PetriP-TNT
Member
My standards are up in the sky and GTAIV is TOP10 games of this gen.
Hopefully this is new shots and details.
Hopefully this is new shots and details.
GTA IV was awful? Some of you guys have set your standards way too stupidly high.
Can't wait.
I'm guessing people feel that way because it wasn't as "zany" as the previous games. But I forgot all about that with Gay Tony.
We already forgot how terrible GTA4 was?
Ugh, I hate it when people use that reasoning.
There was barely anything to unlock, main characters choices never made sense to me, the "choice" stuff was never there when it was needed most etc.. I could go on
If anyone would like to refute the above claims, have at it.
Just because the earlier games didn't have it, doesn't mean it's better.stuff
I'm referring to the fact that there were only a few, small places where you could buy weapons.- Tedious accrual of weaponry
Too late. We'll debate it forever.please do not let this turn into another gtaiv GOOD OR BAD thread
Look at this guy.We already forgot how terrible GTA4 was?
I thought Rockstar typically used trailers for their game reveals, not magazine exclusives.
Just because the earlier games didn't have it, doesn't mean it's better.
You also seem to rationalize a lot of the points by saying "it wasn't that bad".
When it comes to long running franchises, my expectations are tempered by my experience w/ said franchise. I think this is why I so often find myself sitting back and enjoying games while it feels like everyone around me is losing their shit and crying about how disappointed they are and coming up with lists of flaws. That's not what gaming is about for me. *shrug*
We already forgot how terrible GTA4 was?
It's a poor game with high production values.
Reasoning:
-
- Cars handle poorly
If anyone would like to refute the above claims, have at it.
While we're giving feedback I'd like it if Rockstar dropped enemy count and instead improved enemy AI. I'm getting tired of gunning down hundreds of dumb cannon fodder all the time, I'd rather face a handful of enemies that communicated with each other, flanked, and used cover intelligently (i.e. didn't pop their heads up in the same spot over and over). Wishful thinking I know but I think it would make the gameplay less at odds with the narrative.
They probably guaranteed Rockstar PR an 11/10 review already.Worldwide exclusive for a dutch magazine ?
No. They didn't.
Eh. I want a smaller city with more to do and more functionality.I want a larger city, but not in scope. When I say larger I don't mean GTA:SA or even GTA4. I want a Vice City sized map, but double layered.
Eh. I want a smaller city with more to do and more functionality.
With more enterable buildings, after a point it's diminishing returns and there's no point/functionality of doing so.
Maybe next gen when we see BG&E2 chases through villas and stuff like that but not on this hardware.
It sounds nice but stuff like that could never be done "normally" through AI, it'd have to be mission based.Not if it allows me to do home invasions of a couple in a high rise condo, cap the guy, tie up the woman, open the sky-line door, kick down the umbrella table and roll her off the 125 storie balcony and jump after her to see how she lands.
Is Chief a new dutch gaming magazine? Never heard of it before. (I'm dutch)
i'm playing Lost and Damned now and the car/bike handling does need improvement.
Didn't they tweak the bike/car handling for TLAD? I have this memory of reading that they made bikes much more reliable and difficult to crash, and made the cars less responsive. The point being that Klebitz rides and drives like a biker would.
IV was a step in the wrong direction, without a doubt. V needs to return the series back to silliness
- Cars handle poorly
We already forgot how terrible GTA4 was?
if i wanted a racing sim, i'd buy a racing sim.yeaaaahh no.