I disagree, it just depends on how they split the different parts IMO. If part 1 is Midgar you could easily skip it and start with part 2, especially with the whole Nibelheim flashback at Kalm that gives you a lot of backstory. Part 3 could start after awakening of the WEAPONs for example, where the original had a time skip (of a few months if I recall correctly) and the world was significantly altered.
If people can skip KH games and start half-through the series, I'm sure they will be fine with FFVII:R.
The thing is that in some ways the episodic nature of the game will feel bigger than ever before, and in some ways it will feel smaller.
They are no doubt going to polish every major story sequence, and make sure every dungeon and town is larger and meatier enough to satisfy modern gaming standards. In that sense it will be "more" than the original.
But of course it being multiple episodes means that it won't have the whole story or gameplay in a single release, and that's going to make it feel smaller. And no I don't think playing them all back to back will really add up to the experience of one big game.
The way I see it, this is not the original game. It's a new series of games based off of a classic game scenario. We'll have to judge it on its own merits because it will not be the original at all.
If the PS5 rumour is true, we could be seeing episodes split across console generations... just think about that.
It's one continuous narrative though. They're not going to radically alter the story to the point you can skip one part and play another, so it's ultimately episodic either way.
It seems like this is going to be episodic in the same way the Trails games are and they've had great success with the bolded. Those games are made on an incredibly modest budget though and Falcom has their priorities straight in a way SE doesn't.
It can be done. Can SE do it? Who can say.
Well if they want to be faithful and keep everything somewhat Intact with modern conventions they have to do this to justify the cost and this new approach.. inb4 people just wanted fresh hd coat ala crash.
Yes absolutely. It's incredibly dumb to do it episodically.
You want a game for the old fanbase that grew up with this.the more i think about this project, the more i appreciate just how doomed it is ...
squeenix's best best? ditch the realistic graphics for something simpler/stylized, & just focus on the gameplay (or, better yet, just leave it as it was?). under these conditions, ffvii remake might actually see the light of day ...
You want a game for the old fanbase that grew up with this.
the more i think about this project, the more i appreciate just how doomed it is ...
squeenix's best best? ditch the realistic graphics for something simpler/stylized, & just focus on the gameplay (or, better yet, just leave it as it was?). under these conditions, ffvii remake might actually see the light of day ...
I have no problems with it being episodic. Now if they take 2-3 years in between releases that changes my mind entirely.
I personally believe this will be one of the biggest disappointments in gaming history.
I hope it isn't though.
The third disc is basically just the final dungeon though.Final Fantasy 7's PS1 release has 3 discs/parts, I suppose the if the remake has 3 parts each part could end like the original did.
Square never even said it would be episodic. When it first broke in Dec of 2015 they said it would be "Multiple Parts" and each one would be comparable to full game. I don't think it can be compared to Telltale, Life is Strange or Hitman. Way bigger in scope.
It doesn't sound like they have a concrete vision for it. It doesn't even really sound much like they want to make it.
Episodic release wil be fine.
Original game was split into discs. Basically the same deal
FFVIIR is fucked. Royally fucked.
Original game was split into discs. Basically the same deal
How do you think Tetsuya Nomura will face those challenges?
Yes.Could Final Fantasy remake 7 greatly suffer
It's funny cause it's true.Yes.