• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Games Journalism! Wainwright/Florence/Tomb Raider/Eurogamer/Libel Threats/Doritos

Status
Not open for further replies.
uqz1UwQ.png


Good bye forever indeed...

Managing Editor
MANAGING EDITOR

Unbelievable!
 

Divvy

Canadians burned my passport
Hey remember when Polygon was touting itself to be a new breed of games journalism that will separate itself from the pack?

Yeah...

Same old useless shit.
 

Not Spaceghost

Spaceghost
He tweeted more about Vanquish after the embargo was up. One of his criticisms was that's "very Japanese".

Isn't it kind of weird that "very Japanese" is a criticism but "very western" isn't?

That shit is fucking ridiculous. Not to mention obnoxious since you already know that the reviewers are going in with an ignorant bias.
 
Isn't it kind of wired that "very Japanese" is a criticism but "very western" isn't?

That shit is fucking ridiculous. Not to mention obnoxious since you already know that the reviewers are going in with an ignorant bias.

You've got to tow the line to get your foot in the door with Microsoft.
 

RMI

Banned
Hey remember when Polygon was touting itself to be a new breed of games journalism that will separate itself from the pack?

Yeah...

Same old useless shit.

yeah, I never bought it for a second. You don't break the mold by starting off saying, "we're going to break the mold!" They have some decent editorial pieces from time to time, but are no different from Kotaku or Joystiq or whatever other news blog you might go and look at.
 

Htown

STOP SHITTING ON MY MOTHER'S HEADSTONE
Hey remember when Polygon was touting itself to be a new breed of games journalism that will separate itself from the pack?

Yeah...

Same old useless shit.

That's unfair. They've TOTALLY separated themselves from the pack.


By falling behind.
 
Polygon seems like its trying to be the Fox News of gaming with Gies leading the charge. He's right when he says it's not the cure for cancer. It's just them trying to entertain you by taking a strong stance on issues. They won't bite the hand that feeds them, so those stances will be in favor of the game makers. They see us as the game takers and are not afraid to call is out on it.

So let's stop trying to make them into what we want or what they promissed. Let's enjoy them for who they are, entertaining news that present one side of an argument and call themselves fair and balanced.
 

Zaph

Member
It wouldn't surprise me at some of these reviewers were literally on the EA payroll or receiving cash under the table especially those from the handful of high profile websites. To a huge company like EA that money would be nothing. Higher reviews scores have generally shown to correlate with higher game sales. It would be smart investment.

There is no way way to explain the constant near perfect review scores for high profile games published by EA especially when public opinion has been extremely critical.
I don't think it's anything that obvious. The biggest problem that plagues game journalism is that it barely exists outside of the PR cycle and reviews - it's an entire industry almost completely built upon rewording and reposting the output of another.

With sites closing and lay-offs happening on almost a monthly basis, you're noticing a lot more sites 'circling the wagons' in an effort to protect that single biggest source of access to the video game industry - publishers and PR. It also doesn't help that a publisher/PR job is a very common career move that many journalists want to keep as an option should their publication shutter.
 

JDSN

Banned
Some dude called Robert Florence, aparently chipped in on the Polygon thing:
Robert Florence ‏@robertflorence

If Polygon does any more backtracking over SimCity they'll backtrack right out of that tiny city they've built.

Who is this guy? And why does he think his oppinion about corruption in games journalism matters?
 

McBradders

NeoGAF: my new HOME
Some dude called Robert Florence, aparently chipped in on the Polygon thing:


Who is this guy? And why does he think his oppinion about corruption in games journalism matters?

Fucking hell, do you have any idea what thread you're posting in?
 

Kimawolf

Member
Some dude called Robert Florence, aparently chipped in on the Polygon thing:


Who is this guy? And why does he think his oppinion about corruption in games journalism matters?

He's a pretty well respected guy with some very strong opinions, and he's right in this instance.
 

kSt

Member
Some dude called Robert Florence, aparently chipped in on the Polygon thing:


Who is this guy? And why does he think his oppinion about corruption in games journalism matters?
Read the thread.
Lol jk. But seriously, he's even in the thread title. There's a recap in the OP.
 

Jeff-DSA

Member
The line between the games press and games PR no longer exists. Games writing is now the province of shills and mouthpieces.

I feel bad for the vanishing minority of quality journalists and writers who have to be tarred by necessity with the broad brush of sleaze, corruption and incompetence that has to be swept over anything written about games.

I won't say much, because I've told my story to a reporter and I'm pretty sure he's still working it into a larger overall story, but I've been offered an exclusive pre-embargo review before as long as my score was above a certain threshold. It was offered exactly like this: "You can publish before the embargo, as long as your score is above X.X."

It was crazy. In the end, I didn't publish first, even though my score was high enough. I just thought it was gross. The person that published first ultimately gave that game its highest score out of anybody else on metacritic/gamerankings. A little fishy, huh?
 

DaBuddaDa

Member
I won't say much, because I've told my story to a reporter and I'm pretty sure he's still working it into a larger overall story, but I've been offered an exclusive pre-embargo review before as long as my score was above a certain threshold. It was offered exactly like this: "You can publish before the embargo, as long as your score is above X.X."

It was crazy. In the end, I didn't publish first, even though my score was high enough. I just thought it was gross. The person that published first ultimately gave that game its highest score out of anybody else on metacritic/gamerankings. A little fishy, huh?

That is no secret. Numerous writers have shared similar stories. It is the direct reason why early review scores are always demonstrably higher than the average review post-embargo. It's not to say those specific reviews can't be trusted, but the metascore for the early reviews can't be.
 

Deitus

Member
Whenever someone uses "very Japanese" as a pejorative, it tells me right away that nothing they have to say about video games is of any value to me.

I'm cool with you using the term as a positive though Jason, and in fact I welcome people out there recognizing that it's okay to be unabashedly Japanese and not have to westernize the hell out of every single game. Just make sure to clarify that it is in fact a good thing so your statement doesn't get taken out of context. Because we all know that all too often in this industry the word "Japanese" is used to just outright dismiss a game without having to actually justify what it does wrong.
 

Pasco_

Banned
I won't say much, because I've told my story to a reporter and I'm pretty sure he's still working it into a larger overall story, but I've been offered an exclusive pre-embargo review before as long as my score was above a certain threshold. It was offered exactly like this: "You can publish before the embargo, as long as your score is above X.X."

It was crazy. In the end, I didn't publish first, even though my score was high enough. I just thought it was gross. The person that published first ultimately gave that game its highest score out of anybody else on metacritic/gamerankings. A little fishy, huh?

I wish I could be even slightly surprised.

This is the sort of stuff that needs to be blown wide open, the rotten core of the 'industry' opened up and scrutinised.

Hopefully something comes from this, quality games writing and reporting does not deserve the shilling, corrupted company it keeps.
 

Jackpot

Banned
I won't say much, because I've told my story to a reporter and I'm pretty sure he's still working it into a larger overall story, but I've been offered an exclusive pre-embargo review before as long as my score was above a certain threshold. It was offered exactly like this: "You can publish before the embargo, as long as your score is above X.X."

It was crazy. In the end, I didn't publish first, even though my score was high enough. I just thought it was gross. The person that published first ultimately gave that game its highest score out of anybody else on metacritic/gamerankings. A little fishy, huh?

Hope you had the balls to at least name the game in question.
 
This is the sort of stuff that needs to be blown wide open, the rotten core of the 'industry' opened up and scrutinised.

Quick, name the last time someone ran an exclusive review of a triple-A game.

This practice is close to dead. The old guard of enthusiast publications never reported on it, but the explosion of blogs and more independent coverage of games over the last decade exposed it to scrutiny, and now I don't even know if any outlets accept exclusive reviews anymore, let alone trade exclusivity for scores/placement. Do any at all?

Real edit:

He did. It's part of a big story I've been working on. Stay tuned.

Nice.
 

Pie and Beans

Look for me on the local news, I'll be the guy arrested for trying to burn down a Nintendo exec's house.
GamesMaster in the UK is a pretty dubious rag with continual "exclusive" reviews. Think the last one was Tomb Raider, so I wouldn't be too surprised if thats the bastard. Its also a game that, while no doubt good, has a bit too high a hand of 10/10's for me to not make overbearing sniffing noises.
 

DaBuddaDa

Member
Quick, name the last time someone ran an exclusive review of a triple-A game.

This practice is close to dead. The old guard of enthusiast publications never reported on it, but the explosion of blogs and more independent coverage of games over the last decade exposed it to scrutiny, and now I don't even know if any outlets accept exclusive reviews anymore, let alone trade exclusivity for scores/placement. Do any at all?

This practice being discussed has nothing to do with exclusivity, so I have no idea why you're asking?
 

Kimawolf

Member
He did. It's part of a big story I've been working on. Stay tuned.

ooh I cannot wait to read it. I've been waiting for something like this and can't wait to read the publisher in question's inevitable reply of "misunderstood/outright lies." Good on you guys.
 

Jeff-DSA

Member
Quick, name the last time someone ran an exclusive review of a triple-A game.

This practice is close to dead. The old guard of enthusiast publications never reported on it, but the explosion of blogs and more independent coverage of games over the last decade exposed it to scrutiny, and now I don't even know if any outlets accept exclusive reviews anymore, let alone trade exclusivity for scores/placement. Do any at all?

I think it's the mid-tier games that get shopped around in this manner the most. And I don' think it's big sites that get hit up, because they have more to gain by blowing the whistle than by a single early review of a moderately anticipated game.
 

TommyT

Member
Quick, name the last time someone ran an exclusive review of a triple-A game.

This practice is close to dead. The old guard of enthusiast publications never reported on it, but the explosion of blogs and more independent coverage of games over the last decade exposed it to scrutiny, and now I don't even know if any outlets accept exclusive reviews anymore, let alone trade exclusivity for scores/placement. Do any at all?

Well, there are those timed exclusives that come out before anyone else... but we know how those turn out (/cynicism).
 
This practice being discussed has nothing to do with exclusivity, so I have no idea why you're asking?

That's precisely what it is: Allowing one or more outlets to put up their review first because the scores are higher. Or in exchange for placement.

Jason just messaged me and said "Dragon Age 2!" He's right. And that was a huge controversy that looked bad for everybody: EA *and* the Escapist. Probably did more damage to the Escapist than EA.
 

JDSN

Banned
Irrelevant dude continues talking:

Robert Florence ‏@robertflorence

Your fella from Polygon mocking the idea of @botherer's inside source at Maxis is a prime example of the arrogance of these websites.
 

Bedlam

Member
I won't say much, because I've told my story to a reporter and I'm pretty sure he's still working it into a larger overall story, but I've been offered an exclusive pre-embargo review before as long as my score was above a certain threshold. It was offered exactly like this: "You can publish before the embargo, as long as your score is above X.X."

It was crazy. In the end, I didn't publish first, even though my score was high enough. I just thought it was gross. The person that published first ultimately gave that game its highest score out of anybody else on metacritic/gamerankings. A little fishy, huh?

Hope you had the balls to at least name the game in question.

He did. It's part of a big story I've been working on. Stay tuned.

Nice. Everyone knows shit like this is happening constantly. It needs to be called out more often.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom