Regulus Tera
Romanes Eunt Domus
Socreges said:Felicidades, pinche cabron
[edit] That may sound harsh to some native Mexicans, I'm really not sure... sorry if it is!
¡Bésame el culo!
Thanks dude, but that was in 1999.
Socreges said:Felicidades, pinche cabron
[edit] That may sound harsh to some native Mexicans, I'm really not sure... sorry if it is!
Regulus Tera said:Mexico won the final against Brazil too!
Verano said:este way...lol.
But dont forget we went against a good Brazil team back in 99 even when they were diving especially for that BS PK call they got. Overall, we samba'd they asses out 4-3 in the end.
Bingo. I said this a couple of pages back. Any interest in this beautiful sport is a plus. Even if its bandwagon-ers that only watch big tourneys. Some stick with it and that's a plus.Heysoos said:That happens in EVERY sport, in EVERY nation. It's not exclusive to the US. They're called band wagon fans who don't necessarily have any interest in the sport other than special situations, like these. While a lot of people hate them, it also tends to get new fans excited in the sport, which I'm all for.
What's your point? Obviously I'm not saying numbers = success. After all, the U.S. would then be ranked 2nd in the world, and not 24th.Heysoos said:Except the sport does have a relatively small interest compared to the major sports in the US, Football, Basketball, and Baseball. Hell, Hockey probably has a much bigger interest in the US than soccer. Not only that, the US has 300+ million people living here it's only natural that is has many more people registered than smaller countries, IMO. Numbers don't always mean quality. A lot of these people don't have the same structure in soccer like many of other countries whose main sport is soccer. I'm not saying high numbers don't help, but it isn't always the case. I'd wager that many of the High School football teams in Texas have A LOT better facilities, coaching, equipment, financing, and structure behind them than many of these professional soccer players in the US.
Meus Renaissance said:Unlike in the men's game, there is nothing you can dislike about these two teams - there's no need for resentment or cheap shots at any player(s). A love of respect, genuine respect, and plaudits all around.
It is what the men's sport and the game globally needs. It's one thing being an ultra, even for one game, but at the end of the match both teams played the game with their hearts on their sleeves and still offered that hand to when an opponent when down in front of them. And with the quality of entertainment on show today, although this may sound cliché, there really are no losers in this.
A fantastic advertisement for the sport and how it should be played. Applause for the Japanese, the Americans, every other nation that took part and also the German people for supporting the tournament through filling the stadiums.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/07/17/article-2015693-0D0DB92100000578-667_634x423.jpg
Nesotenso said:Just a question, which you are free to ignore if you want. Are you first generation or second generation immigrant?
Regulus Tera said:After watching this and the U-17 World Cup I have to blame the heavy commercialisation of professional football. Just look at the goal by Julio Gómez in the u-17 semifinal: no professional player nowadays would think of doing that; there's just too much potential money at risk.
Luixfern said:The chilena?
Socreges said:What's your point? Obviously I'm not saying numbers = success. After all, the U.S. would then be ranked 2nd in the world, and not 24th.
And facilities/equipment aren't the most important factors. Soccer development requires coaching, and that's obviously where the U.S. seriously pales in comparison to the most successful nations. That's changing, though, and will continue to.
A loser!Regulus Tera said:I was born in the United States, but was raised in Mexico for fifteen years and now I'm studying in Houston. I fully support the Mexican national team and feel no attachment to the USMNT.
What does that make me?
Well, technically, you can't play while bleeding. It's against the rules.Regulus Tera said:Not just the bicycle kick, but coming back to the pitch when you are fucking bleeding your head out.
I cannot link the picture, but Google-search "herida julio gómez". That son of a bitch won the game against Germany with his skull cracked like that.
Heretic said:A loser!
USA! USA! USA!
=p
odd_morsel said:Japan loves and treasures their women and for them to go on and show the world the strength of character and desire to win for their tsunami-ravaged country, even as massive underdogs, well... the atmosphere here in Tokyo is beautiful. It really means a lot.
The idea that there is any malice, revenge or negative motivation is misguided and silly.
I couldn't be more thrilled for our girls - they had a lot more to show than just technique, and they succeeded. My gf couldn't stop crying after the second equalizer. Truly a meaningful victory.
Luixfern said:I think you're giving Julio too much credit. I've seen plenty of professional established players come back with wounds. Besides, Julio did NEED to do that if he wants to earn that ticket to Europe.
Regulus Tera said:I was born in the United States, but was raised in Mexico for fifteen years and now I'm studying in Houston. I fully support the Mexican national team and feel no attachment to the USMNT.
What does that make me?
OH YEAH!? Well, i hope mexico loses! And... and... and their shit gets stolen!Regulus Tera said:See you at Brazil 2013.
Oh wait, we won't see you there. olololol
Nesotenso said:I dunno, but you from your post I guess you hold an american passport and might have Mexican parents, so Mexican-American ? Only you can answer that question and I have no problem with which country you chose to associate yourself.
Anyways as I mentioned in a subsequent post, its understandable for first generation or second generation immigrants ( or people with any particular ancestry , doesn't matter which generation) to support their countries of origin. Its not an isolated case with soccer and happens in lot of other sports and immigrant communities in other countries.
But badmouthing your adopted homeland, even in something as trivial as international sporting competitions (which in the grand scheme is trivial as opposed to other issues), irks me though, I admit.
It's fucking pathetic when your Men's national team gets booed on your home soil but you could fault Americans for not turning up at the Rose Bowl in larger numbers and the general disinterest in soccer. I just hope the sport grows in this country.
Understand the context. The point is to contest people saying that Americans succeeding at soccer is so great because they don't care anyway.... yet have millions registered.Heysoos said:My point was, that higher numbers than smaller countries doesn't mean that interest is suddenly high, in a country of 300 million people. Or that quality should suddenly increase, like you pointed out, many of these players lack the infrastructure many of the other countries have. So higher registered player is kind of a moot point.
Regulus Tera said:I have both a Mexican and American passports.
I may have been born in the United States, but I have never felt American. I don't celebrate 4th of July, but do celebrate September 16th. I rather speak Spanish than English when given the chance, and I have a Mexican flag at home, not an American one.
filler said:
Regulus Tera said:See you at Brazil 2013.
Oh wait, we won't see you there. olololol
xbhaskarx said:This year it was "tainted chicken" leading to positive drug tests and prostitutes stealing Apple products from hotel rooms, what's the Mexican team's scandal going to be in 2013?
Regulus Tera said:Chicharito's Mexican passport is discovered to be fake; he was actually an American all along.
Luixfern said:More like Chicharito is actually a female with a crew cut.
I'd kill myself...Regulus Tera said:Chicharito's Mexican passport is discovered to be fake; he was actually an American all along.
That's quite an interesting take you have there. I'm quite the opposite. Born here and my parents were born in mexico but I've never felt I was "mexican". Born and raised in the US and don't follow any traditions or the culture despite being around it my whole life. Sept. 16 is just another day for me while I celebrate the 4th of July by getting a ticket for carrying fireworks =pRegulus Tera said:I have both a Mexican and American passports.
I may have been born in the United States, but I have never felt American. I don't celebrate 4th of July, but do celebrate September 16th. I rather speak Spanish than English when given the chance, and I have a Mexican flag at home, not an American one.
Argentine essayist Jorge Luis Borges once said something akin to "one is not from where he is born from, but from where he loves". And that applies to football as well. Why should someone root for the colours of a place where he was chosen by luck/fate/whatever-deity-you-believe-in to be born at? One should support the team that represents the culture he feels a connection with, or the ideals he thinks represent his the best.
Luixfern said:More like Chicharito is actually a female with a crew cut.
Can't win them all...coldvein said:what the fuck, women of america? totally let me down..
Regulus Tera said:Dammit Luixfern, now my red herring strategy is busted!
exarkun said:PK's have been a part of the game so long and are there only in the rare chance that peeps are tied after 120 mins of play.
And I mean rare. What we saw in this Women's cup doesn't happen very often.
elty said:Diving is a problem but only a few players do it regularly. It is also more physical (and some team is worse than other) so a lot more sliding tackle that can break people's leg. They also used a lot more small movement (like shirt pulling) that is hard for the ref to spot the foul. And then finally the boring tactic of keep passing the ball around indefinitely or placing 9 defender is getting very popular.
The men's final was not very good. One team has 2 destroyers that will break your leg with no regret, the other has a few players that will roll on the floor with the face covered if you barely touch him. The stake is also much higher so both team played rather conservatively. Overall the 2010 WC was pretty boring in my opinion, except with some Uruguay game (especially the one vs Ghana) which is full of drama.
Gigglepoo said:Wasn't the 2006 Men's World Cup determined with penalty kicks? That doesn't sound too rare at all. I remember a few different World Cup matches settled with kicks last year, in fact. Am I wrong?
I just think it's a baffling conclusion to a tournament. Kicking point-blank, undefended shots barely ever comes up during the course of a match. Why they think that's a good way to determine a winner is beyond me.
I really don't understand why people defend this. Just seems really anti-climatic to me. I think it's interesting that NFL fans get in frequent argument about the way overtime is handled -- and that is a real game, just sudden death -- while soccer fans defend penalty kicks.
elty said:
Regulus Tera said:Holy shit, over fifty percent? De Jond needs to be nerfed.
yellow submarine said:Even when I was watching it real time, I saw that he did not even go for the ball. Just straight up kung fu kick. Didn't even need the slowmo replay for this one. At the time I was thinking "Welp, let's see how Holland do with 10 men, here comes the ref with his red card". I was pretty shocked that he didn't get carded at all for that one.
KidA Seven said:The coin toss kind of ruins it though. Whoever scores on the initial possession (non field goal) wins the game.
That specific rule you mention is only used in the postseason, you can win in OT with a field goal during the regular season I believe. Pretty terrible way to go about OT. I think if you mixed the college football version of OT with the NFL's that would be the best way to go about it. Don't really care/follow the NFL though so it's not that big of a deal to me.KidA Seven said:The coin toss kind of ruins it though. Whoever scores on the initial possession (non field goal) wins the game.
travisbickle[B said:]Ha ha, America lost. There will be a bunch of Jingoistic, Xenophobic, Nationalist wankers crying into their piss-weak beer[/B] after this damning result proves you guys are poor at all sports that have global recognition. Go back to your poor-mans rugby and rounders leave the real sports to real men and women.
And if you are angry at this post I'd like to respond with words borrowed from Carly Simon "You're so American, you probably think this post is about you."
Hasphat'sAnts said:Didn't he get a yellow for it? I'm pretty sure he did because at the time, I was thinking that a yellow card made even less sense than let him go scott-free.
I'm bitter about that to this day. That's not even red card-worthy. It's assault and battery accusation-worthy.yellow submarine said:Even when I was watching it real time, I saw that he did not even go for the ball. Just straight up kung fu kick. Didn't even need the slowmo replay for this one. At the time I was thinking "Welp, let's see how Holland do with 10 men, here comes the ref with his red card".I was pretty shocked that he didn't get carded at all for that one.
Edit: He did get a yellow card, I remembered it wrong.
Gigglepoo said:Obviously. The point is, NFL fans recognize a flaw and try to figure out a better way to handle tie games. That doesn't seem to be the case with soccer fans. I refuse to believe penalty kicks are the best solution. In fact, it's one of the worst solutions.
elty said:I just read that no Japanese TV station bothered to broadcast the group games. The quarter final against Germany was only offered by a cable channel. Only when they got into the semi Fuji TV bought the broadcast right and assembled a team in a hurry.
They could always flip a coin.KidA Seven said:TBH I like penalties because of the drama. On the other hand, I always say it's a terrible way to decide the game. But what can you do? Playing after 120 minutes would wreck your body.
It's hard to find a solution.
(*) Peru qualified through the drawing of lots
Philip Brasor & Masako Tsubuku said:The victory of the Japanese womens soccer team at the FIFA World Cup tournament in Germany smashed a lot of preconceptions, most of them having to do with Japans international sports profile. However, a more specific truism bit the dust Sunday afternoon in Frankfurt when Japan came out on top, and thats the notion that the more money you spend on a sport, the better your chances. About 1.5 million girls and women play soccer in America in some sort of organized fashion. Theres a popular professional league. Womens soccer is a huge business. In Japan, about 45,000 girls and women play soccer. The womens semi-pro and pro leagues are barely solvent, and there are no organized teams in Japan for elementary school girls. In fact, one of the more interesting factoids to come out of the news about the victory is that many of the members of the Japan national team started playing soccer as children on boys teams.
As pointed out in an article in the tabloid Nikkan Gendai published before the championship victory, Nadeshiko Japan was winning in spite of their meager remuneration. Very few of the members have pro contracts. Two members, Aya Samejima and Karina Maruyama, earned the most at one time playing soccer, about ¥5 million a year each, but thats because they originally played for the Tokyo Electric Power Co. team in Fukushima, as a matter of fact and were thus company employees. After the disaster of March 11, Tepcos soccer team activities were suspended, but by that point Maruyama has already left. She went to the U.S. and played for while but ended up returning to play for JEF Chiba. Gendai says her salary there is very small. Samejima stayed with Tepco until March and then moved to the USA, where her salary was better, the equivalent of about ¥300,000 a month. Team captain Homare Sawa earned about ¥3.6 million a year playing for the Nihon TV team, which among women soccer players is considered good. NTV dissolved its team not long ago, and Sawa now makes less playing for a team in Kobe.
Theyre the exceptions, though. Gendai characterizes most of the players financial situations as being borderline poverty. When the national team was preparing for the World Cup they couldnt start practice until after 7 every night, because most of the members had part-time jobs during the day at convenience stores and other small businesses. They had to provide their own food and were usually too tired to cook for themselves and so ended up eating a lot of junk food and instant meals, thus obliterating another truism: that athletes have to eat well to win.
Compare this to the mens national soccer team, which employs its own chef who travels with them wherever they go. In fact, if you compare the two organizations financial situations, its easy to see how much more cost effective the womens team is. Most of the pay for national players comes through incentives. Nadeshiko Japan will receive a total of ¥1.5 million from the Japan Football Association for their first place finish at the FIFA World Cup. If the mens team came in first, they would receive ¥35 million. Second place? ¥25 million for men, ¥1 million for women. Even if the men place in the top 16 they receive some sort of bonus, but the womens team have to place at least in the top four to receive a bonus. Also, the mens team receives a bonus of ¥2 million for each game they win during the World Cup final. The womens team receives ¥100,000 per win. The mens team even get a bonus for a win during the preliminaries. The women dont. According to Gendai, seven members of the the mens team received a total of ¥20 million each in various bonus payments from the last FIFA World Cup in South Africa, even though the team only placed in the top 16.
Its not clear what the women will receive after their stunning victory but some rough arithmetic would indicate that each player will probably get less than a million yen at most. If the USA womens team had won, they would have received from the relevant American soccer association a bonus of $3 million, or ¥237 million, not to mention lots of promotional opportunities. (At present the members of Nadeshiko Japan are only being used for a lowkey ad campaign for the lunchbox chain Hotto Motto.) Not to put too fine a point on it, but do these figures make the Japanese womens victory all the more impressive? Local news are already reporting projected economic effectiveness of ¥1 trillion. Its difficult to get any more impressed with the team at this point, but even taking into consideration the size of the mens soccer market compared to the womens soccer market, already the Japanese language Twittersphere is exploding with one sentiment: Given what these women have done for Japan, not to mention the Japanese media, they deserve to be paid.
Regulus Tera said: