Thunder Monkey
Banned
I enjoy the hilariously bad.Dragona Akehi said:This is why we cannot have nice things.
I enjoy the hilariously bad.Dragona Akehi said:This is why we cannot have nice things.
How am I going to extreme to defend my side of the arguement? By using actual examples from the game?upandaway said:I'm going to ignore the rest of the post and only go with this for now.
False. Lies. Absolute bullshit. No puzzle at all that requires any thought? Well, screw you too man, maybe you're super smart and I'm super stupid, but whatever. You're going way too extreme to prove your point.
Well I for one stucked at the part with the large fan in the Sky Temple. That has never happened with any other dungeon in a 3D Zelda game including water temple from both OOT and MM.KeeSomething said:How am I going to extreme to defend my side of the arguement? By using actual examples from the game?
Try this: instead of insulting me, why don't you defend your point with examples of Twilight Princess's puzzles being more than basic distractions.
But Oracle of Age is my favourite handheld Zelda game =(FutureZombie said:Handheld Zeldas should be considered separate entities from console Zeldas. Separate, and besides Link's Awakening, much worse. Phantom Hourglass is not a good game, even by non-Zelda standards. That's why there's no hype for the new handheld Zelda.
speedpop said:I hope the next Zelda game revolves around a trucking business.
Mana Sin said:No, the next game will be based around Roc's Travel Agency. Link will be a pilot traveling the world looking for baddies, as he dodges around airborne enemies trying to keep his engines free of gore.
A train-based Zelda is a great idea. Whether or not this will translate into a great game will depend entirely on the execution, which we know next to nothing about.Vercingetorix said:When I say that this is exponentially superior to your earlier ideas, despite being a joke, I mean it.
Hell, I'd go so far as to suggest that you're a viral marketer hired by Nintendo to make their horrible ideas for Zelda games seem less horrible.
"A train? What the hell was Nintendo thinking?"
"But wait, this other guy, he has even worse ideas than that! Compared to this, a train based Zelda game seems like a great idea!"
I can't... actually, what the fuck is that sock doing?Magypsy23 said:I can't stop staring at the Nasubi avatar.
Vercingetorix said:When I say that this is exponentially superior to your earlier ideas, despite being a joke, I mean it.
Hell, I'd go so far as to suggest that you're a viral marketer hired by Nintendo to make their horrible ideas for Zelda games seem less horrible.
"A train? What the hell was Nintendo thinking?"
"But wait, this other guy, he has even worse ideas than that! Compared to this, a train based Zelda game seems like a great idea!"
Mana Sin said:Well, I haven't even mentioned any of my cross over ideas (If SE and Disney can do it..) and my role reversals.. Link is evil, Ganon is good/neutral.
cha-ching.
Jason's Ultimatum said:Retro Studios should just create a Zelda game in 3rd/1st person. I think they have talented artists that could make Hyrule or whatever land they create look awesome.
amtentori said:I dont think that would work out so well, but maybe have a twist that makes ganon your best friend but then gets consumed by power... make him a more sympathetic characters
beelzebozo said:because i mean, if you found MARIO GALAXY boring or a retread of past mario games, then i think you're not only wrong, i think you're fucking nuts and should rethink your positions. all of them. even those not concerning video games.
Andrex said:I'm scared. There is too much fanfiction in this thread.
2 Minutes Turkish said:Really? You didn't at ANY stage get a Mario 64 vibe from Mario Galaxy?
REALLY?
While Galaxy is a fuck awesome game, to say it bares no resemblance to Mario 64 is far more ludicrous than calling Galaxy a retread.
beelzebozo said:did i say it bore no resemblance whatsoever to 64? i said it was completely stupid to call it a retread, and it is stupid to do so. i don't see the logic snag in that.
I want to feel this way again.upandaway said:I think that point in the game, I was absolutely broken. It's just so frustrating how the game doesn't show any forgiveness for how long it takes to retrack to minibosses and bosses. There aren't any shortcuts besides key doors (rare), you have to do every single puzzle. The main problem is that this is a portable game where you don't have all the time in the world.
Mana Sin said:Reset LoZ entirely. [...]
D-Pad said:You forgot the shocking twist where Link confesses his true feelings for Ganondorf. Why not go all the way?
Same Oracle of Ages was an amazing game, by all gaming standards. Seasons was also quite good too. Ages is definitely up there in my top 5 Zelda's. My list would probably go like this;$200 said:But Oracle of Age is my favourite handheld Zelda game =(
With a very hard paddle.speedpop said:Should I be spanked if I said that I owned both Oracle games for years yet never seriously touched them?
Dragona Akehi said:You only worked that out just now?
:/
Wait...a reasonable...post wtf... gtfo with your sanity and logical thinking bs.viciouskillersquirrel said:A train-based Zelda is a great idea. Whether or not this will translate into a great game will depend entirely on the execution, which we know next to nothing about.
People are hating on the train idea because it doesn't fit with their idea of the medieval fantasy world people think Zelda is about. People think it's all magical swords, forests and mountains and all that jazz. Which it is. Thing is, it's also a world where cannons, gunpowder, telephones, photography and steam engines have all been worked out and applied. A train isn't that big a leap from a steamboat.
Let's try to not pre-hate this game, shall we? For all we know, this game could be the greatest Zelda game to come along in ten years.
DavidDayton said:I've always given folks the benefit of the doubt before... but I've never quite "gotten" the notion that a good bulk of the "OCARINA IS THE BEST EVER" folks are exactly the same as the scary "FF7 IS THE BEST RPG EVER" folks.
Now I see it.
The world has become a darker place for us all.
Such good games, had both at one point (only one now, ages) and played through them several times. Did the connect-game thing too.speedpop said:Should I be spanked if I said that I owned both Oracle games for years yet never seriously touched them?
AniHawk said:The Ocarina folks have a little more sanity on their side. They're just living in the past. OoT once was the best ever, and TP has surpassed it. FFVII was never the best RPG by any stretch of the imagination.
Why? There isn't anything challenging in it. It's just you spending time going to a boss, messing up a bit and dying, then doing it all over again even though you proved you could do it before. The puzzles were mainly platformer-centric with changing your locations and it was horrible to do them time and time again with no reason to do so besides having not managed to beat the miniboss/boss on the first time (which is totally reasonable in this game).D-Pad said:I want to feel this way again.
DavidDayton said:True, but now the Ocarina fans are all starting to look like FF7 fans. That's the problem.
Oh well... it could be worse... they could be the "LTTP > LA" crowd. (shudders)
DavidDayton said:True, but now the Ocarina fans are all starting to look like FF7 fans. That's the problem.
AniHawk said:The Ocarina folks have a little more sanity on their side. They're just living in the past. OoT once was the best ever, and TP has surpassed it. FFVII was never the best RPG by any stretch of the imagination.
Andrex said:But... LTTP is better than LA.
DavidDayton said:(pats you on the head)
Oh, indeed. LTTP was far better than LA. You are quite right.
(cough)
DavidDayton said:(pats you on the head)
Oh, indeed. LTTP was far better than LA. You are quite right.
(cough)
I'm actually playing through Link's Awakening once again and any comparison between the two is so beyond the mark. Sure they are directed by the same guy and it's practically the same team who made it, but it's like people trying to compare OoT vs. MMDavidDayton said:(pats you on the head)
Oh, indeed. LTTP was far better than LA. You are quite right.
(cough)
Wait a minute... are you saying LA isn't a sequel to LttP?DavidDayton said:Oh well... it could be worse... they could be the "LTTP > LA" crowd. (shudders)
viciouskillersquirrel said:Wait a minute... are you saying LA isn't a sequel to LttP
Oh. Carry on then.DavidDayton said:No.. you misunderstand.
I agree with: LTTP -> LA
I disagree with: LTTP > LA