Boss Doggie
all my loli wolf companions are so moe
Ah so Venice, former City State right?
I'm not a big fan of another Italian Civ, Rome was enough in my opinion. Their UA is pretty unique however but I don't think I'll ever use it. Maybe for a one city culture challenge, maybe.
Rome and Venice are pretty far removed from one another (with the former being the imperial power of its time and the latter a wealthy merchant republic), apart from the capital city of both being in the Italian peninsula. Italia was just one small part of the Roman Empire.
I know, it still just rubs me the wrong way, especially when there are literally hundreds of other choices.
Venice isn't just "another Italian Civ", it represents a completely different period of history, wherein there was no communal Italian governorship, there were numerous city states that were often in rivalry or open conflict against each other, the Popes, and other major European states. At its height, it had virtual monopoly over the trade going through Constantinople and the Black Sea, a position of preeminence in Mediterranean trade, and it's territorial claims were such that their power wasn't broken until the Venetians ran headlong into the motherflippin' Ottoman Empire. They wouldn't cease self-governorship until running headlong into the person of motherflippin' Napoleon Bonaparte.I'm not a big fan of another Italian Civ, Rome was enough in my opinion. Their UA is pretty unique however but I don't think I'll ever use it. Maybe for a one city culture challenge, maybe.
Another Euro civ? Really?
Medieval-Early Modern. Reputedly founded in 421 AD, though it would be 500-600 years or so before it emerged as a pivotal player on the world stage.So Venice would be ancient Italy then?
Also it seems like buying the game from GMG won't hand you the code until its release date.
Venice isn't just "another Italian Civ", it represents a completely different period of history, wherein there was no communal Italian governorship, there were numerous city states that were often in rivalry or open conflict against each other, the Popes, and other major European states. At its height, it had virtual monopoly over the trade going through Constantinople and the Black Sea, a position of preeminence in Mediterranean trade, and it's territorial claims were such that their power wasn't broken until the Venetians ran headlong into the motherflippin' Ottoman Empire. They wouldn't cease self-governorship until running headlong into the person of motherflippin' Napoleon Bonaparte.
Gives you an idea of what sort of company Venice kept, non? These are not bit players in the scheme of European history.
So Venice would be ancient Italy then?
Also it seems like buying the game from GMG won't hand you the code until its release date.
Medieval-Early Modern. Reputedly founded in 421 AD, though it would be 500-600 years or so before it emerged as a pivotal player on the world stage.
No, the Most Serene Republic of Venice wasn't a city state until after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. So, medieval (and to some extent renaissance, though Venice's influence began to dwindle soon after) times, not ancient
Yes, as a city state, but it's not the same thing . Denmark didn't face the same objections raised when several city state names were retired with its inclusion, nor should Venice.Except that Venice is already in the game, as a city state. Admittedly, it had a greater contribution to Early Modern history than a NPC city state can achieve, but I rather have a unified Italy, which controlled more land area, was a colonial (albeit minor) power, and had a significant impact in modern Europe. Having Venice lessens, if not completely destroys, the chances for an Italy Civ.
Yes, as a city state, but it's not the same thing . Denmark didn't face the same objections raised when several city state names were retired with its inclusion, nor should Venice.
Yes, as a city state, but it's not the same thing . Denmark didn't face the same objections raised when several city state names were retired with its inclusion, nor should Venice.
If true, that's probably the best way to represent the Venetian Republic in Civilization and pretty in-line with the city-state historically.
Although it is strange to have an actual historical city-state be a civilization in this game. But I suppose that's due to the simplicity of the game more than anything (as city-states in the game aren't really differentiated from one another).
The UA is significant, but the list of things a Venice civ can do is still far, far longer than the list of things a Venice city state can do. Expanding by force and cash are two biggies, and they're through and through true to the empire the Venetians built. Historically as well, the city state appellation doesn't even begin to tell the whole story.And the rumored UA basically paints Venice as a super city state. That kind of kills the point of there being city states in the first place. Are we going to see a Singapore civ next?
I just feel that Venice does not fill the role of a Civ as well as other choices. Gameplay-wise, it's an interesting Civ, but I rather they look to other parts of the world, like Vietnam or an African kingdom.
Holy crap being able to pick bonuses from looting ruin is pretty awesome. I really like being able to run around with free movement archers early on in the game, being able to do this at will shall be godlike.
Free movement rocket arties would be even better. Could only be topped if someone modded Grit into the game and I got +1 range rocket arties that get an additional +2 range during golden ages awwww right
*Comanche, who themselves were an offshoot from the larger Shoshone peoples.Wait, why are Cherokees units? I thought the Shoshone and Cherokee are different?
So when do GMG codes typically go up?
I wonder if Social Policies still exist.
Ahh neat! I thought the culture overhaul redid them.Definitely - in fact, they added two new trees (Exploration and Aesthetics).
Memory of the Q&As is fuzzy, are the Ideology trees accessed like any other social policy, or did they show something a bit different?Definitely - in fact, they added two new trees (Exploration and Aesthetics).
Memory of the Q&As is fuzzy, are the Ideology trees accessed like any other social policy, or did they show something a bit different?
Ever since this expansion was announced. I stopped my playing of this cold turkey. I have it paid off, just waiting on this to drop. It looks utterly fantastic
Ever since this expansion was announced. I stopped my playing of this cold turkey. I have it paid off, just waiting on this to drop. It looks utterly fantastic
I'm itching to play more Civ, but the main game is a little boring by now. I'm debating on whether to buy Gods and Kings now and then upgrade to BNW when it comes out, but it seems like I'd be able to save money by waiting a month and getting a package deal. Does anyone have an opinion on this?