• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Dragon's Crown (Vanillaware PS3/PSV) Sorceress Trailer

abadguy

Banned
It's funny that DOA and Soul Calibur are mentioned. They cleaned up the "objectifying" quite a bit... Especially sc5 where even Ivy dressed slightly better and Taki was no where to be found lol.


Of course long time fans complained.

So somebody will be mad no matter what it seems"

I always found it funny how DOA and SC were supposed to be "objectifying women" so much, but the most female gamers i ran into online were playing DOA4. Not to mention going to cons running into an Ivy ( in hewr SC4 getup)cosplayer was not uncommon.
 

dude

dude
I love how you are speaking for every women out there.
I'm not saying that everything you have proposed is wrong but you are starting to sound more than a little arrogant.

I'm not a woman and I wouldn't dream of trying to speak for an entire gender. But contrary to your beliefs some women do like to dress sexily or skimpily and not just because the are trying to impress men.

Every heard of cosplay?
People will go to insane lengths to show off and be the centre of attention.
Its just something they enjoy.

There's nothing wrong with women dressing however she likes. I'm not speaking for women, not even close, never said I have. I don't even have this debate "for woman", I do it for myself - Because I think these sort of things are bad, for all of us.

This sorceress is not a woman taking control of her sexuality, she's a pin-up model. I mean, look at that art I posted. That pose oozes sex, quite needlessly. No other character, except maybe the amazon, has been put in such a sexual pose for these official art pieces.

So how do you feel about Kinu Nishimura's art? She's a woman and she's quite well known for drawing sexy women. Her art for SF women probably puts them in more revealing poses than even the male artists would dare.

Well, personally I consider her art to be a disservice as it helps further sexualization of women in the gaming industry. Women can, and do, help keep the patriarchy... It's unfortunate, but sometimes to succeed in a male dominated world you must do these things. I cannot judge for it, of curse. I'm still only an ally in the feminist struggle.

You said the concept that a 'strong independent woman might actually decide to dress as the sorceress while winking and pressing as ass against her goddamn staff' was 'a delusional fantasy'. You presumed to speak for all women. That'd be pretty daft if you were a woman and downright disrespectful if you're not.
I did not claim to speak for all women, but I said that it was a cop out and possibly more to say that the sorceress might act from a position of power, since this design is so clearly something made solely for the amusement of men.
 

i-Lo

Member
There's nothing wrong with women dressing however she likes. I'm not speaking for women, not even close, never said I have. I don't even have this debate "for woman", I do it for myself - Because I think these sort of things are bad, for all of us.

This sorceress is not a woman taking control of her sexuality, she's a pin-up model. I mean, look at that art I posted. That pose oozes sex, quite needlessly. No other character, except maybe the amazon, has been put in such a sexual pose for these official art pieces.

And why can't a "pin up" model with exaggerated proportions (primarily the breast) be empowered enough to break free of the "sexual object" label? It's obvious that her hyper sexuality is a part of her identity but her function is far beyond just that.

I think the difference in culture (east v west) and your presumptions that causes cognitive dissonance are the larger issues here.
 
Well, personally I consider her art to be a disservice as it helps further sexualization of women in the gaming industry. Women can, and do, help keep the patriarchy... It's unfortunate, but sometimes to succeed in a male dominated world you must do these things.

Or maybe it's just what she likes? Isn't that a possibility? Perhaps she doesn't find it offensive, just as women in this thread have stated that they don't find the Sorceress to be offensive. I'm pretty certain that the concept, story and art for Code of Princess all came from her. She didn't have to draw Solange in a revealing outfit, but she chose to.
 

DarkKyo

Member
Strong women can indeed take control of their sexuality, and they should. But you think the sorceress is in control of her sexuality? Does the poses the male designers of the game put her into make you think of her as a strong hero? Does her large breasts symbolize her great courage? This is a cop out, and partly a delusional fantasy that a strong independent woman might actually decide to dress as the sorceress while winking and pressing as ass against her goddamn staff.

If that's the choice a female wants to make....

Believe it or not, many people try to look as sexually attractive as they can. But I guess a girl doing so just screams sexual object. Is that what you're saying?
 

erpg

GAF parliamentarian
dude, the gender breakdown? You checked, right? I just want to be sure you aren't projecting or anything.
 

Gbraga

Member
Yes, there is nothing woman wants more than to be just like the sorceress.

Because ever man wants to be bald, ridicously muscular and dumb, right?

I don't know anyone that would want to be Kratos, but he's still considered a power fantasy, isn't he?

EDIT: I don't even agree that the sorceress is a power fantasy, but this is not a very good point.
 
And why can't a "pin up" model with exaggerated proportions (primarily the breast) be empowered enough to break free of the "sexual object" label? It's obvious that her hyper sexuality is a part of her identity but her function is far beyond just that.

I think the difference in culture (east v west) and your presumptions that causes cognitive dissonance are the larger issues here.

it's been done (reposted from previous page):

look familiar?

elvira-4.jpg


look again:

elvira1.jpg


offensive? or just a silly bit of fun? :) ...

dumb? lovable? subversive? maybe. but demeaning?... really don't think so...
 

abadguy

Banned
Well, personally I consider her art to be a disservice as it helps further sexualization of women in the gaming industry. Women can, and do, help keep the patriarchy... It's unfortunate, but sometimes to succeed in a male dominated world you must do these things. I cannot judge for it, of curse. I'm still only an ally in the feminist struggle.

Or maybe she just enjoys drawing sexy women, she's far from the only female artist that does it.
 
Why are you ignoring the fact that some women like the design... In fact one in this very thread or the last states that she will or has cosplayed as the sorceress?

I remember being at PAX a few years back when they first showed off the Sylvari race in Gw 2, and someone asked about all the sexy/skimpy armor in GW 1. One of the female designers, who was giving the panel, basically said they put it in because they, females included, thought it was sexy and they liked it.

I do admit the design in question is a bit, well, over the top, but then again so is every design in this game. It's like every one of them is somehow a character of fantasy tropes. In the context of the game, she looks fine.

That's a far cry from some other games, where the sex appeal doesn't fit with the rest of the world design.
 

Pyrrhus

Member
But the male sexuality stands on its own, it is a sexuality of strength over the feminine meekness. Male sexuality is a power, especially at the expense of female power.

So you are in fact saying that you believe male sexuality is inherently pernicious to women.
 
Well, personally I consider her art to be a disservice as it helps further sexualization of women in the gaming industry. Women can, and do, help keep the patriarchy... It's unfortunate, but sometimes to succeed in a male dominated world you must do these things. I cannot judge for it, of curse. I'm still only an ally in the feminist struggle.

I am all for equal rights/treatment but this is just silly. You're taking this wayyyy, wayyyy to far from the original argument (IMO) which was - the sorceress, amazon, etc have ridiculous character designs who were probably drawn by a 14 year old boy (Kotaku's words). It has since been spun into a moral argument that is just bringing in the clicks for Kotaku.

They were not drawn by a teenage boy, and the general census is that she's not in a position of objectification, she is kicking just as much ass as the regular characters. Sure, her huge floppy breasts are distracting but that's part of her character design. It boils down to the character art in general, it's not meant to be proportionate or adhere to what we consider normal or acceptable for women or men.

Let's say the gaming fanbase is 50/50, just for the sake of argument. If a game covers both genders in terms of style, then what's the problem? You can play as any of those characters, if you don't identify with the woman with the giant knockers then you can just play as the Amazon, or if you want something that's completely acceptable in your world, play as the Elf.

Look, I'm not trying to say that objectification of women is ok, I'm not. I'm just saying that sex or attractive characters/people sells products. I know that there are plenty of games out there that have completely acceptable female characters/designs that sell well, but generally games have been predominantly made with men in mind.

Maybe this boils down to the stigma that "there are no girl gamers", therefore they shouldn't design games to appeal to them, but I digress. I don't think this is something that will be resolved, no matter how much you shout it from the rooftops.
 
Can anyone help me to see where the sexist line is in this issue?

Is sexist to: like sexualized women?
Is sexist to: like to see sexualized women?
Is sexist to: play a game as a sexualized women character?
Is sexist to: make a game that allow to play as a sexualized women character?
 

Pyrrhus

Member
Can anyone help me to see where the sexist line is in this issue?

Is sexist to: like sexualized women?
Is sexist to: like to see sexualized women?
Is sexist to: play a game with a sexualized women character?
Is sexist to: make a game that allow to play with a sexualized women character?

Do you mean "play as" sexualized women? Or are we talking Doki Doki Majou Shinpan?
 
Can anyone help me to see where the sexist line is in this issue?

Is sexist to: like sexualized women?
Is sexist to: like to see sexualized women?
Is sexist to: play a game with a sexualized women character?
Is sexist to: make a game that allow to play with a sexualized women character?

If the women in the game where not allowed to fight, made weaker than their male counter parts, or the women were the only ones with exagerated features or exposure then the game would be crossing the line.
If the game was aiming for mass market appeal, along the lines of Call of Duty or The Sims, then it's exagerated designs for BOTH men and women should be seen as a marginal negative thing.

The real danger is if a game reinforces a negative stereotype or gender role (Women bad at math, can't defend herself, should stay home, weaker than men) or is excluding women from participation (Assassin's Creed main line not having a female lead, Battlefield 4's lack of female soldiers, publishers refusing female leads, etc).

Dragon's Crown is mostly harmless, but if exagerated forms (both men and women) make you feel uncomfortable, you should probably avoid it. And of course, probably not for children.
 
If anything this whole controversy made me interested in Vanillaware's games, so...I guess that did the trick.
On the other hand I feel bad for the fans as, apparently, it seems impossible to discuss them even in their own dedicated threads.

You don't know the half of it. Seriously. There has never been any chance of any other discussion about this game in the two years it's been in the making.
This is specific of this one game, though, as most of their previous games had pretty regular-bodied main characters. Of which at least half are female, by the way. Odin Sphere had five main characters, three of which were female.

Well, personally I consider her art to be a disservice as it helps further sexualization of women in the gaming industry. Women can, and do, help keep the patriarchy... It's unfortunate, but sometimes to succeed in a male dominated world you must do these things. I cannot judge for it, of curse. I'm still only an ally in the feminist struggle.

So her art is a disservice, it helps keep the patriarchy, and you believe the only way she does it is because she was forced to, but you aren't judging her?
 
I don't understand this either. My missus makes her characters stunning whenever she gets a 'create-a-character' option. If I designed the exact same characters, people would say they were objectifying women (and probably throw the odd 'misogynistic' in there too).

Boy, in my experience, this is the truth, haha.

I really hope the OT for this game isn't full of this bullshit.

Well, some of this isn't completely bullshit.

But it will be.

I am hoping I'll be too busy laying waste with the Amazon to focus on it.

look familiar?

elvira-4.jpg


look again:

elvira1.jpg


offensive? or just a silly bit of fun? :) ...

Man, the lady of the house loves Elvira.
 
Part of this debate (like those pejorative comments towards women drawing sexy art) is not new at all; it's a quite delicate and complex issue at the core of one of the biggest schisms in feminism. There are no easy or absolute answers to it, and people have been arguing about it for decades. If and of you are really interested in the intricacies of this issue (as opposed to just wanting others to know about your awesome opinion), I really suggest you read this very short Wikipedia summary before going on:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_Sex_Wars

While I identify myself with feminism (or, from my point of view, egalitarism), this is one issue I don't have a clear-cut opinion of; although I tend to side with the "sex-positive" side, I also do realize how some repercussions can lead to oppression, especially in a male-dominated society.
 

zoukka

Member
Always the same arguments surface in this discussion. Super muscular males in positions of power are not sexualized like the sorceress or women in game in general. They both are aimed at male audiences.
 

-COOLIO-

The Everyman
Silly, outlandish or rediculous would probably be a better description. Easy to see why some people may not like it.

either of those work too. with boobs that big though you'd expect them to be a plot point. if the story is about her trying to acquire all of the boob enlargement spells then i can see where they're going.
 
Always the same arguments surface in this discussion. Super muscular males in positions of power are not sexualized like the sorceress or women in game in general. They both are aimed at male audiences.

Super muscular males don't really appeal to me at all. Does that mean I am not male? :p

either of those work too. with boobs that big though you'd expect them to be a plot point. if the story is about her trying to acquire all of the boob enlargement spells then i can see where they're going.

I think there's a description somewhere saying that she transformed her body through magic/sorcery or something like that so that's a possibility. Since that was mentioned I'm sure we'll see her original form at some point.
 
Always the same arguments surface in this discussion. Super muscular males in positions of power are not sexualized like the sorceress or women in game in general. They both are aimed at male audiences.

I personally would like to have seen them sexualize their men more to women's tastes. Someone linked the castanics from Tera earlier as a good example:


Women should definitely start demanding better man candy. The old stand by's of being a protector and bread winner should no longer define what an attractive man is.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
I don't think I can keep up with this thread anymore. Way too many dudes in here thinking they know what's best for all women and laying down the law about how everyone should feel about a piece of art.
 

ciridesu

Member
I don't think I can keep up with this thread anymore. Way too many dudes in here thinking they know what's best for all women and laying down the law about how everyone should feel about a piece of art.

This. Honestly, you know what's misogynous? When guys talk with guys, about what's best for women ignoring women's opinions in the process. And, most women are ok with this kind of art. Good old "Try not to think you know what's best for others."

What many of you are actually complaining about, is the "apparent lack of games targeted at girls and other demographic groups". But is there really a lack of them? We have Wii-games, we have Kinect games, we have mobile phone games. People are different, and like different things. Can people try and stop forcing the usual blockbuster console game diversification. Guys like sports, violent movies, and such much more too. And there's nothing wrong with it. People are different.

On topic, add me to the list who now knows Dragon's Crown and is interested in buying it as a result.
 
I don't think I can keep up with this thread anymore. Way too many dudes in here thinking they know what's best for all women and laying down the law about how everyone should feel about a piece of art.

uZ7JZTM.jpg


Memes may be bad form for a serious discussion, but this is all I've been able to think about since yesterday.
 

7Th

Member
Well, personally I consider her art to be a disservice as it helps further sexualization of women in the gaming industry. Women can, and do, help keep the patriarchy... It's unfortunate, but sometimes to succeed in a male dominated world you must do these things. I cannot judge for it, of curse. I'm still only an ally in the feminist struggle.

This has to be self-parody; nobody can write something so condescending with a straight face.
 
I don't think I can keep up with this thread anymore. Way too many dudes in here thinking they know what's best for all women and laying down the law about how everyone should feel about a piece of art.

This has been a common theme. Several women have tried to point out that this isn't the open and shut case of sexist design that Jason and others have tried to make it out to be. But they're either ignored or written of as being a strawman argument like the indie dev quotes that were posted earlier in the thread.
 

GuardianE

Santa May Claus
Sorceress looks like a sexy badass. If people find her to be some sexual objectification of women, that's something wrong with their perspective.
 

Dresden

Member
Well, personally I consider her art to be a disservice as it helps further sexualization of women in the gaming industry. Women can, and do, help keep the patriarchy... It's unfortunate, but sometimes to succeed in a male dominated world you must do these things. I cannot judge for it, of curse. I'm still only an ally in the feminist struggle.

Of course, it's the white man's burden.
 

QisTopTier

XisBannedTier
This. Honestly, you know what's misogynous? When guys talk with guys, about what's best for women ignoring women's opinions in the process. And, most women are ok with this kind of art. Good old "Try not to think you know what's best for others.".

This thread in a nutshell
 

Haly

One day I realized that sadness is just another word for not enough coffee.
She looks like she's wearing one of those huge fur hats you see in Europe.
 
Top Bottom