Ok tell yourself whatever you have to to so you can feel superior to these people. This bootstrap mentality is toxic and you seem far to gone.
In Palo Alto? Yea, it is. She could be buying her own house in Oakley, Vallejo, or Richmond on that salary. But she wants a short commute. Yes, it's entitled to think you should be able to live anywhere you want, in any neighborhood, at $20/hr
If someone in your town made $20/hr and lived in a neighborhood where the cheapest house was $2m, are you suggesting we should pay them enough to afford a $2m house so they don't have to move to a cheaper neighborhood?
I hate the idea of living in SF, and I live in LA!!! It's already shitty enough for me here.
They work in a cafeteria though. Why can't they move to a cheaper area and (hopefully) get the same jobs? Sure, they will take a salary cut but the cost of living would drop dramatically.
why do people love to stan for fucking billionaires like zuckerberg? i will never understand the mentality of 'we must protect the rich at all costs'
It's always the boomers fault.
I know Zuck isn't a boomer. Message still applies.
The super-duper-rich are not the ones reducing class mobility, the top 20% are. We are literally pulling the ladder up behind us.why do people love to stan for fucking billionaires like zuckerberg? i will never understand the mentality of 'we must protect the rich at all costs'
There is no cheaper area. That's the problem.
why do people love to stan for fucking billionaires like zuckerberg? i will never understand the mentality of 'we must protect the rich at all costs'
I mean out of the whole area tho. For example, Bakersfield in CA has an average rent for a 2b/2b under $900/month.
Lot of jobs are open in SF and Boston for my career but I'm just not interested in moving to these expensive areas.
Enaging with people like you and the poster is point less. I will just say good day to you sir or madam.
So 1 hour to cross the bridge, then 20 minutes?Just hop over the bay bridge and drive for 20 minutes and you can find tons of cheap housing.
He's taking vacation to the middle class! How enlightening.
These people are not Facebook employees. They are employees of a company called Flagship Facilities Services.Didn't Porsche give every single employee a 9100 euro bonus last year cos they had a good year.
It fucking insane that a company like Fb, with its billions just sitting in a bank, don't pay each and every one of its employees at the very least a sensible wage.
Back in the day, [the wage] would have been a great number, said Victor, but because of Facebook moving in, everything is so expensive. I have to get payday loans sometimes. We barely make it.
At times, the challenges make the couple nostalgic for the days before Facebook moved to Menlo Park. When Victor was growing up, his father was able to buy a small house there from his earnings as a landscaper. Earlier in their relationship, Nicole and Victor both earned about $12 an hour as managers at Chipotle and were able to afford their own apartment.
The reliance out working class has on state provided services, such as Medicaid, insurance subsidies, food stamps, had greatly limited their ability to just pick up and move.Do what everyone else does when they can't afford to live somewhere and move to a place with a cheaper cost of living.
It's not like working in a cafeteria is some special job that can only be done at FB.
The minimum wage is supposed to stop price competition from dropping wages bellow a certain standard of living. There is many benefits for the state to do so. The argument would be to either force employers to pay for people commuting or suggesting that 3hrs a day in commuting is not an acceptable standard of living effectively increasing the minimum wage in that area.If someone in your town made $20/hr and lived in a neighborhood where the cheapest house was $2m, are you suggesting we should pay them enough to afford a $2m house so they don't have to move to a cheaper neighborhood?
Ahaha.Move to the suburbs and commute to work. There problem solved
LA is by far a better place to live than SF/Bay Area.I hate the idea of living in SF, and I live in LA!!! It's already shitty enough for me here.
They work in a cafeteria though. Why can't they move to a cheaper area and (hopefully) get the same jobs? Sure, they will take a salary cut but the cost of living would drop dramatically.
And as I replied, fb could quite easily take the staff back in houseThese people are not Facebook employees. They are employees of a company called Flagship Facilities Services.
As I've said in an earlier post, the article is written in a hit-piece style against Facebook. Flagship Financial Services is responsible for paying them crap wages. I'm sure Facebook is paying "FFS" a huge amount of money with their contract, but Facebook has no say in what FFS's management pays their employees, other than the $15 minimum wage policy that is required of their contractors.
Making low salary employee work in SF is cruel.
Just build some fucking job buildings somewhere else.
How many homes could Facebook build, for say 1bn? And still have 437 billion in the bankPaying them a shit load isn't going to fix the housing situation.
You are treating a symptom and hoping it cures the entire disease.
And paying everyone a livable wage and not fixing the housing problem is only going to drive the price of housing up even more because everyone will have more money to spend on housing. It is clearly a supply issue not being able to keep up with demand.
I do have empathy, I just don't understand the solutions that people are proposing.
You'd give them both 150k a year and I don't think it'd be enough to support a family with 3 children in the Bay area.
Can't really defend them, there already getting paid better then min. wage ..a job that not complicated ...don't want to come out as begin a dick, but it is what it is ...and they live in a high cost of living area ...yeah ...can't expect to get paid $25 an hr while some people with college degree barely make $25+ an hr
How many homes could Facebook build, for say 1bn? And still have 437 billion in the bank
The problem is that the local residents will actively prevent the housing that needs to be built from being built.How many homes could Facebook build, for say 1bn? And still have 437 billion in the bank
Yep. FB would probably do it! They want that talent lol.The problem is that the local residents will actively prevent the housing that needs to be built from being built.
Where are you getting $72k from?
In oklahoma me and my wife do , family of 4. Homeowners.A lot of couples live on the salary equivalent of $34 an hour, even with a family. Just not in Silicon Valley.
How many homes could Facebook build, for say 1bn? And still have 437 billion in the bank
17 dollars an hour is not a salary. Shit is too low to live on with a family. Regardless if both parents make it.
Can't really defend them, there already getting paid better then min. wage ..a job that not complicated ...don't want to come out as begin a dick, but it is what it is ...and they live in a high cost of living area ...yeah ...can't expect to get paid $25 an hr while some people with college degree barely make $25+ an hr
How would you fix their current issue? just curious...
But he managed to get his complex approved, with a large donation?Zero, because the nimbys in the area won't let anyone build anything
Where they are 0.How many homes could Facebook build, for say 1bn? And still have 437 billion in the bank
But he managed to get his complex approved, with a large donation?
They don't have to live in silicon valley, they can commute from the bay's outskirts where housing is cheaper. Sure the drive sucks but you'll actually be able to save money, pay for healthcare, not be broke, etc. wow isn't that great.
Give them a livable wage based on their cost of living for that area?
Didn't Porsche give every single employee a 9100 euro bonus last year cos they had a good year.
It fucking insane that a company like Fb, with its billions just sitting in a bank, don't pay each and every one of its employees at the very least a sensible wage.
Facebook could relocate. Companies often do because of these kinds of issues. Let's see the homeowners complain when their houseprices plummet.Where they are 0.
It's a local political issue.
It's hard to pick up and move when you can barely afford to eatThey work in a cafeteria though. Why can't they move to a cheaper area and (hopefully) get the same jobs? Sure, they will take a salary cut but the cost of living would drop dramatically.
Well exactly.It's hard to pick up and move when you can barely afford to eat