• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PC Low Settings Screenshot Thread

louiedog

Member
rVKcSzs.jpg


0T2E9o9.jpg


The textures on objects you can interact with remain good enough to make out. The textures for things like letters where there's fine typed text or handwriting are as sharp as they are at higher settings which is important to the core of the gameplay. I didn't post any screenshots of those though as some people are very spoiler sensitive about that in this game.
 
This thread makes me confident that my goal of building a powerful PC that outputs most next gen games at 60FPS is not as crazy as it sounds.

Apart from the battlefield and Serious sam pics, nothing in this thread looks so bad that I couldn't play.

framerate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>graphics every damn time.
 
This thread makes me confident that my goal of building a powerful PC that outputs most next gen games at 60FPS is not as crazy as it sounds.

Apart from the battlefield and Serious sam pics, nothing in this thread looks so bad that I couldn't play.

framerate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>graphics every damn time.

Not to mention the differences between "Extreme" and "Very High" or w/e are often negligible.
 

Sinfamy

Member
I wonder if there anybody else other than myself who literally feels sick when playing games on low.
I get slightly dizzy and my eyes start to hurt a lot. I tried playing FF7 on the PS2, god my eyes were tearing, I couldn't take it.
 

Kinyou

Member
I wonder if there anybody else other than myself who literally feels sick when playing games on low.
I get slightly dizzy and my eyes start to hurt a lot. I tried playing FF7 on the PS2, god my eyes were tearing, I couldn't take it.
Never heard of that before, but hey, maybe you can convince your health care provider to pay for your new pc
 

Sectus

Member
Not really low settings as the game has no graphics settings besides resolution, but I think the unpatched version of Resident Evil 4 on PC counts for this.

re4-part10-06-39-21yas6g.jpg


re4-part12-42-13-133xsn9.jpg
 

Stimpack

Member
*edit*

Actually, I'm going to delete this and fix things up a bit in settings. It appears on low settings that the FOV was just changed drastically.
 

Yusaku

Member
It might be a good idea to make it a rule to not do under sampling for games that support it (like bf4). If you set that to it's lowest setting it looks like it's running on a NES.
 

Mona

Banned
im not sure Crytek understands what low settings is supposed to mean heh.

although the first Crysis looks unbelievably puke on lowest settings
 

Clawww

Member
Not really low settings as the game has no graphics settings besides resolution, but I think the unpatched version of Resident Evil 4 on PC counts for this.

haha, when I saw this thread on the front page I thought to myself, I should post those RE4 screens in here

so bad
 

KKRT00

Member
im not sure Crytek understands what low settings is supposed to mean heh.

although the first Crysis looks unbelievably puke on lowest settings

Their low settings run on all new integrated GPUs, so i think they made a good design decision.
 

Paganmoon

Member
This thread has shown me (again) that Mass Effect 3 looks the same on low and high settings... Couldn't even add Film-grain to make it look less plastic
 

KOCMOHABT

Member
I want to see what some modern games look like at super low res. like this:

quake-split.jpg

I give you Crysis 2 in 320*200 (scaled up 2x afterwards)
screenshot0027scaleqis6y.jpg


After this I set out to make "play like it's 99" mode.
So this is not actually low, but the textures are at 1/16 (!) resolution (of default at low). Also anisotropy, who needs it. Same goes with AA. Not hardcore enough. Shadow jittering lol. nope.

Actually Crysis 2 is the most impressive game at low. Incredibly smooth framerate on old hardware, while retaining stuff like dynamic lighting (obviously), SSAO, per-object-motionblur (!), DOF, postprocessing AA, Anisotropic 8x, dynamic sun shafts

but anyway. 1999. here it is. Note how the street texture in the first picture would still be acceptable for most current productions (with filtering of course), while being at 1/16th resolution.
screenshot00309fsui.jpg

screenshot0033wds33.jpg


EDIT: forgot that only 2 screens allowed, deleted some of these.
 
Just came into this thread, it's fascinating. Some of these games (shoutout to the CoD devs) still look really good at lowest settings, still better than PS3/360. But some of them, man oh man, just awful.
 

M3d10n

Member
I give you Crysis 2 in 320*200 (scaled up 2x afterwards)
screenshot0027scaleqis6y.jpg


After this I set out to make "play like it's 99" mode.
So this is not actually low, but the textures are at 1/16 (!) resolution (of default at low). Also anisotropy, who needs it. Same goes with AA. Not hardcore enough. Shadow jittering lol. nope.

Actually Crysis 2 is the most impressive game at low. Incredibly smooth framerate on old hardware, while retaining stuff like dynamic lighting (obviously), SSAO, per-object-motionblur (!), DOF, postprocessing AA, Anisotropic 8x, dynamic sun shafts

but anyway. 1999. here it is. Note how the street texture in the first picture would still be acceptable for most current productions (with filtering of course), while being at 1/16th resolution.
screenshot00309fsui.jpg

screenshot0033wds33.jpg

screenshot0047j3sxu.jpg


EDIT: forgot that only 2 screens allowed, deleted some of these.

It looks kinda surrealistic. That picture in the last screen almost looks like hand-made pixel art.
 
It does slightly defeat the point, me thinks, for the people using old games on low settings.

I do think a lot of modern games on "low" still look really good and playable... just glad my rigs are good enough I don't have to worry about them :)
 

Crisium

Member
Yeah, I do like some of the low settings, but SSAA High Resolution pics. Notice how they still look pretty decent? This is why many of us say resolution trumps all - and we are very disappointment to hear a console game is running in 1600x900 or, god-forbid, 1280x720 in 2013-2014. Even the Xbone can run BF4 at 1920x1080, I just wish DICE/EA valued resolution over some of the other settings...
 
Top Bottom