• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Polygon Rumor: Xbox 720 DRM, Achievements, Friendslist, and Share feature info

They're an extrinsic motivation system. Even if the devs greatly ignore them they cheapen and are antithetical to the intrinsic motivation of games.

Extrinsic systems have been a part of gaming since the beginning. My parents got into vicious Pacman High Score battles back in the day. Earning my way onto an Arcade high score page was my primary motivation for pumping quarters into machines.

Extrinsic systems are in many ways, more compelling than intrinsic systems because, when done correctly, they allow the game to break the fourth wall and live outside itself. A game that properly balances intrinsic and extrinsic motivations can be ridiculously compelling.

The best achievements have been ones that encourage players to play in a way that they would not have previously considered. The problem with achievements is 90% of the time they feel like after thoughts.
 
They're an extrinsic motivation system. Even if the devs greatly ignore them they cheapen and are antithetical to the intrinsic motivation of games.

No they are not, if anything when done right they can enhance the value of the game.

In Japan? You really think that's why the Xbox brand doesn't sell well at all there? Anything is going to enforce the negative perceptions, because the Japanese markets just don't want to play a console that isn't Japanese. (Also, I don't remember any Xbox 1 disc scratching issues; at least nothing major.)

Just the name alone could help a lot, add some Sega exclusivity like every single the released first and could help.
 

spekkeh

Banned
And this hurts you how?
they cheapen and are antithetical to the intrinsic motivation of games
It's well-known from psychological experiments that providing extrinsic rewards lowers the intrinsic motivation of an activity.



Extrinsic systems have been a part of gaming since the beginning. My parents got into vicious Pacman High Score battles back in the day. Earning my way onto an Arcade high score page was my primary motivation for pumping quarters into machines.

Extrinsic systems are in many ways, more compelling than intrinsic systems because, when done correctly, they allow the game to break the fourth wall and live outside itself. A game that properly balances intrinsic and extrinsic motivations can be ridiculously compelling.

The best achievements have been ones that encourage players to play in a way that they would not have previously considered. The problem with achievements is 90% of the time they feel like after thoughts.

This is an interesting observation. One I don't share, because I feel that the desire to get a high score is shifting the focus on the actual game enjoyment to something outside of it, but if you prefer that, then all the better for you.
 

Izick

Member
It's well-known from psychological experiments that providing extrinsic rewards lowers the intrinsic motivation of an activity.

I don't understand though. How do they cheapen it when you can just ignore them? I'm not sure if you can turn of notifications all together on the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 (should be an option in the next ones) but if you can, then you could (in theory) go through and never even acknowledge them.

They only affect the intrinsic rewards if you let them.
 
Now I'm sad that the Sega Spectrum won't be a rebranded nextbox lol. I would totally buy one.

Edit: @Izki yeah you can turn off the notifications. Lots of people do it in let's play videos to not spoil secret achievements.
 
That reminded me when I got 1000/1000 in RE5.I felt so accomplished by because I didn't cared for Versus Or the DLC, I never achieved completion.

One Vs 100 also had seasonal achievements. And some of them where available only during the actual live show.

I don't mind that in the slightest.
 

spekkeh

Banned
I don't understand though. How do they cheapen it when you can just ignore them? I'm not sure if you can turn of notifications all together on the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 (should be an option in the next ones) but if you can, then you could (in theory) go through and never even acknowledge them.

They only affect the intrinsic rewards if you let them.

This is true of course, and I have. Although I think the forced nature of them by MS can harm the gameplay because the devs have to work them in somehow, I'm mostly not too bothered. (although I do think the collectathon idea that blights current games is in part due to the popularity of Achievements) I was just stating why I thought achievements were categorically bad.
 
In Japan? You really think that's why the Xbox brand doesn't sell well at all there? Anything is going to enforce the negative perceptions, because the Japanese markets just don't want to play a console that isn't Japanese. (Also, I don't remember any Xbox 1 disc scratching issues; at least nothing major.)

they had issues with that in Japan with faulty drives after xb1 launched. Some got replaced / recalled.
 

graywolf323

Member
In Japan? You really think that's why the Xbox brand doesn't sell well at all there? Anything is going to enforce the negative perceptions, because the Japanese markets just don't want to play a console that isn't Japanese. (Also, I don't remember any Xbox 1 disc scratching issues; at least nothing major.)

didn't people used to say that about phones in Japan as well? from what I've read the iPhone proved that to be a fallacy
 

Izick

Member
didn't people used to say that about phones in Japan as well? from what I've read the iPhone proved that to be a fallacy

They may have, but I don't see that being analogous to this situation. Maybe some day an American company will be able to follow the iPhone breaking into the Japanese market, but I really don't know if we'll ever get a console that is as revolutionary as what the iPhone was for the cell market. The iPhone was something that was so revolutionary for its time, it just seems like a very, very special case that is going to be really hard to replicate in the video game space. Could be wrong though.
 

Izick

Member
*rubs beard* I wonder if the share feature was added recently. Is such a thing possible?

Probably not. I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft has had something similar to what Sony unveiled for quite some time now.

I was thinking the exact same thing. A lot of this news sounds very similar to PS4.

Right. It'll likely just be another repeat of this generation, where the consoles are nearly identical in games they get (sans first-party exclusives) and a somewhat comparable feature-set.
 

Satchel

Banned
Sorry, but adding achievements that can be missed forever is not on. It's already bad enough we have online achievements that can never be achieved given the communities are dead.

I believe it's another reason CoD is as successful as it is. No online achievements. They know what's up.
 
I am curious once these console are out 2-3 years from now what kind of drastic difference will be perceived on the forum. I am glad to be getting both this time as things should be getting more interesting.
 

Izick

Member
Man... "Xbox 1.5" was such a popular term on gaming forums back in 2005/2006. Forgot all about that.

Funny looking back on it.

It's funnier to see perceptions shift when reality sets in, and how people so easily forget the past and repeat it.
 

Izick

Member
assuming they do nail it there's going to be some fucking hilarious posts on GAF.

Can. Not. Wait.

Indeed, but it's also gong to be funny because I think a lot of gaming sites and publications have got all mucked up in this as well, much more so compared to 2005 when a lot of gaming press was focused and a little more professional, so it's going to be funny to see just how many people related to all of this just comes up looking foolish.
 
its going to be chaotic here if they deliver or not. i hope they do impress but no big deal if they fail ,I will just not buy their system
 

abadguy

Banned
Holy shit I remember when Xbox 1.5 was a real thing. People are nuts.

Very hard time to be on forums if you were interested in the 360 during and after E3 05. Then E3 06 happened, Gears of War dropped and crow was eaten. Yeah you'd think people would learn from that and yet here we are. Not a single game shown for the console, and we're back at the "xbox 1.5" stage.

Those were indeed great times. The PS3 chalkboard was and still is hilarious.

What was that about?
 

JaggedSac

Member
Content is king. And by content, I mean games. If MS has great games, lots of people will buy the box regardless of any online requirement schemes, or specs, or etc. I think they know this, and will have some really great games.
 

chris0701

Member
Very hard time to be on forums if you were interested in the 360 during and after E3 05. Then E3 06 happened, Gears of War dropped and crow was eaten. Yeah you'd think people would learn from that and yet here we are. Not a single game shown for the console, and we're back at the "xbox 1.5" stage.



What was that about?

Was that list "Those games will save PS3 ", included each game had been deleted one by one after terrible sales performance ?
 

Dunlop

Member
What was that about?

PS3chalkboard.png
 

jaypah

Member
*rubs beard* I wonder if the share feature was added recently. Is such a thing possible?

If I'm not totally wrong, it was mentioned in the 2010 MS leak (Yukon?). It's also been in the rumors since that first 720 roadmap leak. It was also brought up on the bombcast a few times, once when discussing the game capturing of COD ("this is what they have to do until the next consoles have this functionality built in") and once when talking about the 720 reveal ("Sony did good by going first, now when MS comes out and says the have game streaming/saving people are going to say "show us something new, Sony already has that").

I'm paraphrasing because I don't have the episodes in front of me. Truthfully I had only heard about game footage capturing in the context of MS so I was surprised to see Sony have it so fleshed out for the reveal. Early on some were speculating that it was one of the reasons for MS to be rumored to set aside so much RAM for the OS, though I think it has more to do with sending different data to different devices, if it's true at all.
 

JaseC

gave away the keys to the kingdom.
There was also the Secret PS3 game that was going to save it.. Pretty sure I saw a chalkboard with that added also.

FFXIII was, as far we knew, a PS3 exclusive up until E3 2008, so that's a glaring omission.
 

TriGen

Member
Content is king. And by content, I mean games. If MS has great games, lots of people will buy the box regardless of any online requirement schemes, or specs, or etc. I think they know this, and will have some really great games.

Me too. Microsoft might be more know for having the preferred multi-platform console, as oppose to being the big exclusive machine, but I expect them to be very aggressive in the first 3 years of the new Xbox with exclusives. They'll go after the hardcore pretty hard out of the gate.
 

ksdixon

Member
"The next Xbox will allow publishers to decide if their games should require an internet connection to be played."

Apparently they have backed-down on the 'always online' then? Not according to What The Tech's Paul Thurrott's sources a couple of days ago. But the rumors are literally trading off, one re-afirming the worse-case rumors, others saying it's not as bad etc, and they are literally day-by-day contradictions at this point. MicroSoft really need to reveal the Xbox and relevant details.

On a related note, if MS ''are'' now matching Sony's policy of letting publishers/devs decide on a game-by-game basis rather than locking-up the entire console, then that is a step upwards in the right direction. But XBL still has the "Gold Issue". It will be interesting to see if Sony are stupid enough to take a step down and start charging for online multilayer in a retooled PS+ service (the rumored PSWorld).
 

GavinGT

Banned
"The next Xbox will allow publishers to decide if their games should require an internet connection to be played."

Apparently they have backed-down on the 'always online' then? Not according to What The Tech's Paul Thurrott's sources a couple of days ago. But the rumors are literally trading off, one re-afirming the worse-case rumors, others saying it's not as bad etc, and they are literally day-by-day contradictions at this point. MicroSoft really need to reveal the Xbox and relevant details.

Twitterconvo_zpsed48067c.png


I suspect that most of the rumor-mongers are reading their own interpretations into "always online". The phrase showed up as early as the leaked Xbox document (page 9), but was always used ambiguously.
 

MaulerX

Member

Karma

Banned
Wasn't sure if this was already posted but here it goes (from today):


"We want to stand out these points; we keep our word about the always online. Durango won’t need internet connection to run games or apps (Games & Apps that you can run without internet, obviously)."

http://www.vgleaks.com/rumor-video-sharing-new-friends-system-and-enhanced-achievements-for-durango/



Sounds like VGleaks are adamant and putting their necks on the line against the always online (DRM) rumor.

I can't understand why people believe the always online rumor at all. MS would not wipe out all the sales they get from people without an Internet connection.
 

Salaadin

Member
I can't understand why people believe the always online rumor at all. MS would not wipe out all the sales they get from people without an Internet connection.

Edge started it, other 'insiders' confirmed it and then a MS employee took to twitter to defend it. For a while there, it looked to be all but officially confirmed.

Good news that VG Leaks is saying its not true. Theyve been pretty good with their predictions/rumors/whatever.
Itll be interesting to see which sources end up being legit on 5/21.
 
Top Bottom