Nintendo can't go high end. They're successful because their consumers are younger. They're bothered about getting their product out to kids and always have been. Nintendo are not luxury and have never been luxury in the same way you may be able to position a PS3.
If Iwata leaves my guess is the new CEO will be a yes man to the shareholders and will shift their portable strategy to iOS and Android and Nintendo will release a Android based gaming tablet.
Here is the problem. High end doesn't have to be bank breaking. In someways Nintendo ends up forcing itself to make performance cuts in order to afford the gimmick they hope sells the device. The WiiU gamepad is why the WiiU doesn't pack a 1.8gflop GPU and an 8 core cpu with 8gb of ram.
Mind you even with a standard controller Nintendo could still shortchange but it would be less likely to have the gap it has
If Iwata leaves my guess is the new CEO will be a yes man to the shareholders and will shift their portable strategy to iOS and Android and Nintendo will release a Android based gaming tablet.
In Japanese business culture, if you say what he said and you don't come through with that in the end, you either resign or kill yourself (I'm not kidding).
If Iwata leaves my guess is the new CEO will be a yes man to the shareholders and will shift their portable strategy to iOS and Android and Nintendo will release a Android based gaming tablet.
If I were Iwata in that situation I'd start a share buy back. It'd really be a shame to waste his efforts in creating high quality games that seek to broaden the relevance of games in general just over silly stock growth reasons. They could introduce paid DLC in Animal Crossing and Pokemon, online passes for Mario Kart and monthly service fees to make the money like everyone else but Iwata is probably the last reasonable person in power who's not willing to take consumers for all their worth.
But so is the curse of being a publically traded company. At least Gaben doesn't have to put up with this shit.
Here is the problem. High end doesn't have to be bank breaking. In someways Nintendo ends up forcing itself to make performance cuts in order to afford the gimmick they hope sells the device. The WiiU gamepad is why the WiiU doesn't pack a 1.8gflop GPU and an 8 core cpu with 8gb of ram.
Mind you even with a standard controller Nintendo could still shortchange but it would be less likely to have the gap it has
Would you rather have 3 identical consoles?
So when are they going to release the Skylanders clone with Pokemon?
If anything Gen 7 has taught us that the vast majority of publishers are happy with consoles that are basically identical aside from exclusives.
Gen 7 is gonna end with all 3 consoles basically selling evenly which has never happened before.
The other day someone said it would be better for the consumer if we only had one unified system that all consoles were based off of. Apparently choice and competition are bad.Would you rather have 3 identical consoles?
That's an insane thing to do IMO. Where's the innovation and competition going to come from?If anything Gen 7 has taught us that the vast majority of consumers are happy with consoles that are basically identical aside from exclusives.
Also does Yamauchi have any family within Nintendo? Maybe bring the company back into the family line?
His solution for merging the portable and console groups, while a good idea, is too late. They should have either developed a next gen console equal in power to Orbis/Durango or merged their portable and console together before. At this point, it's too late for both and they are forced into the situation they are in. It is mismanagement and a lack of understanding the direction the industry is heading in. At the end of the day, as much as I hate to see him go, he has a huge responsibility in this.
DLC in Animal Crossing would reduce its sales at retail. Nintendo currently has the best DLC strategy imo; they have to continue to ensure they don't break the userbase with a few games. This is why their IPs are still selling after 10/20/30 years.
So fire the man who oversaw the creation of Nintendo's 2 best selling consoles, ever?
That seems extremely shortsighted based, apparently, on one possible failure (the Wii U), and obviously even that is still way too early to tell.
The 3DS I don't think can even be considered a failure at this point; it's already surpassed the lifetime sales of the GameCube in under 2 years.
So the short term financial losses Nintendo has incurred in the last 2 years somehow invalidate the BILLIONS they raked in during the Wii/DS era?
I realize it's a business, but it just seems ungrateful. I don't see how it could be argued that he's had anything but a net positive impact on the company and that should buy him some good will.
So fire the man who oversaw the creation of Nintendo's 2 best selling consoles, ever?
That seems extremely shortsighted based, apparently, on one possible failure (the Wii U), and obviously even that is still way too early to tell.
The 3DS I don't think can even be considered a failure at this point; it's already surpassed the lifetime sales of the GameCube in under 2 years.
So the short term financial losses Nintendo has incurred in the last 2 years somehow invalidate the BILLIONS they raked in during the Wii/DS era?
I realize it's a business, but it just seems ungrateful. I don't see how it could be argued that he's had anything but a net positive impact on the company and that should buy him some good will.
That's an insane thing to do IMO. Where's the innovation and competition going to come from?
I think Kamiya should take over Iwata's place if he resigns.
Way too many bone-headed moves with the release of the 3DS and WiiU for there to not be repercussions. Rather than totally outing Iwata however, they should demote him to share responsibilities with a new and highly talented western co-CEO/President and shifting a lot more power and money westward for development, marketing, and more. Nintendo owns Japan, but it is forfeiting the rest of the entire world with that myopic focus and that needs to change.
All while firing Reggie of course. Out of a cannon.
As far as I know, most Nintendo shareholders have no voting rights whatsoever to begin with.Note that it's not necessarily the shareholders calling for his head but more Iwata taking on the responsibility of pleasing them.
Taking Japan for granted to make a desperate grab at America has worked so well for Sony.
They're doing good things with digital downloads on 3DS and Wii U though
So fire the man who oversaw the creation of Nintendo's 2 best selling consoles, ever?
That seems extremely shortsighted based, apparently, on one possible failure (the Wii U), and obviously even that is still way too early to tell.
The 3DS I don't think can even be considered a failure at this point; it's already surpassed the lifetime sales of the GameCube in under 2 years.
So the short term financial losses Nintendo has incurred in the last 2 years somehow invalidate the BILLIONS they raked in during the Wii/DS era?
I realize it's a business, but it just seems ungrateful. I don't see how it could be argued that he's had anything but a net positive impact on the company and that should buy him some good will.
Q : If Nintendo continues to miss sales targets do you think that Nintendo may consider creating games for smartphones and SNS networks?
A : Do you eat shit?
Developers seem to disagree.Compared to Sony and Microsoft they're doing completely terrible.
They're doing great things especially compared to Sony and Microsoft.
Such as?
Is this where we pretend indie devs love Nintendo and are going to support Wii U over other platforms?
How would an Orbis/Durango-esque console mean more software? Surely it would make it a harder learning curve; increase the price even further and massively increase the risk and reduce software profits?
They can't merge portable/console yet as the power vs cost situation is not there.
Iwata does not have magic fairy dust; his job is to position the company the best he can in the current market.
This really isn't the place, but yes, Nintendo offers excellent terms and conditions, the most freedom, lowest barrier of entry, and does a lot to support and promote indies.Such as?
Is this where we pretend indie devs love Nintendo and are going to support Wii U over other platforms?
Because Wii U is more in the power range of 360/PS3 as opposed to Durango/Orbis they will lack the ports seen on those systems. The software droughts and lack of diversity on both 3DS and Wii U show this.
A console/portable hybrid could have happened if they wanted to. Of all companies, Nintendo was in the best position to do this considering they are not going for a high end console. After doing some research on ARM processors, Nintendo could have gone with their bigLITTLE approach and gone with an architecture that was compatible for both handheld and console. This would put all Nintendo games on one console and alleviate the first party software droughts. For third party support, they could continue the approach they've been taking with Japanese devs. For western support, they would have to target indie devs.