It's really annoying to see so many folks try to belittle the conversation as people just piling on MS for the sake of it. Really, the problem with these interviews is that it's the same song and dance every time - MS representative says something stupid, and ends up either appearing totally out-of-touch or just trying to avoid the heart of the real issue. Whenever it comes to the DRM and other policies and their subsequent 180s, rather than fess up to their mistake, they dance around the issue by trying to paint it with "well consumers just weren't ready" or "we just didn't get the message out correctly" which simply further insults the intelligence of anyone keyed in.
On top of that, you've still got a few people defending the policies out of pure fanboyism. Those individuals represent a real problem for everyone - people who welcome the dissolution of consumer rights purely out of blind faith in a company that they can never see as doing any wrong by virtue of it being their favorite corporation. It sets an ugly precedent when you've got people just sitting by and accepting, even defending, those policies, even in the wake of their removal, and the potential for that attitude to spread just makes it that much easier for MS to justify bringing it all back.
With that in mind, of course you're going to see people quick to jump on MS whenever this stuff is brought up - until they outright apologize* for ever trying to implement these anti-consumer policies in the first place and acknowledge that their vision, in and of itself, was the problem, these threads are going to largely follow the same format - MS rep says something glaringly transparent, Gaffers call the statements out as such, and we get 20+ pages of laughing at a fool.
*No, I'm not referring to Nelson's "apology tour" that amounts to little more than a direct Q&A; I mean a direct statement from the likes of Spencer or some other head of the Xbox division.