• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Albert Penello puts dGPU Xbox One rumor to rest

Status
Not open for further replies.

eastmen

Banned
Really no point in arguing the pros and cons of MS DRM since the majority have voted it down and MS 180ed on it.

the majority is not always correct. Aside from that , no one ever said it was a majority , it could have (and most likely was ) a loud minority .


Your backing out of the conversation because you know when laid out truthfully the drm ms had set to release was not bad at all and in many ways benfitial to gamers.
 

onanie

Member
No. You don't need to reserve a fixed amount of your GPU resources for GPGPU.

PS4 is capable of a feature that Cerny calls "asynchronous fine-grain compute". On older GPUs you have a command processor that has a graphics pipeline for rendering and a compute pipeline for GPGPU. You can only do either rendering or GPGPU efficiently, both at the same time is pretty ineffecient.

AMD's GCN GPUs have asynchronous compute engines (ACEs). Basically, these ACEs are like additional compute pipelines for GPGPU. You can use them instead of the compute pipeline in the command processor. As a result, the latter will be able to focus on maximum rendering performance. A HD7970 has 2 of these ACEs, it can take care of 2 compute jobs at the same time. PS4 has 8 ACEs and can take care of 8 compute jobs at the same time.

To minimize the overhead for graphics rendering, you want to split your compute load into as many small jobs as possible (fine-grain) and "feed" it to your shader cores when they're not fully utilized during rendering jobs (which happens all the time on modern GPUs). Therefore each ACE has compute queues. A HD7970 only has 2 queues (one queue for each ACE), a PS4 has 64 compute queues (8 queues for each ACE). That means programmers can queue up to 64 different compute jobs at the same time in PS4. The 8 ACEs will choose the right jobs at the right time based on pre-defined dependences and according to Cerny you will not notice a penalty for graphics rendering since the ACEs wait until some part of the GPU is underutilized.

Hats off to you! A brilliant response.
 

Dragon

Banned
Fable (85%), Crackdown (83%), Dead Rising 2 (79%), Halo 3 (94%), Assassins Creed 2 (90%).
Old, sure. Lack of quality? Give me a break.

Fable sucks period. Anyone talking up that series needs to have their gaming cred questioned. But you're right, the rest of the games are older than most gamers in here.

the majority is not always correct. Aside from that , no one ever said it was a majority , it could have (and most likely was ) a loud minority .

Your backing out of the conversation because you know when laid out truthfully the drm ms had set to release was not bad at all and in many ways benfitial to gamers.

So the majority isn't correct but it isn't the majority according to you, so...what?

The DRM MS set up was anti-consumer. They have since gone back on it because it got such a response when announced and the fact they could not even explain it well enough themselves.
 

beast786

Member
the majority is not always correct. Aside from that , no one ever said it was a majority , it could have (and most likely was ) a loud minority .

yes I am sure it's the loud minority preorders that made them 180. yep a multibillion dollar company changes in a sec its core ideaology not based on factual preorders but loud Internet minority. if that's the case than they are even more inept than we thought.
 

chadskin

Member
the majority is not always correct. Aside from that , no one ever said it was a majority , it could have (and most likely was ) a loud minority .

The minority was big enough to force a multi-billion dollar company to radically change its principles on several occasions. After all, a minority of gamers (a.k.a. The Core Gamer®) will buy these consoles for $400/$500 at launch and have an influence on the majority.
 

VanWinkle

Member
I make perfect sense. I actually use steam often.


1) Steam allows me to shop around for the best deal. I bought two weeks after launch portal 2 at gamestop and saved $20 and was able to activate it on steam. This would be the same function with ms's original drm. I would be able to say buy dead rising on sale and convert it to DD as soon as I put it on my system. Thus I would be able to download it on any other system , play it with no disc and so on.

This is exactly the same as steam correct ?

2) Steam has sales - Xbox live had sales. Go into one of the threads.

3) Steam has an off line mode- xbox one drm would not have had this

4) Steam does not allow you to sell your games - xbox one drm would have allowed this

5) Steam does not allow you to lend games to your friends - xbox one drm would have allowed this .


I see one negative and 2 positive vs steam . Now its your turn to tell me how features aren't what ms claimed them to be and how ms would bait and switch what they were.

Cause that's always what happens instead of having a real conversation about it.

Can I buy five AAA EA games in a humble bundle for a dollar and activate them on Xbox One?

Speaking of which, how is the digital store competition looking on the One?
 

Dragon

Banned
He did not say that. At all. He said developers are getting same performance for games at launch. That is in no way indicative of future performance and discrepancies. He's demonstrating that it is possible. Even then, it's ultimately up to the devs, not Albert.

Since you have the inside track on Albert and how he feels about things, how does he feel about big breasts?
 

eastmen

Banned
The minority was big enough to force a multi-billion dollar company to radically change its principles on several occasions. After all, a minority of gamers (a.k.a. The Core Gamer®) will buy these consoles für $400/$500 at launch and have an influence on the majority.

The fans that got shows like veronica mars back on air even after executives canceled it or a movie for firefly made may seem large also at the time. But we see how small they are in hind sight .

Anyway off to bed for me.
 
Last post? Not even close. Sorry - still many more meme's yet to come.

As was kindly suggested by someone in a PM, it's unlikely anything more I'm going to post on this topic will make it better. People can believe me and trust I'm passing on the right information, or believe I'm spreading FUD and lies.

When I first started coming on, I said what I wanted to do was speak more directly and more honestly with the community, clarifying what we could because you guys have more detailed questions then we had been dealing with.

Regarding the power, I've tried to explain areas that are misunderstood and provide insight from the actual engineers on the system. We are working with the technical folks to get more in-depth. As I said - they are more credible then I am, and can provide a lot more detail. Best I leave it to them.

Next stop - launch itself. Only then, when the games release and developers will inevitably be asked to compare the systems, will we there be a satisfying answer.

Until then, as I have been, I'll try and answer what I can. But I'm not going to add more on this topic.

Why don't you answer the questions you've been getting about your statements being wrong?, and further explaining?, the light that illuminates you (and your company) is not flattering right now.
 
Loud enough at the very least. Loud an uninformed if the responses I've gotten to my like of the drm are anything to go by.

Being loud for more than 3 months did nothing, and somehow that loudness for the few days after E3 was?

And call it uninformed if you'd like, but MS didn't do anyone any favours at all, by looking as uninformed as the 'loud minority' were.
 

stonesak

Okay, if you really insist
He did not say that. At all. He said developers are getting same performance for games at launch. That is in no way indicative of future performance and discrepancies. He's demonstrating that it is possible. Even then, it's ultimately up to the devs, not Albert.

So then we can't use multiplats as a fair measuring stick of each system's power? Just want to be clear.
 

CLEEK

Member
yes I am sure it's the loud minority preorders that made them 180. yep a multibillion dollar company changes in a sec its core ideaology not based on factual preorders but loud Internet minority. if that's the case than they are even more inept than we thought.

Pre-orders (or lack of them) is key to everything we've seen with the One. Complete reversal of the major USPs for the One, backtracking on policies (mandatory online, mandatory connected Kinect etc) and culminating with the restructure of the executive team and departure of the person primarily responsible for the original One vision.

Shit like that doesn't happen based on a few snarky comments gaming forums or twitter. Monumental changes like we've seen with the Xbox only occur when there are severe dollar implications. If unchecked, the One would have utterly tanked. This was due to market forces, not vocal minorities venting online.
 

daxter01

8/8/2010 Blackace was here
after reading this threat I will suggest every one who is interested in buying 7850 to buy 7770 instead why bother more CU ,ALU ... etc are useless apparently
 
I have a friend at work who is going to get the XB1 at launch because of the achievement, he asked me if Destiny was a launch title, I said no, he asked what big games were coming so I asked if he was excited for Titanfall


He replied that he hasn't seen Titanfall lol

I laughed
 

jaypah

Member
He should ignore the haters?

Yes? Stupid .gifs and meme pics might be fun for us but he probably doesn't have time to deal with stuff like that. Or post that amount to "why is your product so shitty?". Now well reasoned questions from from gamers, regardless of their intention to buy a 180, should be welcome. But the snark and people who are hoping he loses it and gets banned...why shouldn't he ignore that?
 

FINALBOSS

Banned
the majority is not always correct. Aside from that , no one ever said it was a majority , it could have (and most likely was ) a loud minority .


Your backing out of the conversation because you know when laid out truthfully the drm ms had set to release was not bad at all and in many ways benfitial to gamers.

I'm backing out of the conversation because I wasn't in it to begin with.

I don't care enough to really participate in a discussion about DRM because it'll be filled with hypothetical assumptions.

My stance on the DRM was that it was draconian and broken.

after reading this threat I will suggest every one who is interested in buying 7850 to buy 7770 instead why bother more CU ,ALU ... etc are useless apparently

LOL. Pretty much the crux of Albert's stance in this thread. Funny when you turn it into PC components like that. But hey, if I add secret sauce to my PC that 7770 will be equal to the 7850.

Yes? Stupid .gifs and meme pics might be fun for us but he probably doesn't have time to deal with stuff like that. Or post that amount to "why is your product so shitty?". Now well reasoned questions from from gamers, regardless of their intention to buy a 180, should be welcome. But the snark and people who are hoping he loses it and gets banned...why shouldn't he ignore that?

Have you been in this thread long? There's been VERY little gifs/meme pics in this thread...nor were "why is your product shitty". The vast majority of responses in this thread have been on point and dealt directly with Albert's tech posts. And the only people that were banned were snarky Xbone dudes acting like douches.
 

B.O.O.M

Member
The fans that got shows like veronica mars back on air even after executives canceled it or a movie for firefly made may seem large also at the time. But we see how small they are in hind sight .

Anyway off to bed for me.

tumblr_m6v2p6P1mR1ranhnao1_500.gif


Yeah get some sleep..probably a good idea
 

Teriyaki

Member
If that's the case, then what's the point for better specs?

No one is going to care by then. The internet runs on instant gratification.

I think that's what makes this all this all so trivial. "Better" is subjective unless you're comparing raw numbers, but they don't magically translate into best experience. Multiplatform games looked better on one box versus the other, but people still bought versions because their friends were already on Live or PSN or they like one controller over the other.

The launch games are there to sell you on potential since the platforms aren't mature yet. They're intended to drive console sales, but in the long run that's not relevant if you're patient. Over time the experience that fits each person best will present itself, and the purchase choice will become more clear (and cheaper too). Console wars are pretty pointless.

Microsoft's biggest challenge for launch is that they're behind in terms of appeal. HW power is the least of their concerns relative to average consumers still thinking it has a spy camera, blocks used games, isn't worth $100 more, has to be online, and doesn't really stand for anything obvious.
 

eastmen

Banned
Can I buy five AAA EA games in a humble bundle for a dollar and activate them on Xbox One?

Speaking of which, how is the digital store competition looking on the One?

Not sure what this has to do with anything.


Could I get 2 free triple AAA games a month free on steam ? See how it works. Silly is silly .



The digital store competition looks fine for a closed box machine j ust like an iphone , android device , ps vita or ps3 or xbox 360.

Even steam is a closed digital store. I can't buy a game on steam and decide I want to move it to origin.

At the very least with MS's old drm I would have been able to buy it on the one and if I didn't like it , I could have sold it and then bought it on steam or origin thus recouping some of my loss. If I bought it on steam i'd have to suck it up and just buy it all over again loosing double the money.



See you expose another great feature on the original xbox one drm that doesn't exist on steam. Thank you for that.

Anyway good night
 

beast786

Member
Not sure what this has to do with anything.


Could I get 2 free triple AAA games a month free on steam ? See how it works. Silly is silly .




The digital store competition looks fine for a closed box machine j ust like an iphone , android device , ps vita or ps3 or xbox 360.

Even steam is a closed digital store. I can't buy a game on steam and decide I want to move it to origin.

At the very least with MS's old drm I would have been able to buy it on the one and if I didn't like it , I could have sold it and then bought it on steam or origin thus recouping some of my loss. If I bought it on steam i'd have to suck it up and just buy it all over again loosing double the money.



See you expose another great feature on the original xbox one drm that doesn't exist on steam. Thank you for that.

Anyway good night

how is it free? Don't you pay monthly/yearly subscription ?
 

FINALBOSS

Banned
I think that's what makes this all this all so trivial. "Better" is subjective unless you're comparing raw numbers, but they don't magically translate into best experience. Multiplatform games looked better on one box versus the other, but people still bought versions because their friends were already on Live or PSN or they like one controller over the other.

The launch games are there to sell you on potential since the platforms aren't mature yet. They're intended to drive console sales, but in the long run that's not relevant if you're patient. Over time the experience that fits each person best will present itself, and the purchase choice will become more clear (and cheaper too). Console wars are pretty pointless.

Microsoft's biggest challenge for launch is that they're behind in terms of appeal. HW power is the least of their concerns relative to average consumers still thinking it has a spy camera, blocks used games, isn't worth $100 more, has to be online, and doesn't really stand for anything obvious.

PS3 and 360 are at parity in terms of sales.

Guess which platform buys more multiplatform games.

To say the performance of a game on a particular platform doesn't factor into some peoples buying decisions is disingenuous at best and a lie at worst. Have you been in any face off threads?
 

Finalizer

Member
the majority is not always correct. Aside from that , no one ever said it was a majority , it could have (and most likely was ) a loud minority .

herewegoagain.jpg

So, pray tell, if MS was just listening to the "vocal minority, why exactly did they wait until after E3, after pre-orders went live, to actually change the DRM in the Xbone? There was certainly no shortage of outcry leading up to the event. Certainly the "vocal minority" was being quite vocal about their distaste for the obnoxious DRM leading up to then. But then, it's suddenly becomes important for MS to listen to this "vocal minority" after months of confrontation that exploded after the reveal.

Again - MS waited until they had tangible proof that their policies were causing a real problem, until they could numerically prove that they were losing support thanks to their message. It was nothing to do with quelling a "vocal minority" and everything to do with making sure the Xbone wasn't doomed to become the next Dreamcast.
 

chadskin

Member
At the very least with MS's old drm I would have been able to buy it on the one and if I didn't like it , I could have sold it and then bought it on steam or origin thus recouping some of my loss. If I bought it on steam i'd have to suck it up and just buy it all over again loosing double the money.

Now you can buy games for the X1 and sell them if you didn't like them (probably making more money since you don't have to sell your games to "eligible MS partners" but everyone you choose).

You don't think you could have sold digital games, do you?
 
Played a little bit of PS4 games at PAX.... Ryse looks great, Forza is fantastic. I think Killzone looks awesome.... However, any difference between those games is subjective of course and subject to viewer bias, but looking at both systems it's hard to substantiate any claims around 40% - 50%.
This very post by you might substantiate the claim, actually. You say both Ryse and Killzone look great. But if you played the PS4 games at PAX then Killzone was multiplayer, running at 40-50fps. Ryse runs at 30fps. That's about 50% greater performance on PS4, according to you.
 
Albert,

GAF is easily one of the largest videogame forums on the net, and contains a ton of industry professionals and plain ol fans who know their shit. If the purpose of trying to rebuke what you or Microsoft feels are unfair or unsubstantiated claims about the supposed PS4/XB1 power difference, then you guys really should have someone come on here that can answer those questions directly.

I think your intentions were really great, giving us info supposedly straight from the source, but the problem is there's no possibility for a true dialogue here, since we're not actually speaking to said software engineer - we're speaking to you, who knows much, much less on the matter (though you still know a billion times more shit than I do on the matter). So when you post something that this engineer claims, and literally dozens of posters call him or her out on being incorrect, the only response we're seeing from you is a puffing of the chest, a ruffling of feathers.

And in a sense, I don't blame you, because it's damn daunting having hundreds of people drooling in anticipation of you tripping up, barking at your posts. But at the same time, it's only fair - they all think at least part of what you posted (on behalf of the engineer) is factually wrong. And the purpose of your posts in this thread were to clear the air over those, and other statements and facts.

So the way I see it, you need to get someone like that engineer to answer these questions directly (if swaying this forum's opinion on these matters is that important to you). You need to get them an account, or you need to set up a thread where people can pick however many questions to send to him for him to answer directly. And there needs to be an option for rebuttal, because frankly a ton of people on this forum don't think Microsoft has been 100% upfront, transparent, or honest in these past 6 months, and if there are going to be technically confusing and detailed questions and answers, there's probably going to be the need for more than one back and one forth.

So don't try to go Spartan (300 reference, not Ryse) in this thread, even if that is your job. I admit that it's somewhat fun to read, but not for the manner that you intend, and you honestly do seem like a pretty decent and approachable guy. If I were talking to Don Mattrick right now, I probably wouldn't be trying to help him step out of the flames (you don't have to reply to that).

So even though I know your guys are super busy right now, set up something with someone who can answer these questions directly, as they come in. Get him to sit in front of a computer for an hour or two and answer some designated (but potentially) tough questions. Lord over him, approve his responses before he sends them if you want, but if you really want to dissuade this unbalanced power groupthink, then that's the way to do it.
 

onanie

Member
Basis is this:

1. Personally, I've seen both systems and games live at E3, Gamescom, and PAX. Played a little bit of PS4 games at PAX. There are great looking games on both systems. Ryse looks great, Forza is fantastic. I think Killzone looks awesome, and honestly have not been impressed with DriveClub (although it came a LONG way since E3). I really would like to see Infamous in person, but it hasn't been shown that I've seen. However, any difference between those games is subjective of course and subject to viewer bias, but looking at both systems it's hard to substantiate any claims around 40% - 50%

2. We're in the final stages of game and SW development now. We're working closely with 3rd parties as we approach launch. Reports we're hearing back from developers consistently are confirming that cross-plat games are running the same on both platforms.

I believe there is a point back near E3 where developers would have said their games were running better on PS4. I think Marc Whitten made the point that we'd just completed some driver work about a month ago just before Gamescom. And look at the frame-rate improvements in DR3 between Gamescom and PAX. We're making huge strides in our SW stability, and again, we have customized and balanced the system to reduce bottlenecks and optimize performance, in ways that aren't seen in the published specs.

As to the follow-up questions; I posted earlier I'm working with the engineers directly who I think (and you guys think) will be more credible than I am. I did say that I went to them for some supporting points which I posted here - so at this point it's probably best to let them speak on it. I'm not sure when, but more detail will show up.

It's late, and it's clear I'm doing more harm then good at this point. So best to let this rest from my seat and get back to you guys with the most credible source.

Thank you for your participation in GAF. Sleep well, and don't forget my questions! http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=80965437#post80965437
 

Dragon

Banned
Albert,

GAF is easily one of the largest videogame forums on the net, and contains a ton of industry professionals and plain ol fans who know their shit. If the purpose of trying to rebuke what you or Microsoft feels are unfair or unsubstantiated claims about the supposed PS4/XB1 power difference, then you guys really should have someone come on here that can answer those questions directly.

I think your intentions were really great, giving us info supposedly straight from the source, but the problem is there's no possibility for a true dialogue here, since we're not actually speaking to said software engineer - we're speaking to you, who knows much, much less on the matter (though you still know a billion times more shit than I do on the matter). So when you post something that this engineer claims, and literally dozens of posters call him or her out on being incorrect, the only response we're seeing from you is a puffing of the chest, a ruffling of feathers.

And in a sense, I don't blame you, because it's damn daunting having hundreds of people drooling in anticipation of you tripping up, barking at your posts. But at the same time, it's only fair - they all think at least part of what you posted (on behalf of the engineer) is factually wrong. And the purpose of your posts in this thread were to clear the air over those, and other statements and facts.

So the way I see it, you need to get someone like that engineer to answer these questions directly (if swaying this forum's opinion on these matters is that important to you). You need to get them an account, or you need to set up a thread where people can pick however many questions to send to him for him to answer directly. And there needs to be an option for rebuttal, because frankly a ton of people on this forum don't think Microsoft has been 100% upfront, transparent, or honest in these past 6 months, and if there are going to be technically confusing and detailed questions and answers, there's probably going to be the need for more than one back and one forth.

So don't try to go Spartan (300 reference, not Ryse) in this thread, even if that is your job. I admit that it's somewhat fun to read, but not for the manner that you intend, and you honestly do seem like a pretty decent and approachable guy. If I were talking to Don Mattrick right now, I probably wouldn't be trying to help him step out of the flames (you don't have to reply to that).

So even though I know your guys are super busy right now, set up something with someone who can answer these questions directly, as they come in. Get him to sit in front of a computer for an hour or two and answer some designated (but potentially) tough questions. Lord over him, approve his responses before he sends them if you want, but if you really want to dissuade this unbalanced power groupthink, then that's the way to do it.

Kudos, you should post more often over here instead of just in Off Topic or wherever you're hiding!
 
This very post by you might substantiate the claim, actually. You say both Ryse and Killzone look great. But if you played the PS4 games at PAX then Killzone was multiplayer, running at 40-50fps. Ryse runs at 30fps. That's about 50% greater performance on PS4, according to you.

And Driveclub runs at 30fps. What's your point?

Also, Killzone's campaign mode is locked at 30fps.
 

kitch9

Banned
I have a few points:

AMD will provide the drivers for the GPU for both, surely? If not, I'm not sure I trust MS with this.

If a boss asks an employee if they did a good job they will always say yes, they believe so.

Since GPUS were invented, the ones were the fastest were the ones which had more stuff and did them faster, what has changed?

Both machines have hardware cycles currently reserved by the manufacturer for future updates which may or may not be needed, and neither will have reserved the same as each other so to try to comment on how much juice they have left in the tank is a little mis-leading, no?
 

Jeels

Member
the majority is not always correct. Aside from that , no one ever said it was a majority , it could have (and most likely was ) a loud minority .


Your backing out of the conversation because you know when laid out truthfully the drm ms had set to release was not bad at all and in many ways benfitial to gamers.

Such a loud minority that we need bots spamming twitter to out message them....
 
Albert,

GAF is easily one of the largest videogame forums on the net, and contains a ton of industry professionals and plain ol fans who know their shit. If the purpose of trying to rebuke what you or Microsoft feels are unfair or unsubstantiated claims about the supposed PS4/XB1 power difference, then you guys really should have someone come on here that can answer those questions directly.

I think your intentions were really great, giving us info supposedly straight from the source, but the problem is there's no possibility for a true dialogue here, since we're not actually speaking to said software engineer - we're speaking to you, who knows much, much less on the matter (though you still know a billion times more shit than I do on the matter). So when you post something that this engineer claims, and literally dozens of posters call him or her out on being incorrect, the only response we're seeing from you is a puffing of the chest, a ruffling of feathers.

And in a sense, I don't blame you, because it's damn daunting having hundreds of people drooling in anticipation of you tripping up, barking at your posts. But at the same time, it's only fair - they all think at least part of what you posted (on behalf of the engineer) is factually wrong. And the purpose of your posts in this thread were to clear the air over those, and other statements and facts.

So the way I see it, you need to get someone like that engineer to answer these questions directly (if swaying this forum's opinion on these matters is that important to you). You need to get them an account, or you need to set up a thread where people can pick however many questions to send to him for him to answer directly. And there needs to be an option for rebuttal, because frankly a ton of people on this forum don't think Microsoft has been 100% upfront, transparent, or honest in these past 6 months, and if there are going to be technically confusing and detailed questions and answers, there's probably going to be the need for more than one back and one forth.

So don't try to go Spartan (300 reference, not Ryse) in this thread, even if that is your job. I admit that it's somewhat fun to read, but not for the manner that you intend, and you honestly do seem like a pretty decent and approachable guy. If I were talking to Don Mattrick right now, I probably wouldn't be trying to help him step out of the flames (you don't have to reply to that).

So even though I know your guys are super busy right now, set up something with someone who can answer these questions directly, as they come in. Get him to sit in front of a computer for an hour or two and answer some designated (but potentially) tough questions. Lord over him, approve his responses before he sends them if you want, but if you really want to dissuade this unbalanced power groupthink, then that's the way to do it.
This.Hopefully he sees this.
 

chadskin

Member
This very post by you might substantiate the claim, actually. You say both Ryse and Killzone look great. But if you played the PS4 games at PAX then Killzone was multiplayer, running at 40-50fps. Ryse runs at 30fps. That's about 50% greater performance on PS4, according to you.

FPS comparisons will only get you so far.
As an easy example: Counter-Strike: Source has hundreds of FPS on 640x480 and with everything turned off but looks like shit. Pump it up to 1920x1080, turn everything on and you'll have much less FPS but the game looks miles better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom