rokkerkory
Member
Is this a thread about Uncharted? I can't understand why there are pics of UC in here. I love that game too but come on.
Gotta love the people bringing up their precious PS4 exclusives.
It'll be so fun to read these future threads as someone who will have both Pro and X.
Probably bettet to have a PS4 and a Switch. Less overlap, more to choose from.
Probably bettet to have a PS4 and a Switch. Less overlap, more to choose from.
Best to have all three, sorry.
Not if you want the best versions of the biggest games
Not if you want the best versions of the biggest games
With these kinds of noticeable improvements between the 1X and Pro, I can see alot of backlash from 1X owners if other games like Destiny 2 and COD run and look the same as the PRO versions.
Not sure why people are WOWing, the image quality on the PRO and Scorpio looks identical, they just added more effects for the Scorpio.
Fair enough, to each their own...I can't relate to that at all. Depth of field and other blurring effects are the second thing I immediately turn off in my PC games (the first being chromatic aberration.) Games are not movies, I enjoy being able to see the detail in a game world. My eyes can add depth of field by themselves just fine. Well-made object motion blur is the only type of effect that I think enhances a game's look.
Not if you want the best versions of the biggest games
Not if you want the best versions of the biggest games
It's cool that by the time I get a XOX I should be able to grab a used copy of RotTR for S10.
Nixxes really does continually do fantastic work.
You're already jumping to conclusions though. You're also not understanding my point from before. Temporal injection is not the same as CBR used in the Pro's version of TR. However other games will use the same or similar implementation of CBR in both the Pro and 1X versions, so it'll be interesting to see how much the Pro version benefits from features like the ID buffer.
Regarding the chances of developers putting in the extra work for the 1X, I think it will come down to resources and how difficult those extras will be to implement. I can't imagine adding higher resolution textures would be that difficult, especially if those higher quality assets already exist for the PC version. Even that alone could make a big difference. On top of that, if both versions use CBR, that would free up additional resources on the 1X allowing for higher quality effects and other improvements.
It'll be interesting to see how it all pans out.
Probably better to have a PS4 and a Switch. Less overlap, more to choose from.
I think people bring up exclusives because software sells consoles better than anything.
So you're literally lying, or do your eyes need to be checked? 🤣
Too much salt is bad for your health..
Anyway, console is a great bit of engineering. Can't wait to own it.
I just booted up the game. Chloe's in-game model is lower quality than your IGC shots.
Not if Nintendo games don't interest me. And the Xbox One is my multiplayer place.
What does sales have to do with this thread? And multiplat sells consoles, why else do you think Sony locks down all those deals.
I wonder if RDR 2 will have different sets of textures for the Pro and X.
I want that texture quality for my GTX 1070. Make it happen Nixxes.
Not if you want the best versions of the biggest games
Not if you want the best versions of the biggest games
If backwards compatible games are anything to go by, snap up a good deal, if you see it, before release.
Those are bad screens and you know it. She's in the shadow, you are too far away to tell any detail and the screens are too small.
Look, here's a link to the screenshot thread:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1421994&page=4
The very first picture on this page is taken by me, it is taken in-game, not during a cutscene and it differs in polygon count and texture detail in no way to the models in cutscenes of the game. The only thing that does differ is lighting and some added image post processing effects. That looks better in cutscenes, yes.
Does anyone remember grassgate from RDR last gen? Imagine when RDR2 comes out...
/shudder
Ah gotcha, must have brushed over that fact in the video. So let me ask you then, why do you think Tomb Raider does not use a similar checkerboarding method in the Xbox one X version?
Salt? That's just a bad statement. No need to conflate the issue. This is a thread about ROTTR why are there Uncharted posts? This is a wider issue. HZD threads turn into Zelda threads. Forza turns into GT and vice versa. In reality one can exist while the other does as well and is prosperous. I'm implying that this has been and is a reoccurring issue.
Saying that:
Is just nonsense.
Threads getting derailed serve no purpose except to affirm the echo chamber hive mind set. Clarifying this looks really really good on it's own no need for fanboy pandering.
Those are bad screens and you know it. She's in the shadow, you are too far away to tell any detail and the screens are too small.
Look, here's a link to the screenshot thread:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1421994&page=4
The very first picture on this page is taken by me, it is taken in-game, not during a cutscene and it differs in polygon count and texture detail in no way to the models in cutscenes of the game. The only thing that does differ is lighting and some added image post processing effects. That looks better in cutscenes, yes.
Does anyone remember grassgate from RDR last gen? Imagine when RDR2 comes out...
/shudder
And on top of that was a resolution difference if i'm not mistaken. But that didn't happen for GTA V on PS3 and 360 and neither on Xbox One and PS4. Unless i'm mistaken.
I can't relate to that at all. Depth of field and other blurring effects are the second thing I immediately turn off in my PC games (the first being chromatic aberration.) Games are not movies, I enjoy being able to see the detail in a game world. My eyes can add depth of field by themselves just fine. Well-made object motion blur is the only type of effect that I think enhances a game's look.
If you want the best versions of the biggest games you will go PC. If you need a console with the best versions of the multiplats you have to buy into the Xbox ecosystem. Many are not going to do that because in fact the masses don't give a shit really.
Yes, the new Xbox is going to have slightly better looking games than the PS4 Pro. This is a known fact and has been known for ages. I think people are overestimating just how big these changes are going to be.
And you still don't have much for first party games, which is a major problem for convincing the masses to buy your system. The age of Halo and Gears is long gone.
Now I'm confused, I just admitted that. So I ask again, why temporal injection for the Xbox one x version, given Nixis' experience with cherboarding on the pro?It's stated in the video that it isn't the same implementation. Looks like you may have brushed over a few facts in the video =p
This is not a system for the masses, plain and simple.
The game is running at twice the resolution though, and the only effect that seems reduced is dof.
No it isn't. CBR is the same resolution as native, just achieved in a faster but less precise manner.All of that on top of a native res that's double the res than pro
No it isn't. Though evidently not using CBR, the temporal method surely equates, meaning resolution is 4x the Pro, though less precise per pixel.And the enriched mode is running at 2 times the resolution too.
This is false. Besides the objective metrics, they constantly offer personal, subjective opinions about the games they analyze.2 personal opinions are not considered by DF about the quality of a game
This is a tech thread. Please take this elsewhere.In two years this will all be obsolete
At any rate, if you want the best performance you pick the XBX.
If you want the most high quality games you pick a PS4. Sony's console exclusives this year have been bananas.
The textures on One X are not "the smallest details". They contribute a great deal to the quality of the final image.It's also really funny to see all the guys that couldn't see the difference between Xbone and ps4 upgrades for the last 3 years suddenly find the smallest details so visually apparent and such a big deal lol.
Do you also hate AA? Because that just adds blurriness.What isngood about depth of field? It jut adds blurriness to me
The tables have finally turned. The downplay is now in full swing and the X hasn't even released yet.
Lawd.. it's going to be the red sea in GAF.
I can't even imagine November up in here.
In the Roman Colosseum, who was more pathetic and weak? The gladiators engaged in combat, or the cynical audience with their cheers for vicarious bloodshed?It'll be so fun to read these future threads as someone who will have both Pro and X.
That's a man who gets it.I bet you Chobels account that you dont make an Irish cream coffee as good as I do.
Played the game on the Pro. It looked great. Comes as absolutely no surprise that the X has a better version - the hardware is more powerful.
I have no intention of buying the X, but I don't see why people can't admit that the version looked markedly better.
This. Close this thread.
They added texture upgrades plain and simple. The Dof gives the illusion of clearer backgrounds, but look at the dirt on the skin and the particle effects vs the pc ultra mode.I'm almost 100% sure that the perceived lower texture quality on the PC is because there's no DOF on the Xbox.
Which is all I've been saying.
People will buy it, it has an audience, but it isn't going to change MS's position this gen.
Sony changed their postion last gen through first party software releases that really got strong starting in 2011.
Which is all I've been saying.
People will buy it, it has an audience, but it isn't going to change MS's position this gen.
30fps with vsync on is shittier than 30fps with vsync off. it's not just about framerate and resolution
That's why I have PC, for the best versions and it let's me have Xbox One games now too. Then my PS4 Pro and Switch cover everything else, no need for Xbox One X for me.
I'm sure the people that get an X will enjoy it though, it's a decent console but it's not something I need personally.