Kabuki Waq
Member
macksplack said:i hope they do this so the franchise will completely be dead
nah the same tools that are complaining about this are the same tools that will bend over and buy the game day one when it releases.
macksplack said:i hope they do this so the franchise will completely be dead
Kabuki Waq said:nah the same tools that are complaining about this are the same tools that will bend over and buy the game day one when it releases.
-viper- said:What the fuck does he mean by that?
Is he trying to tell us the consumers WANT TO PAY MORE MONEY?
Cornbread78 said:MoH, your up buddy, followed by Brink, Rage, and once KZ3 and R3 come out, I'll be all-set with my sci-fi shooters for a long time... ... Please let me save the $60 dollars.
GAF always makes the mistake of thinking their opinion is universal. When it comes to shooters, nothing is further from the truth.Kabuki Waq said:nah the same tools that are complaining about this are the same tools that will bend over and buy the game day one when it releases.
I remember paying (well, my dad paying) $15 for these, like, unofficial 100 map packs for Warcraft 2. :lolKintaro said:Call of Duty players pay $15 for fucking map packs. Yes, CoD customers have more than proven that they want to pay more money for Call of Duty.
If gamers have proven one thing this entire generation, its that you want to pay MORE for gaming. You paid $10 MORE per title. You paid $50 MORE just to play online. You paid $15 MORE just for maps. You paid MORE for DLC. You paid MORE for the hardware and you paid for it over and over and over again (those customers who bought replacement 360 after replacement 360 when they red ringed).
Gamers have paid more for less and any business man would be foolish not to make them do it again and again and again.
Thanks man!Najaf said:Strange. I linked to it off of myHere is the appropriate part. He goes on to talk about being taken under Steve Wynn's wing and whatnot. Yes; that Steve Wynn.Activision stock ticker.
MomoPufflet said:Just admit that all you fucktards will eat it up when it happens, just like that stupid map pack that sold millions. Let's skip the feigned outrage step please.
Kabuki Waq said:nah the same tools that are complaining about this are the same tools that will bend over and buy the game day one when it releases.
eznark said:I don't see why everyone is shocked. Every single publisher would love to be able to make their games a subscription based platform, the difference here is that Kotick and CoD will absolutely be able to make it work.
Thank God I think the games are shit.
Danielsan said:First they will make you pay for the online in Call of Duty.
You will cry foul and bitch but you will you give in.
Then they will raise the price.
Rinse and repeat.
Danielsan said:First they will make you pay for the online in Call of Duty.
You will cry foul and bitch but you will you give in.
Then they will raise the price.
Rinse and repeat.
Darklord said:That would kill CoD. $20 map pack is one thing, $20 a month when games like MoH and BC2 are out? LOL. Yeah, some people would pay but not 20 million.
Genesis Knight said:These generalizations are dumb. Of the entire CoD install base, GAF and enthusiast gamers were the least likely to buy the map packs - I didn't, and my 'core' gamer friends didn't either. The people who did were the ones mentioned above: the Madden/NBA/'Duty' gamers who make few purchases and are unaware of what is a good price for a map pack and what is highway robbery.
Please. I can't get my roommate to stop playing it late-night, and I want L4D2 on the bigscreen. :lolDon't listen to the naysayers, just do it Bobby. And the earlier the better.
eznark said:GAF always makes the mistake of thinking their opinion is universal. When it comes to shooters, nothing is further from the truth.
There are toooons of gamers who make two purchases a year, Madden and CoD. They don't give a shit who the developer is, they don't give a shit about dedicated servers, and they won't give a shit about paying an extra $5-10 a month to play their one game.
(also, lol USA soccer)
Genesis Knight said:These generalizations are dumb.
Genesis Knight said:But if it makes your e-peen hard to gloat in between greasy FFXIII games, I guess you've got to do what you've got to do.
TheGreatDave said::lol He's like a cartoon villain.
Red Scarlet said:Man, I remember when that lawyer guy was the "gamer villain", this guy is like the superboss compared to him.
carlo6529 said:The day they start charging a montly fee for call of duty games, is the day I stop buying call of duty games.
Kintaro said:Pfft. EA would just copy Activision step for step. Then what? John R. is already thinking about how to raise the cost of games that contain 3D. You think he wouldn't co-sign this? Get real.
Darklord said:He didn't release $20 map packs did he? And no, John R is a businessman but not as much of a scum bag as Kotick. EA would probably use the subscription of CoD to promote their own games like they did with the no dedicated server back-lash.
I can just imagine seeing "NO subscription fees!" on the front on a MoH box, right next to MW3 saying "Subscription required".
Sir Garbageman said:Yup. No way in hell would I or any of my buds buy that game. Vote with your dollars people.
MomoPufflet said:Just admit that all you fucktards will eat it up when it happens, just like that stupid map pack that sold millions. Let's skip the feigned outrage step please.
Y2Kev said:So do it. What are you waiting for?
Probably setting up the infrastructure right naomckmas8808 said:Such a great question. He's acting as if he can't make it happen.
Kintaro said:BF:BC2 used the CoD backlash and still can't make a dent in the CoD fortress. Also, have you already forgotten the backlash over online codes in EA sport titles? EA beat Activision to the punch there. Don't act like John R. isn't trying to get your money just as much.
Kintaro said:BF:BC2 used the CoD backlash and still can't make a dent in the CoD fortress. Also, have you already forgotten the backlash over online codes in EA sport titles? EA beat Activision to the punch there. Don't act like John R. isn't trying to get your money just as much.