Controller battery life seems so much greater then the PS4.....how did they do that?
By using standard batteries rather than internal rechargable?
Controller battery life seems so much greater then the PS4.....how did they do that?
Controller battery life seems so much greater then the PS4.....how did they do that?
The main issue I think, is it has a bit of a learning curve like google voice, you have to know when to speak and when not to.Also many of the reviews have multiple ppl talking and them not knowing the system right. I'am sure after a few days of using the X1 the voice commands will work well because people will know how to use them correctly.
I don't think anybody said it would crash and burn, I actually think the reviews have been pretty accurate with predictions, only the awful voice recognition is the shocker.
no touchpad?
no touchpad?
You've got people crying that reviewers didn't make a big enough deal about the One's perceived deficiencies compared to the PS4. It's idiotic.
Shit, some people are really catching feelings in here.
Sorry the One didn't crash and burn like you wanted it to guys.
Is there any review that mentions if the Kinect can be placed on top of a TV without buying an extra mount?
It's the same as a sports car comparison where one is endlessly praised for its voice navigation while the other receives little to no praise for having both more power and a significantly cheaper price point. It's just bad writing and reasoning.
Well, I like it on PC (when properly configured) and I find it really useful. XBONE UI looks awful though.Such a terrible UI. Metro UI (I refuse to call it Modern) is just a mess.
Let's see the launch week past before we all start gloating, eh?
They could keep voice commands as well, sans Kinect.
Well, it's not like that at all, but ok. Maybe, JUST MAYBE, certain reviewers are choosing to focus on the experience delivered as opposed to raw numbers.
For some people, the extra horsepower of the PS4 will deliver what they consider a superior experience. Others will prefer certain XBone features.
Why is that such a difficult concept for some people to grasp?
Is there any review that mentions if the Kinect can be placed on top of a TV without buying an extra mount?
The broken HDMI-passthrough is indeed bullshit. This is one of the things that just has to work for people to use it. I wanted to connect my AppleTV to it, but as long as it corrupts the quality, I just won't do it. The stereo downmix is a joke.
I wasn't expecting to use voice navigation, but the reliability seems to be a joke as well. 90% reliability doesn't sound to bad at first sight, but if you imagine every tenth command to do nothing or - worse - something else, just just won't use it.
Kinect has to work perfectly or not at all. Even though it's seemingly a huge step up from the previous model (which was so bad I'm amazed MS ever released it to consumers), if I have to fucking repeat myself at all I ain't using it.
If your TV has a large enough surface on top and is very stable I can't see why not.
My TV has a decent area on top I can sit it on and I'll do what I did with the last Kinect and use some velcro to keep it on. Never once did it wobble at all, velcro is amazing stuff.
Other than fashioning something yourself pretty sure you'd need some sort of mount.
You stopped one step short of calling us SonyGAF.Shit, some people are really catching feelings in here.
Sorry the One didn't crash and burn like you wanted it to guys.
but it sounds like the OS is optimised for voice, and can be a bit difficult to find/do things when using the controller - eg game DVR sounds horrible without voice. So kind of rock-hard place potentially?
Well, it's not like that at all, but ok. Maybe, JUST MAYBE, certain reviewers are choosing to focus on the experience delivered as opposed to raw numbers.
Is there any review that mentions if the Kinect can be placed on top of a TV without buying an extra mount?
You stopped one step short of calling us SonyGAF.
Why is this hardware review thread full of so much contempt?
The main PS4 thread here is quite large and filled with complaints about what the system does and doesn't do. Many of those issues are replied to with "probably get patched pretty soon" or something similar.
Why is it that the One is being attacked for not being perfect out the box when many of you know that some of these issues will probably be ironed out and fairly soon?
Both of these companies should have had their shit together but they don't, obviously. It's too much to ask that they be given the same treatment?
Polygon describes that the Kinect blasts the room with IR to change the channel on the cable box? Wouldn't there be some room for failure without something that can reflect the beam?
Feels like that way....I'll probably buy a PS4 eventually but the tech and features that Microsoft have put into the box are really exciting, it does look like next gen.
The problem with the PS4 is that it's mainly a gaming machine with nothing much else at the moment but at launch, it actually looks like the xbox has better games
Your Eyes should be good enough.
[*]reports of Noticeable lag from HDMI IN
Come onnnn Polygon. Let's see that 8.0
Well, it's not like that at all, but ok. Maybe, JUST MAYBE, certain reviewers are choosing to focus on the experience delivered as opposed to raw numbers.
For some people, the extra horsepower of the PS4 will deliver what they consider a superior experience. Others will prefer certain XBone features.
Why is that such a difficult concept for some people to grasp?
A review by any reasonable journalist should attempt to cover all facets of a consumer electronic device comparison
If you were reading reviews by journalists of various TV models and they only talked of the smart tv options without mentioning that one of the 2 tvs was stuck at 720p versus 1080p for the other would that not seem silly to you? (don't mean this as a direct analogy, XB1 is capable of 1080p etc.)
There is no reason why you wouldn't talk about hardware spec or power differentials
The closest hardware reviews for this type of things would be laptops wherein which you would literally spend most of the time on hardware spec comparisons
Well why is one form of advertising okay and not the other? I just find it funny that people that normally soak in ads everywhere in society and more often than not through stuff they have paid for for unrelated reasons, have suddenly turn into anti-advertising zealots.
Ads are not inherently bad, and from what I've seen of XB1's UI, they are not intrusive to the experience at all.
Eurogamer:
That's the best summary of the situation I've seen and mirrors my feelings. Sony did an wonderful job creating an amazing gaming system at an awesome price that's sure to be supported by some of the best games. That's a great deal for gamers. I can fully understand why most are in that camp. Years ago, I would be there too.
However, I'm past those years. Been around long enough to have enjoyed my share of game consoles. I'm ready for something that aims toward the future and is willing to gamble at being revolutionary. For as amazing as the PS4 is, it's playing it safe. It's more of what we've already gotten only done much better. It's a PS3 on steroids and that's a great thing. That's exactly what many core gamers want and what will serve them best.
But what intrigues me at this point is something that is willing to take risks and push this industry forward. Three OS's, snapping, cloud, kinect, hdmi input, DVR, and IR blasting for full living room home theater control. Maybe those innovations pay off and become new standards for all consoles. Or maybe they fizzle and die. That's what's so exciting about it.
I'm confused as to how the ps4 thread is different. You said it's full of complaints (as is this one) and it's filled with people saying it will get better over time (as is this one).
If people are being harder on the xbox one than the ps4 it's because it billed itself as an all in one box that seemingly doesn't live up to that promise yet. The ps4 billed itself as a game machine with share/streaming and it does both of those things wonderfully.
That's Microsoft's fault, not ours. They said it would take over the living room. Most reviews say it's a step back in controlling your living room.
But, like the Sony thread, there are many people pointing out it will get better. There's no need to get defensive.
Well, it's not like that at all, but ok. Maybe, JUST MAYBE, certain reviewers are choosing to focus on the experience delivered as opposed to raw numbers.
For some people, the extra horsepower of the PS4 will deliver what they consider a superior experience. Others will prefer certain XBone features.
Why is that such a difficult concept for some people to grasp?
I'm confused as to how the ps4 thread is different. You said it's full of complaints (as is this one) and it's filled with people saying it will get better over time (as is this one).
If people are being harder on the xbox one than the ps4 it's because it billed itself as an all in one box that seemingly doesn't live up to that promise yet. The ps4 billed itself as a game machine with share/streaming and it does both of those things wonderfully.
That's Microsoft's fault, not ours. They said it would take over the living room. Most reviews say it's a step back in controlling your living room.
But, like the Sony thread, there are many people pointing out it will get better. There's no need to get defensive.
So...PS4 billing itself as a games machine but showing a dearth of quality titles at launch is given a pass cause "we know it's coming", for example...but the One SHOULD be torn a new one cause "MS said"?
Seriously?
I think you get my point but I'll retreat. I'm not a fan of forum squabbles.