The recent thread about straight female protagonists makes me hope it isn't about Emily, if I'm honest. The absence of heterosexual women in leading roles was a strange pattern to be confronted with in the medium. I assume it's it's partially due to the fact that the amount of female protagonists is simply low, but the speculated reasons painted an uncomfortable picture. It's not hard to imagine that it could be done to try and not alienate the straight male part of the audience, who may not want to be asked to participate in a relationship with a male character. If this is indeed the hurdle, it tie in directly to the total lack of homosexual male protagonists. If these folks already have trouble with something as heteronormative as "protagonist girl likes boy", then "protagonist boy likes boy" is going to be a challenge.
While I think gay characters as target in the game could perhaps seem tasteless at the moment, I don't think developers should go out of their way to avoid it. Dishonoured 2 for instance is many months away from release, and hopefully society has healed enough by then that the subject won't make too many folks uncomfortable. Violence is one of the primary methods of interaction in games, and LGBT characters inhabiting these worlds exposes them to these risks. As long as games aren't projecting some sick message onto their specific deaths, I think it should be fine.
just curious, but isnt it ban-able offense to talk against anything LBGT?
If so, I dont see how we can have a discussion on this topic if we all have to pretty much agree on this situation.
There are plenty of ways to talk about the subject in a critical fashion. Pop in one of the several LGBT threads for instance to see folks discussing potentially problematic elements that float around LGBT sub-cultures, or in media depictions. Poorly handled LGBT characters in video games are thus of course open-season, and has been the subject of many threads in the past. Like someone mentioned earlier in the thread though, just because it's done poorly, doesn't necessarily mean it shouldn't have been done to begin with. The path to mastery is paved with failures after all.
Just keep in mind that sexuality and gender play a large part in ones life, and thus it's only fair to be courteous and respectful. GAF's a pretty chill place as long as you don't deny the existence of groups of people, or condemn them for things they have little to no control over. If you can't express your opinions within those parameters, then sure, it's going to be easier to keep those to yourself. Perhaps that time you aren't spending on writing that post can be used to reflect on why you think these self-censored opinions aren't acceptable.