for the fiscal year.
 

Daingurse

Member
contrary to your belief, nintendo may not be made of money but they do have enough money that 4.7bn wouldn't kill them, though thats not ever likely to happen anyway

Nintendo is a fucking business, they have shareholders and investors. They can't just lose money willy nilly. Someone would get fired and things WOULD change if Nintendo lost such a massive amount of money. Just because Nintendo can weather that loss, doesn't mean they ever want to even be near that position in the first place. You people need to remember these are multi-national Conglomerates who at the end of the day are all about the money.

We're just consumers consuming content, I have no emotional investment in any company except Sega *RIP*. I'll never understand irrational reactions to negative news.
 

Triple U

Banned
Nintendo are not Sony. And the market has inexplicably changed since the PS3 was being all shitty 5 years ago.

Could they bounce back like Sony did? Certainly, but it's a poor thing to compare to.

It is. There was almost never a time where the PS3 was doing bad sales-wise, if you're looking at respective LTDs compared to 360. At every point past around its first quarter, its performed at and mostly above the 360 at the same point in the 360's life. It was bleeding almost $300 a unit though.

Nintendos problem is that they are both losing money and under performing in the market. They're currently on a Vita-like pace for growth with the Wii-U. What Nintendo has that Sony doesn't so much is the handheld market though. And probably the strongest IPs in the market place.

Its really two different situations.
It is missing some more positive recent data; i.e. the 29B yen profit from year end March 2012.
FYE Mar-13 hasn't been reported yet; while the division has made an operating profit of 3.3B yen though the first 9 months, it's as yet unknown what the last quarter's numbers are. The segment may ultimately post a loss for the fiscal year.

I know, which is why I said its missing 7 and not 8 quarters.
 

Tobor

Member
We're not talking about your trolling here.

Trolling? Sony is a terrible comparison to make, not the least of which because management was completely turned over, which is what most of being accused of trolling want to see.

No hypocrisy is exposed with this comparison. If anything, it reinforces the opposite position.
 
Nintendo is a fucking business, they have shareholders and investors. They can't just lose money willy nilly. Someone would get fired and things WOULD change if Nintendo lost such a massive amount of money. Just because Nintendo can weather that loss, doesn't mean they ever want to even be near that position in the first place. You people need to remeber these are multi-national Conglomerates who at the end of the day are all about the money.

We're just consumers consuming content, I have no emotional investment in any company except Sega *RIP*. I'll never understand irrational reactions to negative news.

did i say they could just loose money willy nilly and the shareholders would be happy, no i didnt, there would be upheaval and change but they are in a far better position than most companies to absorb such losses so it wouldn't kill or cripple them
 
We're using it to show the hypocrisy of some of you guys.
What hypocrisy? The board fired Kutaragi after those losses. Pretty quickly too.

The magnitude of losses may be different but Sony are much more able to withstand losses of that scale than Nintendo as they are much more diversified.
 

Tobor

Member
Speaking of Sony, who is in charge of Hardware at Nintendo? Who is in charge of software? Somebody needs to be fired, and if Iwata isn't willing to fall on the sword, then he needs to shit can somebody else. Somebody needs to face some responsibility for this mess.
 
Trailing twelve months NPD figures.

But I guess we'll see what Pokemon can do to reverse this.

In fairness, boiling it down to just Pokemon that can improve the figures is a little weak. The 3DS lineup is significantly stronger for the rest of the year than the 2012 in many aspects, not just Pokemon.
 
why? for pointing out the fact nintendo have a boatload of cash? its not like i'm suggesting they should loose that much

But they don't. A company the size of Nintendo would be extremely crippled to the point where they would be unable to properly invest in R&D. Those kind of losses are fundamentally unacceptable.
 

Daingurse

Member
But they don't. A company the size of Nintendo would be extremely crippled to the point where they would be unable to properly invest in R&D. Those kind of losses are fundamentally unacceptable.

Exactly, listen to Aqumarine. I see her up in nearly every sales thread, and she knows business.
 

Triple U

Banned
why? for pointing out the fact nintendo have a boatload of cash? its not like i'm suggesting they should loose that much

Thats not really a fact.

2011 FYE March they had 10 billion in cash and equivalents.
2012 same point in time, they lost 50%, down to 5 billion.

Mind you, a -4.7 billion period of losses wouldn't directly affect that reserve but almost all of that relatively meager 5bln would be matched with debt.

Nintendo as they are now are debt free. But a sony like string of years would almost cripple them.
 
But they don't. A company the size of Nintendo would be extremely crippled to the point where they would be unable to properly invest in R&D. Those kind of losses are fundamentally unacceptable.

of course they're unacceptable, doesn't change the fact its only around half of nintentendo's cash pile
 
Panic Nintendo didn't help N64 get games or GCN get sales. Also, its arguable that WW and Sunshine are some of the worst games in the series. (And I loved TWW just hated all the sailing.)
 

jcm

Member
Thats not really a fact.

2011 FYE March they had 10 billion in cash and equivalents.
2012 same point in time, they lost 50%, down to 5 billion.

Mind you, a -4.7 billion period of losses wouldn't directly affect that reserve but almost all of that relatively meager 5bln would be matched with debt.

Nintendo as they are now are debt free. But a sony like string of years would almost cripple them.

Your numbers are incorrect. They have just under a trillion jpy in cash and short term.
 

Tobor

Member
According to Nintendo, their cash is on hand to prevent a hostile takeover. They can't spend it, or afford to lose it.
 

Somnid

Member
According to Nintendo, their cash is on hand to prevent a hostile takeover. They can't spend it, or afford to lose it.

I really don't know why Iwata was so determined not to do a share buyback. The less you have the worry about outside investors the better.
 
According to Nintendo, their cash is on hand to prevent a hostile takeover. They can't spend it, or afford to lose it.

Indeed, big losses would make Nintendo a very tempting takeover target for someone like Disney who could leverage Nintendo properties into films.
 

Pie and Beans

Look for me on the local news, I'll be the guy arrested for trying to burn down a Nintendo exec's house.
What use is cash anyway if you keep waiting to use any while your marketbase dwindles. The WiiU is most likely going to be the last Nintendo home-console, because why invest in a platform thats continually shrinking and third parties deem absolutely poisonous to their interests and will not even glance at post WiiU?

So Nintendo will be down to one platform, the sole ship of their entire fleet, to push their business. And what then if dedicated handheld gaming continues to lose audience numbers, mainly in the west? Investors and shareholders must be giddy at the very thought of there never being any growth ever again, just a slow or swift slide downwards.

Betting against the onward march of technology was a poor choice by Iwata and those directly below him.
 

Linkified

Member
Yes, just as the PS3 is a failure because it didn't match or beat it's predecessor. Also, you are making the mistake of thinking sales will be constant when most likely they will slow down further in the west as smartphones continue to ramp up and get into cheaper markets eating into the 3DS' market.

The thing is though your assuming people who would buy a smart device would also want to buy a 3DS, and vice versa, as well as many who will buy both - simply because they offer different experiences
 

Kouriozan

Member
What use is cash anyway if you keep waiting to use any while your marketbase dwindles. The WiiU is most likely going to be the last Nintendo home-console, because why invest in a platform thats continually shrinking and third parties deem absolutely poisonous to their interests and will not even glance at post WiiU?

Same reason as why Nintendo made the Gamecube and the Wii.
 

Somnid

Member
What use is cash anyway if you keep waiting to use any while your marketbase dwindles. The WiiU is most likely going to be the last Nintendo home-console, because why invest in a platform thats continually shrinking and third parties deem absolutely poisonous to their interests and will not even glance at post WiiU?

So Nintendo will be down to one platform, the sole ship of their entire fleet, to push their business. And what then if dedicated handheld gaming continues to lose audience numbers, mainly in the west? Investors and shareholders must be giddy at the very thought of there never being any growth ever again, just a slow or swift slide downwards.

Betting against the onward march of technology was a poor choice by Iwata and those directly below him.

You've got a lot of hypothetical here but I think you lost track of where you were going.
 

Pie and Beans

Look for me on the local news, I'll be the guy arrested for trying to burn down a Nintendo exec's house.
Same reason as why Nintendo made the Gamecube and the Wii.

Iwata: "I do not intend to declare how many Wii we will be selling today, but Wii will be a failure if it cannot sell far more than GameCube did. In fact, we shouldn't continue this business if our only target is to outsell GameCube. Naturally, we are making efforts so that Wii will show a far greater result than GameCube."
 

Conor 419

Banned
Panic analysis all up in this ship, I'm going to wait until this time next year before I declare any kind of doom, like any reasonable person would.
 
This thread...

Just wow. Straight up, trolling, deathwishes for Iwata (Posting a seppuku drawing is just that, don't try to defend it. It can't mean anything else), gifs calling him a Bitch.

smh.

Theres nothing to defend. Seriously. Im not talking about the news here. This is about GAF not being able to have a fruitful discussion about ANYTHING Nintendo. If people are willing to go this far just to shit on a company then its not even worth for me to start. If i need future proof that GAF is not a board for Nintendo fans, i just need to link to this thread.

This topic is worth having a thread and a discussion. Good and bad news are worthy of a discussion. But not like this!

Ironically if theres good news, all those people jumping happily into every bad news Nintendo thread are MIA. Oh gee what a surprise. Good Nintendo news rarely reach 3 pages on GAF (50ppp). Cant give credit when they do good stuff (example: The last Nintendo Direct).

Too bad a discussion cannot be had about Nintendo on NeoGAF.

Im 28 years old now. Im too old for this behavior and certanly won't drop to such a sameful level. Its just Videogames people.

man, some delicious posts in this thread.
 

prwxv3

Member
Nintendo having at large wad of cash and lossing less money then sony does not please the investors seeing the company they invested in lossing money and market share (console space) especially after the amazing wii years.
 

Portugeezer

Member
edit: how much is that in $?



Doesn't seem that bad. Not resignation worthy, surely?

Not really, it's just a fractions of how much Nintendo has, but considering Nintendo used to always make money even when at their least popular, it's kind of a big deal.
 
Top Bottom