• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Chinese president Xi Jinping has vowed to lead the “new world order”

Status
Not open for further replies.

Blablurn

Member
rtx2o6hm-e1487740963997.jpg


Chinese president Xi Jinping has vowed to lead the ”new world order"
Zheping Huang

Chinese president Xi Jinping has vowed for the first time that China should take the lead in shaping the ”new world order" and safeguarding international security, one of the latest moves putting him in stark contrast to Donald Trump and the US president's ”America First" policy.

Xi had on numerous occasions called for China to play an important part in building the new world order. But during a Feb. 17 national security seminar in Beijing, he indicated China should ”guide" the international community in the effort. A Feb. 20 commentary (link in Chinese) by the Chinese Communist Party's central party school, which trains officials, noted the distinction. It has since been widely shared by state-controlled media.

News outlets dubbed Xi's new approach the ”Two Guides" (两个引导) policy, with the ”two" referring to the new world order and international security. (China has an obsession with silly-sounding numbered policies.)

”The overall trend of world multi-polarization, economic globalization, and democratization of international relations remains unchanged. We should guide the international community to jointly build a more just and reasonable new world order," Xi was paraphrased by Xinhua (link in Chinese) as saying during last week's seminar. In another paragraph, the state newswire paraphrased Xi as saying ”We should guide the international community to jointly maintain international security."

Xi's new proposal has ”profound meaning," as his speech coincided with the annual Munich Security Conference and the G20 finance ministerial meeting, noted the commentary. It added that the Western-dominated world order is near its end as Western countries are showing less willingness and ability to interfere in global affairs—as evidenced by Trump's isolationist foreign policy.

Xi attended the seminar as head of the National Security Commission, a secretive party organ set up in 2014. Until last week, the body had held just one publicly reported meeting since its establishment. The latest seminar came ahead of the party's 19th congress, a major leadership reshuffle event slated for this fall.

Since Trump's election China has emerged as the world's strongest proponent of globalization.
In the past few months, Xi has been busy sending the world messages that are the exact opposite of Trump's.

As Trump promised to tear up the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Xi touted his alternative Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, including at last November's APEC summit, right in the US's backyard.

As Trump threatened to close the borders and back away from global affairs, Xi rebuked Trump—without mentioning his name—in his keynote speech at the 2017 World Economic Forum in January. As Trump pressed to curb immigration, Xi called to make it easier for foreigners to get Chinese green cards.

Xi and Trump appear aligned on one issue: the press. As Trump denounced the media as the ”enemy of the American people," China's state-controlled media marked the first anniversary (link in Chinese) of Xi's talk demanding ”absolute loyalty" from the press—an idea that Trump, it would seem, could get behind.

Source: https://qz.com/916382/chinese-president-xi-jinping-has-vowed-to-lead-the-new-world-order/

Interesting article on Xis push forward towards a new global order.

Are you ready to follow him, GAF?
 

vonStirlitz

Unconfirmed Member
Glorious Chinese New World Order needs you. Let us march to prosperity and bash imperialists.

Chairman Xi Wan Sui!
 
Well, he's already made the old leader of the world fall apart like wet tissue paper over the one china policy so who will stop him? John McCain?
 

aznpxdd

Member
Nice thought, but they should get their shit together in China first.

China might look nice on the surface (really even that's debatable), but really the standard of living is still faaaaaaaar off from the Western World, the shit people gotta deal with just living here is just...ugh. I say this as someone who has lived in China for 6+ years.
 

Blablurn

Member
Nice thought, but they should get their shit together in China first.

China might look nice on the surface (really even that's debatable), but really the standard of living is still faaaaaaaar off from the Western World, the shit people gotta deal with just living here is just...ugh. I say this as someone who has lived in China for 6+ years.

What do you mean?
 

Trickster

Member
I mean this is gonna happen sooner or later really as China becomes to dominating economic force in the world. Trump and his band of crazies are just helping make this happen more easily for china.
 

Sunster

Member
What do you mean?

Standard of living in China is low compared to US and the rest of the West.

I feel like China will grow during this administration while the US slides back. Idk about "leading the world" though. Not informed enough to say.
 

Mohonky

Member
I fear a confrontation between China and the west.


Highly doubtful. I just dont see it. China has generally stayed out of international conflicts (even though they tend to push the boundaries with territorial lines). They'd be more likely to financially bust someone than anything.
 

Dahaka

Member
China can't even take care of its own people

this

Well, he's already made the old leader of the world fall apart like wet tissue paper over the one china policy so who will stop him? John McCain?

John McCain's so called moderate rebels failed to topple Assad. I don't think Xinjiang is strong enough to challenge Beijing if he considers appearing there to take selfies with his future buddies.
 

justjohn

Member
Lol. I know Trump is rubbish but given the choice between living under a Trump govt and a chinese one, i know who id pick.
 
why not just post the official state source again :p

posting it via quartz and their convenient replacement of "guide" with lead does the original source no favours lol

either way, it's symbolic. china is starting regional geographic confrontations; regulating capital controls; tightening rather than loosening its efforts of globalizing the yuan; potential loses soft power in russia as an ally of assumed cooperation if trump and putin cozy up (why do you think china last year began importing more oil from russian than saudi arabia; it's not geographic its geo-political leverage; china wants russia relying more and more on china); and is implementing protectionist international financial regulation to vanguard itself against its restructured debt tidal wave bigger than the US circa 2008/09. politburo says one thing to fill in a symbolic vacuum left by trump, but its policies are the exact opposite at worst and mildly contrasting at best.

and i'm actually pro-china for both personal financial and family reasons lol but all this international leadership is symbolic at best. hah at least for the next few years until the capital/debt situation at home clears up. south china sea, japan, global leader, trump: politburo use as convenient distraction from capital/debt issue growing at home. which is smart, and wouldn't be the first time a country creates boogiemen or pretends to be a global leader/liberator to distract from problems at home.
 

Jashobeam

Member
you know, its a tough job but somebody's gotta do it.

well you talk about the money, you talk about beat'n people up, well its the new world order, and I hope it's ok because theres nothing you can do about it.


wLtezLl.jpg
 

BocoDragon

or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Realize This Assgrab is Delicious
This is exactly what Trump's rhetoric implies.

America first? Nationalism? Isolationism? Protectionism?

...okay... sure. You do that. You'll have many obvious candidates willing to step into the international order vacuum you are creating.


Lol. I know Trump is rubbish but given the choice between living under a Trump govt and a chinese one, i know who id pick.

.......

.....so, don't leave us hanging... which one?
 
This is exactly what Trump's rhetoric implies.

America first? Nationalism? Isolationism? Protectionism?

...okay... sure. You do that. You'll have many obvious candidates willing to step into the international order vacuum you are creating.




.......

.....so, don't leave us hanging... which one?

i thought his dumbass wanted to bring jobs to the US. who's going to buy our crap if China is leading the way?
 
I like the occasional dumb Kung Fu movie, plus big Trouble in little China is one of my favourite movies ever.

But no, I don't want China to lead "the new world order".
 

eizarus

Banned
China can't even take care of its own people
Neither can the US. Like many countries, China and the US ensure that the elite are comfortable, the working class are comfortable enough that they don't rebel and don't give a shit about anyone below that.
 

Timedog

good credit (by proxy)
All the people who actually know what any of those words in the quoted text in the OP are, are gone or will be leaving soon.
 

Usobuko

Banned
They spoke as if the end of Western dominated world is a bad thing.

I would much rather see Asia, Middle East and Africa to punch their weight. We deserve much better than to be seen as second class in this western dominated culturally, economically and politically world.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom