I liked her when she was doing porn, she is still hot, but a bit too cut for my tastes. I wouldn't knock her back though!SmokyDave said:This one - http://www.youtube.com/user/charliejames1975#p/a/u/2/FBvdrW9MSQw
Sweaty boobs. Made my day.
I liked her when she was doing porn, she is still hot, but a bit too cut for my tastes. I wouldn't knock her back though!SmokyDave said:This one - http://www.youtube.com/user/charliejames1975#p/a/u/2/FBvdrW9MSQw
Sweaty boobs. Made my day.
MiDNiGHTS said:In this thread we state the obvious? Also,
While I think there are many legitimate concerns surrounding extreme body building, I agree, synthol is it's own special kind of stupidity:Corky said:yawn I despise that fucking freak loser. Anything to talk bad about steroids with gregg retard valentino as their posterchild.
Look , I'm not advocating the use of AAS or saying theyre good/bad. But when it comes to that balloon freak its not about steroids its about fucking synthol.
" A site enhancement oil (SEO) is a liquid substance, usually a mixture of oils, used by some bodybuilders to increase the apparent size of some muscles. The effects of SEOs are purely cosmetic and there is no increase in muscular performance. "
Those arent muscles on his biceps, its what it looks like that is skinballoons filled with liquids
Aurora said:Funny thing is, these guys aren't anywhere near as strong as you'd think. Their muscles are very weak relative to their size. They're just optimised to look super defined but their functionality is severely reduced. Compare the bodies of the World's Strongest Man contestants which are way more stocky and less defined but far stronger.
MiDNiGHTS said:Not really...
Aurora said:Compared to this:
We're not scared OF you, we're scared FOR you.Docpan said:We scare you? Good. That's the whole fucking point. "Train like a freak!"
Aye dude looks alot better than most 70+ year olds :lolBlueTsunami said:I'd honestly rather have Arnold's physique in the 70s/80s and live with the physique he has in his sixties than just a normal non-bodybuilders physique. Well, a fraction of his physique (the fraction that doesn't need steroids!)
It is somewhat true in a most/many cases, though, as bodybuilders are building for looks, mass, symmetry, etc. whereas the World's Strongest Man contestants are building for strength. There's obviously some crossover but the two groups are going for different overall goals. To take it to highly exaggerated extremes, a bodybuilder doesn't care if he could barely pick up his own shoes if he looks good enough to win contests whereas a WSM contestant wouldn't care if he looked like a 12 year old boy as long as he could drag a train.yacobod said:5x worlds strongest man mariusz pudzianowski says sup
No one is scared of you. Well... maybe your pets.Docpan said:We scare you? Good. That's the whole fucking point. "Train like a freak!"
Replicant said:Is that Zeb Atlas?
Aurora said:Funny thing is, these guys aren't anywhere near as strong as you'd think. Their muscles are very weak relative to their size. They're just optimised to look super defined but their functionality is severely reduced. Compare the bodies of the World's Strongest Man contestants which are way more stocky and less defined but far stronger.
Monroeski said:If you think that 3's not shopped, there is no way I can take your word that 4 isn't either.
Replicant said:Is that Zeb Atlas?