I don't think they could at this point. Sony & Microsoft's systems are extremely similar, so there's no use for Nintendo to offer a third console that's just like the other two when most of the market already got cozy with those kinds of systems from Sony & Microsoft.They need to stop buying into their own bullshit and actually try to compete again. Not, "Here's a peripheral with alternative inputs, you devs figure out something to do with it."
I'm talking about actually competitive hardware performance with the services to match. Without those crippling disadvantages the odds of third-parties showing up increase which should help with sales and make their first-party offerings and good support for local multiplayer actual difference-makers instead of consolation prizes.
Since I only have time for one console, It's gonna be real difficult for Nintendo to win me back, but if they can get hardware on par with ps5, or next xbox, and good third-party support then I might choose there next console, buts that's not gonna happen. There hardware has no value for me since the wii brand came out.
Its why it bummed me out Retro got stuck with Donkey Kong. They seemed like a studio that could scratch that itch but then they got put on more Nintendo formula Nintendo games. I am as tired of it as I am the Ubisoft formula.
I don't think they could at this point. Sony & Microsoft's systems are extremely similar, so there's no use for Nintendo to offer a third console that's just like the other two when most of the market already got cozy with those kinds of systems from Sony & Microsoft.
I find it very unlikely the next Xbox/PS are launching in the same year as Wii U's successor. Without that, there's no chance of them matching future tech.
....Yeah3rd party support and a modern online system are obvious things they need but I will stick to just Nintendo as a game company here... The 3rd parties aren't coming back, but DeNA was brought on to help with the online system part.
I miss the Nintendo of the N64 era.
You had Mario and Zelda over there doing great Mario and Zelda things but on the other end you had Rare making games like Goldeneye and Perfect Dark. More action-y Teen rated games. Bayonetta 2 & The Wonderful 101 say hi. Ever since then it seemed like Nintendo has abandoned that audience.
That kind of stuff I want from Nintendo again.
Branch out from the core franchises they recycle over and over. Splatoon, The Wonderful 101, Xenoblade Chronicles, & Code Name: STEAM all say hi Dont be afraid to get out of the E for everyone and 3 and up rating. Bayonetta 2 & Fatal Frame say hi
Its why it bummed me out Retro got stuck with Donkey Kong. Yeah, they got stuck with what turned out to be one of the best games of 2014 & one of the greatest platforms of all time. How unfortunate. Besides, they have a new project coming & we may learn of it this E3. They seemed like a studio that could scratch that itch but then they got put on more Nintendo formula Nintendo games. I am as tired of it as I am the Ubisoft formula.
The quality is still clearly there... I am just tired of it.
Maybe open world Zelda U is a start is shaking things up again though.
Nvidia Titan X alone is $999. Although it's unlikelyThere is no way the next Xbox/PS are launching in the same year as Wii U's successor. Without that, there's no chance of Nintendo matching tech from the future unless it cost like $999.
But the third parties aren't coming back. It's not just about the system, but it's about the audience Nintendo tends to attract & the general stigma of the Nintendo brand to the uneducated audience that tends to buy Sony & Microsoft (not all, just a good chunk of the casual buyer). Besides, Nintendo going with a different route gives more justification of buying it alongside a Sony or Microsoft system, since they're practically the same anyway.The point is it would make it easier for third-parties to support them and in a visual comparison or line up they wouldn't be at such a disadvantage.
Their entire hardware philosophy should be thrown out frankly. At least the GCN and Wii were cheap, the 3DS and Wii U made far too many tradeoffs for features that not many people care about. Performance has gotten too cheap with ARM/x64 and die shrinks have gotten too expensive to justify the kind of custom hardware that Nintendo stuck with on Wii U.
That's the thing, they're never coming back. Or at the very least, they won't return for the foreseeable future.If their next system has the same third party games as Sony and Microsoft, I'm back.
....Yeah
a virtual console library that is gigantic and completely connected through a unified account system. every single NES/SNES/GB/GBA/N64 game should be available on the virtual console. with online functionality implemented. (if I could play snes bomberman against my friends like 15 years ago on my Dell laptop, I should be able to do it on video game hardware today)
But the third parties aren't coming back. It's not just about the system, but it's about the audience Nintendo tends to attract & the general stigma of the Nintendo brand to the uneducated audience that tends to buy Sony & Microsoft (not all, just a good chunk of the casual buyer). Besides, Nintendo going with a different route gives more justification of buying it alongside a Sony or Microsoft system, since they're practically the same anyway.
More single player focused games. I don't care if they're third or first party.
But hardware performance is only half the problem, & the other half isn't one that can be fixed at the flip of a switch. It'd take years to wash away the stigma from the common gamer.The audience that has bought into PS4 and XB1 are plenty educated on the things that matter to them and a big one is third-party support.
Nintendo's refusal to at least be competitive on performance is a self-inflicted wound drives away the kind of people who buy third-party games to begin with and limits their audience to mostly hardcore Nintendo loyalists. It's not sustainable.
Haven't lost me yet, but they will if:
- Mario continues to be phoned in
- Zelda continues to be made to Aonuma's tastes and not to the tastes of fans of Zelda games made before Aonuma
- They don't actually justify the cost of their hardware with the quality improvements it adds to software
- They don't unify their account system
- They continue to dance around online multiplayer in places where it really belongs
Metroid wait for E3
F-Zero wait for E3
But hardware performance is only half the problem, & the other half isn't one that can be fixed at the flip of a switch. It'd take years to wash away the stigma from the common gamer.
That's the thing, they're never coming back. Or at the very least, they won't return for the foreseeable future.
You know its launching this year right? Club Nintendo has shut down so Nintendo can launch a unified account system. Id be surprised if we didnt get all the details at e3.
That would pretty much mean that Nintendo would have to charge for online, & free online is one of the only pros they have over the other two.So start now by fixing their services. Microsoft's have been better almost since day one. Sony managed to do a better job with theirs on a console with ~90MB of RAM for the OS, while the Wii U is equipped with 2GB so what's Nintendo's excuse?
Microsoft gained and squandered a great reputation over the course of a few years, while Sony lost a decade's worth of good will in months and managed to recover it. It's doable, but you have to actually accept that you have a problem and do more than change the curtains to pull it off.