• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

FB worker living in garage to Zuckerberg: challenges are right outside your door

Acyl

Member
I hate the idea of living in SF, and I live in LA!!! It's already shitty enough for me here.

They work in a cafeteria though. Why can't they move to a cheaper area and (hopefully) get the same jobs? Sure, they will take a salary cut but the cost of living would drop dramatically.
 
Ok tell yourself whatever you have to to so you can feel superior to these people. This bootstrap mentality is toxic and you seem far to gone.

If someone in your town made $20/hr and lived in a neighborhood where the cheapest house was $2m, are you suggesting we should pay them enough to afford a $2m house so they don't have to move to a cheaper neighborhood?
 

Gutek

Member
In Palo Alto? Yea, it is. She could be buying her own house in Oakley, Vallejo, or Richmond on that salary. But she wants a short commute. Yes, it's entitled to think you should be able to live anywhere you want, in any neighborhood, at $20/hr

Ahh, good old Vallejo. Only a 2 hour/80 mile commute. One way.
 
If someone in your town made $20/hr and lived in a neighborhood where the cheapest house was $2m, are you suggesting we should pay them enough to afford a $2m house so they don't have to move to a cheaper neighborhood?


Enaging with people like you and the poster is point less. I will just say good day to you sir or madam.
 
I would save up change every month to eventually move out and move on from the Bay Area. It’s not worth the money at all. When you got software engineers and other “techies” living out of trucks and shit, there’s no way Facebook and other large tech Corp are going to throw a ton of money at support staff workers for them to afford 3+ bedroom place in the Bay Area. The housing market sucks over there, and feel like they have a better chance of finding cafeteria jobs elsewhere and upgrade a bit from a garage.
 

Kthulhu

Member
I hate the idea of living in SF, and I live in LA!!! It's already shitty enough for me here.

They work in a cafeteria though. Why can't they move to a cheaper area and (hopefully) get the same jobs? Sure, they will take a salary cut but the cost of living would drop dramatically.

There is no cheaper area. That's the problem.
 

geestack

Member
why do people love to stan for fucking billionaires like zuckerberg? i will never understand the mentality of 'we must protect the rich at all costs'
 
NWOS.jpg


I know Zuck isn't a boomer. Message still applies.
It's always the boomers fault.
 

Gallbaro

Banned
why do people love to stan for fucking billionaires like zuckerberg? i will never understand the mentality of 'we must protect the rich at all costs'
The super-duper-rich are not the ones reducing class mobility, the top 20% are. We are literally pulling the ladder up behind us.
 

royalan

Member
And shit like this is exactly why ol' Zucker has not a chance in hell of making it through a primary, not matter how many truck stops he visits.
 

Acyl

Member
There is no cheaper area. That's the problem.

I mean out of the whole area tho. For example, Bakersfield in CA has an average rent for a 2b/2b under $900/month.

Lot of jobs are open in SF and Boston for my career but I'm just not interested in moving to these expensive areas.
 
I mean out of the whole area tho. For example, Bakersfield in CA has an average rent for a 2b/2b under $900/month.

Lot of jobs are open in SF and Boston for my career but I'm just not interested in moving to these expensive areas.

Just hop over the bay bridge and drive for 20 minutes and you can find tons of cheap housing.
 
Didn't Porsche give every single employee a 9100 euro bonus last year cos they had a good year.

It fucking insane that a company like Fb, with its billions just sitting in a bank, don't pay each and every one of its employees at the very least a sensible wage.
These people are not Facebook employees. They are employees of a company called Flagship Facilities Services.

As I've said in an earlier post, the article is written in a hit-piece style against Facebook. Flagship Financial Services is responsible for paying them crap wages. I'm sure Facebook is paying "FFS" a huge amount of money with their contract, but Facebook has no say in what FFS's management pays their employees, other than the $15 minimum wage policy that is required of their contractors.
 
Do what everyone else does when they can't afford to live somewhere and move to a place with a cheaper cost of living.

It's not like working in a cafeteria is some special job that can only be done at FB.
 

blitz64

Member
I think I'd the city finds out. They can come kick people out of the garage and prevent people from living there.
Even if it is the parent or owner themselves.
 
I see what happened to this couple
“Back in the day, [the wage] would have been a great number,” said Victor, “but because of Facebook moving in, everything is so expensive. I have to get payday loans sometimes. We barely make it.”

At times, the challenges make the couple nostalgic for the days before Facebook moved to Menlo Park. When Victor was growing up, his father was able to buy a small house there from his earnings as a landscaper. Earlier in their relationship, Nicole and Victor both earned about $12 an hour as managers at Chipotle and were able to afford their own apartment.

It seems they have been priced out of a market they have spent their whole entire lives in.
 

Gallbaro

Banned
Do what everyone else does when they can't afford to live somewhere and move to a place with a cheaper cost of living.

It's not like working in a cafeteria is some special job that can only be done at FB.
The reliance out working class has on state provided services, such as Medicaid, insurance subsidies, food stamps, had greatly limited their ability to just pick up and move.

Intact interstate migration is the lowest it has been in a century.
 

Theonik

Member
If someone in your town made $20/hr and lived in a neighborhood where the cheapest house was $2m, are you suggesting we should pay them enough to afford a $2m house so they don't have to move to a cheaper neighborhood?
The minimum wage is supposed to stop price competition from dropping wages bellow a certain standard of living. There is many benefits for the state to do so. The argument would be to either force employers to pay for people commuting or suggesting that 3hrs a day in commuting is not an acceptable standard of living effectively increasing the minimum wage in that area.
 

hateradio

The Most Dangerous Yes Man
Move to the suburbs and commute to work. There problem solved
Ahaha.

The entirety of the bay is a suburb, except for SF proper which is the size of a thimble. There are just homes spread throughout, but they're all expensive. Some areas are bit less, but it's not really practical because of the mediocre public transport.

The problem is no new housing is being created, except in San Jose where you'll find 2.5k+ apartments and condos. But I would sooner kill myself than live in SJ.

I hate the idea of living in SF, and I live in LA!!! It's already shitty enough for me here.

They work in a cafeteria though. Why can't they move to a cheaper area and (hopefully) get the same jobs? Sure, they will take a salary cut but the cost of living would drop dramatically.
LA is by far a better place to live than SF/Bay Area.

This is coming from an LA person currently living in the pits of the bay.

I would love to live in SF but it's impossible because work is in the south bay, so commuting would be shitty af.

It's not like I haven't done close to 2-hour commutes in LA, but I don't want to do that again. Not to mention that SF is insanely expensive and that there's really nothing of value, culture, art, etc., in the south/east area besides the tech companies and a few universities. Plus, everything closes by 9-10pm. Meh.
 

Goodlife

Member
These people are not Facebook employees. They are employees of a company called Flagship Facilities Services.

As I've said in an earlier post, the article is written in a hit-piece style against Facebook. Flagship Financial Services is responsible for paying them crap wages. I'm sure Facebook is paying "FFS" a huge amount of money with their contract, but Facebook has no say in what FFS's management pays their employees, other than the $15 minimum wage policy that is required of their contractors.
And as I replied, fb could quite easily take the staff back in house
 

Velcro Fly

Member
Paying them a shit load isn't going to fix the housing situation.

You are treating a symptom and hoping it cures the entire disease.

And paying everyone a livable wage and not fixing the housing problem is only going to drive the price of housing up even more because everyone will have more money to spend on housing. It is clearly a supply issue not being able to keep up with demand.
 

Goodlife

Member
Paying them a shit load isn't going to fix the housing situation.

You are treating a symptom and hoping it cures the entire disease.

And paying everyone a livable wage and not fixing the housing problem is only going to drive the price of housing up even more because everyone will have more money to spend on housing. It is clearly a supply issue not being able to keep up with demand.
How many homes could Facebook build, for say 1bn? And still have 437 billion in the bank
 

D i Z

Member
I do have empathy, I just don't understand the solutions that people are proposing.

You'd give them both 150k a year and I don't think it'd be enough to support a family with 3 children in the Bay area.

Now I know for sure you're just talking out of your ass because someone is knocking Zuckerberg. You have no concept of how any of this works at all.
 
Can't really defend them, there already getting paid better then min. wage ..a job that not complicated ...don't want to come out as begin a dick, but it is what it is ...and they live in a high cost of living area ...yeah ...can't expect to get paid $25 an hr while some people with college degree barely make $25+ an hr

This is basically my thoughts as well regarding this.

For more broad statement, I believe it's perfectly reasonable to want living wages but you have to be willing to be pro-active about your own situation as well. Moving might suck but that is on you. Was it their plan to have 3 kids in that area while only working low skill jobs?
 

Velcro Fly

Member
How many homes could Facebook build, for say 1bn? And still have 437 billion in the bank

How is this Facebook's problem though? Facebook isn't the only corporation doing business in the area. Facebook isn't the one causing there to be a housing shortage, forcing people to either live far away and have a shitty commute or live in a garage. Seems to me these local municipalities need to sack up and start building housing and not worry about what it will do to the property values of things that are already built.

Zuck has a leg up on this politics thing though. Already getting blamed for something he didn't do and that he can't really easily fix on his own.
 

midramble

Pizza, Bourbon, and Thanos
Zuckerberg always seems pretty shady in my book. Here's my feelings.

He spent $30 million on homes in silicon valley that was decided against zoning code, then he replanned so that his 4 houses would be approved. Happened around the same time they donated 3.1 million to housing legal services in the same area.... I'm not saying they paid the get their compound approved but things smell fishy.

All the while his own employees suffer from absurd housing prices due to zoning that needs changing. Now is he fighting to change zoning to help everyone else? No.... That would depreciate his land value. Instead just donate 3 mil so they can not be evicted for a bit longer while prices keep rising.

Guy is great at seizing opportunity. He knows the hustle.

Edit: Though just read that FB as a whole is putting in 20 mil to fight for affordable housing which looks to include support for building affordable housing and change in zoning. Though I'll believe he cares when he doesn't require an entire compound in an impacted housing area. Would this be Nimbyism? He's got one hell of a back yard.
 

darkinstinct

...lacks reading comprehension.
17 dollars an hour is not a salary. Shit is too low to live on with a family. Regardless if both parents make it.

I think there is a disconnect in this forum between what is possible to live on depending on where you are from. In Europe you can live on €15 with one person working to support a family of four. It basically means you don't pay any taxes, come out with 2500 € including child support and health care for everyone. Rent would be 600 to 700 €. So you could live relatively comfortably on that one salary in a small to medium town.

That two people work for more than that (with much less time off, we have 24 mandatory holiday days plus unlimited sick days plus sick days for when your kids are sick) and have to live in a garage in the US and don't even have health care is mind blowing. I'd say if your employer doesn't pay you enough to afford the minimum any decent working human being should have, get another job somewhere else.
 

Briarios

Member
Can't really defend them, there already getting paid better then min. wage ..a job that not complicated ...don't want to come out as begin a dick, but it is what it is ...and they live in a high cost of living area ...yeah ...can't expect to get paid $25 an hr while some people with college degree barely make $25+ an hr

Minimum wage isn't something to use as a marker - no family in the US can survive on minimum wage without assistance. It shows a certain level of simplemindedness to take an arbitrary number to set it as the benchmark as to where the working class no longer has a right to complain.

You're not even engaging in the depth and breadth of the issue -- your basically telling the working poor to accept the crumbs they're given and to shut up.
 
They don't have to live in silicon valley, they can commute from the bay's outskirts where housing is cheaper. Sure the drive sucks but you'll actually be able to save money, pay for healthcare, not be broke, etc. wow isn't that great.

This is kind of how I feel. I suppose I could live in a garage to be closer to work too. Instead I take public transportation for 90 minutes both ways to provide exactly what they are seeking. Sometimes you just can't have your cake and eat it too.
 

quickwhips

Member
Give them a livable wage based on their cost of living for that area?

The inflated price of living is bullshit but people need to live else where. I make 80k but the cost of a family of 4 to live where I am is 60k. So I live a pretty good life. My house cost 150k but elsewhere it might have been 250-300k. I wouldn't dream of living in a some places because it would cost too much just to break even...
 
Didn't Porsche give every single employee a 9100 euro bonus last year cos they had a good year.

It fucking insane that a company like Fb, with its billions just sitting in a bank, don't pay each and every one of its employees at the very least a sensible wage.

They probably do(internal people only), but which company gives a contractor a bonus.
 

dc3k

Member
They work in a cafeteria though. Why can't they move to a cheaper area and (hopefully) get the same jobs? Sure, they will take a salary cut but the cost of living would drop dramatically.
It's hard to pick up and move when you can barely afford to eat
 
Top Bottom