• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PAL Charts - Week 17, 2013

True, but there are also a ton of other aspects to considere. For example, a game that has its most appealing feature in on-line gaming will be bought for the consoles with a bigger community.
If you add to the mix that no one bought a WiiU to play this game, it becomes apparent that while not being great or even good, those sales are far from bad.

This game's main purpose is to create a user-base of those kinds of games for future releases on the system.
Of course, what will matter the most is the total amount of copies sold to the public.

It's understandable why this is happening, but that doesn't help the WiiU any because the underlying factors causing these low software sales are unlikely to change.
 

-MB-

Member
Your post history bias is about as damning as it gets so I wouldn't go playing the "can't be trusted" card. Its bad news, but sticking fingers in your ears isn't going to solve anything.

Videogames aren't made and released suddenly, decisions behind their budgets and where stuff is going are made 2-3 years in advance, and right now publishers are looking at their efforts on WiiU not making the money back with no turnaround in sight. So right now theyre cancelling things, aborting before the lost cost of a WiiU port gets too much. Worse still, devs like Criterion that actually put extra effort in will be feeling massively burned.

Now even if Nintendo does turn things around to some gigantic platform adoption rate due to Mario Kart, only the second sustained month after those sales figures are available will third parties think twice and actually restart WiiU projects again, leaving you entering early 2014 with the PS4 and Xbox 720 power gap finally there and taking up budgets going forward and whatever adoption rates theyre offering which most betting men are guessing will be substantially better than WiiU's due to that being where the mainstream hardcore gaming audience gravitates these days.


My posting history mostly consists of calling out the likes of you.
And your posting history is much more damning, maybe if I were to go into any Sony related thread and do the same, you might have had a shred of a point.
 

Foshy

Member
How do you figure that? Wii U install base is about 2.3% of PS3+360 and in 1/2 the time it's sold 4% of the total units.
Let's see how much this is in raw units.

Injustice 360 is on third place and has sold less than Dead Island PS3, which accounts for 26% of Dead Island sales.

Dead Island's first week had the maximum possible number of 124,000 units. So Riptide's first week is less than 62,000.

26% of 62,000 are 16,120 copies, let's be optimistic and take this as the best case scenario for the 360 version, which makes up for 58% of Injustice sales.

As a consequence, Injustice's maximum sales across all platforms for this week are 27,793 units.

4% of that are 1,111 units for the Wii U version, in an absolute best case scenario. It's most likely under 1'000 units.

That's not much, regardless of install base.
 
Ahh OK I was thinking he meant total sales. Anyone have total sales for it on the platforms?
We don't have percentage drops for this week.

But for the sake of elaboration, Injustice sales were supposed to be around UFC3 i.e. ~30-40K, so let's take 35K on the PS3 and 360.

Let's say Injustice showed a relatively typical second week fall of ~70% on those platforms to ~10K.

That would make the Wii U SKU's sales around 400 units.

The other thing to note, is that game sales don't necessarily increase EDIT: linearly with installed base.
 

Pie and Beans

Look for me on the local news, I'll be the guy arrested for trying to burn down a Nintendo exec's house.
My posting history mostly consists of calling out the likes of you.
And your posting history is much more damning, maybe if I were to go into any Sony related thread and do the same, you might have had a shred of a point.

I mean if you actually admit to and seem proud of being part of a defence force, what more can be offered up really?

You don't need to actually enter a Sony thread to throw fire at the Vita it seems after your exemplary performance in the 3DSXL Charger thread, where outta nowhere:
Without memory card you can't play anything on a Vita, besides welcome park.

I'm discussing sales in a UK sales thread where week after week, month after month its become easily apparent third parties will be absolutely shocked at the non existent uptake of their software on a new platform. This isn't "doomsaying", this is reality.
 

test_account

XP-39C²
When they shipped few pallets of PS3 and X360 versions someone in warehouse forgotten to add that one small box of Wii U copies ?
Sorry, i forgot to answer this earlier. Hehe, well, i honestly wonder why they decided to ship the WiiU version of Injustice one week after the PS3 and Xbox 360 version. Is it possible that it was a one week delay on printing the WiiU discs?


LOL!

And damn 360 having the bigger selling percentage on most games. Wonder why that is.
More people own a Xbox 360, so it is more likely that more people will buy the Xbox 360 version.
 

-MB-

Member
I mean if you actually admit to and seem proud of being part of a defence force, what more can be offered up really?

You don't need to actually enter a Sony thread to throw fire at the Vita it seems after your exemplary performance in the 3DSXL Charger thread, where outta nowhere:


I'm discussing sales in a UK sales thread where week after week, month after month its become easily apparent third parties will be absolutely shocked at the non existent uptake of their software on a new platform. This isn't "doomsaying", this is reality.

yes because pointing out hypocrisy is the same as goign in attack mode in other threads right?
I guess being a defender is considered worse then being an attacking troll constantly hyperboling.
 

Kikujiro

Member
My posting history mostly consists of calling out the likes of you.
And your posting history is much more damning, maybe if I were to go into any Sony related thread and do the same, you might have had a shred of a point.

Your posting history consist of you defending the same multi-billion company from any criticism (valid or not) and saying "but your post history is worse!" is pretty childish. Before calling someone out you should look at yourself.
 

Pie and Beans

Look for me on the local news, I'll be the guy arrested for trying to burn down a Nintendo exec's house.
I guess being a defender is considered worse then being an attacking troll constantly hyperboling.

Wheres the hyperbole? Saying third parties will be cancelling projects because they're not entirely pleased with selling 500-1000 copies of their new expensively budgeted videogame in a leading market?

The situation is just that bad right now. You yourself know that, but youre letting personal feelings get in the way of actually accepting it. Sales charts is the logic zone, check your heartstrings at the door.
 

SmokyDave

Member
Probably best to ignore post histories and focus on the question at hand: How are the sales for Injustice Wii-U?

They don't look too hot to me. Makes me wonder how the games below it on the Wii-U chart are selling.
 

-MB-

Member
Your posting history consist of you defending the same multi-billion company from any criticism (valid or not) and saying "but your post history is worse!" is pretty childish. Before calling someone out you should look at yourself.

from any critisism? LOL
I don't attack everyone who can bring valid arguments, I attack the same subset of trolls that are well known here on GAF, subtle difference.
 
It's understandable why this is happening, but that doesn't help the WiiU any because the underlying factors causing these low software sales are unlikely to change.
I disagree with this. What is preventing the WiiU to sell more is lack of exclusive games. Once those games are released, the system will see its sales increased, that's how it works.

For now, it's competing with systems that are cheaper and have a huge catalogue of games without having anything that can put it above the others. Maybe ZombiU and NSMBU, but that's not enough by any means.

Give it a few months so more games can be released for the system, and let's see how the market reacts to this.

Third party support will surely increase over the next months once PS4/Durango are put on sale and PS3/360 will be left behind.

Regards!
 
They don't look too hot to me. Makes me wonder how the games below it on the Wii-U chart are selling.

To be fair Smoky - it is 5th.
4% is not substantial but I don't think its quite 'dire'. Flawed ofc to say 'but the userbase in tiny' when the userbase is light on new releases; but you can't expect it to be everyones cup of tea.

Am actually surprised how well Injustice has done; with the likes of Luigi holding strong, FE having a good european launch - I think above Wii U, third parties are going to be turning their attention to the 3DS. We know something like Injustice could be done on it, and I suspect it would have sold rather well too.

Wonder what 3DS hardware sales are like; am not sure there will ever be such a heavy 2 months of releases. Very good for Lego though.
 

Pie and Beans

Look for me on the local news, I'll be the guy arrested for trying to burn down a Nintendo exec's house.
Am actually surprised how well Injustice has done; with the likes of Luigi holding strong, FE having a good european launch - I think above Wii U, third parties are going to be turning their attention to the 3DS. We know something like Injustice could be done on it, and I suspect it would have sold rather well too.

Wonder what 3DS hardware sales are like; am not sure there will ever be such a heavy 2 months of releases. Very good for Lego though.

A 3DS Injustice would have taken developing an entirely exclusive new game for it assets and all, not a port. I'm not seeing third party stuff other than Nintendo published/Lego doing great in that market to warrant western third parties undivided attention.
 

Spiegel

Member
To be fair Smoky - it is 5th.
4% is not substantial but I don't think its quite 'dire'. Flawed ofc to say 'but the userbase in tiny' when the userbase is light on new releases; but you can't expect it to be everyones cup of tea.

Am actually surprised how well Injustice has done; with the likes of Luigi holding strong, FE having a good european launch - I think above Wii U, third parties are going to be turning their attention to the 3DS. We know something like Injustice could be done on it, and I suspect it would have sold rather well too.

Wonder what 3DS hardware sales are like; am not sure there will ever be such a heavy 2 months of releases. Very good for Lego though.

Mario 3D and Mario Kart held strong too. And Injustice would have bombed just as bad on 3DS.
 

Mpl90

Two copies sold? That's not a bomb guys, stop trolling!!!
To be fair Smoky - it is 5th.
4% is not substantial but I don't think its quite 'dire'. Flawed ofc to say 'but the userbase in tiny' when the userbase is light on new releases; but you can't expect it to be everyones cup of tea.

Am actually surprised how well Injustice has done; with the likes of Luigi holding strong, FE having a good european launch - I think above Wii U, third parties are going to be turning their attention to the 3DS. We know something like Injustice could be done on it, and I suspect it would have sold rather well too.

Wonder what 3DS hardware sales are like; am not sure there will ever be such a heavy 2 months of releases. Very good for Lego though.

This month we have other 2 good releases saleswise: PMD and Donkey Kong Country Returns 3D. Then, June it's Animal Crossing month.
 
It's nice to see some different games selling well on the 3DS than just Mario and Mario Kart everytime.

Injustice did horribly on the WiiU. It's not even in the value charts, so numbers must have been extremely low. There are reasons, but it still paints a terrible portrait of 3rd party sales on the console and the future support it might get.

Even Deadly Premonition managed to chart well above it. A 2 and a half year "port" of a cult "classic".
 

-KRS-

Member
I missed the Swedish numbers update last week. Fire Emblem effectively being #1 here (#3 after PSN Voucher & WoW Game Card) is really surprising to me. I mean I couldn't find it in any stores I went to on Saturday (had to order online) but I just thought we got a small shipment or something. It's also the only 3DS game on the list this week which makes it even more surprising, since Sweden doesn't seem to like the 3DS that much. Not even Luigi's Mansion is on there. Anecdotally I could find Luigi's Mansion in almost every store I went to look for Fire Emblem at. Sweden hates Luigi confirmed? LM debuted at #7 here apparently, but it also went against Bioshock Infinite and Sly Cooper so I wouldn't expect it to be higher than that. But it dropped rather quickly after that. They should really stop counting those vouchers though. It just waters out the lists since they're always #1 and #2 pretty much.

I expect FE to drop out of the Swedish charts this week though since there probably hasn't been a new shipment yet looking at online store stocks. Only a few stores has any and the others won't have any new copies for some weeks it seems. Also the new high profile releases will likely push it down. Will be interesting.
 
Third party support will surely increase over the next months once PS4/Durango are put on sale and PS3/360 will be left behind.
I don't know where this notion is coming from at all.

The PS3 and 360 still selling are likely why the Wii U is still getting the few ports it does.

When developers shift entirely to next gen, they won't have a 360 SKU they can cheaply port to the Wii U.
 

liger05

Member
Let's see how much this is in raw units.

Injustice 360 is on third place and has sold less than Dead Island PS3, which accounts for 26% of Dead Island sales.



26% of 62,000 are 16,120 copies, let's be optimistic and take this as the best case scenario for the 360 version, which makes up for 58% of Injustice sales.

As a consequence, Injustice's maximum sales across all platforms for this week are 27,793 units.

4% of that are 1,111 units for the Wii U version, in an absolute best case scenario. It's most likely under 1'000 units.

That's not much, regardless of install base.

Yikes
 

guggnichso

Banned
Why is everyone still pointing out, that software on the Wii U has abysmal sales? The Wii U has abysmal sales, and as long as there are very few Wii U consoles out there, software sales on that consoles will be minimal.

I don't think we have to talk about this every single week until Nintendo brings out their heavy hitters and Wii U sales start to rise.
 

liger05

Member
Why is everyone still pointing out, that software on the Wii U has abysmal sales? The Wii U has abysmal sales, and as long as there are very few Wii U consoles out there, software sales on that consoles will be minimal.

I don't think we have to talk about this every single week until Nintendo brings out their heavy hitters and Wii U sales start to rise.

Thats a very long time away!!
 
Why is everyone still pointing out, that software on the Wii U has abysmal sales? The Wii U has abysmal sales, and as long as there are very few Wii U consoles out there, software sales on that consoles will be minimal.

I don't think we have to talk about this every single week until Nintendo brings out their heavy hitters and Wii U sales start to rise.

So we should just forget about the WiiU until September/October?

Well I guess Nintendo has, so it's fair enough ;)
 

Pie and Beans

Look for me on the local news, I'll be the guy arrested for trying to burn down a Nintendo exec's house.

The reality is far worse in that its most likely anywhere between 500-1000. This is the exact same problem Activision was facing with COD selling like 300 units a week early on, and whatever the low ass number Criterion enjoyed.

Thats why none of this is hyperbole, these numbers are just clear "kill all WiiU support dead, thing is stillborn" activators. Some theoretical future where Mario Kart in November jumpstarts the entire platform with an audience that also buys third party games on Nintendo platforms just isn't a calculated risk any sane person will take.
 

guggnichso

Banned
So we should just forget about the WiiU until September/October?

Well, what do you want to do otherwise? Rehash the same old posts every week again and again? Because that#s basically what this amounts to. We all could basically make some posting templates, or copy'n'paste out posts over to the new thread every week. *shrug*
 
Probably best to ignore post histories and focus on the question at hand: How are the sales for Injustice Wii-U?

They don't look too hot to me. Makes me wonder how the games below it on the Wii-U chart are selling.

Business decisions were a bit against the game, though.
We have to consider the context; just think about it a second:
-released one week later all the other versions
-UK, where Wii U is doing even worse than in other PAL territories
-Wii U userbase is low
-sort of new IP
 

Foshy

Member
Business decisions were a bit against the game, though.
We have to consider the context; just think about it a second:
-released one week later all the other versions
-UK, where Wii U is doing even worse than in other PAL territories
-Wii U userbase is low
-sort of new IP

You know, these points all sound good and fine in theory, but when it sold only a thousand units (if even that) while the other versions are doing more than 10x that in their second week it's pretty clear that the average Wii U owner isn't the market for that type of game.

Also, I'm not sure if it's really a big problem that it's releasing one week late. You hear from a lot of Wii U owners that they'd rather get that version instead of the others, and 7 more days isn't really a long wait.
 

guggnichso

Banned
Business decisions were a bit against the game, though.
We have to consider the context; just think about it a second:
-released one week later all the other versions
-UK, where Wii U is doing even worse than in other PAL territories
-Wii U userbase is low
-sort of new IP

- Most important online functionality (inviting and playing against your friendlist buddies) not included. Probability of addition via patch uncertain.

But well, I bought it, and I can play Ranked matches online without having to wait more than 10 seconds for a new challenger, so I'm not disappointed.

However, Wii U's problems will not be fixed by 3rd parties, and Nintendo will have to get the sales for their console going by themselves. And they have to do so fast. They managed to turn the 3DS sales around, now let them put some effort into the Wii U (they should have done this from the start).

Ok, that's my statement regarding the Wii U until september ;)
 

Shahadan

Member
No but seriously, why the fuck would you buy any game with an online mode on Wii U if you already have a 360 or a ps3? (which is likely for almost everyone buying videogames)
Your friends are all there.
That's the flaw of Nintendo's willingness to receive the same support than its competitors.

Unless the thing starts to sell in the hundred of thousands rapidly, or it receives a version of PS4/720 games, multiplat games are doomed to boot.

Blops2 was a nice thing to port I guess, but no way it would have sold bajillions.
 
You know, these points all sound good and fine in theory, but when it sold only a thousand units (if even that) while the other versions are doing more than 10x that in their second week it's pretty clear that the average Wii U owner isn't the market for that type of game.

Also, I'm not sure if it's really a big problem that it's releasing one week late. You hear from a lot of Wii U owners that they'd rather get that version instead of the others, and 7 more days isn't really a long wait.

Wii U is not a market for late and lazy portings? Glad you discovered this.

Edit: I mean, just think how much could have sold ME Collection on Wii U, instead of a lazy, though good, porting of ME3. Or, for example, NFSMW released as a launch game. Or instead of Deus Ex, Tom Raider. Not million of units, but it could have been a good start. Now we're in the cycle:
-develop lazy porting
-gamers don't buy them obviously
-companies complain why they failed
-no more games
 

Pie and Beans

Look for me on the local news, I'll be the guy arrested for trying to burn down a Nintendo exec's house.
Wii U is not a market for late and lazy portings? Glad you discovered this.

I love this continual painting of the WiiU audience as these ultra snobs, the hardcore princes and princesses of gaming that will never lower themselves to such efforts because they are far too busy playing everything else on the system.

The reality is its not a market for anyone but Nintendo's own published properties.
 
The quality of the ports doesn't seem to matter much.

It's not exactly the quality. It's that you're selling old games, often at full price, to people that probably already played them elsewhere, or they could find them cheaper. Early Wii U adopters are likely to have either PS3 or 360, so why they should buy a 2 year old Deus Ex, a ME3 when elsewhere there's the collection, etc.?

I love this continual painting of the WiiU audience as these ultra snobs, the hardcore princes and princesses of gaming that will never lower themselves to such efforts because they are far too busy playing everything else on the system.

The reality is its not a market for anyone but Nintendo's own published properties.

You completely missinterpret what I wrote.
Wii U audience is likely to already have an HD platform. Or a PC. Selling one, even two year old porting is stupid, because you're selling a full price game to people that already had the occasion to buy it elsewhere, cheaper.

Do you think that a porting of Tomb Raider on PS4 will do wonders?
 

NotLiquid

Member
Straight Right are probably going to be rolling in their sleep once Deus Ex hits. As good as that port looks it's probably going to tank like a motherfucker and we'll all be back singing the "wasted effort" tune, which is a shame since both them and Criterion are going some good lengths in making their games into slightly compelling re-releases.

These things are built for a user base that just doesn't exist yet and Nintendo are the ones who are going to have to fix that. Of course for late ports there might never be a base for such. I can only imagine Injustice Wii U is doing better in America where it was a simultaneous launch.

It's also going to be interesting to see how Splinter Cell Blacklist performs on the console. It's the first simultaneous multiplatform launch that's going to happen after Nintendo puts out a few key titles and hopefully expand their user base.
 

Pie and Beans

Look for me on the local news, I'll be the guy arrested for trying to burn down a Nintendo exec's house.
It's not exactly the quality. It's that you're selling old games, often at full price, to people that probably already played them elsewhere, or they could find them cheaper. Early Wii U adopters are likely to have either PS3 or 360, so why they should buy a 2 year old Deus Ex, a ME3 when elsewhere there's the collection, etc.?

Because Off TV Play is a "killer feature" and Nintendo created their entire new console under the assumption that it would be?

If Nintendo can't offer 360/PS3 gamers a compelling reason to play multi-plats on their system, then thats their problem. NFS was the definitive version, Injustice is merely one week late, but the WiiU audience doesn't care.

In comparison, when cross-gen games launch on PS4 and Xbox 720, the improved graphics, social functions, and things like streaming and recording will make for incentives for people to buy those games on those new platforms despite being on the old ones. No such luck for WiiU as the market has decided the GamePad is an irrelevant value add and it doesnt have enough horsepower for a defining leap in graphical quality.
 
It's not exactly the quality. It's that you're selling old games, often at full price, to people that probably already played them elsewhere, or they could find them cheaper. Early Wii U adopters are likely to have either PS3 or 360, so why they should buy a 2 year old Deus Ex, a ME3 when elsewhere there's the collection, etc.?



You completely missinterpret what I wrote.
Wii U audience is likely to already have an HD platform. Or a PC. Selling one, even two year old porting is stupid, because you're selling a full price game to people that already had the occasion to buy it elsewhere, cheaper.

Damn, you should have been on the Nintendo marketing team to tell them that 3rd party ports wouldn't sell for shit since almost everyone that buys a Wii U will already have a current gen console to play said games on.
 

Foshy

Member
Wii U is not a market for late and lazy portings? Glad you discovered this.

Edit: I mean, just think how much could have sold ME Collection on Wii U, instead of a lazy, though good, porting of ME3. Or, for example, NFSMW released as a launch game. Or instead of Deus Ex, Tom Raider. Not million of units, but it could have been a good start. Now we're in the cycle:
-develop lazy porting
-gamers don't buy them obviously
-companies complain why they failed
-no more games

How is Injustice a late and lazy port? It's the very definition of a multiplat game, same content as the other versions.
 
Because Off TV Play is a "killer feature" and Nintendo created their entire new console under the assumption that it would be?

If Nintendo can't offer 360/PS3 gamers a compelling reason to play multi-plats on their system, then thats their problem. NFS was the definitive version, Injustice is merely one week late, but the WiiU audience doesn't care.

Why would PS360 owners buy a new platform for games that they can play on the device they already have, and why not, at a cheaper price?

It's not that one game or two released well (Call of Duty, for example) can offset all the other poor efforts.
 
Early Wii U adopters are likely to have either PS3 or 360, so why they should buy a 2 year old Deus Ex, a ME3 when elsewhere there's the collection, etc.?

You completely missinterpret what I wrote.
Wii U audience is likely to already have an HD platform.
Under your premise, there is no point in creating Wii U SKUs.
 

Pie and Beans

Look for me on the local news, I'll be the guy arrested for trying to burn down a Nintendo exec's house.
Why would PS360 owners buy a new platform for games that they can play on the device they already have, and why not, at a cheaper price?

It's not that one game or two released well (Call of Duty, for example) can offset all the other poor efforts.

In comparison, when cross-gen games launch on PS4 and Xbox 720, the improved graphics, social functions, and things like streaming and recording will make for incentives for people to buy those games on those new platforms despite being on the old ones. No such luck for WiiU as the market has decided the GamePad is an irrelevant value add and it doesnt have enough horsepower for a defining leap in graphical quality.

Nintendo created a new console in 2012 that was competing with 2006 consoles. When you play against the cutting edge technology game, if you're not lucky enough to have a casual fad behind you, this is the result. No value incentive to play cross-gen titles, no value incentive because youre not getting exclusives, no value incentive because it doesnt stand out from budget prices boxes available now.

Its going to be very interesting watching the over under on cross-gen titles like Destiny, Watch_dogs and more.
 
How is Injustice a late and lazy port? It's the very definition of a multiplat game, same content as the other versions.

Well its released a week late for some unknown reason and the online multiplayer is missing some pretty important features (though apparently it will be patched at some point)
 
Top Bottom