• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Eon Productions allegedly mooting a James Bond Cinematic Universe

SpaceWolf

Banned
We're finally getting that Jinx spin-off they planned out a few years back, aren't we?

Bond159.gif


Remember Jinx? She was a character with lines, possibly.
 

Htown

STOP SHITTING ON MY MOTHER'S HEADSTONE
like, these people realize that a lot of the reason these comic book shared universes work... is because they're adapted from decades worth of shared universe stories, right?
 
We were just talking about this in the Box-Office thread!

1) They've tried this before as mentioned, with the Jinx spinoff. Die Another Day's reception (It made money but was laughed at until the series basically died) prevented it from going forward (I think Halle Berry went ahead and made Catwoman instead?)

2) The fact EON is thinking about it doesn't really mean anything - they'd still have to convince a studio that it's a good idea to pursue. And so far as I can tell, of the three studios that really, really want it (Sony, WB, and surprisingly, A24) two of them are already neck deep in Cinematic Universes that they're already having big problems managing well, and the third probably doesn't really want one.

It's entirely possible that EON pushing for a Cinematic Universe might hurt their value to a studio, not build it up. Who the fuck would want to take all THAT on if they didn't have to? Typically just making one Bond movie every two years is a herculean mess of clusterfucks. Making one a year with characters who don't have the cachet Bond does?

3) Jeff Sneider, who is apparently the primary source on this, is couching his report in all sorts of weasel-words, which tells me he's less interested in getting this right and more interested in covering his ass for the pending debunk that will probably be coming, because he's floated shit like this before (most notably, that Miles will be the MCU Spider-Man, I believe) and gotten burnt.

Could they be thinking about it? Maybe? They thought about putting James Brolin in the role in the 80s. They've thought about a lot of things over time. You stick around for 50+ years some interesting notions get entertained. And it's not like EON hasn't been all about trendchasing ever since the Moore days. This is a damn big trend.

But I dunno if this is going to actually be a thing.

(Although if they do pursue it, I think this ends up making codename theory being implemented into this continuity almost a certainty)
 
I'm generally on board with cinematic universes because I found them to be potentially good and could enrich every or (like the MCU) some movies. But a Bond Universe? That's all sorts of weird.
 
2) The fact EON is thinking about it doesn't really mean anything - they'd still have to convince a studio that it's a good idea to pursue. And so far as I can tell, of the three studios that really, really want it (Sony, WB, and surprisingly, A24) two of them are already neck deep in Cinematic Universes that they're already having big problems managing well, and the third probably doesn't really want one.

I would lose my fucking shit if Bond went to A24

I hope it happens. That would be rad.
 
Simple solution to establish universe:

Nicolas Cage cameo shows up as a random FBI agent along with Felix Liter and introduces himself as Stanley. He will do anything for money so this is likely more a legal discussion between Disney and Eon productions than anything else.

Joe Don Baker comes back as Jack Wade and references himself having been previously being an arms dealer.

Instant universe.
 
If done right, this could be really cool.

I'd love to see directors try their hand at more experimental Bond-esque films with different 00s. Plus then, it'd allow all sorts of actors to play different 00 roles and even let established directors have their own unique takes on the 00 system.

But, that's probably not what EON wants.
 

Solo

Member
They currently are releasing one movie every 3-4 years, and only about 33% of the time do they get that one right.

Moving into a cinematic universe with multiple ongoing films would be a disaster. Not to mention that the Bond universe, as much as I love it, isn't exactly ripe with opportunities for expansion.
 

KillLaCam

Banned
Why though? Everything had to be a dumb universe now. What if I like stand alone movies? I wanna watch western movies sometime, Korean movies probably can't last me forever
 

SpaceWolf

Banned
Accept your salvation SpaceWolf.
Click to reveal this spoiler, knowing full well what it is, and welcome it within your heart:

O93VQsC.gif

I literally wrote a thread about that damn scene, and as a result, I've execersied its sickly impurities from my soul.

I am no longer scandalous.
 

Dabanton

Member
Eon needs to worry more about making a actual good mainline Bond film again before messing with extended universes. SPECTRE was god awful.

The films have really dipped in quality and care imo.
 
Actually this doesn't sound bad, especially with the concept of an M spinoff, but good lord does this make EON sound desperate, seriously stop trying to jump on trends, quality-wise it usually doesn't end good.
 

SpaceWolf

Banned
The films have really dipped in quality and care imo.

Not sure if either of those statements are really fair given the depths this franchise has sunk to, even as recently as Quantum of Solace. Also, these movies have a fuckload of work put into them, especially with their emphasis on practical effects...so I don't really think it's about not having enough "care" poured into them, either.
 
I watched Die Another Day again recently and found myself enjoying it. The problems it has are glaring but I though Gustav Graves was one of the better Bond villains in recent memory. I also love the action scene in the film. The opening, sword fight and plane scenes are all quality work.

That being said, I didn't find myself liking Jinx at all. For a top level NSA agent she made a lot of bad judgement calls. I think they struggled with having her in the typical Bond girl role while trying to make her a "tough woman" and failed. I'm glad she didn't get that spin off.
 

Ushojax

Should probably not trust the 7-11 security cameras quite so much
I've wanted something like this for a while. As long it's not going to focus on other 00 agents it might work, but knowing movie executives it will be exactly that.
 

DopeToast

Banned
Fuck this. It's a series that's gone on for fifty years. Isn't that enough to know you can keep making these every 3-5 years?
 

Davey Cakes

Member
James Bond could use a break. Give it until 2020 and cast someone different.

Also, no need for a cinematic universe. I thought some of the appeal of the James Bond films was that you can watch each one individually, with any connections to other movies being superficial.
 
It can't be worse than the "Author of all your pain" ass pull in Spectre, can it?

James Bond could use a break. Give it until 2020 and cast someone different.

Feels like Bond is always on a break between movies, at least in Craig's era. Granted the WGA strike, MGM finance issues, and that Sony e-mail hack probably didn't help matters.
 
I think that's it. I mean my big issue with Specter was that it didn't earn it. It was just "oh yeah I did that shit James." And I get shadow organizations would be that way, but shouldn't be that way for the audience. If they knew they were going to make Specter there should have been winks and nods that once Specter hit people could have said "oh shit, now this makes sense." But nope.

To be fair they got fucked over by the legal battle over the rights to Thunderball.

Long story but until 3 years ago EON couldn't use any story elements from the book Thunderball including SPECTRE and Blofeld so they couldn't continue the conspiracy storyline from Casino Royale like the books and start slowly revealing SPECTRE.
They had to come up with new elements like the Quantum organization but when they finally got the rights to Thunderball back they decided to pull a "It was SPECTRE-Blofeld behind everything" (Also Blofeld is Bond's stepbrother and he did all of this because he hates him which was the worst ass-pull ever)
 
Ugh thats the opposite direction to where they should be heading. I have said it a couple of times before, but I feel with Bond they should really allow themselves to be flexible with the continuity and to allow for more creative changes between films. Basically if I were in charge, I would reboot as more of an anthology series, where different directors and actors can have the freedom to either follow the story naturally film to film, or to bring a completely new actor, setting, plot etc, each time.

Hmmm, Chris Nolan wants to make 2 parter, cold war era, grounded Bond movie. Sure why not.

007: *blank* Vol 1
007: *blank* Vol 2

Edgar Write wants to make a more campy, whimsical gadget laden Bond movie, and a female Bond, sure.

007: *blank*

David Cronenberg randomly calls up and wants to make some insane psychological, deconstructed Bond film, with half the budget. Hell yeah.

007: *blank*
 

Korigama

Member
I was hoping that by "mooting" a James Bond Cinematic Universe, OP meant they were ruling it out. But, there is some schadenfreude to be had in seeing yet another studio desperate to chase after the MCU model.
 
Marvel's thing being ridiculously successful was the worst thing to happen to the industry in the past decade

EVERYBODY wants in on that cash
 
Top Bottom