Actually in that case the PC is the overall pick.
Actually, if one is only in the market for consoles, or have both consoles, the PS4 version is the overall pick.
Actually in that case the PC is the overall pick.
I'm not but the way they presented this minor diff of XB1 advantage in some particular situations and recommending the XB1 for performance is like PS4 version performance is worst. They can mention the advantage of XB1 which i don't mind it, but overall PS4 version is best in this game considering the dips which happened rare and very stress situations only, but their recommendation of go for XB1 for performance and IQ for PS4 is the one i dislike and they nitpicked this FPS diff in bad way.
Actually, if one is only in the market for consoles, or have both consoles, the PS4 version is the overall pick.
Factual, maybe, but it is dishonest to paint a narrative that PS4's persistent resolution advantage is equivalent to hand-picked instances of XB1's framerate advantage. If you are a consumer that wants both image quality and performance, there should be no question that PS4 is the overall pick.
I'm not but the way they presented this minor diff of XB1 advantage in some particular situations and recommending the XB1 for performance is like PS4 version performance is worst. They can mention the advantage of XB1 which i don't mind it, but overall PS4 version is best in this game considering the dips which happened rare and very stress situations only, but their recommendation of go for XB1 for performance and IQ for PS4 is the one i dislike and they nitpicked this FPS diff in bad way.
Factual, maybe, but it is dishonest to paint a narrative that PS4's persistent resolution advantage is equivalent to hand-picked instances of XB1's framerate advantage. If you are a consumer that wants both image quality and performance, there should be no question that PS4 is the overall pick.
An advantage of 1 FPS during 1% of the game is equal to being 1080p 100% of the game.
Then maybe next time you will add those qualifiers right from the start instead of making a blanket statement about the PS4 being the only version to get for consumers who want quality and framerate?
Where did you pull that 1% number from?
Frame-rate drops are extremely rare, only appearing in the most extreme circumstances
Surprise surprise eagle-eyed PS4 owners who would rather stab their eyes out than play at a sub-native resolution claim ignorance when it comes to regular framedrops.
Side-by-side the PS4 stills do look better than the XB1 but framedrops suck no matter what. If that's a tradeoff you're willing to make then knock yourself out but don't claim that it's not there or that it's imperceptible.
Not sure why more developers don't provide the option of a dynamic framebuffer. My primary takeaway from the XB1 trial - before seeing the PS4 version - was just how smooth the game ran.
Then maybe next time you will add those qualifiers right from the start instead of making a blanket statement about the PS4 being the only version to get for consumers who want quality and framerate?
Oh, I am so sorry about that.
Look at it this way.
This generation, developers are pushing equivalent to the highest settings available on current generation of PC's on these consoles from year 1.
I tend to agree with you. They want both versions to sell well. It doesn't serve any developer to focus on one console and then release a busted port on the other. This was the case last gen. (Skyrim. Bayonetta) . Maybe they've learned their lesson.It sounds to me more like they're just treating PS4 as an after thought while they focus more on the Xbox One to try to get it running well with weaker hardware and esram.
Factual, maybe, but it is dishonest to paint a narrative that PS4's persistent resolution advantage is equivalent to hand-picked instances of XB1's framerate advantage. If you are a consumer that wants both image quality and performance, there should be no question that PS4 is the overall pick.
They never said it was 'equivalent'. That is your own insecurity speaking there.Factual, maybe, but it is dishonest to paint a narrative that PS4's persistent resolution advantage is equivalent to hand-picked instances of XB1's framerate advantage. If you are a consumer that wants both image quality and performance, there should be no question that PS4 is the overall pick.
It's funny how people will find occassional frame rate drops unacceptable, but are happy with lower resolution at all times.
They can be more clear in their writing. There is no reason why some of it is open to interpretation.
Make it short and clear.
A lot of people care very, VERY deeply about small frame dips, based on previous df threads, so it's a valid comment Imo.I'm not but the way they presented this minor diff of XB1 advantage in some particular situations and recommending the XB1 for performance is like PS4 version performance is worst. They can mention the advantage of XB1 which i don't mind it, but overall PS4 version is best in this game considering the dips which happened rare and very stress situations only, but their recommendation of go for XB1 for performance and IQ for PS4 is the one i dislike and they nitpicked this FPS diff in bad way.
I'll definitely take a clean IQ over rare 1-2 FPS drops.
They never said it was 'equivalent'. That is your own insecurity speaking there.
Actually, if one is only in the market for consoles, or have both consoles, the PS4 version is the overall pick.
But it is quite short and quite clear:
1. Get the PC version.
2. Don't have a decent PC? Do you value quality over minor (it says minor right there in the article) framedrops? PS4 version is easy to recommend.
3. Don't have a decent PC? Do you value framerate consistency above all else? Get the Xbone version.
How much more clear can they get?
A lot of people care very, VERY deeply about small frame dips, based on previous df threads, so it's a valid comment Imo.
They also said frame dips are "noticeable" on ps4 when busy, so I'm not sure how minor that makes it.
Bullshit. Speak for yourself.
Unless i'm viewing 2 different resolutions side-by-side, i'm not going to really notice that i'm playing at 900p.
I will on the other hand notice every single time the framerate drops a few frames.
Don't presume that everyone wants "balance".
I've actually stopped playing the game, because it stutters too much during cutscenes. (PS4)
Have you been following how many bugs the PC version has? I wouldn't jump on that bandwagon quite yet.
How about you speak for yourself. I noticed poor IQ fairly quickly.
Holding off on buying this until I get myself a new gaming pc, personally... Just feels like the kind of game that should be played at a desk not a couch (anyone else know that feeling?)
it does that on all versions, afaik. I have it on pc. it's fucking annoying.
What bug's? I've been playing all week without seeing any bugs.
Have you been following how many bugs the PC version has? I wouldn't jump on that bandwagon quite yet.
I've actually stopped playing the game, because it stutters too much during cutscenes. (PS4)
I often use a controller on my pc... Guess I mean it feels like needing more concntration/focus as it's an rpg and has a good story, so better played in my study, vs on couch where wife want to watch tv, chat, cat jumps on lap and sticks its arse in my face, etcSince the game is optimised for controllers, no, not really. There were some complaints that the kb/m controls don't work very well.
This is different than DA:O
Eh, every version has bugs at first, it's to be expected in modern triple-A development. They will get fixed soon enough on all platforms.
They never said it was equivalent.Oh, I am quite secure about my comprehension of the written language. Are you?
PC has more, which is to be expected with the myriad hardware configs. It is what it is.