It's definitely kind of tone-deaf. It's the kind of idea that, you know, 6 years ago I could look at and say "Sure, why not?" But now? Sorry IO, but your competitors around the world have assassinated your options; consumers are, rightfully so, on the defensive, and in many cases are more enabled now than ever before to not only voice their disappointment with the idea, but protect their money.
Personally, I really want to play the game. My normal response would have been to snag a deal at GMG for 30-40, and I wouldn't care so much -- now, though, after Arkham Knight, I pretty much have to rely on buying straight through Valve so I can ensure that I can return the game no questions asked.
Which is definitely an option, for anyone, though I don't know how much a 2 hour limit can buy players in terms of evaluating a Hitman game.
I would say, sell the game at 40, and provide an 'upgrade' to the "season pass" for an additional 20. If people like what you have, they'll buy in no problem. Asking for the money up front just isn't a good idea when you don't have the content up front -- again, 6 years ago, maybe, but today? Look around you.
Personally, I really want to play the game. My normal response would have been to snag a deal at GMG for 30-40, and I wouldn't care so much -- now, though, after Arkham Knight, I pretty much have to rely on buying straight through Valve so I can ensure that I can return the game no questions asked.
Which is definitely an option, for anyone, though I don't know how much a 2 hour limit can buy players in terms of evaluating a Hitman game.
I would say, sell the game at 40, and provide an 'upgrade' to the "season pass" for an additional 20. If people like what you have, they'll buy in no problem. Asking for the money up front just isn't a good idea when you don't have the content up front -- again, 6 years ago, maybe, but today? Look around you.