I don't know about benchmarks, I'm talking actual gameplay, I was looking at videos on the tube and missed the benchmark which, now that I've seen it, does look really really good. But even official PR videos like this CAPCOM video (so I assume it's set to max visuals) aren't as good as that. That video doesn't just scream PS2 HD to you? Some elements are really HD sharp, but clearly lacking in detail, and areas use many simply flat surfaces and boxy designs. Granted, it looks much nicer than I remembered, it must be that enhancement pack someone mentioned, but Tri easily looks at least as good. And before the enhancement, which mostly seems to have vastly improved monster texture work and the previously jaggy low res foliage etc, as well as adding bloom, MH Tri looked easily superior. In some ways it still does to me (geometry levels most notably, though I imagine some of the newer MHFO stuff are just as good perhaps).
So, disregard that generational leap comment, but the bulk of the MHFO content, mainly the actual areas you traverse, is still inferior.
So, disregard that generational leap comment, but the bulk of the MHFO content, mainly the actual areas you traverse, is still inferior.