• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Gran Turismo 5 Prologue: Famitsu Interview with Kazunori Yamauchi

spwolf

Member
bud said:
i'm not saying it should be free, but, again, paying 30-40 for a small portion of the game is not something i'd support

it is a bit dumb to call 40 cars, 4 tracks, Online MP, true SP, "small portion of the game".

I played GT4 for 2 months, and I played with 4-5 cars on 2-3 tracks, mostly, without online mode.

Yes, I would love it to be free. I would love PS3 to be free. But I am not going to put it down just because I wish it was free.... I cant wait for GT:p
 

zsidane

Member
Dear Sony, please don't release this game until I can afford an 1080p HDTV and a PS3.
And thank you very much for the HDD, it will save me an official sony memory card.
Respectfully.
 

Killthee

helped a brotha out on multiple separate occasions!
shagg_187 said:
I refuse to consider Prologue as a demo. GT:HD was a demo. Prologue is a full-fledge game. Thats how it has always been. GT:prologue will have 40 cars and 4 race tracks (8 different configurations). Some games don't even have more than 30 cars and they still charge full-price.

I refuse to consider it anything other than an awesome GT5 demo. Just because this demo has more features than some full games does not mean that it should be classified as a full game. GT5: Prologue is a demonstration/sneak peak/preview of whats to come in GT5. That to me sounds like a demo.
 

drohne

hyperbolically metafictive
Doctor_No said:
For instance, it the Ferrari F430 you can appreciate the shine off the carbon fiber and the quality of the black leather seats. You can tell the quality difference in the leather of the Ferrari versus other cars.

this is living!
 

Crayon Shinchan

Aquafina Fanboy
Killthee said:
I refuse to consider it anything other than an awesome GT5 demo. Just because this demo has more features than some full games does not mean that it should be classified as a full game. GT5: Prologue is a demonstration/sneak peak/preview of whats to come in GT5. That to me sounds like a demo.

GT Prologues are what they are.

They're not full games, that much is obvious, but neither are they simply demos.

They're commercial previews for hardcore fans and people interested enough to pony up $40.

What's so hard to understand about that?
 

Tideas

Banned
there will no way in hell GT5 Prologue is gonna be free, or even $10, or even $20.

See, the easiest solutoin is, if you don't like the price, vote with your wallet. Don't buy it. Instead of bitching why it's so expensive, just don't buy it.
 
Crayon Shinchan said:
GT Prologues are what they are.

They're not full games, that much is obvious, but neither are they simply demos.

They're commercial previews for hardcore fans and people interested enough to pony up $40.

What's so hard to understand about that?

Yep. Prologue has always been for the nutters that want an early crack at the game. If folks want to pay for a sneak preview thats on them (and there's been a lot of them). I've never had a problem waiting for the full game... although this time it'll be pretty tempting (assuming it's in the $30 range).
 

bud

Member
spwolf said:
it is a bit dumb to call 40 cars, 4 tracks, Online MP, true SP, "small portion of the game".

I played GT4 for 2 months, and I played with 4-5 cars on 2-3 tracks, mostly, without online mode.

Yes, I would love it to be free. I would love PS3 to be free. But I am not going to put it down just because I wish it was free.... I cant wait for GT:p

plz read before you respond
 

Killthee

helped a brotha out on multiple separate occasions!
Crayon Shinchan said:
GT Prologues are what they are.

They're not full games, that much is obvious, but neither are they simply demos.

They're commercial previews for hardcore fans and people interested enough to pony up $40.

What's so hard to understand about that?

I get that and agree with it.

Killthee said:
I refuse to consider it anything other than an awesome GT5 demo.


What I didn't get and was responding to was shagg_187 calling it a full game.

shagg_187 said:
I refuse to consider Prologue as a demo. GT:HD was a demo. Prologue is a full-fledge game. Thats how it has always been.
 

ThirdEye

Member
Crayon Shinchan said:
GT Prologues are what they are.

They're not full games, that much is obvious, but neither are they simply demos.

They're commercial previews for hardcore fans and people interested enough to pony up $40.

What's so hard to understand about that?
It's a full game, in the same sense that the online-only Warhawk can be called a full game.
 

Crayon Shinchan

Aquafina Fanboy
Killthee said:
What I didn't get and was responding to was shagg_187 calling it a full game.

They can be considered full games in the sense they provide as much value to some gamers as other full games do, and that they include functionality and value far beyond what any demo allows for.

But they're obviously not the complete GT games.
 
chubigans said:
I wouldn't say that.

Look at Wipeout HD and SOCOM HD. Both are not true next gen games, and both are downloadable. They are meant only to bridge the gap between the last gen and next gen games. They'll go for $30-40 if the Warhawk pricing is anything to go by.

Now GT Prologue. It's very much a next-gen game, with all of the next gen features. BUT it's lacking in content. Now, with that analogy, we can assume that GTP will range in the $20 area...and really, why shouldn't it? It ABSOLUTELY wont be free. Do I hope I'm wrong, absolutely, but let's be serious here...this is a product that could justify a decent price.

Whoa there, their is no way in hell Wipeout HD should cost $30-$40. It's a beefed up PSP game like Gripshift and should cost no more then $20. Socom: Confrontation isn't Socom HD, it's built from ground up on the PS3. It may be a quick one year job, but it's not a port of any of the old games(only 1 map is remade, the rest are new). Now that I can see them charging $30-$40 for if it has enough content to warrant the price.

But I do agree with your guess for GT: Prologue, it should be $20 only. That much content doesn't warrant a price that Warhawk(and maybe Socom: Confrontation) has. Especially when compared to the final game that will probably tons more cars, tracks, options, and content.
 
AltogetherAndrews said:
Uh, have you seen Wipeout HD?

Yes I've seen it, and I think it looks amazing. But that doesn't change the fact that it's a remake of a year old game that's a GH product now. When I said that I didn't mean it as a bad thing, but still that's what it is.
 
Rice-Eater said:
Yes I've seen it, and I think it looks amazing. But that doesn't change the fact that it's a remake of a year old game that's a GH product now. When I said that I didn't mean it as a bad thing, but still that's what it is.

Do we even know what it is a remake of? Honest question, I haven't seen any PR that details what it actually contains. If it's just a Pure remake, then sure, it probably shouldn't be priced all that high. But if it's a general Wipeout HD experience, with track designs from earlier Wipeout games, then I'd view it as a Best Of, and I'd consider that when judging the pricing scheme.
 
AltogetherAndrews said:
Do we even know what it is a remake of? Honest question, I haven't seen any PR that details what it actually contains. If it's just a Pure remake, then sure, it probably shouldn't be priced all that high. But if it's a general Wipeout HD experience, with track designs from earlier Wipeout games, then I'd view it as a Best Of, and I'd consider that when judging the pricing scheme.

You know, I don't know that for sure either. But that's what I've seen a lot of people say around here, so I assumed it was true.

But anyways, I don't think GT: Prologue shouldn't cost anymore then $20. It just seems crazy if it cost half as much as the full game which will have a hundred times more of everything.
 
Rice-Eater said:
You know, I don't know that for sure either. But that's what I've seen a lot of people say around here, so I assumed it was true.

But anyways, I don't think GT: Prologue shouldn't cost anymore then $20. It just seems crazy if it cost half as much as the full game which will have a hundred times more of everything.

The way that might work though is if it falls under paying more for the privilege of getting this early preview sampler. That may not be the proper way of doing things, but at the same time it's pretty commonplace. Hell, I've paid ridiculous amounts of money for advance copies of certain music CD in my day, and while the price point may have been somewhat annoying, that annoyance was offset by the sheer enjoyment of hearing the stuff early and, perhaps embarrassingly, before other people.
 

Grayman

Member
The interm versions of GT probably sold better than most full games.

Diablohead said:
It sounds realy good and i'm looking foward to trying it out on a mates PS3 since I do not own one, I seriously hope they include the Autum Ring, best GT track ever.
Special Stage Route 11(GT1) wants to have a word with you out back.

Goldrusher said:
My guess:

La Sarthe (seen in Audi demo)
Suzuka (seen in E3 demo)
London (shown as some kind of photo mode location)
Tokyo (talked about in various articles)
Suzuka makes sense because it can hold two or three sub tracks.
I would hope for the nurburgring but that would be pushing it for prologue.
 

TTP

Have a fun! Enjoy!
Do we have an official confirmation this will be a PSN only title? Or is there the possibility of this being released a la Warhawk (both PSN and BD)?
 

arias

Banned
Wollan said:
I'm not sure about confirmation but they have never ever mentioned a Blu-ray version to my knowledge.

If they want GT5:p to sell PS3s; it better be on Blu-Ray.

Bundled, too.
 
gtmax said:
Yamauchi had mentioned that there would be two sets of 'physics' levels. I hope there's a significant improvement because i can't play GT4 as it is.

Also i hope that they've re-recorded the sounds, particularly the tire sounds.

I still get the feeling that all the updates in the games are purely cosmetically. There hasn't been any inquiry into hte technical aspects of the game (will tire wear be more realistic, gas consumption, will the temp of the cars be affected this time, will cars at least get dirty, rain, snow, donuts, AHHHHHHHHHHHH!)

amen.

and a revamped carrear mode. smarter AI. more tuning options. telemetry, more sim aspects, maybe a professional mode only for hardcores...

let's see, it looks good so far, i hope my favorite series of all time delivers:D
 

TTP

Have a fun! Enjoy!
arias said:
If they want GT5:p to sell PS3s; it better be on Blu-Ray.

Bundled, too.

Indeed. Such a big franchise. Wouldn't make sense as a download-only product.
 

Yoboman

Member
TTP said:
Indeed. Such a big franchise. Wouldn't make sense as a download-only product.
It'd be very smart for Sony to have both GT5 Prologue and SOCOM Confrontation out on retail shelves this year

Even if they're stop gap products, they could easily do a million or more
 

Wollan

Member
If they do a disc version what should they bundle it with? I'm guessing the PSN version will sell for 39$.
They could release the retail version for the same price unbundled though.

Kinda ot but they should slap a Home sticker on every PS3 console box.
 

Yoboman

Member
Wollan said:
If they do a disc version what should they bundle it with? I'm guessing the PSN version will sell for 39$.
They could release the retail version for the same price unbundled though.

Kinda ot but they should slap a Home sticker on every PS3 console box.
They don't have to bundle anything, and I'm guessing it'll be cheaper than Warhawk anyway
 

Wollan

Member
I doubt the value of the game itself is cheaper. I'm pretty sure it will turn out to be 39$ now with Warhawk having set that standard. It has 40 (extremely detailed) cars and it has online. 4 tracks is probably a little less than people would want out of it but you have all the tuning options (revealed in this thread) and you have the Home connectivity, schedule planner, online replays, photo album... all that jazz. They will definitely sell it for 39$.
 

Yoboman

Member
Wollan said:
I doubt the value of the game itself is cheaper. I'm pretty sure it will turn out to be 39$ now with Warhawk having set that standard. It has 40 (extremely detailed) cars and it has online. 4 tracks is probably a little less than people would want out of it but you have all the tuning options (revealed in this thread) and you have the Home connectivity, schedule planner, online replays, photo album... all that jazz. They will definitely sell it for 39$.
It's the next step from last Prologue, I see no reason for it to cost more
 

Wollan

Member
Guaranteed. It's a worldwide release and if it follows the pattern of GTHD it might be a simultaneous release (excluding delayed EU PS3 release). It releases in Japan October 24th apparently.
 

AnIco

Member
Grayman said:
The old disc releases never came out in north america even...
Reading some of the comments here, it's eminently understandable as to why SCEA never released either GT: Concept or GT4: Prologue in North America.
 

nofi

Member
AnIco said:
Reading some of the comments here, it's eminently understandable as to why SCEA never released either GT: Concept or GT4: Prologue in North America.

Exactly. I don't know where people come from to assume that they should get a fully functional mini-version of a game for free... Mars?
 

Raistlin

Post Count: 9999
Duck said:
Porn stickers on Ferrari dashboard confirmed.


...Seriously, I'm curious by what "fully" means. What is there to even change for interiors?


Not sure about racing cars, but all of the standard car models will probably offer the real interior variants you can get. They use the real paint colors for exterior options (with the real manufactures 'interesting' names) ... offering the real interior options is the logical extension.
 

cilonen

Member
Onix said:
Not sure about racing cars, but all of the standard car models will probably offer the real interior variants you can get. They use the real paint colors for exterior options (with the real manufactures 'interesting' names) ... offering the real interior options is the logical extension.

I'm wondering if you'll be able to get some of the bespoke features that, say Lamborghini, Ferrari and Mercedes-AMG will let you have if you go to them with enough cash. I know Ferrari will let you have the leather in your new Fiorano 599 any color you want it as long as you can pay.

Edit: I know this thanks to the Discovery Channel, not having bought a 599 recently :(
 
Wollan said:
Most likely like said earlier in that racing cars and rally cars will take damage (in races that obviously only include those cars).

I think that is a very smart decision because that is like shooting two birds with one stone - they want to tease us with their damage engine only on sport cars and rally cars and if it prove groundbreaking and popular with fans then for sure GT6 is where full on damage on every cars will be present. Put in another word if all cars in GT5 have damage then what is there to be anticipated about GT6 -im sure the leaps in term of grahic, physics and AI from GT5 to GT6 will not be as huge as the leap from GT4 to GT5. So in conclusion, PD has made a very good choice to include only some damage on some car to make us wonder what the damage engine of GT6 will be.
 
Top Bottom