Drag the photo into the Google images search bar.
This will forever change the way I browse the net. Thank you base gaf.
Drag the photo into the Google images search bar.
She's gorgeous.
Imperfect upper lips are GAF's new sharp knees. You guys are ridiculous.
This will forever change the way I browse the net. Thank you base gaf.
Indeed I actually find her lips to be attractive as fuck. Where is that virginkiddance.gif when you need it.
Same. Dat Cupid's Bow. Reminds me of Rosie Huntington-Whitely...
Which isn't really bad thing. I mean Andrej looks a like woman, not like a man.She looks like the transsexual model Andrej Pejic.
Same. I can't bring myself to 'right-click -> save as', but every time I see the topic title I open the thread and let out a sigh of delight. She's flawless. That cupids bow gap is hot as hell too.
My brain needed a couple of seconds to adjust to the 2nd girl's face.
Supermodels:
Beauty is a funny thing really.
Asians always win for me.
So what do you think about her without all the make up and false eyelashes ?
I'm not denying that she's beautiful. I'm saying the fact that the Mail's 'mathematically most beautiful British woman' is white is no coincidence, and denying that is giving the Mail way to much credit.
And what should Da Vinci even have to do with it? White European decides proportions of white European female face are mathematically most beautiful? Stop the presses.
i saw a girl once. she looked at me and told me to leave her alone.
i am so lonely guys
Could use those foreheads as billboards.
Adolf approves of this post.
What happened to this:
Oh god, stop. Please. This has nothing to do with race. You are making this into a huge issue for no reason at all.
It's the fucking Daily Mail. Of course there's a fucking agenda.
The competition was organised by Lorraine Cosmetics based in New York. The Mail just covered it. You seem to think they went out and scouted 8000 women just for some thinly-veiled piece on white supremacy.
Google her name and there are more articles about her. All from horrifically biased white-supremacy sites, obviously.Where does it say it was for Lorraine Cosmetics? It reads like it was for Lorraine the daytime TV show.
What do you want her to say? "This woman exhibits all of the traits we associate with a classical beauty and therefore we should do a radical 180 and decide on a whole new paradigm for beauty just to please a vocal minority"?Oh and back to Carmen, I just noticed this:
"Florence has all the classic signs of beauty,' she added. 'She has large eyes, high cheekbones, full lips and a fair complexion. Symmetry appears to be a very important cue to attractiveness."
Which doesn't do anyone any favours. Could argue that it goes for 'classic signs of beauty' but it gets it all mixed up in that article which just ends up spouting out that classic signs of beauty pretty much equal modern signs of beauty. It's like Harry Potter being written in Olde English.
What do you want her to say? "This woman exhibits all of the traits we associate with a classical beauty and therefore we should do a radical 180 and decide on a whole new paradigm for beauty just to please a vocal minority"?
I'd argue that a 'fair' complexion does not mean 'must be light skinned' but I'm guessing I'd be fighting a losing battle.
RELAYER said:"Fair complexion" does not mean "She's white"
It means she has blemish free skin. Jesus.
In the meantime, let's go and read the Beyonce thread for a little compare & contrast. I've already seen one post explicitly calling out her dark skin as a source of her beauty.
Just pointing out an interesting 'classical' choice of words. Mostly hear the word clear rather than fair when regarding clear skin.
Meanwhile in England...
What?
I dunno where you're from, but I've heard "fair" used quite often by people in England. Maybe it's a generational thing.
Google her name and there are more articles about her. All from horrifically biased white-supremacy sites, obviously.
What do you want her to say? "This woman exhibits all of the traits we associate with a classical beauty and therefore we should do a radical 180 and decide on a whole new paradigm for beauty just to please a vocal minority"?
I'd argue that a 'fair' complexion does not mean 'must be light skinned' but I'm guessing I'd be fighting a losing battle. In the meantime, let's go and read the Beyonce thread for a little compare & contrast. I've already seen one post explicitly calling out her dark skin as a source of her beauty.
Yeh I'm from England and it's a fairly typical word here.
We use it to describe most things. But using fair in that context makes me think of fair hair, which means bright. Not clean. Or fair weather, which means bright. Not dark. Just me being fairist.
Should point out that I'm not saying there's anything inherently racist about that article itself, just that there's something inherently rotten about the paper it stems from.
The competition was organised by Lorraine Cosmetics based in New York. The Mail just covered it. You seem to think they went out and scouted 8000 women just for some thinly-veiled piece on white supremacy.
Of course I don't think that.
Let me put it another way: I don't think the Mail would have reported it if she was a member of an ethic minority.
I think they would have, but the article would have had a different angle.
You might be right.Of course I don't think that.
Let me put it another way: I don't think the Mail would have reported it if she was a member of an ethic minority.
Removing her make up will reveal her sharp knees.Let's see her without the cakes of makeup.
this is america's most mathematically good lookin woman