Amir0x said:All I know is EDGE gave FFXII a 9/10, so I approve of their analysis of what is important in FF games.
ANY site/magazine that gives FFXII a 9/10 can't be taken seriously.
Amir0x said:All I know is EDGE gave FFXII a 9/10, so I approve of their analysis of what is important in FF games.
Action game.AniHawk said:What genre is GOW III exactly. Because I always thought of it as an action game but people say that it's wrong because I should stop comparing it directly to Bayonetta but whatever genre each one belongs to, they look like they're pretty much the same to me.
McBradders said:Fucking A, another PS3 exclusive shitting up yet another thread.
2San said:Did you only play normal mode or something? You know if you turn up the difficulty it gets harder. Not to mention Bayonetta has challenges which are pretty fun as well. Not to mention the differences in weapons actually matter. How are the extra features overkill they all give you options to get a distinct play style and give replay value. Yeah you can mash buttons in normal mode, try cranking up the difficulty settings. Normal mode is just an introduction. Honestly GoW3's style and mythos, I'll give GoW that it makes more sense, but it's not like it's the epitome of writing. And I prefer Bayo's style at least it doesn't take itself seriously.
Look you have different priorities in games. People who prefer Bayonetta are people who like gameplay, people who prefer GoW put more interest in the wow factor you have no control over. I like to have control over my games, and where the coolest shit that happens is done by myself.
it is an action game but with a different idea. Would you compare Forza to motorstorm just because you drive cars on them?AniHawk said:What genre is GOW III exactly. Because I always thought of it as an action game but people say that it's wrong because I should stop comparing it directly to Bayonetta but whatever genre each one belongs to, they look like they're pretty much the same to me.
Snuggler said:Yeah the only interesting score is the FFXIII 5/10 score, can anyone sum up why they gave it such a harsh number? I've been considering purchasing the game but all the negative impressions have left me feeling unsure about it.
Aad said:As said before EDGE uses the full scale 1-10, I saw this on another forum
10: Sublime
9: Outstanding
8: Excellent
7: Great
6: Good
5: Average
4: Poor
3: Terrible
2: Awful
1: Why bother?
GoW falls under the cinematic action genre, while Bayonetta belongs to the pure action genre. Though afaik GoW doesn't have any competition well next to Dante's inferno. :lolAniHawk said:What genre is GOW III exactly. Because I always thought of it as an action game but people say that it's wrong because I should stop comparing it directly to Bayonetta but whatever genre each one belongs to, they look like they're pretty much the same to me.
Dabanton said:This should be posted at the beginning of every Edge thread it would stop some of the more 'emotional' responses
also how did this thread become Bayonetta VS GoWIII? :lol
onken said:I'm no Final Fantasy nut (I've never even bought or finished a FF game before) but having platinumed FF13, giving it a 5 is simply ridiculous. There's one thing not liking the direction a series has taken, but come on, a game should be rated on its own merits.
the problem is giving a 10 to bayonneta, not an 8 to god of warKandrick said:Because Edge gave Bayonetta a 10. And God of War 3 "only" got a 8. So people are getting pissed i guess :lol
tzare said:it is an action game but with a different idea. Would you compare Forza to motorstorm just because you drive cars on them?
tzare said:the problem is giving a 10 to bayonneta, not an 8 to god of war
well, especially compared to XII, it is just about the most accessible FF game I have ever played.kaizoku said:from the sounds of it, my less than hardcore gamer friends who all love Final Fantasy games are really digging this one.
Sums it up about right.Fersis said:Im amazed by this (Every month):
GAF: We're so hardcore, game journalism sucks, we dont care about reviews.
Magazine : Super Game 8/10.
GAF: RAAAGEEEE!!! THEY INSULTED EVERYTHING WE BELIEVE ON!!! FUUUUU !!!
But hey, at least is fun to read the meltdowns.
Kandrick said:Because Edge gave Bayonetta a 10. And God of War 3 "only" got a 8. So people are getting pissed saying that Edge sucks etc etc. :lol
Fersis said:Im amazed by this (Every month):
GAF: We're so hardcore, game journalism sucks, we dont care about reviews.
Magazine : Super Game 8/10.
GAF: RAAAGEEEE!!! THEY INSULTED EVERYTHING WE BELIEVE ON!!! FUUUUU !!!
But hey, at least is fun to read the meltdowns.
Rez said:well, especially compared to XII, it is just about the most accessible FF game I have ever played.
it seems like a direct response to the Japanese and/or the casual market being overwhelmed by FFXII. even for me, that game certainly wasn't -- uh -- easily digestible.
AniHawk said:What genre is GOW III exactly. Because I always thought of it as an action game but people say that it's wrong because I should stop comparing it directly to Bayonetta but whatever genre each one belongs to, they look like they're pretty much the same to me.
Net_Wrecker said:But I don't see those as exactly the same genre. Forza is Simulation Racing, while Motorstorm is Arcade Racing. Sub-genres of the same genre, sure, but they can't be directly compared in terms of gameplay which is what people seem to do with GOW, and Bayonetta.
GOW is Action Adventure (though very linear), Bayonetta is action IMO.
panda21 said:my problem with their scores isnt that they give some games low scores (using full scale etc), but that a lot of their scores make no sense given that they also give thoroughly mediocre games far too good scores if they were genuinely using the full scale.
saying 5 is average and giving FFXIII a 5 and GoW III an 8 is fine, but then doing that and giving stuff like prototype, fuel and tomb raider an 8 just makes no sense.
saying 5 is actually a good score doesnt mean much when it is pretty much reserved for stuff they didnt like and piles of mediocre games get a 7/8. if they really used the full scale they would give a lot more 5s.
lorddarkflare said:Agreed. And I think they did just that.
The Final Fantasy name buffs scores more often than it nerfs them.
Hootie said:I'm disheartened by the 7/10 for JC2.
eznark said:the news here is that Alice in Wonderland is "great." What platform did they review it for, and which British developer developed it?
nib95 said:When I saw that Edge gave Bayonetta a 10 (on the front cover of the box), I was thinking that it was either another example of how ridiculous Edge's opinions are (especially their 10's), and how much of a farce the "they use the entire 10 scale" defense was. Or, I was hoping I'd stand happily corrected and be absolutely blown away by the game beyond measure. Lets just say it wasn't the latter.
WrikaWrek said:Production values alone don't mean shit.
We need to stop with this bs. Look at other entertainment mediums, Transformers 2 has production values blowing out of every goddamn hole, and it's still a piece of shit movie.
panda21 said:my problem with their scores isnt that they give some games low scores (using full scale etc), but that a lot of their scores make no sense given that they also give thoroughly mediocre games far too good scores if they were genuinely using the full scale.
saying 5 is average and giving FFXIII a 5 and GoW III an 8 is fine, but then doing that and giving stuff like prototype, fuel and tomb raider an 8 just makes no sense.
saying 5 is actually a good score doesnt mean much when it is pretty much reserved for stuff they didnt like and piles of mediocre games get a 7/8. if they really used the full scale they would give a lot more 5s.
The Hug Dog said:Not only this but they are somewhat selective over what they review so many games that would get 2s or 3s or whatever are just ignored.
Developed by Étranges Libellules. French, obviously.eznark said:the news here is that Alice in Wonderland is "great." What platform did they review it for, and which British developer developed it?
I don't think anyone anywhere should be encouraging this mentality at any time. It's absolutely toxic.nib95 said:Gameplay changes aside, the production values and other key ultra polished elements still remain.
tzare said:if you are talking about god of war, production values are not alone you know.
It is like mass effect, it is an okay plot, in a sci-fi setting with nice prodution values: races, planets all that codex stuff. It is an arcade game on a RPG suit.
WrikaWrek said:Production values alone don't mean shit.
We need to stop with this bs. Look at other entertainment mediums, Transformers 2 has production values blowing out of every goddamn hole, and it's still a piece of shit movie.
Rez said:I don't think anyone anywhere should be encouraging this mentality at any time. It's absolutely toxic.
kaizoku said:really think EDGE has lost touch with its purpose which is to educate gamers, understand what gamers want and like and so on.
Omotesando said:I actually thought the special effects and action in Transformers was its biggest downfall, with cartoony action and tin like frail robots, and not not the over the top acting, story and humor.
Production values made Avatar, but it didn't help Transformers.
i cannot talk about FFXIII because i hate JRPGWrikaWrek said:I was talking about FFXIII, from what i see God Of War 3 is much more than just production values.
Not reason to think otherwise considering the 1st two.
AniHawk said:What genre is GOW III exactly. Because I always thought of it as an action game but people say that it's wrong because I should stop comparing it directly to Bayonetta but whatever genre each one belongs to, they look like they're pretty much the same to me.
wsippel said:Developed by Étranges Libellules. French, obviously.