Has this link been consistent throughout history or are you taking the actions of a few in the last 2-3 decades as representative of a 1400yr old religion? Islamic terrorism is just like any other form of terrorism: a complex phenomena that is difficult to explain and where the answers always have to be sought in history. That’s true for Irish terrorism, Socialist terrorism, Separatist terrorism, etc. Nobody would explain away the IRA as an inherently Christian problem despite the presence of a religious dimension in the Irish conflict. The real elephant in the room is the existence of an inequality of suffering that has existed for centuries at this point. An inequality with Whites at the top and non-Whites at the bottom. That sentence alone will probably be reason enough for some people to dismiss the rest of this post. There goes ‘the racism’ again, the ‘historical justification’, the ‘blaming of the West’. Just deal with the real problem: ‘your religion’! But this inequality of suffering is perhaps the most important part of Islamic/Middle Eastern terrorism. My father, a liberal and pretty moderate Muslim, always taught me about the ways Muslims around the world have suffered at the hands of the West. It’s probably an important part in the upbringing of most Muslims, especially those living in Europe. And it isn’t wrong. Through political coups, sponsorship of tyrants, the creation of the State of Israel and military interventions Muslims have been tortured, forced to flee and killed by Western hands, even if sometimes indirectly. This suffering at ‘our hands’ and its rather immense size is never really felt in the West because Muslim, Arabic and brown lives are devalued so much. I mean, two decades into this century we have seen the complete destabilization of the Middle East. The situation in Iraq is downright chaotic and it’s had real destructive consequences in the entire region. Are these developments the result of Islam? Hell no, they’re the result of a military intervention by the US and the UK (and allies) that was based on either misjudged information or outright lies (most Muslims will believe they were lies by the way). Similarly, are the actions of violent Palestinians the result of Islam, or of their oppression by Western-backed Israel? Ignoring the political and historical reasons behind attacks like these is just taking the easy way out. And if you’ve just read all that and thought ‘get outta here with your whataboutism or whatever’ than I don’t know what else to say. A handful of attacks have certain elements in the West ready to adopt a philosophy of a ‘War of Civilizations’. So what do you think 2 centuries of colonization, war, coups, military intervention and drone strikes have done to Muslims across the world? If there were to be a War of Civilizations most Muslims would have no problem pointing out the aggressor and victim and, by sheer numbers alone, they wouldn’t be wrong.
Now, I just want to mention that this isn’t a defence of Islam, though it could be seen as a defence of Muslims. I don’t believe in Islam anymore for a reason. I think Islam, like most religions, is extremely patriarchal, controlling of sexuality and intolerant towards those thinking too differently. Even those things are more complex than just evil and backwards however. I also think that the secularization of Europe had more to do with certain economic and societal developments mostly outside the control of the people themselves and that changes in morality were more often the result of those developments than their cause. And though Islam has problems of its own, I am still confident that it isn’t immune to that process of secularization but that things will progress roughly how they’ve progressed within the Christian world. I’d be more than happy to have a conversation about Islam and to talk about the issues (not all of which I agree with) you mention in your second paragraph but I think taking Islam as the main or even merely one of the more important lenses through which to analyse terrorism is just flat out wrong. Modern day terrorism cannot be discussed with talking about politics and history. Otherwise we’re just talking around the real, difficult issues.