Really?With the recent success of the Playstation VR
"vr success"
I think when Nintendo do finally jump on VR they will school everyone with some amazingly creative games. The tech plus a new motion control method suits their creativity perfectly.
The tech just isn't there yet though for a Nintendo machine. Clunkiness and price point, for Nintendo it will have to be great and accessible for the whole family, not just nerds.
I think when Nintendo do finally jump on VR they will school everyone with some amazingly creative games. The tech plus a new motion control method suits their creativity perfectly.
The tech just isn't there yet though for a Nintendo machine. Clunkiness and price point, for Nintendo it will have to be great and accessible for the whole family, not just nerds.
Ps vr a success?? Define success?? Compared to other VR competitors (in a young market place) than yes, theyre kicking ass. In a market that plays videogames (new gimmick), Id say its poor compared to other Nintendo, Sony accessories not names Virtual Boy. PS VR is following PS Vitas early success, but Ill wait and see if Sony 1sr party studios will continue to churn out more games on it. Thatll determine if PS VR is here to stay long term
Regarding Nintendo, they follow the beat of there own drum. They rarely copy a market leader more like improve and re-design a thing or come out with a brand new way to play.
I wish I'd care to come back in 10 years time to laugh at this post.
Anyway I'll bookmark this thread just in case GAF is still around.
You really think standing up with a eyewear/headset on being locked out of the real world is going to take off for the masses?
It's not practical, comfortable or a form of media wanted by most. Only the most hardcore of gamers will spend money on something like this and I just don't see it ever making enough money to still be around in the future. While I'm sure it will find uses outside of games I just don't see it ever taking off enough for gaming companies to focus on.
At best it will still be the niche it is now, at worst it will be gone altogether.
I wish I'd care to come back in 10 years time to laugh at this post.
Anyway I'll bookmark this thread just in case GAF is still around.
Only a complete idiot would be stupid enough to still doubt VR by this point.
It's been obvious to anyone with common sense for years that it would be the future and its genuinely hard to believe that people stupid enough to doubt that fact can even exist.
It might be. Here are 10-year-old reactions to the iPhone.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=136250&page=33
"Wait... how do you surf the internet without a keypad? all touch screen? ick."
"Is the name "iPhone" really THAT great? Seems like it will be very expensive."
Geeze, wouldn't it be simpler to just call it 'iTalk' or something? Or 'iCall'?
"Here are some other alternatives:
iTel
iConnect
iChat
iCell
iMobile"
😂 That thread is a trip.It might be. Here are 10-year-old reactions to the iPhone.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=136250&page=33
"Wait... how do you surf the internet without a keypad? all touch screen? ick."
"Is the name "iPhone" really THAT great? Seems like it will be very expensive."
Geeze, wouldn't it be simpler to just call it 'iTalk' or something? Or 'iCall'?
"Here are some other alternatives:
iTel
iConnect
iChat
iCell
iMobile"
This is misleading because Samsung basically gives it away, very few people buy it standalone.
I think when people think off VR they imagine something like The Matrix, not a toaster on your head. And that's why I think VR at this point in time is simply a gimmick.
Nintendo will go after AR, not VR.
couldnt they just use the switch screen and put it in a VR helmet? Im throwing out a random assumption here
Nintendo will go after AR, not VR.